Here2CWoodson

November 29th, 2018 at 3:40 PM ^

I was going to say the same. Would a top flight QB want to go to Wisconsin?  Probably not, they are an offense built around running the ball.  Michigan has become the same thing.  Michigan is 106th in the country in pass attempts per game (25.9). Shockingly, this was DOWN from last year's O'Korn/Peters/Speight debacle (26.6).  I really wish Harbaugh would open things up for a change.  Hell, in 2015 we were at least 67th at 31.9/game.  I fear we are both wasting incredible WR talent (DPJ/Black/Collins) and scaring away top flight WRs and QBs.

I was honestly surprised we didn't see more frustration this year out of Patterson. We spent so much GD time running the ball against every opponent that he never got into a great rhythm.  

Rafiki

November 29th, 2018 at 3:54 PM ^

I concur. I think the O is good enough to win games and even games against osu. But if I was a top WR or QB recruit I would be concerned Um's O doesn't feature me enough. If Harbaugh isn't going to feature WRs and a passing game with the WR class he got 2 years ago I'd be skeptical he ever would and that would make me lean towards other schools.

I hope they find someone who can help with in game play calling because that seems to be where the problem is. It seems like the plays are in the O playbook. We saw slants, we saw Evans line up outside, we saw creative short passes, we saw RPOs. Problem is they would happen infrequently during games. 

bluepalooza

November 29th, 2018 at 4:03 PM ^

QB attempts were down as Michigan could actually run the ball.  The year prior they were forced to pass more.  One other often overlooked point, Patterson was in the Michigan system for how long? Not even a year.  I think that's why McCaffrey looked so good when he stepped in, he had been in the system much longer.  I agree, Harbaugh's system is not chuck and duck like OSU and Oklahoma.  But how many National Championships has Bama won without the prolific passing game?  I am not saying Michigan shouldn't open up the passing game more.  What I am saying Michigan scored a lot more points this year with a ballanced attack. Also, kept the defense off the field.  Why do you think Oklahoma is giving up so many points?  There defense is gassed due to being on field so long. Michigan didn't lose to OSU due to lack of offense........

Guy Fawkes

November 29th, 2018 at 4:18 PM ^

AAAAHHHH There it is, you were good until your last sentence. "Michigan didn't lose due to lack of offense"? Yes, they did, I'm tired of this 39 point bullshit. They, as an offense, manufactured only 13 points of their own through 3 quarters!! Gifted a TD on the 9 yard line. It was ground and pound for basically 2.5 quarters and it cost them. Opened it up and scored meaningless TD's when it was too late. Why cant people understand this? 

rob f

November 29th, 2018 at 5:58 PM ^

But we DID lose to OSU and it was largely due to a lack of a consistently productive offense: 3 and out on the first drive, a couple of stalled drives that ended in FGs, only those 6 points until the final minutes of the 1st half (and one of those TDs gifted by OSU after a fumbled KO)

And do you have to be reminded of our scoreless stretch in the 2nd half while they scored 17 to essentially put it out of reach?

bluepalooza

November 29th, 2018 at 7:26 PM ^

Michigan lost to OSU because Don Brown didn't have enough tools in the  tool box.  There is not one person on this or any other forum that thought the Michigan defense would look so inept.  Of course, most of us thought OSU would score, but not pick apart the Michigan's defense at will.  Everyone thought the Michigan Dline would put pressure on Haskins. The good news is Don Brown will take it personal as he did PSU and there will be an OSU beat down in the Big House in 2019.

Unfortunately, Michigan picked the worst time to play their worst game and OSU picked the best time to play their best game. Just like if Purdue played OSU the following week after they lost, is there anyone here that would think that score would be different?

Michrider41

November 29th, 2018 at 9:12 PM ^

It is all about exploiting match ups.  Michigan's two starting corners are two of the best in the NCAA.  So OSU ran plays to exploit the 3 other DB's and LB's.  It's not rocket science.  The fact that we couldn't generate any pass rush was the biggest issue in this game.  Michigan ran plays to get our 6'7" TE on their smaller DB's, he just didn't catch anything.  When they threw it up to Collins and DPJ, they made plays.  

LDNfan

November 29th, 2018 at 4:18 PM ^

UM came into the season with a ton of questions about it's Oline and particularly its ability to pass block. It returned 2 pretty good running backs. After last year, it made perfect sense to establish a reliable running game and not get the starting QB killed mid-way through the season.

And for much of the season it worked. The O moved the ball, put up good numbers and kept the D fresh. 

Even in the debacle it wasn't the O that significantly under-performed it was the D. 

Wolverine0007

November 29th, 2018 at 2:58 PM ^

Honestly not surprised here and I had a gut feeling the night before that would be the case. Why? He'll be facing a stacked QB room where if Dylan Mccafrey, Joe Milton, and Cade Mcnamara all pan out talent wise, he could be facing at least 3-4 years until he starts. Plus the fact that our offense is so run centric and doesn't center around throwing the ball like today's NFL and collegiate offenses do, must have played a role. I hope this sends an added signal to Harbaugh that he needs to be creative with his offense next year and open it up to more passing. Go Blue.

Mr Miggle

November 29th, 2018 at 3:14 PM ^

I think it's obvious that our offense is being updated. Aside from how Patterson was given more options during the season and the plays that were called for McCaffrey and Milton, look at this recruiting class. Posters keep talking about how we lack a big WR, fair enough. I think we want and and could use one. But look at all the emphasis on slots and APBs. Harbaugh is recruiting for a different offense. You can't put it out on the field until you get the personnel. Well not too successfully, just look at 2008. And with a couple of classes like this one, he can't keep running his old offense.

 

Sideline

November 29th, 2018 at 3:40 PM ^

I truly believe OL is the reason we aren't passing as much as we expected Harbaugh to. Sure, they are going to be a run-based offense, but with that said, I think we all expected to be dropping PA-dimes all over. I think OL is the reason we aren't. Do I think we'll get there? Sure hope so with development, but recruiting needs to hit more on the more "polished" OL (Specifically T) prospects. 

test

November 29th, 2018 at 3:03 PM ^

Heard from reliable sources here in GA yesterday he was picking UT. UT will pull a few more in the next month.  One is a 5 star committed to Auburn.

Mr Grainger

November 29th, 2018 at 3:03 PM ^

So this wasn't the "commit watch" we were put on earlier in the week.

Are we still on commit watch? Or do those eventually expire like a severe thunderstorm watch?

rainingmaize

November 29th, 2018 at 3:09 PM ^

I know I'm sounding like one of those bitter fans that say I didn't want him anyway, but I was always skeptical of how Bailey fit for Michigan. I think Michigan's offense works best with a dual threat/mobile guy, and Bailey isn't that type of player. Patterson, McCaffrey, and even Milton have some mobility, and I hope we recruit more QBs with that element to their game.

Double-D

November 29th, 2018 at 4:24 PM ^

Your take is interesting and something I noticed as well.  The kid is obviously a huge talent but runs 5 something 40 yard dash and shows zero scrambles to move the chains in his HUDL.  

Our offense changed when we opened up the RPO plays and it seems like an important dimension to keep on the table.  

Unless you want to run short pick play crossing routes all day but who would ever do that?

Tyler1495

November 29th, 2018 at 3:13 PM ^

I mean as of right now Michigan has 4 high profile Qbs on the roster not including Cade. I am not shocked he went somewhere else honestly