[Bryan Fuller]

Someone Is Wrong On The Internet; Someone Is Flat On The Field Comment Count

Brian September 13th, 2021 at 11:40 AM

9/11/2021 – Michigan 31, Washington 10 – 2-0

It is not, in fact, true that the Michigan fanbase is unique amongst fanbase in its capacity to self-immolate amongst news that in any non-sports context would be taken as "good." Take it from someone who spent years writing This Week In Schadenfreude, a trip through the most psychotic reaches of college football's internet underbelly. TWIS often featured teams who had won (in the sense that their team had a bigger number than the opponent) but had lost in a much more immediate and real way (because the third-string cornerback gave up a touchdown that one time). Sports brain always works the same way.

However, your author will concede if there was a national championship for hand-wringing, Michigan would be in the playoff conversation annually. On the one hand, this makes total sense given the last seventeen years. On the other, it is very annoying. The responses I got to this tweet…

…were split between "this tweet is annoying" and replies like "JJ MCARTHY NOW" that I found annoying. Sports tweeting is like driving: the only appropriate speed to be going is exactly the speed you are going. Everything else == jail.

In the cold, hard light of day on this Monday I can see both sides of the equation. Yes, it is pretty good that Michigan took a P5 opponent with some recent history of being a good defense and paved them in a way I haven't seen in a long time. On the podcast I referenced the 2019 ND game, but even that featured a large number of stuffed runs interspersed with big plays based off misdirection. In this game if Michigan didn't get four yards on a run it was a surprise. When's the last time that happened? Probably at some point when honorary captain Steve "Not Aidan's Dad" Hutchinson was roaming the field. And honestly, my recollection of Lloyd Carr offenses doesn't have anything like this in it. This felt like a game from the 70s.

Yes, it is pretty bad that Michigan seemed to have an aversion to passing that was also out of the 1970s. You can say this makes sense given the game context, and maybe it did. But it nonetheless feels bad when you end up in situations that are obviously passing downs and then barely pass. It conjures up ideas about what the offense will look like when it inevitably runs up against a team that doesn't get paved.

You can be forgiven if the internet has beaten this fact out of your head but it is possible to hold both of these thoughts in your head at once. I am not immune to this, either, despite my clucking. On the podcast I said that I didn't think this offense could beat Ohio State, and then immediately apologized because my expectations going into the season weren't "beat Ohio State," they were "ehhhh… bowl eligible?"

This is the grandeur and glory of sports fandom: you literally never have to be sane or happy. You can hop from grumbling about 7-5 to grumbling about 9-3 to grumbling about beating a P5 team by 21 in a game that wasn't actually that close, spiritually. These avenues are open to you, and you can take them, and anyone not going at your speed will seem insane. But also you can literally never be dissuaded from optimism. There was a certain kind of Cubs fan who thought this was the year, every year, and anyone not going at that speed was insane.

So you get these camps of people and give them a common allegiance and a way to communicate to each other and you get a great firestorm of anger in the midst of Michigan grinding a name brand Pac-12 school into a fine dust. Here too there is a choice. This is what is great about sports; this is what is stupid about sports. If you sit very still in a forest for several months you will find they are the same thing.

AWARDS

Known Friends and Trusted Agents Of The Week

51456724059_322917bfbb_k

mmm dump truck holes [Fuller]

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]you're the man now, dog

#1 Your Offensive Line. This column generally punts on specific OL for this section because it does not have time to form an opinion on every dang guy; that's a process that requires UFR. So when the OL needs to be in this bit of the column they get it as a unit. Their placement here should be self-explanatory. If you need an explanation: 345 rushing yards on 55 carries.

#2 Aidan "My Dad's Name Is Chris" Hutchinson. 2.5 sacks and down-to-down terror whilst being frequently matched against a tackle that people think could go in the first round of the draft. One of the lingering Qs from the WMU game was whether Hutchinson could be an every-down problem. The answer appears to be an emphatic yes.

#3(t) Hassan Haskins and Blake Corum. 155 and 171 yards, respectively, maybe not a missed cut between them, and plenty of yards generated themselves after the OL set them up. Full points for both! They're made up and don't matter!

