JUB: Contract talks with Harbaugh are at an impasse over "what should be covered by immunity"

Submitted by FrankMurphy on January 16th, 2024 at 1:53 AM

Presumably, Bacon is referring to disagreements over the the types of adverse NCAA findings that would entitle the University to fire Harbaugh for cause or perhaps withhold certain incentives.

Take it FWIW. I don't think any of the insiders has had a great track record lately, so 'no one knows anything until we all know something' is probably not a bad rule to live by. Having said that, John U. Bacon is among the few journalists whose reporting is worth paying attention to.

https://twitter.com/Johnubacon/status/1747092593358606467?t=j9N-fdmqJ_r…

M-Dog

January 16th, 2024 at 10:30 AM ^

I do believe that if Harbaugh leaves, the NCAA will still go through the process . . . but in a normal administrative way - i.e. the punishment will now fit the crime.

And no wins will be vacated.  That was the point of the NCAA head making his statement that Michigan won the National Championship "fair and square".  There is no appetite for punishing the players over this.  

swalburn

January 16th, 2024 at 5:44 AM ^

Harbaugh has given the University the best 3 year run of football in the school's history.  I hope they don't screw this up.  That being said, I'm not buying the whole contract argument.  I think coach has to decide if he wants to scratch his NFL itch or not.  

Tunneler

January 16th, 2024 at 5:52 AM ^

NCAA president says Michigan earned football national title 'fair and square'. There is nothing that Michigan needs to hide from. They won it all and Harbaugh is largely responsible for it. Nobody will take it away. I am watching Michigan fuck this contract extension up in slow motion.

crg

January 16th, 2024 at 10:05 AM ^

The concern isn't so much about what the ncaa will do (against Harbaugh) for the scouting issue - they've already said he had no knowledge of it.

The concern is what they might do against him about the "covid recruiting" issue - since they seem to think he "lied" to them about it or was somehow not truthful/forthcoming.

team126

January 16th, 2024 at 6:05 AM ^

I think it’s very simple: NFL is where JH wants to go. If he is offered HC job for team he likes to join he is gone.

No wonder M recruiting has been terrible these past few years.

 

NewBlue7977

January 16th, 2024 at 6:08 AM ^

Michigan cannot actually believe Harbaugh will sign this contract knowing the University can fire him for cause depending on this and possibly any future investigations, and enforce Harbaugh not to look for NFL jobs while at Michigan.  Michigan should know it's not about the money, but that seems to be the only thing in this contract that everyone else would take except for Harbaugh.

I am irritated with Harbaugh's constant and yearly interest in an NFL job, but this contract is not fair to him in what he wants the most.  

Bluesince89

January 16th, 2024 at 6:45 AM ^

The university and AD cannot and should not make a stupid and emotional decision. They absolutely need to protect themselves in the event of an adverse finding by the NCAA. Being on the hook for 8 or 9 figures if the NCAA comes down hard on Harbaugh could wreak havoc on the AD. And the same fire Warde people now will he here saying fire him again. Now given that’s all been transpired, I don’t think what the NCAA does will be that bad. But you never know. Ultimately, I think Harbaugh wants to leave for an NFL gig so he’s using this as a soft landing with the fanbase. 

Bluesince89

January 16th, 2024 at 10:09 AM ^

From my uninformed perspective, that's the worst case scenario. None of us really know. What if Harbaugh wasn't completely forthcoming? What if there's stuff he didn't remember? What if the NCAA just says fuck it, we're suspending him for 3 years under the Head Coach rule, facts be damned? 

The University is a very large institution and a pretty conservative one at that (not in the political/social sense) when it comes to these sorts of these things. There's a lot more stakeholders and chefs in the kitchen than just Jim and Warde, believe it or not. So these are the scenarios they're running down internally. How much risk can we stomach? Maybe we can stomach a year suspension? Maybe Harbaugh agrees to not get paid for that year and the AD redistributes his salary internally to help the assistants who take over to bring in a rental coordinator to help out? Could they stomach a 2-3 year suspension and paying upwards of $30MM? What if there's litigation - who is funding that? I used to represent the University and I've negotiated some high-level executive agreements in the past for them. They have almost moved away from using larger Michigan-based firms and are almost exclusively working with DC/NYC based BigLaw firms (except for their union stuff). When you have partners charging $1,200 an hour and first year associates who don't know anything charging $600+ an hour, you're going to be looking at heavy costs. Who funds that? What if the University says we don't want to pursue this any more but Harbaugh does?

Again, you have to consider the best and worst case scenarios. What you described is the best case. What's the worst case? We're on the hook for $100MM+? What about a middle of the ground scenario where we're on the hook for $50MM? 

