[Marc-Gregor Campredon]

The Thousand-Yard Stare Comment Count

Brian September 27th, 2021 at 1:57 PM

9/18/2021 – Michigan 20, Rutgers 13 – 4-0, 1-0 Big Ten

Well, at least it took 3.5 games to get back to the same old feeling. The grim one, where you're staring grimly at the grim field where grim things are happening and then Michigan and its steamroller of a run game takes a delay of game penalty instead of attempting a fourth and one. After that there's another penalty before Michigan can finally punt. The color drains out of the world until you forget where you are and momentarily think you're at Eastern's stadium, which is now gray—not just gray, but gray-gray, ultragray—in some sort of marketing stunt turned guerilla art installation.

Grey-Field-at-Rynearson-Stadium

Say what you want about the Eastern Michigan Eagles' proficiency at football, but never slander their perspective on the fatalistic trudge we call life. Football is healthy and good to have influence your thoughts.

At times like these the man with the mustache arrives in my head.

screen-shot-2016-09-05-at-10-31-53-pm

You can find him by googling for "sad Florida State fan," and you will discover that this is now a bustling corner of the image search internet populated by folks in glitter and surrender cobras from sea to shining sea. But mustache man is still first, because he is a perfect distillation of the emptiness of a bad football game where your team gets to do the fun parts three plays, and only three plays, at a time while the opposition dunks on you.

He is also a tribute to the human ability to read nuance into facial expressions. What makes Sad Mustache Man so compelling? He merely stares ahead, stoic. His brow furrows slightly. The way he communicates the existential angst of Ole Miss punching your face in is mysterious. Blindingly clear, and somehow impossible to define. He stares into the middle distance and attempts to keep all his atoms in the same place.

--------------------------------------------

Since Michigan was playing Rutgers, "dunks on you" means "scores ten points in a half and still loses." The feeling is still the same. Michigan's second half didn't lose this game; it felt like it lost future games. At some point down the road when Michigan gets conked everyone watching will think about how the second half of Rutgers foretold this woeful fate.

Which, I guess, fine, okay, yeah. I predicted this team would go 7-5 and so did everyone else. Even after… that, a reversion to that level of pessimism is not reasonable. A reversion to the same old thing—9-3 or thereabouts, losing most of the exciting games, not being particularly competitive against Ohio State—is, and here we're in the same treadmill it seems like we've always been on.

Michigan can exceed expectations this year and still put up something entirely unsatisfying. Too good to fire, not good enough to enjoy. That's not fate, of course: maybe Greg Schiano is pretty good at this and Michigan will receive a wake-up call and actually bomb someone worth bombing on the road. One half doesn't erase the other halves.

But when you keep walking down the same road year after year it's hard to expect that something's different until it actually is. Until then, a steady stare into the middle distance is always a good option. Doesn't usually get you put on TV unless you're a perfect distillation of sadness, and even then there's usually someone just as sad but dressed more outlandishly.

AWARDS

Known Friends and Trusted Agents Of The Week

51521193190_75842bcb79_k

I AM DETECTING AN ILLEGALITY [Barron]

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]you're the man now, dog

#1 Aidan Hutchinson. Didn't have a massive game statistically but is likely to check in with a monster UFR number. Had a sack, bowled over an OL on the direct snap to Pacheco, probably should have drawn multiple holding flags. Making up for meh performances otherwise.

#2 Nikhai Hill-Green. Shuffled through traffic on the second to last Rutgers drive to stick folks short of the sticks on critical plays. Led team in tackles, a fair few of which were important. Preseason hype seems not crazy.

#3 Brad Robbins. Ok he had a bad one but the one he dropped at the three that took a right turn out of bounds was important, and he limited the dangerous Cruicshank to just one punt return attempt.

Honorable mention: Josh Ross turned in a good performance with one thunderous TFL before leaving; Chris Hinton got off a block on one of the key Hill-Green stuffs to help; Dax Hill was a bit up and down but did stuff some perimeter stuff.

