[Patrick Barron]

Signgate The Sixth: Nevermind All That? Comment Count

Brian October 31st, 2023 at 4:45 PM

And then it was fine? Yesterday I laid out what I thought was the most likely scenario in which the NCAA did something of significant consequence to Michigan: leverage the new head coach responsibility bylaw to drop a show cause on Jim Harbaugh for stuff Connor Stalions did. IMO, this is still a concern, but it looks like less of one now that ~all paysites are reporting that whatever roadblocks this investigation had put up towards Harbaugh's new contract are gone:

Henschke followed that up with a tweet saying that there is "some hypothesizing that the contract will likely mean Michigan is Jim Harbaugh's last job." For his part, Sam Webb posted an article headlined "Harbaugh extension process no longer paused."

It seems likely Michigan will announce a new contract that makes Harbaugh the highest-paid coach in the Big Ten, and it sounds like for the first time it will have a significant buyout if Harbaugh wants to leave. Given that he's been at Michigan for ten years and has never had anything like that in his contract, if that does come to fruition it would be a statement that he's sticking in Ann Arbor long-term.

A lot of people are taking this as good news in regards to the NCAA violations Stalions was racking up. I agree, at least partially. It beggars belief that Michigan would move forward with the contract unless they had completed their review of everyone's laptops, phones, etc., and found no evidence that Stalions's "vast network" was anything other than his personal project. Certainly at Harbaugh's level, and likely all the way down the list. The contract proceeding means that if we were going to hear about additional suspensions/firings/personnel being launched into the sun, we would hear about them now. No news is good news.

[After THE JUMP: sigh: however]

However! Even if Stalions was acting entirely on his own, there is still the matter of the HC responsibility bylaw. AFAIK it is so new that Harbaugh is going to be the first case, more or less. Anything could happen. In general, you should bet on "the NCAA will do nothing" in almost all cases. But here you've got a guy who the enforcement committee clearly hates. He's coming off a three-game suspension that appears to be for stonewalling on some piddly charges. A guy with a blood vendetta against Harbaugh is literally on the committee, and even if he has to recuse himself from this case he's probably going to be trying to influence it in any way he can.

I have no idea what the chances of this transpiring are but they're not zero.

But the contract? All coaching contracts give the school an out if the NCAA comes down on them. Harbaugh's current contract has this in the section detailing when the university can fire Harbaugh for cause:

image

Unless that language changes in the updated contract the U isn't going out on a limb here. If the NCAA does give Harbaugh a show cause they could fire him for cause. In fact, it is dead certain that at some point they are going to have the ability to fire Harbaugh for cause. The next bullet:

image

Probation and a fine are definitely happening.

Michigan is not going to fire Harbaugh for cause unless they have absolutely no other choice; this section asserts that while the contract going forward is evidence of several good things, it is not evidence that Jim Harbaugh is personally in the clear with the NCAA.

He's deceiving me, it cuts my security. CMU is investigating whether Stalions was on their sideline for the MSU-CMU game in week one this year. (It was on Friday, thus opening up the possibility of attending.) I believe they're going to find that he was, and that he dressed up in CMU coaching gear to access places he wasn't supposed to. You only investigate who a person is when you don't, you know, know who he is. Because he's employed by you.

This doesn't matter: one more game isn't going to significantly move the needle when Stalions was taping 30. It should further indicate just how off the rails this guy was, and certainly makes it more believable that he was, uh, dedicated enough to do all this on his own. He's wearing sunglasses at night.

I guess the good news is that Ed Norton's going to play him in the movie. That's a big get.

Nothing is happening soon. Pete Thamel appeared on Pat McAfee's show and said that "this will not get expedited and there's no mechanism for it." 2023 punishments are not happening from the NCAA. The Big Ten would have to be mad enough to make Fox furious, reduce the conference's chances of making the playoff, reduce all their bottom lines, and deal with Michigan saber-rattling about going to the SEC. That's not happening either. This team is in the clear. 

Comments

Hail-Storm

November 1st, 2023 at 11:09 AM ^

To be fair to Brian, he knows more than me. 

This all seems so crazy.  A super fan who was finally given a low level position, creates an elaborate scheme to steel signs, using his own funds, which may or may not be a true violation in the way he did it, and provides, at most, a marginal advantage, could cause Harbaugh to face harsh penalties due to a new rule this year, and due to an NCAA investigation board that has it out for Michigan. Michigan better fight tooth and nail on this one to prove that we aren't going to bend over backwards on this and will fully support Harbaugh. 

ahw1982

November 1st, 2023 at 1:26 PM ^

What's the advantage of Stalions attending the CMU/MSU game on CMU's sideline, vs. Stalions attending the game in the stands?  It seems like, it'd be a worse POV if you're stealing signs.  And I doubt CMU/MSU was sold out or super expensive.

The only reason I can think of is that MSU was onto him, so he thought the heat was on, and he couldn't purchase tickets conventionally, but WTF?  If the heat was on, the solution isn't "oh, let me dig this hole deeper and TRESPASS on this team's sidelines?"

