[Patrick Barron]

Could Have, But Did Not Comment Count

Brian November 1st, 2021 at 11:59 AM

10/30/21 – Michigan 33, Michigan State 37 – 7-1, 4-1 Big Ten

Any close game is going to have its share of coulda-shoulda-woulda moments. There's always missed free throws or shots that hit the post, etc. Saturday's game will stand out in my memory for sheer quantity in this department. It felt like every third play was a Fateful Moment, from Andrel Anthony ripping through the MSU secondary for 93 yards to Blake Corum dropping a swing pass with almost nothing but grass in front of him to David Ojabo's sack-strip touchdown to having that taken off the board by the replay official.

The previous sentence didn't get out of the first half. Also it could have included several other items. You see what I mean. This game was jam-packed with stuff. Bombs! Exciting runs! Special teams disasters! Aztecs invading Europe! Four straight field goals from the same guy at the same spot on the field! Boggling attempts to substitute while the other team was going up-tempo!

Unfortunately for Michigan, the most fateful thing was the backup quarterback coming in and having a mutual misunderstanding with Corum about who was supposed to have the ball. Michigan was up three and at their 45 with seven minutes left. They had almost 500 yards of offense at that point. JJ McCarthy had already fumbled, and so there is nonstop rabbling in the Michigan fanbase this day. Ah well.

--------------------------------------------------

Here, as always, the particular Michigan mania sets in to ruin everything. This is a team with a more-or-less first year starting quarterback that could bring back literally everyone on the roster except for Andrew Vastardis and Brad Hawkins. Even when you account for likely NFL departures like Aidan Hutchinson and Dax Hill, this team looks more like a team building towards a peak roster year than something for the here and now. Anthony is breaking out on offense; Ojabo is breaking out on defense.

To many programs that would feel pretty good. There are scattered outposts of Michigan fandom attempting this zen even now.

To me it's difficult to get there because this is year seven of Jim Harbaugh and it seems like the error rate is baked in at this point. Michigan took three illegal substitution penalties and failed to get lined up on several other plays because of basic college crappe like "sometimes we use tempo." When Michigan tried it themselves they ended up asking AJ Henning to block a linebacker. Then they false-started on a fourth and one attempt and the punter did not get a punt off.

You could ascribe some of that to a near-complete staff reboot. I'm not particularly inclined since this is a program that has made shooting itself in the foot in miserable fashion a trademark. Sometimes they're pretty talented and it doesn't matter until they get to the games where the opposition is capable of matching them. When they are, though, it's always Michigan turning around to hand the ball off and failing to, you know, do that.

This does not have to be fate. LSU just won a national championship with a coach they'd fire less than two years later because he is excessively horny. Whatever Ed Orgeron's assets are, they do not include "is organized" or "suitable for indoor use." But man am I inclined to jump off the moving car that is football season as soon as this stuff rears its head again. It doesn't feel like Michigan is building to anything except another Michigan Football Season where they win enough games to make you think they're going to win the important ones and then don't.

So when McCarthy's in the game because Cade McNamara is briefly in the injury tent it doesn't feel like a weird one-off that you can shrug about and leave in the past. It feels like something that's going to happen against Penn State, and Ohio State, and so forth and so on. Maybe that's irrational. At this point, expecting Michigan to do something other than one-up themselves in late game failures seems more irrational to me.      

AWARDS

Known Friends and Trusted Agents Of The Week

51642807119_551271102e_k

[Fuller]

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]you're the man now, dog

#1 Cade McNamara. My pregame take was that I thought Michigan would probably win if they got equal QB play but I was very nervous about that. McNamara blew expectations out of the water with a 383 yard, 8.7 YPA day where he was lasering in pinpoint passes while under some duress.

#2 Andrel Anthony. Hello Mr. Anthony. Randy Sklar lands the second-best Hot Take of all time by predicting Anthony would break out as Michigan's #1 receiver by next year; that took about a game to seem true. Anthony outran the entire secondary on his 93-yarder, had a Braylon/Terrell leaping TD later, had the wherewithal to get out of bounds on a late first half catch, and nearly made another spectacular leaping grab late on. It's not just the catches, it's the way he made them. Looks like a future star. Maybe a current one.

#3 Aidan Hutchinson/David Ojabo. Three sacks and one erroneously deleted touchdown between them. Generally unblockable. Three points each.

Honorable mention: Erick All had ten(!) catches, building on last week, and looks like he's emerging into the kind of dual-threat weapon Michigan fans had envisioned from him for years. Dax Hill forced an INT with a PBU, had another one, and tracked down a would-be TD, for all the good that did. Jake Moody was 7/7 on field goals, four of which counted.

KFaTAotW Standings.

(points: #1: 8, #2: 5, #3: 3, HMs one each. Ties result in somewhat arbitrary assignments.)