KFaTAotW Standings.

(points: #1: 8, #2: 5, #3: 3, HMs one each. Ties result in somewhat arbitrary assignments.)

16: The OL (#1 Wash, #1 NIU)
14: Aidan Hutchinson (HM WMU, #2 Wash, #1 Rutgers)
11: Blake Corum (#2 WMU, T3 Wash, T2 NIU)
8: Ronnie Bell (#1 WMU)
7: Hassan Haskins (HM WMU, T3 Wash, T2 NIU)
6: Nikhai Hill-Green(HM NIU, #2 Rutgers)
5: Dax Hill (#3 WMU, HM NIU, HM Rutgers)
4: AJ Henning (HM WMU, #3 NIU),
3: Donovan Edwards(T2 NIU), Josh Ross (HM Wash, HM NIU, HM Rutgers)
1: Andrew Vastardis (HM WMU),Mike Sainristil (HM WMU), Brad Robbins (HM Wash), Jake Moody (HM Wash), Mazi Smith (HM Wash), Gemon Green(HM NIU), Cornelius Johnson(HM NIU), Chris Hinton (HM Rutgers)

Who's Got It Better Than Us(?) Of The Week

Michigan's opening drive is a 17-play marathon featuring two passes, a touchdown, and the absorption of half a quarter.

Honorable mention: Hill-Green gets back to back sticks to functionally end the game; bonafide RPO gets Roman Wilson a chunk on Michigan's second efficient TD drive to start; ditto the Sainristil catch; officials ignore a blatant block in the back on Henning's return.

image​MARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

Can I say the entire second half? No? Okay, uh, McNamara missing three straight open receivers on one of the three-and-outs. (Sainristil could have caught the first one, yes; still low.)

Honorable mention: The rest of the second half.

[After THE JUMP: up up up up nope nope nope nope]

OFFENSE

A cliff, visualized. Via Seth:

image (45)

Many people have already noted that the flattening out exactly correlates with McNamara being on the receiving end of a targeting penalty. The big jump at play ~32 is the strike to Sainristil and the ensuing ejection, and after that it was a slow drip of disaster. McNamara went from 8/9 to start to 1/7 to finish. The possibilities there:

  • coincidence,
  • McNamara was hurt and either nobody noticed or he successfully concealed some mild concussion symptoms, or
  • McNamara wasn't hurt but was rattled.

I think coincidence is the most likely, especially because the amount of data we have on him is so limited. But we're again in a spot where we're wondering if this guy is actually the guy and glancing at the five-star freshman. One negative of the monster run game is that Michigan's called fewer passes than anyone outside of service academies, so we have a tiny amount of data.

The coaches have more and their reticence to open things up may be an indicator.

Jeremy Gallon graduated. McNamara's lone incompletion before the cliff was this:

51520264581_e320c41d6b_k

[Barron]

That's a perfect corner route that got broken up by an excellent no-look play from the DB, but also maybe this should be someone other than Sainristil. (I saw some back and forth online about whether Sainristil should have brought this in. My opinion is no, there's really no opportunity to out-beast a guy who punches the ball the instant you touch it.)

A frustrating contrast. Rutgers does not have Michigan's talent level but stuck in this game and significantly outrushed Michigan with a bunch of janky college crap. Swing it to the flat, run the quarterback, run with some WRs, use a lot of misdirection, etc. It felt like Michigan did almost none of that. There was a significant amount of variation in the between-the-tackles ground game, but once Rutgers adjusted and started dispensing a bunch of two-yard runs Michigan did not have a plan B. Nor did they make any attempts to get janky college yards until very late.

WR screens? 0. AJ Henning touches? 0. Perimeter run plays of any description? 1, that coming on a bash play to Corum deep in the fourth quarter. QB runs? 1, which Rutgers predicted and blitzed right into.

It's mystifying. Seems like we have one out of every three games where the Speed In Space has arrived and then it goes back in the bin. Shades of the Army game from a couple years ago.