Honorable mention: Mazi Smith got a ton of push on the interior. Josh Ross was quite a bit more active and ended up with 11 tackles, a TFL, a PBU, and three hurries. Brad Robbins had 4 punts with a 46 average and one return for four yards. Jake Moody had a 52 yard field goal and put almost all of his KOs out of the endzone.

KFaTAotW Standings.

(points: #1: 8, #2: 5, #3: 3, HMs one each. Ties result in somewhat arbitrary assignments.)

8: Ronnie Bell (#1 WMU), The OL (#1 Wash), Blake Corum (#2 WMU, T3 Wash)
6: Aidan Hutchinson (HM WMU, #2 Wash)
4: Hassan Haskins (HM WMU, T3 Wash)
3: Dax Hill (#3 WMU)
1: Andrew Vastardis (HM WMU), AJ Henning (HM WMU), Mike Sainristil (HM WMU), Brad Robbins (HM Wash), Jake Moody (HM Wash), Josh Ross (HM Wash), Mazi Smith (HM Wash)

Who's Got It Better Than Us(?) Of The Week

51461465192_b9f175f9a7_k

lol nope [Barron]

Blake Corum. Meep meep.

Honorable mention: Pick anything off the third quarter drive that was seven runs, zero passes, and a touchdown. John Donovan calls a run play on fourth and four. McNamara and Cornelius Johnson execute an excellent back shoulder throw to convert third and long.

image​MARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

This one goes out to the people in the crowd booing when Michigan was up 10-0. Yeah, some frustrating playcalling. Let's get it together.

Honorable mention: Haskins is stuffed on fourth and goal from the one. Various McNamara dropbacks go Not Well.

[After THE JUMP: successful coordination, shirts edition; unsuccessful coordination, football edition]

OFFENSE

Made 'em quit. Ryan Hayes is the willowy converted tight end left tackle who's mostly a pass protector, and also on Michigan's final touchdown he blew his guy inside the hash:

This was a game in which you could just feel the opposition defensive line wilt as the game went along. Those do not happen all that often these days.

51455998086_7650d54acd_k

[Barron]

I promise that if he gets hurt I will never speak to anyone again about anything. Okay so the thing that I thought when Corum broke into the open field and the safety came up to take an angle that was so very, very wrong was "that is Denard fast." Corum let up over the last ten yards and nobody got any closer. Is that crazy? I asked Seth if that was crazy and he was like "…maybe not?" I feel like it has to be crazy, and then I feel like it's not crazy.

Also in this game, Corum jump cut over two gaps at the last second to hit a hole that was indeed there and busted another chunk run.

That is what I am talking about when I say "Mike Hart but fast." It figures that Michigan gets the Chosen One at RB as soon as I don't get to chart him.

51450822676_6a020682f5_k

hey WRs exist [Fuller]

A palpable hit. Michigan did do one good thing downfield in the passing game when McNamara hit Cornelius Johnson on a slick back-shoulder throw to convert a third and long. There's always some consternation about whether the QB in fact meant to do that when a back shoulder is completed (*cough* Mitch Leidner *cough*) but this one saw Johnson stop very early, look prepared for it, and achieve a ton of separation. Verdict: slick.

Overrun on the edge. Washington was extremely prepared for Michigan's edge dinks. We had a slack discussion about a particular play that probably should have worked but for an MA; other instances of bubbles were crushed. This is a natural thing to happen when you're not really threatening downfield. In that case those throws are not valid because you haven't backed anyone off.

Thunder and lightning manifest. One thing about that long Corum TD: I think that's an example of why Thunder and Lightning backfield combos are powerful. That safety's very bad angle probably had something to do with tackling Hassan Haskins earlier in the game. Haskins isn't going to go around you; he's going to run you over, so you need to match momentum with momentum. So you go forward fast. That's death against Corum.

DEFENSE

Caveats apply. We talked about this in the run-up to the game and to be consistent now we should reiterated: against Montana the Huskies did not look snakebit or unfortunate or on the verge of putting it together. They just looked bad. They continued to look bad in this game. To be perfectly honest, two drives in I thought to myself "these guys aren't scoring." Their late surge-type substance where they hit some shots between levels in the zone and actually put up points were maybe the most surprising occurrences of the day. I think we're going to find out this is a MAC caliber offense.

