[Marc-Gregor Campredon]

The Thousand-Yard Stare Comment Count

Brian September 27th, 2021 at 1:57 PM

9/18/2021 – Michigan 20, Rutgers 13 – 4-0, 1-0 Big Ten

Well, at least it took 3.5 games to get back to the same old feeling. The grim one, where you're staring grimly at the grim field where grim things are happening and then Michigan and its steamroller of a run game takes a delay of game penalty instead of attempting a fourth and one. After that there's another penalty before Michigan can finally punt. The color drains out of the world until you forget where you are and momentarily think you're at Eastern's stadium, which is now gray—not just gray, but gray-gray, ultragray—in some sort of marketing stunt turned guerilla art installation.

Grey-Field-at-Rynearson-Stadium

Say what you want about the Eastern Michigan Eagles' proficiency at football, but never slander their perspective on the fatalistic trudge we call life. Football is healthy and good to have influence your thoughts.

At times like these the man with the mustache arrives in my head.

screen-shot-2016-09-05-at-10-31-53-pm

You can find him by googling for "sad Florida State fan," and you will discover that this is now a bustling corner of the image search internet populated by folks in glitter and surrender cobras from sea to shining sea. But mustache man is still first, because he is a perfect distillation of the emptiness of a bad football game where your team gets to do the fun parts three plays, and only three plays, at a time while the opposition dunks on you.

He is also a tribute to the human ability to read nuance into facial expressions. What makes Sad Mustache Man so compelling? He merely stares ahead, stoic. His brow furrows slightly. The way he communicates the existential angst of Ole Miss punching your face in is mysterious. Blindingly clear, and somehow impossible to define. He stares into the middle distance and attempts to keep all his atoms in the same place.

--------------------------------------------

Since Michigan was playing Rutgers, "dunks on you" means "scores ten points in a half and still loses." The feeling is still the same. Michigan's second half didn't lose this game; it felt like it lost future games. At some point down the road when Michigan gets conked everyone watching will think about how the second half of Rutgers foretold this woeful fate.

Which, I guess, fine, okay, yeah. I predicted this team would go 7-5 and so did everyone else. Even after… that, a reversion to that level of pessimism is not reasonable. A reversion to the same old thing—9-3 or thereabouts, losing most of the exciting games, not being particularly competitive against Ohio State—is, and here we're in the same treadmill it seems like we've always been on.

Michigan can exceed expectations this year and still put up something entirely unsatisfying. Too good to fire, not good enough to enjoy. That's not fate, of course: maybe Greg Schiano is pretty good at this and Michigan will receive a wake-up call and actually bomb someone worth bombing on the road. One half doesn't erase the other halves.

But when you keep walking down the same road year after year it's hard to expect that something's different until it actually is. Until then, a steady stare into the middle distance is always a good option. Doesn't usually get you put on TV unless you're a perfect distillation of sadness, and even then there's usually someone just as sad but dressed more outlandishly.

AWARDS

Known Friends and Trusted Agents Of The Week

51521193190_75842bcb79_k

I AM DETECTING AN ILLEGALITY [Barron]

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]you're the man now, dog

#1 Aidan Hutchinson. Didn't have a massive game statistically but is likely to check in with a monster UFR number. Had a sack, bowled over an OL on the direct snap to Pacheco, probably should have drawn multiple holding flags. Making up for meh performances otherwise.

#2 Nikhai Hill-Green. Shuffled through traffic on the second to last Rutgers drive to stick folks short of the sticks on critical plays. Led team in tackles, a fair few of which were important. Preseason hype seems not crazy.

#3 Brad Robbins. Ok he had a bad one but the one he dropped at the three that took a right turn out of bounds was important, and he limited the dangerous Cruicshank to just one punt return attempt.

Honorable mention: Josh Ross turned in a good performance with one thunderous TFL before leaving; Chris Hinton got off a block on one of the key Hill-Green stuffs to help; Dax Hill was a bit up and down but did stuff some perimeter stuff.

KFaTAotW Standings.

(points: #1: 8, #2: 5, #3: 3, HMs one each. Ties result in somewhat arbitrary assignments.)