Now look, I think Harbaugh is a good guy and he maybe forgoes that money, especially if, at the end of the day, the University says, "Jim, if we pay you this, we can't afford to hire another decent coach and we're going to cripple the football team and AD." He doesn't really need the money at the end of the day. But again, no one knows. 

The University is also looking at some general fundraising problems given certain political and social events on campus recently. From what I gather talking to someone in the know, a lot of people towards the end of the year were very pissed off and either withholding their usual donations or insisting on specific earmarks or redirecting it towards specific grants or scholarships and setting up the criteria. So from a PR perspective, if the University is dealing with that, how do you go to your big donors and  say, "Hey, we know you didn't donate to LSA this year, but do you mind shelling out a mill to help us cover the cost of Harbaugh not coaching this year?"

The very real problem is that everyone is negotiating in the dark against something that everyone knows is bound to happen  - but to what degree and how we do protect ourselves? The NCAA has really put both sides in a shit situation. If they basically said, look "these are the violations and this is the absolute max penalty we can impose," it's a much easier problem to solve.

NewBlue7977

January 16th, 2024 at 7:31 AM ^

This contract Michigan wants Harbaugh to sign seems to be saying Michigan can fire Harbaugh, but he cannot look for another job in the NFL while he is at Michigan.  The investigations have pretty much cleared Harbaugh from any severe punishment from the NCAA, so it's not a matter of his job being on the line pending the outcome of the investigations.  I am looking at it that Warde is offering Harbaugh a contract with nice money, but little power. 

Romeo50

January 16th, 2024 at 6:09 AM ^

If they would witch hunt for this bs than they would abuse anybody whose our coach and we know where we stand. Who’s going to be better under those conditions? Get’er done!

98xj

January 16th, 2024 at 6:16 AM ^

What part of F*CK the NCAA, do we not understand? Harbaugh's vision for College Football will ultimately wreck the current system (NCAA/cheater schools). Are you onboard with that or not?

1WhoStayed

January 16th, 2024 at 6:21 AM ^

So again,  nothing new here! JUB is tiresome. He said it himself. “Nobody knows anything” and yet he keeps trying to provide “updates” to make himself relevant… Talk about a nothing-burger!

Perkis-Size Me

January 16th, 2024 at 6:48 AM ^

I don’t see any issue with providing immunity for the issues that we already know about. If the university isn’t willing to do that, then shame on them. 

But I wouldn’t blame them for not wanting to provide blanket protection against all issues that may arise in the future as a result of Sign-Gate. Who knows what’s still left to uncover. 

Bluesince89

January 16th, 2024 at 7:01 AM ^

I am really convinced the more time I spend here that this fansbase isn’t as smart as it thinks it is and that a sizable portion of the posters are children pretending to be adults. 

LSAClassOf2000

January 16th, 2024 at 7:03 AM ^

If there has been any lesson to learn in college football, basketball and several other varsity sports over these last several decades, it's that the NCAA is not to be taken seriously, nor thought of as a valid enforcement entity really, at least not in the sense we would think of more conventional everyday enforcement entities. 

Get this done, Michigan. 

AeroEngin04

January 16th, 2024 at 7:43 AM ^

If that’s the impasse, it’s could be the same impasse for NFL teams.  Based on previous precedent, the NFL will follow along with any punishment the NCAA hands out.  Unless the owner has got a written guarantee from Goddell that he will tell the NCAA to F off on Harbaugh or the contract is short and small enough to just eat it, it’s the same impasse.

los barcos

January 16th, 2024 at 7:53 AM ^

This contract has been floating around for months now, even before sign gate, and we’ve all heard Harbaugh wants to stay and he’s going to sign! And yet, here he is interviewing for NFL jobs. 
Harbaugh either gets a gig he wants in the nfl at which point he’s gone, and was always going to go anyways - or he doesn’t and somehow the contract details work themselves out. 
All this warde teeth gnashing - it has nothing to do with him and everything to do with Harbaugh wanting to go back to the nfl, which he has made clear every off season for the last three years. 

Hensons Mobile…

January 16th, 2024 at 7:57 AM ^

I am glad, I suppose, that the NCAA didn't rush their investigation and penalties so that we could get through the season and only had to deal with (ugh) the idiot conference.

But we had heard they had promised to go super duper fast and would have this done in December. If they had done that, then Michigan and Harbaugh would be working with knowns from the NCAA. Gee, that would be pretty helpful.

Thanks NCAA!

Hensons Mobile…

January 16th, 2024 at 8:00 AM ^

Also, not hating on JUB here, but yet again this is not news. Sam and JUB (and probably others) have been saying for weeks this was the sticking point, although when we just discussed this the other day a lot of you acted like it might not be the issue.