Even so, you'd be very happy if Michigan came out and put this beating on a MAC caliber offense given preseason expectations. Alex detailed some major problems with one guard spot in particular for the Huskies, but other than that this OL should be at least okay, and Michigan's defensive line whipped them. Going into the season we were worried that the DE/DTs as a potential fatal flaw. This was at least a reasonable step forward.

51451788185_5090b9936b_k

Tight end on Hutchinson: inadvisable [Fuller]

No caveats there, though. Washington LT Jaxson Kirkland is universally considered a candidate to go high in the draft; PFF had him for two pressures allowed in 124 pass blocking snaps during Washington's abbreviated 2020 season. There were bonafides to establish here; consider them established.

Hutchinson just sucked some of that draft status into himself, Highlander-style.

Let's read a lot into a butt tap. Junior Colson is a true freshman linebacker who is rotating in for meaningful snaps early in his career. That's a good sign for a guy who was ranked around 100th, since those rankings often rely more on physical presence than aptitude. Many of Michigan's best linebackers have been badly misranked—hello Devin Bush—because they don't look like superheroes. Then they blow up because they've got a mind like a diamond.

Anyway at some point in the third quarter Colson was in and butt-tapped Mazi Smith into a different technique because he realized he was lined up wrong. Then Michigan stuffed Washington—which okay they were always doing that. Let's keep a careful eye on Colson; if he's ready to be on the field this early and has a preternatural grasp of the D combining that with his top-100-ish athletic status would be real nice.

51451070838_5ea5458dd3_k

moving on up [Fuller]

Useful depth? Mike Morris seemed to have another productive game as an OLB/DE sort in the Wormley mold, and Michigan even got some snaps out of mountainous Oregon State transfer Jordan Whittley, who came in on short yardage and was relative immovable. Also in Whittley news, Michigan wisely put a single digit on him after the first game. He's now #3, and it is always deeply entertaining for a person the size of a small moon to have a single-digit number.

There was a little bit of woofing. Giles Jackson was not welcomed back warmly, which is to be expected I guess. The team got in his face a little too:

51462247601_932ad7beff_k

woo! you did not get many yards! [Barron]

WHAT ARE WE DOING DOT COORDINATOR. There was much merriment on the podcast about John Donovan, particularly the fourth and four where the Huskies—who had approximately 15 rushing yards at the time—decided this was their best move:

Note also that Moten has the QB keep nailed if that's the way it went. So it looks like Michigan… run blitzed here? On fourth and four when the opposition cannot run? And was right? Somewhere Christian Hackenberg was very itchy Saturday night.

Secondary: ask again later, again. I still don't want to draw any grand conclusions about the state of the secondary after that game. I tentatively believe they'll be significantly improved, give up more chunk plays on zone breakdowns than we're happy with, and will still be vulnerable to bad things when they go up against elite WRs. Doesn't look like there are a ton on the schedule until the end of it.

SPECIAL TEAMS

A continued strength. Special teams rundown, like last week. Michigan:

  • Hit a 52 yard field goal.
  • Punted four times for 46 yards gross with just one four-yard return, that on a 59 yard punt.
  • Converted a fake punt.
  • Allowed Giles Jackson just one kick return, which ended inside the 25.
  • Almost broke both kick return opportunities, with Corum getting ankle-tackled just before afterburners time on both.

Punt returns were a notable exception. Caden Kolesar did have a 20 yard return on a line drive; to me it didn't look like he got more yards than were there on the catch. He also didn't field a couple of punts, costing Michigan a significant amount of field position on the second. In the aftermath it kind of seems like Michigan should be auditioning other guys; if Kolesar isn't actually the reliable option then we can have an unreliable guy who runs really fast try his hand at it.

I probably shouldn't put all the special teams bits into a single bullet point. Looks silly.

MISCELLANEOUS

Slice of life.

51461265177_8c7ad2c8ff_k

[Barron]

"So what are you doing after the game? Want to get a beer?"
"I'm sorry, but my lupine jaws are incompatible with your human glasses."
"You could just take the suit off."
"Oh… this isn't a suit."

