Question on Issue - Gattis vs. Patterson

Submitted by Ajcoss on October 6th, 2019 at 12:40 PM

This was discussed some in O snowflakes, but asking more of a direct question. That has over 400 hits so think it’s worth a thread. I want to get the reaction of the fan base & mainly from ones who attend the games and can see the entire field. 

Is the issues more Gattis play calling and nobody is getting open or Shea Patterson and just not making the right read? Unfortunately I haven’t been able to attend a game, so on TV you can’t see as much. Is Gattis system getting guys open and Shea missing them? Is Shea just not forcing really hard throws (told ball security priority #1) and this O can’t seem to get anyone open, thus blame to Gattis? Shea misses a few throws and receivers drop a few passes, but seems the main issue is the system/play calling sucks, or our QB is awful and can’t make simple decisions that any good Power 5 college QB should make. 

I know it clearly isn’t 100% one way or another, but looking at the majority of the time. Ones that attend the games and can see the field should be able to help answer this. Who is at the biggest fault for why this O completely sucks on actual plays in games (not bigger issues like Harbaugh in year 5, Gattis year 1 running his own O, Patterson regressing, Patterson loves golf in summer). 

ldevon1

October 6th, 2019 at 1:30 PM ^

I agree. Last year it was Pep's fault these guys couldn't get open. He was calling plays that took to long to develop, and the QB was getting crushed. This year we aren't calling enough deep plays to give these guys opportunities to make plays on the ball. At some point the players have to make plays. I've seen Tarik drop a number of balls, including a crucial 3rd down ball yesterday. Nico can't get separation so we expect a QB with no confidence to continually throw jump balls and hope for the best. DPJ is just now getting his feet wet, but catches everything, and gets separation, but Shea has missed him on a few occasions. I don't think its Gattis, as much as people complain. I saw him all over Nico a couple times because of bad routes. Some of these guys have to be better. 

DeepBlueC

October 6th, 2019 at 12:57 PM ^

It’s clear by now that Patterson is flawed as a QB in ways that are not fixable, and that Harbaugh’s reputation as a quarterback whisperer is seriously overblown.  But even given that, Gattis should be calling plays that minimize those problems.  Our pass plays virtually all take far too long to develop, and are not designed to get guys open in space. Essentially no slants, quick hitters or screens. 

Other than the initial big play to Bell against Wisconsin, how many plays have we had this year where the receiver ran further after the catch than the ball traveled? Damn few.

Durham Blue

October 6th, 2019 at 1:11 PM ^

Didn't JH bring in McDaniels as the QB guru?  What the heck is he teaching the QB's?  It's difficult to comprehend that all of our highly paid and supposedly experienced and talented assistants and analysts can't field a functional offense.  And with the talent we have on that side of the ball?  Cumong man.

Bambi

October 6th, 2019 at 12:59 PM ^

I mean both? There have been multiple instances of Shea making bad reads (INT yesterday), not throwing to open receivers (Nico vs Wisc), or refusing to take 1 on 1 shots down field (DPJ on a play Shea got sacked yesterday). He's clearly a major part of the problem, and that's before we get to his inability to run the ball leading to stacked boxes and killing the run game.

That being said our one good pass play yesterday was a PA bomb to Collins that looked to be a designed shot down field. It went for 51 yards and we never took a shot downfield again all game. It worked last year and its been our best O this year. And after that play we didn't see it again against Iowa. There were probably guys open downfield and Shea missed them, but if that's the case Gattis needs to call a play where Shea's first read is to chuck it downfield to Collins/DPJ. And it never happened. So it's Gattis too.

And all of this kills the run game. Despite all the speed in space talk, our offense is still based around run the ball up the middle. So teams stack the box and kill the RB run game. You can combat that with the QB Read game or deep passes. But we do neither. So we get what we saw yesterday.

It's just a perfect symphony of ineptitude really.

Justibro

October 6th, 2019 at 1:48 PM ^

The damn shame is I thought McCaffrey was poised to take the starting job with how bad the O looked in the first half against Wisconsin, or at least the chance to and against rutgers for your first start would be the pert ask. Than he got injured against Wisconsin until he got hurt and now may not get that shot at all this year

BlueHills

October 6th, 2019 at 12:59 PM ^

I think the majority of the issue rests with Gattis and his player development and training in his new system. Way too much blame is put on Patterson, and here’s why:

There’s no run game, at least not an effective one. The runs get stuffed. So there’s no credible run threat the defense has to account for. Every down becomes a passing down.

