Iowa Snowflakes: The Offense

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on October 2nd, 2022 at 4:00 AM

This will be the thread for hot takes regarding the offense and offensive playcalling. 

rice4114

October 1st, 2022 at 4:26 PM ^

I agree with you 100% with everything but the “dont put stuff on tape”. I will die on that hill.

1. Put a million things on tape. Good luck practicing to stop these 27 plays!

2. Practice all these plays in game situations so one team is defending it for the first time but your team has perfected it.

But the second half play calling was fine. You dont gift a win but you do put ill informed Michigan fans in a bad mood. The win kids. Thats all that matters on the road at Iowa.

 

 

stephenrjking

October 1st, 2022 at 4:07 PM ^

It’s generally not an issue, though. Michigan is almost always ready at the line with tons of time on the clock, sometimes in hurry-up looks. They had two instances where that didn’t occur, but it’s not like snapping the ball on time was a persistent struggle.

I’ve seen no evidence that Michigan is struggling through a play calling process where plays are getting to JJ late because the OCs are talking about individual play calls. As far as I can tell there is no such dialogue on a down-to-down basis. 

AlbanyBlue

October 1st, 2022 at 4:46 PM ^

I don't have a problem with co-OCs, but it would be better would with one playcaller. Unfortunately, with JH also certainly being involved in play calling, that's not gonna happen.

That said, this was a coherently called game. It was always going to be conservatively called, but through that lens, it was called well. Your comment is off-base -- for this game anyway.

The Maryland game has disjointed play-calling and your beef is valid for that one. 

HAIL-YEA

October 2nd, 2022 at 8:30 AM ^

Stop listening to Joel Klatt, he is decent but he doesn't know more than Harbaugh. Plenty of teams are doing co-coordinators, suddenly Michigan doing it is a problem. Yes, Maryland was sloppy. I am guessing the staff did not expect MD to play that soft zone coverage all game. 

It turned out to be a good warmup for Iowa anyway

Gohokego

October 1st, 2022 at 3:20 PM ^

Jj needs to hit Wilson on that deep shot and end of 1st half he needs to put it back corner of end zone for Wilson to have a chance. 1st half should have been 21-0. 

UMForLife

October 1st, 2022 at 3:20 PM ^

Congrats JJ for breaking the 2 decades of futility at Iowa for UM. Good experience. Get your groove on long balls and plow through the rest of the season. Overall, conservative game plan, but we did not let Iowa beat us because we turned over the ball. Glad to be on the winning side of Kinnick record against top 5 team. OL and BC deserve the game ball.

stephenrjking

October 1st, 2022 at 3:20 PM ^

Looked great until we went up 20. Then the freakish backward pass event, then the calling got way too conservative with the Corum run into a stacked line with a yard to gain.

This was a midterm exam and the team passed with a solid B. Took what they had to, OL paved, JJ was precise and made good reads, great play calls for the first 2.5 quarters.

Missed another deep shot and didn’t try many. But they took what was available and did it pretty efficiently when they needed to build the lead.

An A would have required a bit of a boot to the throat and/or hitting a big play to turn one of those early FG possessions into a TD. But this was a winning performance against an excellent defense. 

UgLi Eric

October 1st, 2022 at 3:21 PM ^

We basically out-Iowa'ed Iowa. That was well called and executed.  The only way we could have lost was to try too hard.  JJ was cool.  Corum was unstoppable.  The Oline almost got push on every single play (not that one at the end at around 8 minutes left in the 4th, but other than that)..

MRunner73

October 1st, 2022 at 3:22 PM ^

Kudos! 3TD+2FG against that defense! Am looking at the glass half full. They bogged down at times but they avoided a costly turn over in the 4th quarter.

Corum was a bell-cow again and iced it with a TD run on the last drive.

JJ was decent and is growing so it was a good road performance.

We needed Donovan Edwards and he came through.

A great road win!

Ronswanson13

October 1st, 2022 at 3:24 PM ^

Love it. It was conservative, but the smart play on the road vs Iowa.

Oline and running game was mashing against a really good D and JJ played a really mature game. Missed another long ball, but he’s about as money as it gets on the underneath stuff - which is nothing to take for granted. And obvious his athleticism led to a huge TD pass.

Really on a couple bad series, mostly stifled by some self inflicted things. They went conservative in the 4th. The 1st series to open the 4th I didn’t like, but when they went conservative later in the 4th and deep in our own zone it was the smart move.

Damn good road win. You’ll see more through the air next week most likely.

MgoBlueprint

October 1st, 2022 at 3:24 PM ^

What is wrong with Harbaugh? He chose to keep them in the game. Corum run into a 9 player box to end the drive was ridiculous.

Let JJ take more shots. There’s a balance that needs to be struck. The play calling left too much to be desired.

there’s no reason to run Blake 30 times a game. Donovan needs more touches. Give CJ ~5-7 touches. Most importantly, it’s about both short and long term health.

stephenrjking

October 1st, 2022 at 3:49 PM ^

As usual, this sort of comment is a big overreaction.

They could/should have dialed up a different play with Iowa clearly showing its commitment to stopping the handoff on 3rd-and-1.

That's one single playcall. On one single drive. I didn't like it, but it's *one call on one drive* and people act like it means the entire offensive scheme and philosophy are a disaster. That's simply not the case.

Edwards got 9 touches. Corum is one of the best players in the country. I think it's a good balance. 

JJ didn't take many deep shots, but I can't complain about that when Michigan was moving up and down the field basically at will without them. The big question about JJ before the season was whether he could execute the offense as called and make on-time accurate throws within the offense's structure. Not only can he, but he is superb at it. He was nailing every pass. Michigan was getting 5-8 yards on first down basically every play. You don't go away from that a lot when it's working, especially against an Iowa team whose only chance to win is for you to make a big mistake.

The play calling was *outstanding*. Did I want a different call on 3rd-and-1 when Iowa was risking everything to stop a run? Yes. 

It's one call. Michigan ran 65 other plays, and almost all of them were good calls. 

treetown

October 1st, 2022 at 4:07 PM ^

Thank you - voice of reason.

On offense - the team scored enough to win without risking the game. To date, the Hawkeyes offense have only put up 14+ once (against Nevada 27-0), so no need to help them. Likewise, forcing them to play catch up meant it didn't matter how many TE completions to the middle of field between 20's so long as no quick big plays were given up - and when the game was a contest it was 20-7.

Sure there are areas of improvement - JJ McCarthy came close to giving up the scoop and score with that backwardy pass. And there needs to be a back up for Corum - he got 29 carries, 30 in the last game - someone has to give him 10-12 carries, or he risks wearing out by the end of the season. Last year, part of the reason he was great was that he split time with Haskins.

AlbanyBlue

October 1st, 2022 at 4:57 PM ^

Agree with you on the 3rd and 1. With this offense and QB, you should feel confident going PA and throwing a 4-yard out to Schoon or running an RPO with Bell, which went for 11 earlier in the game and was run to perfection. Also agree with more touches for DE -- there's so much we can do with him.

Absolutely disagree about giving Stokes touches against an Iowa team that thrives on TOs. Dude had a bad fumble against Maryland. No way you give him the ball in this game.