51455236362_9d0871a132_k

not a good place to be [Fuller]

An operative demonstration of "go for it" philosophy. I don't think we need to argue about whether going for it on fourth and goal from the one was the right move, right? At this point in the evolution of football that is the conventional wisdom. The stuff, while not so great for winning football games, was an excellent example of why it makes sense.

Washington, which had no run game, was stuck on their own one. They ran for zero yards, threw incomplete, and would have been facing a third and ten from their one if they hadn't gotten bailed out by a terrible roughing the passer call. In those situations teams almost always run for a few yards to give their punter room, and then they run a max protect punt with horrible coverage that sets the opponent up 30 or 40 yards away from goal.

A bizarre sequence. So we got 1) a fourth down measurement for Washington that was ruled a first down despite a seemingly obvious gap between the ball and the sticks, 2) a review of that spot that actually overturned it, which never happens. Also we had the more familiar "we're gonna go for it, timeout, nah" sequence from Washington in the first half.

Maize-out: accomplished. Michigan Stadium heeded the internet bullying and actually did something coordinated for the first time ever.

51456933060_d9a165a11d_k

[Fuller]

I, too, yielded to the bullying and found something "maize" to wear. This was the strength of the peer pressure. As previously stated, I have found the fanbase's absolute refusal to wear a particular colored shirt endearing. Alas, all half-ass traditions must pass. I promise you that if there is a night game and it's cold that this temporary unity will evaporate like so many motes of snow, because ain't nobody got a bright yellow coat.

HERE

Best And Worst:

A vocal smattering of Michigan fans had booed the predictable playcalling, and I have to assume that a key part of  Washington’s halftime adjustments was shifting formations and bringing safeties even closer to the line in order to dissuade Michigan from running the ball.  Even people who were very much content with the first-half playcalling (I count myself in that group) likely assumed Michigan would be forced, whether by gameplay circumstance, expected adjustments to counteract the UW defense, or sheer human nature to seek out variety, would switch up the playcalling a bit and maybe throw the ball around a couple of times.  It would be like making a full song out of a single riff – it’s gotta be unlistenable.

You would, of course, be wrong in this assumption –  we’ve got popular one-riff songs and Michigan proceeded to run the ball 7 straight times for 73 yards and a TD that felt like the end of the game with a half to play.  First it was Haskins just grinding forward for 4 yards, 4 yards, then ripping off a 20-yarder and then a run featuring him (and the rest of the line) turning a 6-yard run into 11 through sheer spite.  Corum followed that up with runs of 17, 6, 4, and 7 for a TD, each one featuring clockwork line blocking and surgical running.

A mini-UFR on the passing game:

In conclusion, I think the pass calls made sense for the most part. There were a couple of duds from a play-calling perspective for sure, and Cade made a couple of bad reads and had a bad throw. But the biggest issue on these pass plays was that the blocking was just not ideal, especially by the receivers. However, the good news is that these are all fixable. The blocking issues were more about angles and technique. And that can be taught and improved week by week. Honestly, this is where I think losing Ronnie Bell really sucks.

Michael Scarn is certainly on one side of the divide in the column:

And yet, grumblings of "pass the ball" repeatedly rained around me in the stands all game.  Board posts reflected many of the same thoughts.  "Give McNamara experience," "develop the receivers" yada yada yada.

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?

And the state of our open threads:

Across 2,030 posts, there were 894 instances of tracked words, which translates to an efficiency rating of 2.26. This is consistent with the more frustrating wins of the Harbaugh era, as well as some of the more heart-rending losses, which to me means that for as much as some of us sometimes bitch about not caring, we do. We certainly engage in these games to some degree anyway, even if it is merely to drop a "fuck".

ELSEWHERE

Apologies to the rest of the Michigan football internet but I got socked with a head cold yesterday and have to get this out due to another commitment. We'll fire up the UV machine tomorrow.

Comments

Mongoose

September 13th, 2021 at 12:30 PM ^

okay, but those of us who watched on TV know haskins was definitely in, right? he had linemen underneath him and clearly made it over the line. they just couldn't see the ball on the replay so they couldn't overturn the call, which was probably made too early.