Reads: scanty. Michigan got a couple of chunks off of RPO action, which are the first of the year IIRC. Otherwise it did not feel like the QB was live in the mesh point until the very end of the game, when Rutgers correctly anticipated Michigan would go to the QB run well and shot a LB directly at McNamara:

You have to wonder how live that read is or if it's just a pull with the expectation that the LB will go after the RB. We've been through this with QB after QB after QB and I have no expectations this will change going forward.

51516787246_e10db49579_k

that guy's never going to catch you [Barron]

Running back détente is always temporary. Seth's likely to have a fair number of negatives from this game for Haskins and Corum; on my rewatch I caught a number of plays where gaps did open up but RBs did not hit them, and I thought Corum in particular had at least a few opportunities for a bounce as Rutgers overplayed the interior.

In one sense this is a testament to Corum's RB instincts. It's unusual for little fast guys to not try to Mike Shaw it a bunch, usually to their detriment. On the other hand, I mean try it a few times? Fast, you are fast.

DEFENSE

51519473867_08590130fa_k

unsettling [Barron]

That was more in line with expectations. This was not a good run game—to say the least—entering the game but Michigan ended up having a lot of problems because the defensive tackles were largely a non-factor. Grinding up the middle with Vedral as Pacheco took linebacker attention outside was effective for Rutgers because Michigan's DLs could not win one on one battles and Hutchinson was being followed around by a posse of dudes*.

I don't think there's much to do about this. At certain spots you are who you are, and Michigan is pretty meh at DT.

*[One notable instance of this was on the last Rutgers drive, where they spent a slot WR to blindside him and knock him down on a pass rush.]

Endurance. Michigan rotated heavily, which on the one hand was somewhat alarming. On the podcast I suggested that if you have eight defensive tackles you don't really have any. On the other hand that did seem to come in handy late when Michigan's defense stiffened—not at all what you would expect when Rutgers is the only team staying on the field. Having eight meh defensive tackles is better than having two, I guess.

Jordan Whittley did not play, which feels like it was a bigger loss than you might expect for a guy who's only going to get a dozen snaps.

51516732896_00a418f4c2_k

this is not going far [Campredon]

WHAT ARE WE DOING? Takes a special kind of baffling thing reoccurring repeatedly for me to start swearing in the stands at this late date, but Michigan's defense accomplished that by repeatedly offering Rutgers a free eight yards on simple hitches on the outside. Completely bizarre. You are playing Noah Vedral!

Rutgers has two long passing plays against FBS opposition this year; they were a TE seam and a five yard hitch. I find it difficult to believe that Vedral hitting a back shoulder throw on the first Rutgers third down threw Michigan's pregame planning into a tizzy. Covering the flats was a problem early against NIU, and then Michigan adjusted. It was baffling, frustrating, and inexplicable that Michigan was handing easy yardage chunks to Rutgers deep into the second half.

Vedral's other attempted shots at the sideline both went OOB. [shakes hands violently]

Slow your roll. Dax Hill had two different clean shots at Vedral on slot blitzes RU did not pick up and whiffed both. This tends to happen when really fast guys come off the corner—I am currently thinking about Brandon Harrison and his remarkable ability to get dodge by quarterbacks—and hopefully he'll be able to gear down a bit and finish those plays.

SPECIAL TEAMS

Got away with one. Entertaining sequence on the AJ Henning punt return where I saw an obvious block in the back, the officials threw a flag, then picked it up, then got to watch the stadium scoreboard demonstrate that the obvious block in the back was very very obvious.  I was shocked when the next play did not have a holding call; one dollar says the extremely weak roughing the passer call a few minutes later was related to picking that flag up.

Orin Incandenza business. This ball done be remote controlled.

Robbins celebrated like he'd birthed the savior of the world and fair enough.

