If he leaves, who?

Submitted by 1408 on January 20th, 2022 at 9:10 AM

I'm prepared for all the downvotes.  I've been a top 0.5% Harbaugh backer on this site all along, especially in the dark ages of 2020 when he was being maligned by essentially everyone.

If Coach leaves for the Raiders, the Bears or whomever, who would we accept as our next coach?

Once I get over my crippling sadness and anger towards UM, I suppose I could learn to accept Luke Fickell.  I like the idea of having the sole criteria be a focus on beating OSU and think he would provide that.  

Here's hoping JH stays because I think he would finish his career as the best coach in Michigan history and an all time legend.  But what if he leaves?

AresIII

January 20th, 2022 at 11:24 AM ^

I never understood this take.  Does no one remember Lloyd Carr?  You know, the guy who was never a head coach until taking over after the Moeller incident?  Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't he the only coach who brought a national title to Michigan since 1948?  He seemed to work out pretty well.

With all of the potential new coaches for NFL teams, I wouldn't be surprised if somebody tries to grab MacDonald as their DC.

MGlobules

January 20th, 2022 at 10:26 AM ^

This is a conversation that people tend to have with very little of the important info available. Running a big institution like a football team is just very different than coaching some piece of playing for one. Maybe some people here have an idea whether a guy like Gattis--for instance--has run big operations, wants to, has shown the kind of skills, but I don't. Handling budgets, hiring, working with 100s of employees, overseeing the scholastic side. . . have any of these guys done that? That's the kind of vision a guy like Warde is supposed to have. . .

It's true that you DO know that other HCs have done it. But the public has very little idea whether they do it well. 

1408

January 20th, 2022 at 9:38 AM ^

Fickell would definitely come here.  He nearly went to MSU.  

You don't think he is a little annoyed that OSU went with Ryan Day over him once Urban left?  I would be.  Now he would have a chance to rub it in a bit.

The OSU job isn't going to be open any time soon.  The ND job won't either.  He doesn't strike me as an NFL-type.  Where else would be appealing to him if not M?

Perkis-Size Me

January 20th, 2022 at 9:52 AM ^

MSU =\= UM in the eyes of an OSU fan. That job may be in the state of Michigan, but it’s not Michigan. Not the one that OSU hates. 

I don’t think he’d ever come here because OSU is where he went to school and it’s where he coached for well over a decade. He’d never be welcome in the state of Ohio again, and I’m sure it would be seen as a personal betrayal to everyone he played and coached with. 

Now who knows, maybe Michigan makes him an offer he can’t refuse, but if you asked me the odds of him coming here, I wouldn’t take them as any better than 20%. 

burtcomma

January 20th, 2022 at 10:12 AM ^

I don’t think you can be so sure that Fickell would not come here.  20% if far too low of an estimate of the chances he would come here if offered.  Bet they are more like 70-80%.  For reference about former OSU coaches/players, please note the coach who followed Bo, and that he was an Ohio State football captain.  

MGlobules

January 21st, 2022 at 9:40 AM ^

This--with 10 people in agreement--is a really good example of being swayed by emotional arguments when the truth is that we have no frickin' idea what Luke Fickell thinks. A more important, connected, question might be whether he has any friendships with current staff or can get along with them given his past work history. 

Watching From Afar

January 20th, 2022 at 9:45 AM ^

Because Bo and Moeller even though those aren't fitting comparisons.

Bo never played for OSU. He just coached there.

Moeller played for OSU, but never coached there and was an assistant at Michigan for years under Bo (before and after flaming out at Illinois).

Fickell is the most OSU person alive. He was born in Columbus. Played for OSU. Coached for OSU. Still lives in Ohio.

Watching From Afar

January 20th, 2022 at 11:08 AM ^

I don't think he harbors bad enough feelings to take a job to spite OSU. He was the interim without much experience in 2011 and had a bad year (for understandable reasons).

Then when they promoted Day, it came in August a year after Fickell went 4-8 at Cincinnati. They didn't look past him in 2018. No one hires an outside coach in August who's HC record is below .500 at a G5.

That being said, offer and make him say no. But I doubt he takes it or stays at Michigan if the OSU job ever opens up.

James Burrill Angell

January 20th, 2022 at 9:42 AM ^

I agree.

1) What big "name" can you pull at this point? 

2) You pull someone from outside the program you're basically starting a flat out rebuild. You'll lose staff which means you lose the players (since its basically free agency with no salary cap in college football) and recruits that those staff members have connections with. Its not like we came off a losing season. You hire from outside you're basically rebooting the program.

3) Its not like Gattis is completely unqualified. The guy was calling the plays (Harbaugh is basically a figurehead) and won the Broyles award last year.  