MGolem

September 13th, 2021 at 1:36 PM ^

This is the fundamental issue with the replay system - there is no logic involved. The refs choose to only rely on visuals rather than common sense. I said this in another thread but unless Haskins was carrying the ball between his legs it was a touchdown because half his torso was in the endzone. 

ESNY

September 13th, 2021 at 1:54 PM ^

I would take it further. Unless you are in a position where you can't figure it out either way, ignore the call on field and make the call based the best available evidence. Why default back to a person standing 30 yards away trying to sort through half a dozen bodies and may not even have a clear view when you have a video that can zoom in and use multiple angles?  51% sure of the call should be better than well they called it no TD on the field and I can't be sure that the ball isn't 1mm short of the line, so let the call stand

lhglrkwg

September 13th, 2021 at 3:57 PM ^

I still don't get how the refs didn't call it a TD on the field. They both saw where Haskins progress was briefly halted at the apex of his leap and immediately spotted it there despite the fact that he was still falling forward after the contact. The ball is clearly over based on where he was carrying it and where his torso landed.

Obviously the review couldn't overturn it because you couldn't see the ball. The refs on the field decided he was short before checking to see where the ball actually was. Usually the officials run in to check the pile but I know for sure on replay that the near-side official just ran in and marked the ball at the one foot line without going into the pile

DennisFranklinDaMan

September 13th, 2021 at 6:34 PM ^

That's what was so annoying, both from the referees and the TV announcers. They kept focusing only on the initial hit, and then simply ignored what happened after that. He clearly fell forward. Yeah, I knew they wouldn't give it to us, but it drove me crazy that the announcers couldn't even acknowledge the possibility that he fell forward.

PeteM

September 13th, 2021 at 12:36 PM ^

Great writeup Brian. I basically agree with everything you wrote, and don't recall a more dominant running game against decent opponent in forever (maybe Biakabatuka by himself against OSU in '95).  As you said, even our better overall yardage outputs in recent years have had more than one long carry mixed in with running backs getting stuffed whereas I think Corum's 67 years was it Saturday. 

On the passing game -- while I agree with you about fans finding reasons to be upset -- I also hope to that Cade is given a chance to get back into rhythm Saturday. 

Blue In NC

September 13th, 2021 at 1:18 PM ^

What is this all evidence you speak of?  Washington didn't give up a ton against Montana, not that it's a big accomplishment but it certainly was not a terrible showing on defense.  And Washington has solid-rated players at DT and CB.  There was nothing indicating that Michigan would just be able to run over them.  I still suspect that Washington will at least be an above-average Pac 10 defense.

stephenrjking

September 13th, 2021 at 12:37 PM ^

The Corum jump-cut was just remarkable. I was doing a scan-through of some first down plays to get a feel if there was a schematic reason that Michigan was so overloaded on run plays, and on several different occasions both RBs just jumped off of the screen with how good they were. Cuts, broken tackles, using blockers, setting up holes, everything. To be honest, I thought that Seth's absurdly high grades for them last week, while not exactly inaccurate, might suggest a slightly more generous grading metric than Brian's. Now I've begun to change my mind. Corum and Haskins are terrific and seemingly make every right cut. 

It's early, but I think we might have the two best RBs at Michigan since... Mike Hart. 

Brian observes that Washington seemed to have sniffed out the edge stuff. I agree. I was putzing through the ESPN broadcast archive while waiting on an update from a work situation, and I found this play:

It's the drive where Michigan hit Johnson on the pass, and wound up getting stopped at the goal line. This is 3rd and 6, the first real notable play where Michigan ran in a clear passing situation. Washington has 6 men in the box. Michigan lines up 4 wide, but then sends All in motion across the formation at the snap. Michigan is going to run a split zone here.

I've BlueSeoul'd the key movements in. The weakside safety is running downhill at the snap, but he is keyed on All's motion rather than the RB. He stays well outside to contain a possible jet handoff or touch pass to that side and never factors into the play. The EMLOS on that side hesitates as Cade looks at him, and is then erased by All's conventional kickout block. 