Noped out. Rutgers tried a couple kickoffs to Corum and while he didn't break one he was close enough that Rutgers decided pop-up kicks were the better part of valor. Michael Barrett had a nice catch and return on one of them to get out to the 35.

MISCELLANEOUS

Oh no baby. Greg Schiano's decision to go for it on fourth and ten with 29 seconds left in the half was completely bizarre. The score was 17-3, which means okay yeah scoring at the end of the half would be an important boost. But 1) fourth and ten, 2) you are Rutgers, 3) you're probably giving Michigan another possession.

The ensuing slant was both broken up and short of the sticks, and then Michigan immediately hit a big RPO to get down to the Rutgers 5. Only a post-targeting McNamara miss on to an open Schoonmaker prevented the worst case scenario.

Shortly after. Michigan elected to kick a field goal on third down with five seconds left in the half. This I'm not too ticked off about that because the thing they probably should have done—throw a goal-line fade—is not likely to convert. But it's coming down before five seconds run off the clock.

We are the premiere Crean Documenting Service in the Midwest. Puttin' a lot of weird guys on the sideline:

51516382306_8bdc4bf32e_k

[Barron]

This gives me an excuse to put this here.

Thanks, Tom.

HERE

The State of our Open Threads:

So, how did we feel about as it was happening? I will just say that there were fewer fucks given than I would have actually thought - only 176 of them, to be exact. Still, when you consider that we only generated 18 of them last week, that's 9.8 times the fucks and probably a corresponding overall increase in fan stress. It's charted in comparison to "fire" here:

In the Harbaugh era, and in the Hoke era when this collection effort began, there has always been at least a mild correlation between our use of "fuck" and our wanting of heads, and while four games isn't telling, you can see they do trail each other somewhat. Normally, this relationship will solidify by the time the OSU rolls around. I can only imagine why that is.

Stephen King on the eternalness of Michigan's offense:

What is telling, to me, about these analyses is that if you change some details, they could be written about Saturday's win over Rutgers. This, despite a complete overhaul in the offensive staff in that time. We've seen the OL coach change twice, the OC change once, different attempts at WR coaches, and now a new RB coach as well. The offensive personnel is completely different as well. The only things those offenses have in common with this team is the uniforms and the head coach.

Best and Worst:

And so with every 3-and-out by the offense and every interminable odyssey by the defensive series it felt like the game was not so much slipping away as getting unnecessarily close.  It’s difficult to describe and probably comes across as homer-ish, but this game never felt quite like last year’s contest in NJ, where Rutgers raced out to a big lead behind superior play.  I’m not saying you should but if you so inclined, go back and re-watch even just the highlights of that game.  Rutgers put up nearly 6 ypp in that game and had 486 yards of total offense while also committing 12 (!) penalties on offense for 99 (!!) yards.  Their defense struggled in the second half but they were consistently getting pressure early on and Michigan barely had 100 yards of total offense before McNamara came in.  Rutgers looked like the better team in that game and Michigan was lucky they were able to stay close enough.  Those were two equal-ish teams in terms of talent and execution playing a defensively-challenged game of chicken, with Rutgers finally blinking in overtime.  It felt not unlike a lot of Big 12 games in that respect.

Comments

dragonchild

September 27th, 2021 at 2:43 PM ^

Speaking of PTSD:

McNamara wasn't hurt but was rattled.

Possible, and it's baffling to me that folks over in the 'Board support the decision to keep playing him on grounds of "confidence".  OK, I know that's how it's been for decades, so everyone just assumes it's true, but let's take a closer look, shall we?  Apparently QBs are super-fragile snowflakes* that must be kept playing (I'm sure RBs love to hear that every time they spend three weeks in the doghouse after a fumble) because. . . the best thing for these fragile minds is to repeatedly expose them to whatever traumatized them, under tremendous stress to boot?

