OSU and Rutgers - Per JUB

Of course it was a OSU connection

So they stole our signals, but we only beat them by three touchdowns on their field because we stole their signals. Got it. hahahahahahahahahaha

I thought that it was OSU and Illinois. Even Stevie Wonder saw the osu connection

Some stuff going on out there, huh Greg?

As for Charmin, no shock

When JUB says "raises question re: relative competitive advantage" does he mean because everyone has everyone's signs or does he mean because those teams lost badly despite having Michigan's signs?

If we’re getting punishment under a “sportsmanship” clause, this would clearly violate that too. If in-person scouting is wrong, this is in-person scouting. 

Mutual assured destruction (MAD) is underway. 

As a University, we are lucky to have someone like JUB!

Wouldn't this violate the same B1G clause that they are trying to get Michigan for?

.

I believe since we've had two days in a row of information being released we've reached the threshold for "OMG this keeps getting bigger and worse and is ever-expanding ahhhhhhhhh!"

Isn't that how it works?

If the rule that Stalions is alleged to have broken (there’s an argument to be made that no rules were technically violated - aside from whether it was him at CMU) is to prevent advanced scouting because it leads to a competitive advantage, then why would it be permissible for opposing coaches and staff to share signs, obtained during a game (which is permissible) be any different in terms of a competitive advantage. 
 

I think that’s what has been missing here. If team M does it this way and team 4523 does it another way, but they lead to the same result, why can one be punished and the other not.

We couldn’t beat them let’s see what purdue can do ! 

Despite being a college football fan for over 50 years, as of 3 weeks ago I was completely naive about how pervasive sign decoding is. Now that it is clearer to me that it happens all the time, every week, every season, and that coaches share what they know with each other, it is also clear to me how this issue is treated within the college football coaching community (ie. as an open secret).

Seen in that context, a rogue analyst like Connor Stalions who wants to make a name for himself (let alone become Michigan's head coach someday) and who looks for loopholes and exploits them to gain further advantage is clearly no big deal.

If Day and Schiano can send our stuff--literally down to the play calls--to Jeff Brohm before the B1G championship game then it's open season. Nobody wanted to talk about it or really cared until we became two time B1G champs. In actuality it's just another week in a normal college football season.

Considering Greg's connections with OSU, I suppose this isn't that surprising.  Despite it being douchey, wonder if it actually breaks any rules.

This is important to move the conversation toward changing the rules since this is all stupid anyway. Get headsets or mandate wrist bands. We need the coaches and Big Ten ADs to stop pearl clutching and admit that none of this really matters. Perhaps even the NCAA will just go toward a rule change in the end if we can thread this needle. 

Disappointing that alma mater (Rutgers) would do this. It's not surprising though since we seem to really hate Michigan and Penn State. Penn State makes sense (local, ton of NJ people go there so we run into them a bunch) and that's probably target number 1. I never understood the hate for Michigan and the respect for OSU among the fanbase.