This shows how Washington was really focusing on those edge plays. When there was motion across the formation, they respected it. When Michigan provided RPO looks, btw, they respected those as well, until late in the game when they sent the cornerbacks on blitzes. The upshot is that Michigan was getting advantageous numbers on the inside.

In this play the seventh defender, that safety, never got close to the action. All's motion effectively blocked two players out of the play, and the OL had five guys to block five guys, and Corum knifed through a hole to gain first and goal.

Carpetbagger

September 13th, 2021 at 4:51 PM ^

You are not crazy. Drevno was also the greatest thing since sliced bread until suddenly he wasn't too.

It did take until Warinner was put to pasture for me to decide I should stop paying attention to the punditry on who is a good coach or not. I now assume it's more how well the coaches work together and their collective competence than any one person's skills. You know, like in a real business.

 

mgoblue0970

September 13th, 2021 at 5:43 PM ^

attention to the punditry on who is a good coach or not.

...and wasn't the indictment of Jaybaugh basically just started by WD -- because WD thought you have to be a running back to coach running backs.   Turns out, Jaybaugh is not a bad coach.  

Bringing this up not to start shit but note how this board evaluates coaching talent... and in here it seems to be a beauty contest based upon personal opinions.

TrueBlue2003

September 13th, 2021 at 6:15 PM ^

Yes, we were.  And you could go back to Funk/Drevno too.

We overrate OL coaching and underrate OL experience.

Everyone thought Funk was terrible when he had young OL in 2013 and 2014.  Drevno came in and got those guys as upperclassmen and felt like a revelation.

Then everyone turned on him when he was working with super young guys that had to start in 2017 because the 2014 and 2015 classes had no OL.

So then Warriner comes in and feels like a revelation again, but that's because he inherited those guys as upperclassmen.  And then they left and he broke in an almost entirely new line last year while also dealing with a lot of injuries.

So in comes Moore to inherit that experience.  It can't be stressed enough how important it is to have experienced OL on the field, no matter how talented they are.

Blue Vet

September 13th, 2021 at 12:53 PM ^

Brian, I like how you keep scratching that itch of how weird sports are.

Especially football.

Especially Michigan football.

Simultaneously a hobby-like interest that offers some pleasure and THE MOST IMPORTANT THING EVER. Every week, no less.

JHumich

September 13th, 2021 at 12:55 PM ^

What a GREAT game! How amazing to be able to dominate like that continually, even when they knew what was coming. And, it's a no-brainer that if they like to basically play 10 vs 11 in the run, you take that matchup.

To be fair, for many the negative wasn't about this game but bracing for the future. It wasn't so much the playcalling as it was that the small sample size of trying through the air did not produce overall encouraging results, and we're all just cringing at the thought of what happens when we come to the moment that we can't rush successfully on every down.

Brimley

September 13th, 2021 at 12:56 PM ^

There is a precedent for naming the whole damn o-line as MVP.  The 1991 Gator Bowl against Mississippi featured 391 rushing yards which led to the o-line as MVP.  It was glorious.  Here is Wolverine Historian's part 1.

DennisFranklinDaMan

September 13th, 2021 at 6:39 PM ^

Thanks -- nice to know I'm not the only old-timer on here. My mind flashed to that game immediately. I've never in my life seen holes like that over and over and over and over again, against a decent (SEC, bowl-qualified) opponent. That was as dominant a game as I've simply ever seen in a game between two Power 5 teams.

slomjh2

September 13th, 2021 at 12:57 PM ^

It all depends on what your aspirations for this team are? If as we frequently proclaim the Big Title is our goal this game while a win was disappointing in some aspects. If Washington had crushed their FCS opposition a week ago people would be happier, but since they actually lost they have to be considered a weak opponent. As how much we jumped in the polls confirms. Beating a weak opponent is expected not being able to muster a passing game isn’t. More than likely Wisconsin, Penn State, and even Michigan State will seriously hamper our running game what will we fall back on? A passing game that we haven’t actually used in game? How has that worked out for anyone ever? If your aspirations are 7-5 or even 8-4 for a rebound year and a middle of the road bowl you should be more than happy. Michigan looks more than capable of reaching those mediocre goals, but if your goal is a Big Championship we have a lot of work to do and not only on the practice field. If we don’t get our quarterbacks a lot of in game passing experience the next two games before we visit Wisconsin we are setting ourselves up for failure.