First off, that you can "fix" the confidence of an emotionally damaged snowflake* with more of exactly what inflicted the damage in the first place is such an amazingly bonkers contradiction that its prevalence among football fandom and coaching (!!!) in the 21st century is alarming.  Second, beyond simple common sense, it also flies in the face of literally everything we know about how the brain works.  Third, that is exactly what Harbaugh does, plays his QBs no matter how screwed up they get until they're literally held out by the team doctor, and for some strange reason he also happens to have a very long record of breaking QBs, including here.  Hmm. . .

I said it there but I think it needs to be said here:  The patented Hoke-Harbaugh "repeatedly play the traumatized QB under traumatizing conditions until he's UN-traumatized" gambit is NOT WORKING.  It instead has handed us an entire fucking graveyard of broken QBs.  Every single shred of evidence strongly indicates it instead causes the lingering, cumulative damage it's supposed to prevent.  Can we please stop doing this already?

*I'm NOT saying Cade is one.  I'm refuting the conventional wisdom (!!) that QBs are such pathetic worms that simply having one sit on a bench for a few minutes to gather himself would leave him permanently damaged.  I think that's bullcrap, and if anything, he should've been benched ASAP just to find out what's going on.

andrewgr

September 27th, 2021 at 3:25 PM ^

I think one way to make this work smoothly is to just go into every game telling the starting and backup QB, "We're going to try really hard to get the backup one full series while the other team still has their starters in.  We're not sure when it will be, it depends on a lot of things, but we're going to try."

Usually this will probably mean getting the backup in sometime in the 3rd or 4th quarter when you're up by 3 scores.  But if the starting QB is stumbling for whatever reason, it could be in the 1st or 2nd quarter.  That would give the starter a chance to watch the action from the sideline, chat with a coach, and hopefully get back to a good mental state.

rc90

September 27th, 2021 at 2:45 PM ^

Greg Schiano's decision to go for it on fourth and ten with 29 seconds left in the half was completely bizarre.

I think Schiano assumed Harbaugh would just kneel down anyway, and go to the half with his nice 17 point lead. I mean, I certainly was surprised by that pass.

EDIT: Argh, 14 point lead.

gbdub

September 27th, 2021 at 3:44 PM ^

From that point on the field though? A field goal attempt was easily achievable with a couple of reasonable completions. The big play to set up TD attempts was a surprise, but that wasn't even really the intent of that play. 

I doubt even Ferentz kneels out a half with the ball at midfield and multiple timeouts in his pocket. 

TrueBlue2003

September 28th, 2021 at 1:33 AM ^

It was Michigan's 44 and there was 22 seconds left when they got it.  Harbaugh is very conservative so def a decent chance he just kneels out that lead but a couple completions in 22 seconds isn't that easy for a college team, especially one that barely throws.  I didn't think it was a terrible decision, and in fact, wouldn't mind Harbaugh being more aggressive in games in which we're clear underdogs (OSU is really the only comp for that but I'd rather never punt against OSU).

L'Carpetron Do…

September 27th, 2021 at 4:37 PM ^

Yeah, this was almost a turtling job for the ages. The problem wasn't that they let Rutgers back in the game or played a bad second half, but it was that they relapsed into the kind of play/mindset that has haunted them in the past. This is how they lost games in infurtiating fashion the last few years. Stevenrjking is pretty on the money with that comment. Last year I wrote a diary about the anatomy of a Michigan loss (but never posted it) and a lot of those same patterns were there in the second half on Saturday. 

I haven't fallen into the sort of despair that most mgobloggers now find themselves, but I admit it's troubling. I just hope the staff notices it (it's a new year, trying to be hopeful) and never turns back. Let's put it behind us!  GO BLUE!!

BlueinLansing

September 27th, 2021 at 2:56 PM ^

Our only hope is that was a bad half of football by a team that knows it.  We've only had that thought or similar for each of the last 17 seasons.  I'm sure it will be different this time.

taistreetsmyhero

September 27th, 2021 at 2:58 PM ^

I predicted this team would go 7-5 and so did everyone else. Even after… that, a reversion to that level of pessimism is not reasonable. A reversion to the same old thing—9-3 or thereabouts, losing most of the exciting games, not being particularly competitive against Ohio State—is, and here we're in the same treadmill it seems like we've always been on.