Erik_in_Dayton

October 31st, 2023 at 4:58 PM ^

Way down in the weeds of NCAA rules and bylaws, where the NCAA itself admittedly may not go, Stallions attending the CMU game would matter.  But it doesn't make having third parties record 30 games a violation.  It's just one violation: a stupid, stupid, hilarious one.  

 

evenyoubrutus

October 31st, 2023 at 4:59 PM ^

So exactly what rule is at risk of being violated? It seems that we've already eliminated any chance that there even were any violations, right? Wasn't it determined that off campus scouting is allowed if it's done by a third party who isn't on staff?

Stuck in Lansing

November 1st, 2023 at 10:42 AM ^

At this point, all Michigan wants from Stalions is painstaking documentation of how he hid this from everyone else.

The more he gives us to that end is useful for rebutting the presumed head coach responsibility rule. Information on an active attempt to hide stuff from Harbaugh is worth keeping him on paid leave for now.

lhglrkwg

October 31st, 2023 at 6:11 PM ^

It had been rumored for days he was there and now someone looking a lot like he was found on the sideline and Brian says its him. Its almost certainly him. So thats definitely a rule violation by Connor. I fail to see why Michigan should be punished for that one. Is Jim supposed to know what everyones doing on their nights off?

Stuck in Lansing

November 1st, 2023 at 10:47 AM ^

Its fairly clear that a fine and probation are going to happen when you look at this combined with Cheeseburger-gate. Its pretty much anything beyond that which M needs to fight. Giving up some scholarships in the age of NIL isn't fatal either. 

M's priorities are simply to keep Harbaugh on campus and avoid material go-forward impacts.  

schreibee

October 31st, 2023 at 7:56 PM ^

He's supposed to have "Institutional Control" - which means, I suppose, that he shouldn't need to know what everyone's doing on their nights off, because they know what they shouldn't be doing. 

The way Stalions has done this, being on the sidelines vs a future opponent, using his own name for tickets and such, seems to prove he didn't know what he shouldn't be doing.

grumbler

October 31st, 2023 at 8:31 PM ^

There are two very different things alleged here:

1.  Stalions bought tickets so non-UM-affiliate persons could tape game for him.  Not a violation of the letter of the rules, and probably not even of the spirit of the rules.  Stalions didn't even try to hide that activity, clearly thinking it was legit.

2. Stalions showing up at the CMU game was at least a violation of the spirit of the rules, even if the letter of the rules (what is "scouting?") is less than crystal clear.  The fact that this person seems (if the stories are true) to have attempted to disguise himself means that, if it was Stalions, he knew that what he was doing was wrong.  That's actually good news for Michigan (the hiding, not the presence), because it shows that there was not a lack of oversight.  It was a person who had been educated on the rules deliberately violating them.

brad

November 1st, 2023 at 11:22 AM ^

You stepped over a lot of ground here.  If Stallions thought he should be on CMU's sideline, he would not have to be in disguise.  Lots of Stallions actions were done the way someone would do them if they had received all the proper "these actions are against the rules" training, but decided to do what he did anyway on his own.

superstringer

October 31st, 2023 at 9:06 PM ^

Uh… yes?

The coach is required to set the tone for compliance.  Zero tolerance for rules violations. Saying “I had no idea my assistants were taking recruits to hookers!” was Petino’s lame excuse.  If hell knew, shame on him. If he didnt know, worse, for not making the staff fear repercussions for violating rules. 

I suppose the real question is, how reasonable was it that the coach didnt know or the violation was in spite of everything the coach did to create an environment of compliance. 

trustBlue

November 1st, 2023 at 10:20 AM ^

Here's Connor from the Team 144 photo posted on the official umichfootball Instagram account on August 28 (four days before the CMU game):

May be an image of 1 person

https://www.instagram.com/p/CwgLUFcxEQI/

I suppose its still theoretically possible that the team photo was taken a few weeks before it was actually posted on August 28th... and that Connor intentionally grew out his hair between the date of the photo specifically to sneak into the CMU game on September 1... and then went home to shave it all off before joining the sideline at the Michigan game the following day...

But that would seems to be a far greater level of spycraft and attention to detail than anything we've learned about Connor so far. 

Hail-Storm

November 1st, 2023 at 11:24 AM ^

Is it just me, or do those two people look different.  The weird part is that CMU can't identify the guy.  From the clips, he interacts with players and staff, so it seems weird that CMU didn't know who he was.  If he is wearing a wig and sunglasses, then he would appear to know this is clearly not allowed.  I can't imagine Michigan would allow anything more than a fine and probation for something like this for an individual like this.  He clearly went to the edge of the line without crossing it in paying for scouting, and this would be a violation obvious overstep in an extreme way. 

blueheron

October 31st, 2023 at 5:01 PM ^

A request: When this is over, as appropriate, please put the spotlight on the guy with the blood vendetta against Harbaugh. I would (again, as appropriate) like to see that bum's influence on Michigan football reduced to zero.

Grampy

October 31st, 2023 at 10:41 PM ^

A second request: investigate the blatant PR whack job on Michigan. 
- who orchestrated it, probably not the NCAA.

- how was the information gathered  
- how was the media co-opted.

The NCAA can’t have their big name programs doing this kind of shit to each other, if only to keep themselves from looking like tools.