DennisFranklinDaMan

January 16th, 2024 at 8:01 AM ^

I assume, despite what JUB says, that Harbaugh is not going to sign a contract while he's actively considering moving back to the NFL. If he decides to come back, he'll sign a new contract. If he decides he wants one more shot at winning the Super Bowl, he's not going to sign with Michigan. 

No?

Ernis

January 16th, 2024 at 8:01 AM ^

Given the NCAA’s recent track record of getting laughed out of court rooms, I think it makes sense to adopt a more aggressive strategy regarding things like, expecting to be able to keep Harbaugh even if the NCAA brings the hammer. Our overall strategy as an AD, at this point, should adopt an assumption that everything the NCAA rules is tenuous at best and can/should be challenged vigorously. Anything less reeks of incompetence.

meeashagin

January 16th, 2024 at 8:04 AM ^

How do we go from literally 3 days ago Warde promising the fan base that he's working toward getting our coach a new contract to now we're at an impasse?

Are we sure Harbaugh isn't just buying time weighing his options? 

brad

January 16th, 2024 at 8:10 AM ^

If we can have Harbaugh for life, the AD should be doing what it takes to get Harbaugh for life.  AD's are a dime a dozen.  Harbaugh is one of a kind and also happens to be perfect for us and has been more or less UM's savior.  What are we doing here?

shoes

January 16th, 2024 at 8:10 AM ^

This is exactly what i've been saying for weeks, and it is entirely reasonably on Jim's part. yet we have people saying the lawyers won't let Mich do that, or its's all or nothing either you have to give him immunity for Mel Tucker type actions  or Lord knows what, or nothing at all. That was never the case- you can craft it so that it applies to the two current NCAA matters and what Jim has already been fully forthcoming about, turning over all cell phone and computer files. If you don't trust that Jim is telling the truth or you're "tired of the drama" and want to move on from the guy who is 89-25 with the first 3 straight outright BT titles at Mich since the 1940's, and the Big 10's first ever 15-0 National championship team- then fine that's your choice, but that's not where I'm at.

If we blow this, then I'll support whomever the next coach is, but I'll still be p---ed about it.

badjuju81

January 16th, 2024 at 8:12 AM ^

We live with this every year because we have the only college head coach who is a proven winner in the NFL.  Saban couldn't do it.  If Pete Carroll went back to coaching at the college level, that school would have the same problem.

Other schools have to worry about their coaches leaving for other college jobs.  We don't with JH.  We would have that issue with Moore.  What if his alma mater, oil-rich Oklahoma, came calling?  Or any other $EC school backed up their Brinks truck to whatever other coach we had?  Witness Washington.  Remember: Texas A&M came after Bo, and he used it as leverage with UM.  JH is using the only leverage he has: the NFL.

We also live with the B1G & NCAA vendettas against UM, & separately JH.  The former for their historic "holier than thou" attitude, plus throwing their weight around in the Yost era - no kidding, the hate goes back that far.  The latter for his advocacy & innovation in trying to undermine the unfair, rigged establishment (exploiting athletes, false amateurism, regional bias).

Other fanbases have neither of these problems.

Neither JH nor UM want to be over a barrel due to these self-serving institutions that are judge, jury, & executioner, who hate them both, & seem to be able to pass ex-post-facto rules.  No wonder both JH & UM are paranoid.

It will be a shame if the B1G & NCAA have their way and destroy our potential dynasty (which is what we have if there's a 10-year contract signed).  I wish JH & UM would jointly display this attitude: "WE won't let these creeps ruin OUR relationship".  I also wished for a national title this year.

Carcajou

January 16th, 2024 at 8:15 AM ^

Couldn't part of the problem be, if they were to grant the football coach such immunity, might it not open themselves up to charges of hypocrisy or suits by other former university employees who were dismissed for violating some rule or another?

jdemille9

January 16th, 2024 at 8:17 AM ^

Feels like this, not Harbaugh wanting to leave and try to win a Super Bowl, is what pushes him out the door. Sad.

Other programs give kids fake classes or no classes, are involved in FBI investigations, have vehicular manslaughter and nothing happens. Harbaugh buys a kid a cheeseburger during the dead period and talks about revenue sharing and then the B1G suspends him based on "information found to be credible" while the rest of the league was a bunch of whiny bitches brandishing pitch forks. And now NCAA is likely gonna come down with the hammer and we're gonna lose our coach because of it. 

Fuck. 

Parkinen

January 16th, 2024 at 8:33 AM ^

Perhaps an alternative approach would be for the University to define "just cause" and not simply default to NCAA and Big10 rules.  I understand that the NCAA rules employ the "captain of the ship" standard which essentially holds the head coach responsible for everything that goes on within the program regardless of whether or not they were aware of the transgressions.  The University does not need to adopt that standard for its definition of "just cause" and could instead provide that it would be required that coach had actual knowledge or should have have had knowledge.