Michigan can exceed expectations this year and still put up something entirely unsatisfying. Too good to fire, not good enough to enjoy.

I think, like Brian, I've lost my ability to enjoy Michigan football. So few games in the season "matter," and we rarely win those games. It is near impossible for me to watch a game against a bad/mediocre game and enjoy the performance for what it is, instead of what it means for future big games.

But I don't know if it is the 9-3 treadmill or the fact I just don't enjoy Harbaugh's brand of football. 

andrewgr

September 27th, 2021 at 3:28 PM ^

"Harbaugh's brand of football" is a really under-rated observation.  The offense just isn't fun to watch most of the time.  Throwing the ball around, getting the ball to the best skill players in creative ways, and other modern tactics are just plain more fun to watch.  3 yards in a cloud of dust is really frustrating, when you see teams with less talent doing so much more.

bronxblue

September 27th, 2021 at 5:29 PM ^

So the fact UM came into the game leading the nation in 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80+ yard plays and averaging about 6.8 ypp is boring, but Duke averaging 7.8 ypa in the air is the height of offensive brilliance and a blast to watch?

What I've largely learned this game is that there's a subset of UM fans who are inclined to be miserable and it's not worth trying to figure out rationally why they feel that way.

gbdub

September 27th, 2021 at 4:14 PM ^

so few games in the season "matter,"

Who decides that? Is the season of every team except the 4 that make the CFP pointless? Why do we treat football so differently than basketball (is every season without a final 4 banner an unenjoyable failure?)

It is near impossible for me to watch a game against a bad/mediocre [team] and enjoy the performance for what it is

Sounds like a you problem as much as a team problem. Part of the issue here is defining every team as mediocre as if that's an insurmountable flaw. Most teams are mediocre, that's what mediocre means. And yet great teams lose to mediocre ones every season. "That's why they play the game (TM)" You can only play the team that's on the schedule that week.

We're only blessed with 12 football Saturdays a year. If you come out on the good side of 9 of those and are still miserable - maybe just find a different form of entertainment that doesn't hurt you?

UgLi Eric

September 27th, 2021 at 3:00 PM ^

The Rutgers game was the college football version of a bottle episode. We saved what little time we had preparing for the same Rutgers team as 2020, at home, with more facial hair, sans Dwumfour, plus a few transfers in order to get a "second bye week" in and to plan for the game next weekend. It was a mistake that nearly cost us, but we are all the better for it and will come out having planned better for Wisconsin. It's taking a book from OSU's playbook where they just out athlete the bad teams and rise up for the big games, losing to a Purdue on a rare occasion. 

Either that or we just have to accept what Brian is saying as fact. 

Greg McMurtry

September 27th, 2021 at 3:32 PM ^

Good post and this is the only other possible scenario. 
 

This forum has gotten very annoying in that there are a few negative nancies and a few others claiming everyone is a negative nancy. Then when a rational personal has a valid concern about the passing game or play calling, that person is labeled negative, gets blasted with downvotes and there’s no room for any discussion.

gbdub

September 27th, 2021 at 4:20 PM ^

 Then when a rational personal has a valid concern about the passing game or play calling

Eeyore has a lot of rational concerns too. He's still a bore, because no one wants to be negative all the time. If all you do is talk about "concerns", that's not a discussion, that's a gripe fest. 

Seriously, read any game thread. It's not just a few "negative nancies", it's "the sky is falling fire everyone" any time anything goes bad. 