outsidethebox

September 15th, 2021 at 7:19 AM ^

You having said this, I hope you at least appreciate and  enjoy what Michigan is doing here. This running game is like a triple option to the second power. All those OLs and TEs pulling and WRs and slots motioning across the formation...and then a room of RBs who have great speed, acceleration, agility and power who are jumping to the creases and running over and through defenders who are trying to figure out what the hell is going on...even flying untouched, to the second level and beyond. 

This is an exceptional, pro-style running attack-a totally different scheme from what we have ever seen. Correct, the passing game was off but it was enough of a concern for, even, a talented Washington secondary that they felt they could not afford to compromise their back four. Hindsight may call Washington's defensive decisions in this regard into question but in the heat of battle their concerns were real and Michigan exploited them. And as the film is being broken down, the good news for Michigan is that what happened to Washington was out of the very basic, nuts-and-bolts of this offensive scheme. There are options here for Cade to pull that ball and pitch it to a counter sweep person or to pass and there are huge chunk plays awaiting here as well. 

I, too, want to see more...see it all come, gloriously together. If and when it does, we may be calling this speed-in-space- on steroids...an offense that has it all. 

I think we can thank another JH for this-both offensively and defensively...Weiss and Macdonald from John H and the Ravens. (I am more than fine if this saves his little brother's ass.) That defense looks as though it may well end up being the answer to many questions as well. 

WolverineHistorian

September 13th, 2021 at 12:59 PM ^

I agree that the game was something right out of the 70’s.

It also felt a little like the 2017 Minnesota game at the big house, which was a almost similar score of 33-10 (the night game that didn’t start until around 9:00 p.m. because of a lightening delay).

In that game, the offensive line was masterful at creating holes for the running game, which was easily over 300 yards.  But their pass blocking was abysmal as we had NO time to throw even the shortest of passes.  It was Hoke like in the way there was no protection.

I’ll have to check the stats but I remember at least a few more attempts to try and throw.  I’m not panicking as much as I was then because the few times we did try to pass looked better than that Minnesota game from a protection POV.  But I think we really do need to try to establish some type of passing attack in our next two games.  

TrueBlue2003

September 13th, 2021 at 6:29 PM ^

Ohhh yeah, very good comparison.  The 2019 ND comparison applies in that we similarly paved them on the ground but that was a rain game when we pretty much had to run.  We knew Patterson and the WRs were good that year, the gameplan was weather related.

That 2017 Minnesota game is a good comp because we also just couldn't pass...like basically that whole season.  Peters had 56 yards on 13 passes for an almost as bad 4.3 ypa.

Part of it was pass pro that season, but something that doesn't get talked about, is that we had no WRs that year. We were counting on true frosh DPJ, Black was hurt, Nico still a true frosh and literally like Nate Shoenle and Mo Ways.  Guys that couldn't get open. 

Unfortunately, with Bell down, we also don't really have anyone that consistently gets open this season.

Losing Bell was devastating given the depthJohnson is the only upperclassman remaining (literally no one else from the 2018 or 2019 classes remain). Hopefully Baldwin adjusts to P5 football or Wilson or Henning ride up the steep learning curve but our WR corps if very weak right now.

SAM love SWORD

September 13th, 2021 at 1:08 PM ^

How has no one mentioned that CADE KEPT THE BALL? I swear he did. I saw it. I even learned how to source at a timestamp to prove it because I know most of you won't believe it.

If only I could recreate the sound I made in my apartment when it happened.

TrueBlue2003

September 13th, 2021 at 6:36 PM ^

Well, it's not hard to figure out that the read is almost never on and it's because they're deathly afraid of an injury.  Probably rightly so this season given the backups are true freshman clearly not ready and two star fullback.  They can't afford an injury (which makes it painful to watch Cade try to juke that guy, c'mon you have the first and you're not getting past that guy, just slide).