16: The OL (#1 Wash, #1 NIU)
14: Aidan Hutchinson (HM WMU, #2 Wash, #1 Rutgers)
11: Blake Corum (#2 WMU, T3 Wash, T2 NIU)
8: Ronnie Bell (#1 WMU)
7: Hassan Haskins (HM WMU, T3 Wash, T2 NIU)
6: Nikhai Hill-Green(HM NIU, #2 Rutgers)
5: Dax Hill (#3 WMU, HM NIU, HM Rutgers)
4: AJ Henning (HM WMU, #3 NIU),
3: Donovan Edwards(T2 NIU), Josh Ross (HM Wash, HM NIU, HM Rutgers)
1: Andrew Vastardis (HM WMU),Mike Sainristil (HM WMU), Brad Robbins (HM Wash), Jake Moody (HM Wash), Mazi Smith (HM Wash), Gemon Green(HM NIU), Cornelius Johnson(HM NIU), Chris Hinton (HM Rutgers)

Who's Got It Better Than Us(?) Of The Week

Michigan's opening drive is a 17-play marathon featuring two passes, a touchdown, and the absorption of half a quarter.

Honorable mention: Hill-Green gets back to back sticks to functionally end the game; bonafide RPO gets Roman Wilson a chunk on Michigan's second efficient TD drive to start; ditto the Sainristil catch; officials ignore a blatant block in the back on Henning's return.

image​MARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

Can I say the entire second half? No? Okay, uh, McNamara missing three straight open receivers on one of the three-and-outs. (Sainristil could have caught the first one, yes; still low.)

Honorable mention: The rest of the second half.

[After THE JUMP: up up up up nope nope nope nope]

OFFENSE

A cliff, visualized. Via Seth:

image (45)

Many people have already noted that the flattening out exactly correlates with McNamara being on the receiving end of a targeting penalty. The big jump at play ~32 is the strike to Sainristil and the ensuing ejection, and after that it was a slow drip of disaster. McNamara went from 8/9 to start to 1/7 to finish. The possibilities there:

  • coincidence,
  • McNamara was hurt and either nobody noticed or he successfully concealed some mild concussion symptoms, or
  • McNamara wasn't hurt but was rattled.

I think coincidence is the most likely, especially because the amount of data we have on him is so limited. But we're again in a spot where we're wondering if this guy is actually the guy and glancing at the five-star freshman. One negative of the monster run game is that Michigan's called fewer passes than anyone outside of service academies, so we have a tiny amount of data.

The coaches have more and their reticence to open things up may be an indicator.

Jeremy Gallon graduated. McNamara's lone incompletion before the cliff was this:

51520264581_e320c41d6b_k

[Barron]

That's a perfect corner route that got broken up by an excellent no-look play from the DB, but also maybe this should be someone other than Sainristil. (I saw some back and forth online about whether Sainristil should have brought this in. My opinion is no, there's really no opportunity to out-beast a guy who punches the ball the instant you touch it.)

A frustrating contrast. Rutgers does not have Michigan's talent level but stuck in this game and significantly outrushed Michigan with a bunch of janky college crap. Swing it to the flat, run the quarterback, run with some WRs, use a lot of misdirection, etc. It felt like Michigan did almost none of that. There was a significant amount of variation in the between-the-tackles ground game, but once Rutgers adjusted and started dispensing a bunch of two-yard runs Michigan did not have a plan B. Nor did they make any attempts to get janky college yards until very late.

WR screens? 0. AJ Henning touches? 0. Perimeter run plays of any description? 1, that coming on a bash play to Corum deep in the fourth quarter. QB runs? 1, which Rutgers predicted and blitzed right into.

It's mystifying. Seems like we have one out of every three games where the Speed In Space has arrived and then it goes back in the bin. Shades of the Army game from a couple years ago.

Reads: scanty. Michigan got a couple of chunks off of RPO action, which are the first of the year IIRC. Otherwise it did not feel like the QB was live in the mesh point until the very end of the game, when Rutgers correctly anticipated Michigan would go to the QB run well and shot a LB directly at McNamara:

You have to wonder how live that read is or if it's just a pull with the expectation that the LB will go after the RB. We've been through this with QB after QB after QB and I have no expectations this will change going forward.

51516787246_e10db49579_k

that guy's never going to catch you [Barron]

Running back détente is always temporary. Seth's likely to have a fair number of negatives from this game for Haskins and Corum; on my rewatch I caught a number of plays where gaps did open up but RBs did not hit them, and I thought Corum in particular had at least a few opportunities for a bounce as Rutgers overplayed the interior.

