Worst Lions Draft Ever?

Submitted by UNCWolverine on April 28th, 2023 at 7:39 PM

There's a lot of material to work with here. Fair over Moss quickly comes to mind. Charles Rogers was a doozy. But this is unreal. Instead of taking Bijan they decide to take a lesser back at #12 that would have absolutely been available at 18. Then at 18 they take a MLB (least valuable position player in the NFL?) that would have absolutely been available at 34. Then at 34 they take the 3rd best TE in the draft instead of the best TE that was taken by the Raiders a pick later. 

The lions are that guy in your fantasy league that drafts so poorly every year that you don't even make fun of him anymore. You just encourage him to keep putting his dead money in and keep trying. Or maybe it's just your drunk uncle....

drunk-uncle-612x380-1

ST3

April 28th, 2023 at 10:23 PM ^

Per ESPN, the Lions have now drafted the #28, 30, 33, 43 and 58th ranked players. Seems like a pretty good draft to me.

bighouseinmate

April 28th, 2023 at 10:38 PM ^

Robinson and Gibbs are NOT the same kind of running back. I wouldn’t have taken Robinson until near the back half of the first round. Gibbs is a completely different story, though. IMO he just may be the best offensive skill position player in this years draft and could be seen as a steal in a few years. 

TheLastHarbaugh

April 28th, 2023 at 10:54 PM ^

I mean if going into the draft people said you're getting...

Brian Branch at 12

Hendon Hooker at 18

Jack Campbell at 34

Jahmyr Gibbs at 45

Sam LaPorta at 68

...and we picked up a bunch of mid to late round draft capital (especially given Brad Holmes' ability to hit on those picks) people might not have liked that we didn't go harder on D early, but I think the overall reaction would be much more positive.

BlueMk1690

April 28th, 2023 at 11:50 PM ^

It's a bit puzzling all. To me the most notable thing is how eager many Lions fans are now to believe in their team because of that ultimately completely pointless run last season. Given how gullible and blue-eyed the fanbase is, can you really blame the franchise for being mediocre? What incentives do they have to get better?

It's like they're saying to their fans "Are you sure you want to keep giving us money? You know we'll just blow it, right?" and meanwhile Joe Shmoe from Clinton Township is like "How much do you need? Is everything I have on me enough? I only got 200 bucks..but I could go to an ATM you know..".

M_Born M_Believer

April 29th, 2023 at 9:32 PM ^

Man these HAWT takes are awesome to read.  So lets break this one down...

"Lions didn't upgrade historically bad run defense...."

A) They finished 29th (bad, but "historically bad"??)

B) They also started the youngest defense in the league last year (avg age 24) youth growing and gaining experience

C) The second half of the season, they had finished in the middle of the pack in rushing to move up from 32 to 29

D) They drafted the Top MIKE LB; the consensus best Hybrid Secondary player; and a HUGE NT.  You could, of course, argue all you want about "positional" value.  Its hogwash, rookie contracts are preset.  The rookie salary cap is the same whether a QB is your 1st pick or a punter is your first pick.  But your right, based upon your opinion alone, they did NOTHING to improve their run defense....

"are without a WR for 6 weeks (they were counting on for major production)"

A) Yup a WR that did not play much on an offense that finish 3rd in scoring last year...

B) Lets blow over also the fact that they drafted the best Flex RB with a 4.36 speed or the fact that they drafted a pass catching TE that were not on the 3rd highest scoring offense last year as well...

C) Said WR will actually be back by week 7 and will still have an impact of the final 11 weeks of the regular season as well as, hopefully, playoff games

D) Lets also gloss over the fact that said receiver was recovering from a torn ACL (Psst, he only played in 5 games and very limited action)  Pfft what a waste, certainly you can know EXACTLY how he is progressing from his recovery from ACL surgery (Side personal note, my 16 yo son is doing EXACTLY this right now.  He had his ACL blown out and torn meniscus last Sept 16 and is just now starting to play baseball again and it is very obvious that while is capable of playing, he is still no where near 100% yet.  So, yay, I can say I have watched this up close and understand the grueling PT one has to go through to get back to 100% ...)

"Lions are one QB injury away from being 3-14"  

Excellent analysis, problem is over half the teams in the NFL would be in the same situation...

