OSU and Rutgers - Per JUB

kind of ironic, isn't it.

What makes what OSU/Rutgers/Purdue did worse is that it was knowingly done by the coaching staffs, rather than by one insane Stalion.

What makes what OSU/Rutgers/Purdue did worse is that it was knowingly done by the coaching staffs, rather than by one insane Stalion.

What makes what OSU/Rutgers/Purdue did worse is that it was knowingly done by the coaching staffs, rather than by one insane Stalion.

We have to assume yes to all three.  At this point, we have to assume that it is our players and coaches against our opponent's players and all of the B1G coaches.  Probably sign-sharing, game planning, and video review all rolled into one.  It might explain how Purdue went against so many tendencies on defense (throwing in lots of zone when they had been all man all year), like a bowl team that had weeks to prepare.

Even with all of their collusion, they are just speed bumps on the way to the inevitable.  The rent is due for the B1G.

Correct. The B1G is not budging. This will continue. There will be a suspension given. Then we have to try to get an injunction.

Something I've wondered and not seen is how the timing might work on that. Is the B1G able to manipulate the timing of the suspension so that it's impossible to seek an injunction, like at 10 p.m. Friday night or something?

Wolverine91, I also wonder where exactly we are in the process with the BIG Ten now. This is all speculation (which is what 99%+ of us are doing at this point) but I believe that  U of M received the BIG10  Notice of Violation on either Friday of last week or Monday of this week. It only gave U of M two business days to respond, which means that U of M must file a response by either today or tomorrow. The response certainly will include that the NCAA apparently said that it had no evidence of Coach Harbaugh's involvement as well as certainly many other good arguments. The ball will then be in the Big Ten's court. It can either lay the hammer on Michigan and ban Harbaugh for a season (certainly resulting in a lawsuit seeking injunction) or it can say that it will do nothing, pending the NCAA investigation, or anything in between. Now would be a good time for U of M to leak a little bit more, showing how ugly this will be if the BIG10 chooses the wrong path. The Big10 should back down, but I have no idea if this new commissioner is wise enough to do so or is getting advice from the right people. The Michigan side needs to have the mindset that it will be fully ready to go to war if the Big10 chooses the wrong path. 

This is a perfected timed post, well done. We better start Haller'n about the player safety aspect with crocodile tears. 

Not to mention Stroud had an incredible game that day.  

This report doesn't specifically say that OSU had our signs for The Game. But if Rutgers sent Purdue our signs, I'd be shocked if they didn't send them to OSU as well.

All sportsmanship arguments go out the window too.

but you cannot provide signs to a future opponent of a team you already played.

What rule is that?  I never heard of that rule. (Of course I never heard of the no in-person scouting rule until 2 weeks ago either.)

Rutgers is only our rival in their minds

There was this magical thing called “the United States Post Office” that could get the material in a day or two to anywhere in the Midwest. 

Schiano is Tattaglia.

Day is Barzini.  

Santa is Michael.  

Warde is Freddo.