In one sense this is a testament to Corum's RB instincts. It's unusual for little fast guys to not try to Mike Shaw it a bunch, usually to their detriment. On the other hand, I mean try it a few times? Fast, you are fast.

DEFENSE

51519473867_08590130fa_k

unsettling [Barron]

That was more in line with expectations. This was not a good run game—to say the least—entering the game but Michigan ended up having a lot of problems because the defensive tackles were largely a non-factor. Grinding up the middle with Vedral as Pacheco took linebacker attention outside was effective for Rutgers because Michigan's DLs could not win one on one battles and Hutchinson was being followed around by a posse of dudes*.

I don't think there's much to do about this. At certain spots you are who you are, and Michigan is pretty meh at DT.

*[One notable instance of this was on the last Rutgers drive, where they spent a slot WR to blindside him and knock him down on a pass rush.]

Endurance. Michigan rotated heavily, which on the one hand was somewhat alarming. On the podcast I suggested that if you have eight defensive tackles you don't really have any. On the other hand that did seem to come in handy late when Michigan's defense stiffened—not at all what you would expect when Rutgers is the only team staying on the field. Having eight meh defensive tackles is better than having two, I guess.

Jordan Whittley did not play, which feels like it was a bigger loss than you might expect for a guy who's only going to get a dozen snaps.

51516732896_00a418f4c2_k

this is not going far [Campredon]

WHAT ARE WE DOING? Takes a special kind of baffling thing reoccurring repeatedly for me to start swearing in the stands at this late date, but Michigan's defense accomplished that by repeatedly offering Rutgers a free eight yards on simple hitches on the outside. Completely bizarre. You are playing Noah Vedral!

Rutgers has two long passing plays against FBS opposition this year; they were a TE seam and a five yard hitch. I find it difficult to believe that Vedral hitting a back shoulder throw on the first Rutgers third down threw Michigan's pregame planning into a tizzy. Covering the flats was a problem early against NIU, and then Michigan adjusted. It was baffling, frustrating, and inexplicable that Michigan was handing easy yardage chunks to Rutgers deep into the second half.

Vedral's other attempted shots at the sideline both went OOB. [shakes hands violently]

Slow your roll. Dax Hill had two different clean shots at Vedral on slot blitzes RU did not pick up and whiffed both. This tends to happen when really fast guys come off the corner—I am currently thinking about Brandon Harrison and his remarkable ability to get dodge by quarterbacks—and hopefully he'll be able to gear down a bit and finish those plays.

SPECIAL TEAMS

Got away with one. Entertaining sequence on the AJ Henning punt return where I saw an obvious block in the back, the officials threw a flag, then picked it up, then got to watch the stadium scoreboard demonstrate that the obvious block in the back was very very obvious.  I was shocked when the next play did not have a holding call; one dollar says the extremely weak roughing the passer call a few minutes later was related to picking that flag up.

Orin Incandenza business. This ball done be remote controlled.

Robbins celebrated like he'd birthed the savior of the world and fair enough.

Noped out. Rutgers tried a couple kickoffs to Corum and while he didn't break one he was close enough that Rutgers decided pop-up kicks were the better part of valor. Michael Barrett had a nice catch and return on one of them to get out to the 35.

MISCELLANEOUS

Oh no baby. Greg Schiano's decision to go for it on fourth and ten with 29 seconds left in the half was completely bizarre. The score was 17-3, which means okay yeah scoring at the end of the half would be an important boost. But 1) fourth and ten, 2) you are Rutgers, 3) you're probably giving Michigan another possession.

The ensuing slant was both broken up and short of the sticks, and then Michigan immediately hit a big RPO to get down to the Rutgers 5. Only a post-targeting McNamara miss on to an open Schoonmaker prevented the worst case scenario.

Shortly after. Michigan elected to kick a field goal on third down with five seconds left in the half. This I'm not too ticked off about that because the thing they probably should have done—throw a goal-line fade—is not likely to convert. But it's coming down before five seconds run off the clock.

We are the premiere Crean Documenting Service in the Midwest. Puttin' a lot of weird guys on the sideline:

51516382306_8bdc4bf32e_k

[Barron]

This gives me an excuse to put this here.

Thanks, Tom.