That puts more pressure on Patterson. I don’t think the other QBs would be in an improved position without an effective run game, either. The premise of the offense is the handoff or appearance of handoff, in the read option. If the run is getting stuffed every time, what on earth does anyone expect to happen? It’s just not going to be an effective offense.

Granted, the pass can set up runs, but the whole point of the fake handoff and the pull decision is based on being able to run. To put it into Clausewitzian military terms, the schwerpunkt - the point of attack and intention to confuse the enemy - is the handoff or pull.

Everyone looks hesitant, kind of like they’re not 100% sure what they’re supposed to be doing, especially when there’s pressure. The offense is a work in progress, and I really think this is where Gattis’ inexperience not just calling plays, but being responsible for teaching an entire offense, is a problem.

I’m not saying he’s an idiot, just that he has much to learn.

ollieboy

October 6th, 2019 at 2:05 PM ^

Not to mention the lack of qb pulls that have had a adverse effect on the production.

Granted it’s a small sample size but I really don’t think the uptick in the running game when either of the backups have been in is a coincidence either.

Theres plenty of blame to pass around & there’s no way to quantity it but at this point, what’s the harm in giving Dmac a legit chance? His durability is a legitimate concern but if he’s able, IMO he should play.

jdib

October 6th, 2019 at 1:48 PM ^

Our offense looked good when we were utlizing short passes to set up the run.  It seems for some reason they are trying to use the run to set up the pass when we clearly don't have the type of o-line to bust big gaps for our running backs.  

It's a philosophy problem of not understanding what your personnel are capable of or being just plain stubborn on trying to execute the gameplan they think should happen.

DakotaBlue

October 6th, 2019 at 2:05 PM ^

I'm certainly far from being an expert, but it feels like the runs up the middle aren't working as well as they might because the D is not respecting either the keeper by the quarterback or the pass in the RPO. The runs go into a loaded box. When Shea actually kept the ball, he got decent gains. 

Charbonnet's TD run opened up the middle nicely because the motion from DPJ and possible run threat from Shea drew the linebacker out of the run lane.

MWolverine7

October 6th, 2019 at 1:02 PM ^

Rumors of too much time on the golf course and not being voted team captain. Our version of Connor Cook without the game day performance.

BoMo

October 6th, 2019 at 1:02 PM ^

Would lean towards Shea--wasn't part of reason for transfer that he was in danger of losing starting job at Ole Miss?  

Also on coaches for not developing/improving him and, frankly, for not trying a change (assuming they don't when DM returns).  It's not looking good this year and if we continue to waste our talent at WR, I worry it will negatively affect offensive skill recruitment for years to come.

M Ascending

October 6th, 2019 at 3:28 PM ^

Shea=Tate Forcier.

I question his work ethic and his football IQ. Inability to move through progressions is an example of both -- time on the golf course that should be spent watching tape.  Inability to envision the full potential of a play by not knowing where his receivers will be and who will be open . 

TomJ

October 6th, 2019 at 9:35 PM ^

"Inability to envision the full potential of a play by not knowing where his receivers will be and who will be open."

Exactly. It seems to Patterson should know that a guy's WIDE open to his left even if he doesn't look there, because he can see the whole field and see where the defense has gone. But he misses this read time and time again. Maybe Gattis isn't expecting him to look there, but if so why do they send a guy out there to stand all alone?

It just seems like such a simple thing if you can visualize the whole play.

Durham Blue

October 6th, 2019 at 1:05 PM ^

I don't understand how Patterson can make a perfect over the shoulder throw to a well covered DPJ along the sidelines (vs Rutgers) but then rarely repeat it when it's really needed.  It reeks of the yips and reflects Patterson's lack of composure when things tighten in game action.  As such, I believe Patterson's limitations are hindering forward progress of the offense.  Gattis and Harbaugh are in deep with their starter and both seem unwavering in their support of him.  That unwavering support could very well be our demise against our rivals this season.

snarling wolverine

October 6th, 2019 at 1:13 PM ^

 Gattis and Harbaugh are in deep with their starter and both seem unwavering in their support of him.  