31: Aidan Hutchinson (HM WMU, #2 Wash, #1 Rutgers, #1 Wisc, HM Neb, #2 NW, T3 MSU)
18: The OL (#1 Wash, #1 NIU, HM Neb, HM NW)
17: Hassan Haskins (HM WMU, T3 Wash, T2 NIU, #2 Neb, T1 NW), Blake Corum (#2 WMU, T3 Wash, T2 NIU, HM Neb, T1 NW)
8: Ronnie Bell (#1 WMU), Brad Hawkins (#1 Neb), Cade McNamara (#1 MSU), Dax Hill (#3 WMU, HM NIU, HM Rutgers, HM Wisc, HM Neb, HM MSU)
6: Nikhai Hill-Green(HM NIU, #2 Rutgers), Jake Moody (HM Wash, HM Wisc, #3 Neb, HM MSU)
5: David Ojabo (#2 Wisc), Brad Robbins (HM Wash, #3 Rutgers, HM Wisc), Josh Ross (HM Wash, HM NIU, HM Rutgers, HM Neb, HM NW), Andrel Anthony (#2 MSU)
4: AJ Henning (HM WMU, #3 NIU)
3: Donovan Edwards(T2 NIU), Roman Wilson (#3 Wisc), DJ Turner (#3 NW)
2: Cornelius Johnson(HM NIU, HM Wisc), Erick All (HM NW, HM MSU)
1: Andrew Vastardis (HM WMU),Mike Sainristil (HM WMU),  Mazi Smith (HM Wash), Gemon Green(HM NIU), Chris Hinton (HM Rutgers)

Who's Got It Better Than Us(?) Of The Week

Anthony takes a crossing route 93 yards to paydirt.

Honorable mention: Sack-strip by Ojabo; the other sack-strip by Ojabo; McNamara threads a needle to convert on a crossing route to All.

image​MARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

The fateful fumble.

Honorable mention: Corum drops that swing pass; various tempo follies; TD taken off the board wrongly by replay official; Johnson drops a back shoulder bomb; no PI on fourth down; more tempo follies; false start on fourth and one; subsequent punt dorf; I could keep going but will not.

[After THE JUMP: ack]

OFFENSE

51641912376_55fa978f3d_k

[Barron]

Star? Looks like a star. To reinforce the comments above, here's the not-quite catch:

The body control, range, and ability to go high-point a ball outside of his frame are all very enticing, especially when he is also capable of putting distance on an entire secondary like he did on the 93-yarder. This seems more likely to be announcing a new talent than a flash in the pan.

Aaargh. McNamara obviously had a great day but man this would haunt me if such things were capable of haunting me any more:

For one, that is an MSU defensive back bashing Johnson off his route with the ball in the air. That is a penalty. It is a very obvious penalty that very obviously should be thrown. I do not like that it was not thrown.

But also for two, why are we running a pick route against man coverage and then not throwing to the wide open guy created by the pick? Is this not supposed to be a pick route? If not, why not? I have so many questions.

 51643009435_510af61987_k

[Fuller]

The Erick All we were promised. 10 catches, 98 yards, no drops, mismatch against linebackers, dogged blocker who may be a little light but gets after it. All was plagued with drops for the first couple years of his career, albeit on limited opportunities. The last two weeks he's been a critical, reliable option on third down. I think that will continue as well; the guy pops out as different whenever you see him run drills.

Pass protection accomplished. Michigan didn't take a sack. McNamara did have to stand in the pocket and deliver in a few uncomfortable situations; given the number of throws and the number of obvious passing downs that seems like a best-case scenario. MSU DE Drew Beesley did return for this game, as well, so that was some version of full strength. Should still be noted that MSU's gaudy sack numbers are largely a function of facing a billion passing attempts, so shutting down Georgia this was not.

DEFENSE

51642400488_2bd7db7c27_k

[Barron]

Rotation gets got. The above is the long MSU rushing TD, and Kris Jenkins has just finished going upfield of his guy on a zone stretch. Jenkins was a guy to check back in on this year with a view towards being a starter-level guy next year and beyond; here he made a devastating mistake. You have to wonder whether this is another NFL transition thing; in the NFL your backups are all, you know, NFL players. So they don't do stuff like the above. Michigan's frequent DL rotation was a huge problem even when they weren't failing to get set on easy touchdowns. Michigan does not need to substitute on nearly every snap.

I mentioned the substitution penalties above. I cannot think of any other game I've seen involving Michigan or not where one team regularly attempted to substitute when the opposition wasn't doing so. In the NFL their leisurely approach to spotting the ball makes this feasible. It's hard not to draw a line straight from "new defensive coordinator who has little college experience" to the loss.

51643007775_aa2b177757_k

[Fuller]

Arriving. That is two consecutive games in which David Ojabo looked pretty analogous to Aidan Hutchinson. Ojabo's still not on his level as a run defender—he did give up one of those Walker runs which bounced outside, IIRC—but dude was still supposed to be pupating after picking up football in 2017. He even got stuck in Scotland for much of last year because of COVID. His improvement trajectory is one that points towards an all-conference DE next year.