HERE

The State of our Open Threads:

So, how did we feel about as it was happening? I will just say that there were fewer fucks given than I would have actually thought - only 176 of them, to be exact. Still, when you consider that we only generated 18 of them last week, that's 9.8 times the fucks and probably a corresponding overall increase in fan stress. It's charted in comparison to "fire" here:

In the Harbaugh era, and in the Hoke era when this collection effort began, there has always been at least a mild correlation between our use of "fuck" and our wanting of heads, and while four games isn't telling, you can see they do trail each other somewhat. Normally, this relationship will solidify by the time the OSU rolls around. I can only imagine why that is.

Stephen King on the eternalness of Michigan's offense:

What is telling, to me, about these analyses is that if you change some details, they could be written about Saturday's win over Rutgers. This, despite a complete overhaul in the offensive staff in that time. We've seen the OL coach change twice, the OC change once, different attempts at WR coaches, and now a new RB coach as well. The offensive personnel is completely different as well. The only things those offenses have in common with this team is the uniforms and the head coach.

Best and Worst:

And so with every 3-and-out by the offense and every interminable odyssey by the defensive series it felt like the game was not so much slipping away as getting unnecessarily close.  It’s difficult to describe and probably comes across as homer-ish, but this game never felt quite like last year’s contest in NJ, where Rutgers raced out to a big lead behind superior play.  I’m not saying you should but if you so inclined, go back and re-watch even just the highlights of that game.  Rutgers put up nearly 6 ypp in that game and had 486 yards of total offense while also committing 12 (!) penalties on offense for 99 (!!) yards.  Their defense struggled in the second half but they were consistently getting pressure early on and Michigan barely had 100 yards of total offense before McNamara came in.  Rutgers looked like the better team in that game and Michigan was lucky they were able to stay close enough.  Those were two equal-ish teams in terms of talent and execution playing a defensively-challenged game of chicken, with Rutgers finally blinking in overtime.  It felt not unlike a lot of Big 12 games in that respect.

Comments

JBLPSYCHED

September 27th, 2021 at 3:35 PM ^

I'm not defending 'knowing' what the future will bring but with all due respect it's not insane; it's PTSD. We're on the road we've driven many times before and approaching an intersection where we've crashed many times. It's human to wince and flinch and swear and sweat while we're gripping the wheel tightly and hoping this time is different.

Vasav

September 27th, 2021 at 5:25 PM ^

I sympathize, but under Harbaugh this crash has mostly been against Ohio State. Outside of 2020 there were a three other notable blowouts against Wisconsin and Penn State - but he typically beats teams who are ranked lower or unranked. Notable exceptions: Utah 2015 (who ended up ranked), Iowa 2016, Sparty and the Bowl game in 2017...I think that's it? Also good times before Ohio you may have forgotten - beating a ranked Sparty on the road during the revenge tour, blowing out a top 15 Penn St, blowing out a top 10 Notre Dame, upsetting a top 15 Iowa.

And for the first time since 2018, Ohio State looks beatable. I'm not super confident about any game going forward, but this season has the old-timey late-BCS #CHAOS vibes. I'm going to enjoy it week over week.

ERdocLSA2004

September 27th, 2021 at 4:23 PM ^

What’s amazing is the amount of people who somehow forget the years of promising starts of beating up on lesser opponents only to end the year with embarrassing, soul-crushing losses after getting our hopes up.  Hoping for the best but expecting the worst is the only safe way to follow this program. 

CursedWolverine

September 27th, 2021 at 3:35 PM ^

Spot on. There's a phrase I like to remember in situations like these, "Borrowing stress from the future." People are so focused on what could go wrong, they are bringing their worst case future scenario into the present and acting as if it has already happened.

There will be plenty of time for being upset and hand-wringing if those potential losses come to pass, if that's how people choose to process them. No need to cause grief for yourself today over a hypothetical. 

Carpetbagger

September 27th, 2021 at 2:43 PM ^

People who can't enjoy 4-0 baffle me. Some people have no ability to rein in their emotional extremes at all, and then revel in that inability to do so like it's a good thing.

Living with some of you must be like living with Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. I feel sorry for your significant others.

Hug your cat or dog or something.

 

BlockM

September 27th, 2021 at 3:33 PM ^

lol, I get your point, but the analogy only works if you treat losing to Staee as some sort of awful death.