I'm not sure if this is true.  Remember that he was pulled in the Wisconsin game.  But then McCaffrey suffered a concussion.  

Certainly, they have him ahead of Milton, but I'm not certain where a healthy McCaffrey fits in the picture.

MGoSteven

October 6th, 2019 at 1:09 PM ^

I think it's on the coaches. I don't think Patterson is beyond saving, it's just the coaches need to put him in a position to succeed.

They need to line up wide and spread out the defense, give Patterson quick throws where he doesn't have to read much. 

Part of the issue I see is we will run max protect and send only 2 or 3 guys out on routes. That makes it easy for the defense to read and defend. 

They are trying to help Shea by giving him more protection and putting him in low risk situations, but they need to spread it out and give him the opportunity to get a rhythm. He'll never get better if we always game plan around him instead of for him. Same goes for any QB. If we put in Dylan, he will have  his own issues. Until the coaches design plays and schemes that help play to the QBs strengths instead of designing to mitigate weaknesses, we will always fail. 

rob f

October 6th, 2019 at 1:10 PM ^

Before I weigh in, one thing to keep in mind regarding Iowa: including yesterday, they have only yielded 44 points in 5 games on their way to a 4-1 record.  And while Iowa's schedule so far has been pretty meh, 8.8 pts/game is still pretty impressive.

My opinion?  It's 60% Shea and 40% Gattis/Harbaugh. From my perspective through binoculars some 70+ rows up,  yesterday Shea often appeared to be again initially locked on to a primary receiver but quickly shied away from checking down, instead reverting to "run/scramble away" mode rather than trusting his protection and stepping up in the pocket.  I don't know how much the coaching staff has done or can do at this point about correcting Shea's bad habits, but it appears he's not likely to ever be much better---at best, maybe when healthy he can return to last season's level.

The Gattis/Harbaugh playcalling is the other 40% of the problem.  One deep throw early and then total lack of a downfield passing game the rest of the day on what appeared to me to be mostly on the playcalling?  More and more I'm convinced of two things: 1) Mike Locksley, NOT Gattis, was responsible for the Bama offensive game plans and play calls last season.  Gattis was a Harbaugh reach.  And 2) Harbaugh, while not calling the plays, puts a lot of constraints on what Gattis feels he can dial up.

 

DeepBlueC

October 6th, 2019 at 1:44 PM ^

Iowa has a solid defense, no question, but we have four teams with better defenses still to come. We’ve only scored 10 points each against the only good defenses we’ve played so far, and only 14 in regulation against Army (who Tulane scored 42 on yesterday).  As surprisingly well as our defense has played so far, that won’t be enough to win any of those games.

AlbanyBlue

October 6th, 2019 at 1:10 PM ^

This is my main offensive question as well.

It has to be mostly on Shea, since he is missing wide-open guys with alarming regularity, bugging out of clean pockets too early, and not keeping on read plays when it's obvious he should be. If he is being instructed not to keep, then it's more on Harbaugh and Gattis than what I have said here.

It falls somewhat on Gattis, since we're clearly not running enough of the deep routes we should be running, and because the playcalling doesn't show the flow that it should have. And forget about speed in space. That's not happening. Now, if Harbaugh is interfering, then it;s more on him than Gattis.

It also falls on Harbaugh, because the game-planning for individual opponents sucks (also on Gattis for that), the turtle-jobs are clearly coming from him - since he's done it for 5 years, and our "nationally ranked" recruiting has left us with glaring holes at OT and DT.

So yeah, it's a bunch of things. The O is systemically broken, and there's no easy fix. Dylan is hurt, and putting him in doesn't guarantee that anything with Harbaugh and Gattis changes - it;s not just Shea here. My guess is he'd be a slight overall improvement - at least he'll run the read-option - so maybe start him against Illinois. But then you run the risk of an even-more broken Shea if Dylan fails.

 

Durham Blue

October 6th, 2019 at 3:55 PM ^

I did not downvote you but I would've agreed with this take last season.  This season my eyes are telling me that the OL is playing at least decent and probably more towards good.  Pass pro was good yesterday.  It was certainly good enough to expect better passes and reads from Patterson.  I need to see Brian's UFR to make a judgement on run blocking.  But they did get chunk yardage on more than a handful of rushing attempts.  Too many fits and spurts for my liking but I am leaning toward play design and play calls for the rushing mishaps.