 

Sec tion 39 Row 45

April 29th, 2023 at 3:53 AM ^

Worst one I recall was Reggie Rodgers way back when Daryl Rodgers was the head coach.  First round pick and very early (picks 1-5 or 6 maybe). Day or two after he gets drafted is involved in a drunk driving accident and kills someone. Never played a down.

CaliforniaNobody

April 29th, 2023 at 4:29 AM ^

Colts fan here who actually was upbeat about the current Lions regime seemingly before you Lions fans were. And yeah, it's been a rough draft on paper. Gibbs and Campbell will be good but that's really high for the 2nd RB and an off ball linebacker, and day 2 didn't change my mind with my concerns over Branch's athleticism. I am sure some of the picks will surprise me but not loving it on paper. Still believe in Campbell and the talent. 

shoes

April 29th, 2023 at 6:29 AM ^

I like the draft.  In addition to their skill sets they seem to have attitudes like their new head coach about football.  CBS ranked the Jack Campbell pick as an A+, though the same guy called their first pick a D.  

cobra14

April 29th, 2023 at 7:03 AM ^

The amount of people taking a dump on Mayer shows me how little a lot on this board understand football. Mayer will be a star in the NFL sooner rather than later. He’ll be the guy no one understands how he gets open he just gets open. 
 

Taking an Iowa TE from one of the worst offenses in college football is hilarious. 
 

Lions fans can justify anything. Never seen a fan base basically threw a parade down Woodward for missing the playoffs by one game.

The Denarding

April 29th, 2023 at 8:04 AM ^

My take as a lifelong lions fan has been consistent.    This regime has an actual plan, an actual culture and finds players who fit accordingly.    They don’t stray from it in anyway.   When you start being someone you aren’t or copying someone you can never be - you accomplish someone else goal not yours.   Dan C. appears to be built on accountability and Holmes is big on cultural fit.    I don’t love the positional value of the picks BUT can anyone here not see HONESTLY la porta, Campbell, Gibbs and Branch not being on the field getting meaningful reps?   They will ALL play and oddly many times situationally which means they feel they have enough talent to harvest and develop depth.   I think they wanted Witherspoon badly and he was probably top of their board.   Seahawks surprised them but they didn’t panic, had a trade in place, and got an extra pick.   The only player they drafted in this era who I believed didn’t really fit was Jameson Williams but otherwise I can’t look at their picks and feel like they don’t make sense from the standpoint of who they want to be culturally.  

swc_92

April 29th, 2023 at 10:44 AM ^

Worst draft ever? Definitely not - I think that practically any of Millen's drafts still holds that distinction. It does feel like the Lions reached up a round for many of these guys though. Time will tell, let's give them a shot and see how it plays out.  

UofM Die Hard …

April 29th, 2023 at 11:17 AM ^

This is an epically bad take. I think it was solid and I love the Hooker get, get him healthy and bake him in the oven for a couple years.  I like all the picks so far …and how can you say it’s the worst now?  Call us back in 2 years big fella 

Seeing as they crushed the draft last year, leadership has earned my trust so far 
 

 

AlbanyBlue

April 29th, 2023 at 11:59 AM ^

Too many responses to sift through, so if this has been said, I apologize.

If this wasn't Brad Holmes, it would be laughable. Total SOL. But Holmes has a good track record so far. My guess is he was actively trying to trade down more to get more picks, and there weren't any realistic takers. So he reached for Campbell -- which I am fine with, since we need LB help -- and LaPorta. LaPorta is a bit of a head-scratcher, since the scuttlebutt is he isnt a very good blocker, and we know (think?) that the Lions will still be run-heavier than many teams.

The real killer is Gibbs. I liked the trade-down, but Gibbs at 12? If they wanted an RB, then take Robinson at 6 and eat your flack for that move. Gibbs seems like a small dude that is going to get eaten up and injured in the league. So I dunno, Holmes has done fine, but this is weird. But if it wasn't Holmes, it would be WTF all the way.

I wonder if he feels comfortable working the second and later rounds of the draft but has trouble with top picks / first round.....time will tell I suppose.

JoeFink

November 9th, 2023 at 2:46 PM ^

Six months after the draft, I will say that the original post was the worst take ever.  Gibbs, LaPorta, Campbell and Branch all are exactly what the Lions were hoping they'd be.  Sorsdal looks like a steal.  Seriously, the OP is exactly why you don't read a few mock drafts and pretend like you know more than an NFL GM.