Spitfire

September 27th, 2021 at 3:00 PM ^

Best part of the article is about the contrast between our offense and Rutgers. They were trying all sorts of things to keep our defense off balance. We seem to think we can just out muscle teams like it's the 70s all over again. It always seems to get worse in tight games too. Why can't our QBs run?  

thisisnotrandy

September 27th, 2021 at 3:03 PM ^

Our D-Coordinator wasn't brought in to stop 8 yard hitches and out routes.  His only job is to stop crossing routes.  Our defense only takes away one thing every year, two years late.  At first we took away screens, then slot fades, and now crossing routes.

The Homie J

September 27th, 2021 at 3:05 PM ^

UGH.  Here come the BPONE'rs.  We're fucking 4-0.  We played one bad half of football (after trashing said team in the first half).  God I can't stand the eternal dourness that permiates this traumatized bunch of "fans."  You'd think we were staring at a 1-2 record where our QB has thrown more picks than touchdowns and our run offense had never crested 150 yards in a game and our defense was wilting from carrying the team...oh wait that's WIsconsin, the team we're facing this weekend.

"Michigan's second half didn't lose this game; it felt like it lost future games."

Oh for fuck's sake, we're kvetching about hypothetical situations now.  "Yeah we might be 4-0 and might have just beat a decent team while never trailing but let's fucking worry about a situation that hasn't occured yet.

If we get waxed by Wisconsin on the road, fine, be a bunch of whiny doomsayers.  But right now, we're an undefeated team with a few POSSIBLE issues that only look bad if you look at a narrow slice of a tiny amount of data rather than the whole.  Let's wait until things actually suck before we crown ourselves king of the shit pile.

bronxblue

September 27th, 2021 at 3:06 PM ^

I said this already but "this is the same old song and Michigan is going to be jogging at a mediocre pace on a mediocre treadmill forever and ever amen OR they take something away from this game and play better and bomb someone worth bombing on the road (which I assume doesn't include Wisconsin now)" is just a tiring outlook on the world.  It covers virtually the entire spectrum of possible outcomes, so while you're likely to be "right" it's like going on the Price is Right and betting $1 on a brand new car - you'll never bust even if you aren't close.

Michigan isn't an elite team this year, but for gawd's sake the #5 team in the country had to come back against Colorado State at home and couldn't crack 200 yards of total offense against Iowa St.  Clemson just lost 2 of their first 4 games and probably should have lost to GT.  Auburn needed a 4th-down conversion with under a minute to play to beat Georgia St. at home.  Wisconsin and ND played a game in which neither of them looked remotely consistent on offense and ND's defense/ST scored more than their offense did.  Oklahoma has tried to lose games to Tulane, Nebraska, and WVU, winning those games by a combined 15 points.  MSU picked up 8 yards of total offense in the second half against Nebraska and were saved by poor punt coverage by the Cornhuskers and Martinez throwing one of his usual bad interceptions.  Michigan isn't Alabama or Georgia, but they've thrown up way fewer eggs than a lot of teams we typically consider "good" and perhaps, and I may be wrong, they just played a bad half and experienced some bad luck and they'll bounce back...from this win.  

Also, I'd like to point out that three coaches this place has been clamoring to replace Harbaugh were PJ Fleck (who lost at home to BGSU), Tom Allen (who barely beat a bad WKU team at home and is 2-2), and Matt Campbell (who lost to Baylor).  There are few, if any, saviors out there, and thinking the grass is always greener doesn't always hold up.  But then again, at least it would give us all a different coach to blame for a 4-0 team having played poorly for a half against the nation's #24 defense. 

tecknogyk

October 1st, 2021 at 6:34 PM ^

Thank you, so tired of the pessimism.  I hate that college football fandom has become this pessimistic all or nothing thing.  It's absurd when you consider that 99% of college football has not been, nor will they be, what Alabama or OSU has been the last decade.  It's like fans want to be miserable.  It didn't used to be like this.

1145SoFo

September 27th, 2021 at 3:10 PM ^

It's mystifying. Seems like we have one out of every three games where the Speed In Space has arrived and then it goes back in the bin. Shades of the Army game from a couple years ago.