JPC

October 6th, 2019 at 1:16 PM ^

We haven’t had consistently good QB play while Harbaugh has been here. It’s good sometimes, but the season to season gains aren’t there. 

Its bigger than Gattis or Shea. 

Hotroute06

October 6th, 2019 at 1:18 PM ^

I don't think its guaranteed they will play Shea for the rest of the season.  

I can see the coaches pulling the trigger and puting Dylan in for the rest of the season when he's healthy. 

I think shea is mentally broken,  he realizes he isn't as good as he was hyped up to be for so many years and he's struggling to come to terms with this new reality. 

 

Michigan Arrogance

October 6th, 2019 at 1:19 PM ^

so here's my thought, I had this same issue in my head all day today.

If you follow a guy named Collin on Twitter who's a M guy, he does some film review talking about route trees vs defenseive coverages and what "should" be open depending on what the D is showing pre snap (cover 1, 2, etc). I think Gattis and Harbaugh's big failure is on their ability to effectively and effeciently teach this system to the players - certain the QB but also the OL and perhaps the receivers too but I don't notice Brian, say, giving a lot of bad grades to the WRs for poor routes, and Gattis is known as a goor WR coach.

I think, certainly in hindsight and a TBH I was a little worried at the time, that the golf comment Gattis made about SP was a harbinger - I now think Gattis let that comment slip, was like, 'oh shit did I say that out loud?!' and them tried to backtrack. Point is, from that guy Collin on twitter and the overall dumb decisions SP makes, that Shea doesn't know who should come open pre-snap, based on what the D is showing him pre-snap.

Now, some of the calls are dumb so that's on Gattis and their run 1st game vs army and subsequent pass 1st game against UW was dumb so it's not all on Shea, but jeez that guy needs to get his head out of his ass and understand what the defense will give you play to play, pre-snap. And if the coaches aren't going to hold SP accountable to get his head out of his ass, then I think the AD (and the alums/fans to an extend reasonable) need to hold this staff accountable.

Teach these guys to make the right fucking reads based on the D or GTFO. And if you feel like you're teaching them and they aren't executing, find the next guy who will. IMO, SP has until McCaffery gets to 100% to turn around his mental game. After that, I'd sit his ass real quick b/c whatever the offense is doing now, it's not good enough to win more than 8 games and that is not acceptable at this point in the program's trajectory with this level of talent and experience on offense. This ain't intramurals, brother. No one gives a shit about SP's NFL hopes cause if he can't do this now, the NFL won't draft him anyway

jbuch002

October 6th, 2019 at 2:20 PM ^

There are some very good points here but I'm a bit more reluctant to call out the coaches at the GTFO level .... yet.

One of my takes is that Shea's shit-ball performances could be a combo of things involving play design, limiting reads to 1/2 the field, stressing ball security - all coaching stuff - that's compounded by Patterson's tendency to go yakaty-sax.

Play calling #1 (Gattis): Obviously, the lack of the deep ball with coaching reluctance to call that play for SP because he's inconsistent with it (poor ball placement). Also noteable that Iowa plays a C-2 Zone D. This is designed to limit the deep ball on the field boundaries and the deep middle. After the DPJ bomb (that was typically under-thrown, BTW) v. single coverage, Iowa went to C2-Zone the rest of the way. Accordingly, if the deep ball was on, the check-down would have been to alternate routes. Then we have SP's yips making those progressions iffy.

Play Design #2 (Gattis/Harbaugh): 4 receivers running 15y verts and then sitting on them- usually a pick play will be factored in there. This play is certainly in the Gattis play book because it fucks with C1 or C0 - man. It is a terrible call v. C2-Zone unless you add clearing routes. If you're going to call it into C-2 Zone, there has to be some kind of motion or clearing routes combined with those short verticals to develop conflict and therefor one receiver who is going to be wide open because the conflict defender in that zone took the bait and left it. That didn't happen on both counts (route design and defenders getting baited) so on these verts Iowa played it well and nobody was open. How is that Patterson's fault?

There's more, a lot more, examples, in this game like this. I could go into the run game design and execution but, who wants to read all that, TL;DR applies.