If in this analogy the worst case was the car eventually ending up safely at the tail-end of a frustratingly long traffic jam or something, I would definitely just enjoy the view on the way down.

Angry-Dad

September 27th, 2021 at 4:28 PM ^

I get the frustration, but I am also enjoying the season.  The second half was rough and everyone knows it (especially the team)  So far I have been pleasently surprised and will give them the benefit of the doubt that one bad half out of 8 is a one off and not a tale of things to come.  

Maybe naive but we will find out soon enough.  No way Bucky is going to let Michigan run up the middle.  Time for Gattis and company to get creative.  

DennisFranklinDaMan

September 27th, 2021 at 7:38 PM ^

You make a good point, and I don't mean to nit-pick. Just ... the second half wasn't "rough" in that it was ineffective. I think we can all deal with a half where stuff doesn't work and we eke out a win. What so many of us are confounded by was that the coaches seemed unable to see what was happening and ... I hate to use the word "adapt," because it seems to suggest some sophistication and enlightened football knowledge, when all I really mean is, "see what's not working and stop doing it."

That's what's so bizarre. We're not complaining that we didn't crush Rutgers. Close games happen. It's the way this happened. So familiar to Army and Iowa two years ago. We're legitimately confused and trying to propose explanations that might make sense.

I'm delighted we're 4-0. Honestly, after last year, I thought we might be 2-2 at this point, or even 1-3. But I wrote repeatedly in the off-season that I didn't care so much about our record this season as being reassured that we were able to exploit mismatches, get the ball to our skill players, and actually play normal football. After four games ... I have not found that reassurance.

Has anyone? Are any of the people so scornful of those of us who are frustrated actually confident in our offensive play-calling ability? Because that's what we're talking about. Not results. Not scores. Just ... are Harbaugh and Gattis actually able to play-call at the most basic BCS level? Schiavo clearly is. He saw what was not working for his defense on the first few drives, and changed it -- and found what was working for his offense in the second half and stayed with it.

Is that so damned complicated?  

DennisFranklinDaMan

September 27th, 2021 at 9:47 PM ^

I'm being serious -- people here seem to make a lot of fun of Schiavo. I honestly don't know -- is he a clown or a consistent failure? Seems like what he's done with Rutgers -- twice -- is pretty impressive. I'm not calling for him to take over at Michigan or even calling him a great coach. But ... damn, to make that program competitive seems like ... he's ok, no?

Sorry, if there's a track record of embarrassment in Schiavo's past, I get it. I just haven't heard of it. Why do people mock?

 

tecknogyk

October 1st, 2021 at 6:11 PM ^

This 100%.  I get the feeling, as I to get it too, but I also know it can be so much worse.  I do not understand why more of the fanbase doesn't have that same feeling.  I mean, we all lived through the RichRod/Hoke years right?  The reality is that almost all of college football is in similar or worse situations to Michigan, and actually, this year you could make the argument that everyone is.  Perspective is important.

Blue Vet

September 27th, 2021 at 2:32 PM ^

I can’t decide which feels worse, the combo platter of awkward play calls & execution OR not knowing why.

The default usually slides to blaming Harbaugh, and that’s not an unreasonable assessment. 

On the other hand, most of what I read here and elsewhere makes the problems & solutions seem fairly obvious. If so, he and his coaching staff seem likely to notice and fix, but they don’t. 

So for me, my default feelz is not knowing why.

KC Wolve

September 27th, 2021 at 3:03 PM ^

I'm in the same boat. Maybe it is Harbaugh or maybe Gattis is a terrible play caller??? I just find it a bit hard to believe that Gattis is so worried about Harbaugh that he wouldn't call up one of his "good plays" to get a first down or whatever. Would Harbaugh really get in his ass for getting a first down or running a successful play? Is Gattis too scared to do it? I'm dubious of this situation and think Gattis just isn't that great of a play caller yet. If he is that scared and isn't allowed to call his own game, i'm not sure why he is sticking around ruining his reputation? That doesn't make sense either. 

gbdub

September 27th, 2021 at 3:36 PM ^

Small sample size? The trouble with consecutive 3 and outs is they don't really present much opportunity for creativity, just not enough plays.