I don't want Luke Fickell. I think he's a very good to excellent coach but he's clearly waiting for the Ohio State job. I don't need us to train their next coach.

James Burrill Angell

January 20th, 2022 at 10:15 AM ^

Truthfully when I say "Big Name" I meant something more than the people you mentioned (Think Lincoln Riley). Already said why I'm not comfortable with Fickell. I'm not sold on the notion that Aranda or Campbell are so much better than keeping Gattis considering the complete reboot on staff and likely attrition with players and recruits that bringing in either of them will carry with it. I'm also concerned with Aranda and Campbell that the recruits that have brought them their success may not be the kind of people Michigan will let them take.

Further, on the subject of Lincoln Riley...with any of the three names you mentioned its not like they can pull a Lincoln Riley and bring the existing star players from their programs and recruits and signees with them. Who do any of those three coaches have that are really any better than what we already have.

I guess my idea of "Big Name" is much "Bigger" than those three.

WhetFaarts

January 20th, 2022 at 12:30 PM ^

I would agree, especially at this point in time, it’s Gattis with an INTERIM tag slapped on it. 

Gattis has a year tryout while the admin kick the tires on all the big names out there. Stoops, Belicheck, Curly Lambeau, etc. 

In all seriousness, it would be a tough spot and they would have to back the brinks truck up to a splash hire if not retaining the current staff and Haurbaugh infrastructure. 

The Homie J

January 20th, 2022 at 9:51 AM ^

I love Mike Hart as much as the next guy, but the folks who want him promoted over Gattis are nuts.  One of them is a promising position coach whose biggest attribute is having played here.  The other is a fucking Broyles Award winner who's been recruiting and running our offense for 3 years while fielding legit interest in HC vacancies. 

You go with the promising coordinator every time (MacDonald is promising, but hella inexperience in comparison to even Gattis)

SecretAgentMayne

January 20th, 2022 at 11:38 AM ^

The only reason anybody on this blog or anywhere else are pushing for him as a viable HC option is because his name is Mike Hart. I love the guy and everything he's accomplished so far and with our RB's this season, but he's just not ready. He may very well be one day, but for now, it's a no from me. Experience-wise between him and Gattis--it's not even fucking close. 

The Baughz

January 20th, 2022 at 9:33 AM ^

Mark Stoops would be a great hire. Much better than any internal candidates. Gattis and especially Hart would be disappointing if one of them were to replace Harbaugh.

I am hoping Warde does a national search and at least calls Fickell, Aranda, Stoops etc.

Make them say no first before moving on to the internal candidates.

Unfortunately, it is believed by insiders that it will be Hart or Gattis that will get promoted. 

The Homie J

January 20th, 2022 at 9:55 AM ^

I very much wanted Matt Campbell last year, but yeah, the luster has worn off that one.  I wouldn't hate if he was the guy, but I feel there's several better candidates now, since it's clear that Campbell is a good but probably not great HC.  If we're looking at guys in Campbell's range, I would prefer Jeff Hafley out of BC (they had a not great year thanks to their QB getting wrecked early, but Ohio State fans have had him tagged at their number 2 coach prospect behind Fickell for a reason...)

That said, how do you not promote Gattis?  He's been running the offensive side of the team for 3 years, has experience learning under Franklin (uh well, maybe learning what not to do from Franklin), Saban and now Harbaugh.   

Ajcoss

January 20th, 2022 at 10:20 AM ^

We seriously have people on this board who think Gattis is a better hire than Matt Campbell? You people are losing your minds. Can’t just go by 1 year. 75% of this board wanted Gattis fired prior to last year. Crazy how a few good games change peoples perspective.

Gattis - Not getting P5 offers

Campbell - Turned down Washington Huskies 

Both of these are from this year. Not going back a year or two ago with Campbell’s name mentioned with lots of NFL and college elite programs. Maybe he learned from this and it’s had made him hungrier? Not saying he’s a home run hire, but to say Fickell, Campbell, Aranda, or even Bill O’Brien is not better than any option on current staff is crazy.

 

King Tot

January 20th, 2022 at 11:03 AM ^

If one year does not matter why are the Harbaugh haters from a year ago not rejoicing at his potential departure? I would imagine that most of the people who claim Gattis would be a huge mistake were saying anyone but Harbaugh a year ago. The fact is we are not qualified to make definitive statements as to who will be the best option at HC.

Ajcoss

January 20th, 2022 at 1:32 PM ^

Harbaugh had a history. Been fair at Michigan (10+ win seasons) handful of times. Clearly his Stanford/SF days. Covid 20 season was only one that was really brutal. Gattis doesn’t have that benefit of doubt history, hasn’t been a successful OC before doing some things this year. Also, Harbaugh is O guy, so we all know lots of this year had Harbaugh’s fingerprints all over it.