First person to get Gattis drunk at 8-Ball and relay an honest description of how gameplanning and playcalling happens with Harbaugh gets.... an, uh..., appreciative upvote from me.

gbdub

September 27th, 2021 at 3:11 PM ^

This was the part of Best and Worst you should have quoted:

I wanted to make it clear that the part of this fanbase I find most annoying is the assumption that bad things are right around the corner and preemptively bracing themselves for it with detached irony.  This isn’t intended as a subtweet of this site’s main writers but BPONE remains the worst thing this site has created by a huge margin mostly because it tries to ignore the fact that being a fan and being irrationally hurt by wins and losses is part of the deal with following college sports.  The ride, for lack of a better term, is part of the deal with being a fan, and that means being up and being down.  Trying to preemptively be mad about bad things that may happen in the future just so you can point it out you called it early drives me fucking insane.  It’s not cool, it’s not being better than everyone else, it’s just annoying and derivative.

The Homie J

September 27th, 2021 at 3:26 PM ^

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Yes, 100 times yes.  Hope and happiness can be fleeting in college football.  Why'd you'd be more concerned about purposely feeling bad instead of just riding the highs when they're there and accepting the lows as they come, I'll never know.  Feels like this fanbase loves misery porn.

rc90

September 27th, 2021 at 3:43 PM ^

I appreciate his point, but it seems like he's stuck a bit in a meta BPONE, which doesn't sound much healthier than BPONE.

Everybody wants to see a good, maybe even just decent, passing attack, and maybe throw in some easy yards from QB reads. That's been a problem for Harbaugh. It wasn't so great under BoMoCarr either. Hell, even in 1997 watching the offense could get annoying sometimes. We're all in a marriage here, and pretending our spouse doesn't have an obvious flaw won't make it go away. And, again, yeah, I get it, that harping on the flaw over and over isn't going to make the situation any more pleasant either. It takes work, day after day, to get through this.

gbdub

September 27th, 2021 at 3:50 PM ^

We're not in a marriage, we're fans of 19-22 year olds throwing an inflated piece of leather around. 

We don't need "expectations" (and we aren't entitled to them). It shouldn't take "work" to "get through this".

That's the problem here, taking this all ultra-seriously such that you can't even enjoy the fun parts. Paving Washington should be fun. If you spent that whole game annoyed about a game scheduled in November, or the game Washington had played the week before, maybe lighten up a bit and enjoy the ride? 

dr eng1ish

September 27th, 2021 at 9:13 PM ^

Unfortunately, as Brian told us himself in the season preview essay, he is not capable of writing rationally about Michigan right now. I totally get it, he's got a lot of sad stuff going on in his life apparently. But he should really reflect on how useful it is bring all that stuff to us in the form of game columns. Because they are really more about his own psychological state than the actual facts of how the season has gone.

AC1997

September 27th, 2021 at 3:27 PM ^

Lots of emotions reading this - and watching that second half.  I am of the opinion that we are seeing the limitations of Gattis as an OC.  While I have no doubt that Harbaugh has overall influence with philosophy (don't turn it over, run the ball, keep my QB healthy for once) it is clearly Gattis calling the plays and likely creating the game plan.  Harbaugh isn't calling up to the booth and saying, "don't run those plays we ran two weeks ago - just keep doing what you're doing."  

I think Gattis schemes up a plan and sticks to it without a long list of plays or variation.  While Borges seemed to have a deep playbook that he pulled randomly from without logic, Gattis seems to have a shorter list of plays that he sticks to even when they aren't working.  

That being said, this year was never going to be "perfect season that makes us happy every single game".  Looking around the landscape of the country there are countless teams struggling with ugly losses, narrow wins against bad teams, sloppy play, and underperforming talent/coaches.  How does Matt Campbell look right now?  How about Oklahoma and their staff?  Even bulletproof OSU is going through a mini-crisis.  

For me this year is all about one week at a time - win and advance.  Hopefully they just got a needed wakeup call for the players and coaches before the biggest game of the year.