The interior runs weren't working - but then, that's ~2 attempts per "drive". If you see an obvious execution biff that causes it, do you call a different play, or do you have Sherrone yell at the OL missing a block (or Hart chew out the RB for missing a cut) and tell them to try it again with less brain fart? 

Pretty much every (all 6 of them - small samples!) passing play in the second half "worked" from a playcalling perspective. So is it an execution problem? Sure, but then again you generally expect to miss at least 30% of your throws on a good day. So is it a run of bad luck, or is your QB broken? Will pulling the QB make it worse or better? Whoops, now it's 3 and out number 3, and you're in a "can't afford to make a big error" mode and your playcalling gets even tighter...

TrueBlue2003

September 27th, 2021 at 3:48 PM ^

It's ultimately Harbaugh's fault for not hiring the right guys.  When Stephen King makes the point that the constant is the head coach through all the OC changes, sure, and the other constant is OCs that are so bad that literally no one else wants to hire them for the same job.

Seriously, since Jed Fisch who actually has gotten another job, let's check in with the Michigan OCs since:

Tim Drevno - offensive analyst at UCLA has not had another job as high as OC and has largely even failed at actual coaching positions since leaving (OL coach at USC)

Pep Hamilton - went to the mighty DC defenders and hasn't risen above QB coach since that league folded.

Josh Gattis - not wanted by Saban as OC (clear sign of asymmetric information) when Lockley left. Has been terrible for Michigan in three seasons which was one too many.  He needed to be a guy that was either good for two years and parlayed that into a HC job or you fire him.  You can't keep a guy around for a third year that has been so bad that no one else wants him despite being a young guy who is a good recruiter.

I don't really think Harbaugh wants to be involved in the offense but he's hiring such bad OCs that he probably doesn't have much choice.  It's not like he's ruining good OCs.  None of these guys have done anything since leaving (and Gattis had never done anything period).

Harbaugh's failure to go out and get Joe Moorhead this offseason will probably be his undoing.

My guess is the only possible answer is to turn Gattis into a Kerry Coombs guy that just coaches the WRs and let Matt Weiss see what he can do.

TrueBlue2003

September 27th, 2021 at 5:15 PM ^

Yes, that's why I said it's ultimately his fault.  But I'm saying that there is a glimmer of hope that he hits on an OC if retained and then can feel comfortable getting out of the way, which is better than if he needed to be involved so badly that he would certainly sabotage a good OCs efforts. We've at least never seen that.

I am disheartened that he retained Gattis after two really bad years that showed no promise.  So yeah, Harbaugh probably needs to go because a glimmer of hope isn't worth what Michigan can pay. 

But if we're operating on the assumption that the team will do enough this year for him not to be fired, I'll take a glimmer of hope that he'll finally actually hire a good OC.

Derek

September 27th, 2021 at 4:14 PM ^

Many of us watch a fair amount of college football every Saturday. We see lots of coaches take worse talent and do interesting things. We see some coaches take better talent and do interesting things. Then we see this staff unable to scheme its way out of the box against inferior talent. Ultimately, the answer is both: Harbaugh & Co. are bad, and we don't really know why.

AlbanyBlue

September 27th, 2021 at 10:21 PM ^

The answer to "why" is they don't see it as a problem. They had the lead. They had (have?) a lack of confidence in their QB specifically and the passing game in general. So they turtled. They defaulted to a super-conservative game plan like this regime has done so often in the past. 

Against Rutgers, it worked. The concern is that against many of the teams left on our schedule, it will not. Acknowledging this fact does not make me mopey (I'm not), miserable (I'm not that invested in the FB team with this staff), or a terrible fan (I will always be an M fan to the exclusion of essentially every other college team). 

theytookourjobs

September 27th, 2021 at 2:34 PM ^

Yeah, I was trying to be optimistic and got "Lucied"  It's hard not to think the stat line from Madison  will read something like the following;

Rushing - 40 attempts for 46 yds

Passing 7 of 11 for 60 yds

Final - Wiscy 23 / UM 13

Then I admit you guys were right and go fishing for the next 2 months.  Hope I'm wrong, doubt I am

 

The Deer Hunter

September 27th, 2021 at 2:36 PM ^

At some point down the road when Michigan gets conked everyone watching will think about how the second half of Rutgers foretold this woeful fate.

Perfect.

And that pic of Creepy Crean is an image I probably won't get out of my head for sometime...uhg.