Bottom line:It can be shown it is a toxic combo of things that makes this offense so janky. Somebody used the term "systemic problems." I can agree with that and they are very difficult to sort out and remedy. However, that's why the guys that are assigned to do that are getting paid 7 figure salaries. Hold them accountable but I'm not in favor of constantly changing the principals. All that does in any organization simply perpetuates chaos and inefficiency, IMO.           

Michigan Arrogance

October 6th, 2019 at 3:23 PM ^

I'm not there yet, but i'm getting there rapidly based on how recruiting will obviously go if this offense functions as it has for the last 6 weeks: like a sad clown kicking a tin can down an alley.

FFS, they can't get 5* CB recruits the last 2 years or enough DE/DTs to account for xfers, you think the WR, QB, RB and even OL recruiting will be just fine the next 2 years if they go 7-5/8-4 scoring 22 pts/game? Forget about OSU and the East for a sec, would M win the west this year after watching the Iowa and Wisc games? Feel good playing NW or Neb on the road?

 

You Only Live Twice

October 6th, 2019 at 1:20 PM ^

Shea was a limiting factor yesterday, it's easy enough to observe, more difficult to understand why.  Injury could impact his running, and his pocket presence could impact his ability to read the field.

With the injuries to Michigan QBs we will never know what the ceiling could have been, from Gardner to Speight to Peters.   

Michrider41

October 6th, 2019 at 1:22 PM ^

Guys are open, the QB doesn’t find them.   Is that a coach issue or a QB issue?  Pretty obvious it’s a QB issue.  Not every receiver will be open on every play.  They are designed to get one guy open and one safety valve.  Our QB rarely finds the open receiver.  If he does he over throws him.  If he checks down to the safety valve he over throws him.  Those are not coaching issues, other than having the wrong guy playing QB. 

Catchafire

October 6th, 2019 at 2:41 PM ^

Show me at least three plays of wide open receivers... This issue isn't receivers being wide open, it's throwing to receivers who have a height advantage and can catch it in a contest.  

Our WRs share some of the blame too. The DPJ fumble and back track doesn't instill confidence 

trustBlue

October 6th, 2019 at 1:30 PM ^

All of the above. 

IMO people are giving Gattis way too much of pass. The best OCs build their offense to fit their personnel rather than try force square pegs in round holes.. This is why Ohio State has continued success despite transitioning from Braxton Miller/JT Barret to Cardale Jones, to Dwayne Haskins, to Justin Fields to whoever. Ohio State struggled at times early last year while they tried to figure out do with with a QB who was not a runner, but eventually Meyer and Day they figured out how to emphasize Haskins' skillset rather than just blame Haskins for not being able to run like JT Barret. 

Michigan installed a read-heavy offense around a QB who is bad a making reads. Whose fault is that? The fact is that Shea has gotten worse from last year, and a large part of that is simply due to the fact that the offense has gone away from the handful of things that he is good at (rolling out, QB runs, solid accuracy on deep balls) and instead emphasizes a lot of quick reads and timing throws at which he is frankly terrible. 

Clearly the problem is not just Shea, as the running game has been equally inept despite having running backs that have turned in solid individual performances. This is an offense that is significantly worse than the sum of its parts.

What we are seeing is a poorly managed effort to reboot an offense from scratch. Every indication is that Gattis was given full control to design and install whatever he wanted and we're seeing the product of that. Harbaugh shares blame for hiring a first time OC/first time play caller and giving him carte blanche, but this is Gattis' baby full stop.

DonBrownsMustache

October 6th, 2019 at 1:32 PM ^

75% Patterson

25% Coaches

Some college QBs just don't get better throughout college and have trouble finding receivers at the college speed.  Patterson seems to be one of those QBs.  Another good example would be J.T. Barrett - great runner but average at best passer.

JT4104

October 6th, 2019 at 1:42 PM ^

I remember Pep and Wilton didnt mesh so who knows. I remember message board innuendo saying Gattis preferred Dylan but we all know what message board rumors do.

AnuckSudicki

October 6th, 2019 at 1:59 PM ^

Well I have seen with my own eyes Shea throw to open receivers and the passes are overthrown or underthrown. The int yesterday was a good example. To many data points to really come up for a good defense for Mr. Patterson.Can't put those on Gattis. Gonna go with sub-par qb play on this one, but an argument could be made for both I guess.