DTs make no impact. Michigan did an okay job bottling up the ground game outside of tempo instances and missed tackles, but this was vastly different than MSU's game against Nebraska where their LOS was getting reset constantly. Michigan DTs did little of note here, getting stalemates against single blocking and not shedding. The starting DTs combined for one tackle. Tackles aren't everything at that spot, but they are an indicator.

Weird stuff. Michigan's first snap was a 6-1 with Ojabo and Hutchinson as "OLBs" on the line of scrimmage and four DE/DT types between them. Michigan frequently went to more guys on the LOS in this game—probably more DE/DT snaps here than any other game by a wide margin and relied on those guys to make it work; therefore there was often little or no second level when that did not work, because Ross was the only linebacker in the game. That proved costly, IMO: as mentioned the DTs weren't making good use of their single blocking and there were multiple instances where breaking through the first line of defense meant nobody else was available.

51641329032_9edbb45bf7_k

[Fuller]

Revenge of the slot fades. Another Fateful Moment occurred above, when Thorne nailed Reed on a fourth-down slot fade. Hill got caught in man coverage again and you can see how close he was to making a play, but he's a step out of phase and therefore his arm is not in a spot he can contest the ball. Michigan's attempt at a slot fade on third and three was well overthrown.

SPECIAL TEAMS

Missing Peppers. AJ Henning did not field MSU's punt after the overturned sack/strip, that turned into a 66-yarder, and Michigan ended up kicking a field goal from the 21. Their previous two plays were fade attempts because that was the thing that made sense to do given the situation. Slash 15-20 yards off that punt and Michigan has an excellent chance of getting those four points back.

Henning did make up for that a bit by ripping off another 50 yards in returns.

Moody, the mood. After the timeout sequence:

I enjoyed that. I did not enjoy Moody going 4/4 on field goals with a long of 38, because that is how you put up 550 yards and pick up two turnovers and lose a game.

MISCELLANEOUS

51643068315_97a69950ec_k

[Barron]

Gone. The goal of replay is to correct obviously wrong calls on the field. It is not to see that a ball is definitely moving as soon as Ojabo hits the QB and to go over it frame by frame until you can convince yourself that there is a whisper of control while a shin may or may not be on the ground. The overturned fumble was the very definition of a situation where you shrug and say "call stands."

But also. Many, many complaints about every video review in this game going MSU's way, but other than the above and maybe the Reed catch he may or may not have taken off the turf I don't think there was much to complain about there.

I guess this isn't a problem since people don't turn it off. FOX was scrambling to insert every possible commercial they could. Action would stop suddenly, key moments would not be replayed, and there were multiple instances of commercial-kickoff-commercial. It took ten or fifteen minutes to be informed that the replay official did look at DJ Turner nearly ripping the ball out on an MSU two-point conversion.

Lord knows how long Jalen Nailor had been out, sporting a neon-green cast on his hand, before anyone at FOX noticed.

So at the same time all the whiz-bang was going on it was still frustrating and boring. I'd like to imagine there's some sort of breaking point at which people put their collective feet down and say no more insurance commercials, but it doesn't seem like that's coming.

Joel Klatt can be on our podcast. Because he's not very good at pronouncing names. Very good at other color commentator things, but not so good with the names.

HERE

Best And Worst:

Worst:  Making Plays

I’ve always been annoyed with the idea of “making plays” as an idiom surrounding sports, especially those so reliant on teamwork and synchronicity like football.  It always feels like post-hoc analysis, divining merit and morality from accomplishment when oftentimes it’s simply the binary result of any football play – a team picks up more or less yards than they needed, someone did or did not catch the ball, etc.  It’s a zero-sum game, and while it’s human nature to find narrative structure in the ebb and flow of a game sometimes there really isn’t one.  Cade McNamara “made plays” all day against the same MSU secondary that decidedly did not “make plays” until Charles Brantley “made a play” by picking off a pass.  Kenneth Walker and Andrel Anthony “made plays” more consistently (but even there you have Anthony only snagging 28 yards after halftime and Walker picking up 32 yards on 10 carries in the 1st and 3rd quarters combined), while Payton Thorne and Cornelius Johnson struggled  “making plays” but then still had moments (Thorne on his dime to Reed in the 3rd, Johnson with his 4th-down reception in traffic).  R.J. Moten “made a play” on his first-quarter interception and then didn’t “make a play” on a dropped pick in the second half, while Quavaris Crouch “made a play” on Robbins’s fake punt but was also picked on all day by Erick All.  This doesn’t mean players didn’t stand out or have atypical performances that had outsized impact on the game, only that the idiosyncrasies of the game don’t lend themselves to a tight narrative of “players” and “scrubs”.

The State of Our Open Threads:

There were 476 fucks given in yesterday's open thread, which is far and away the most this year, with the next highest total being 299 fucks given during the Nebraska game. In a diary that you'll see in December, we will discuss "The Fuck Differentials", which will highlight differences in usage frequency across wins and losses, even down to margin of victory / loss (there is a "Fuck Curve", and you will see it). For now, we'll talk about yesterday - 476 fucks is not the highest we've managed in a game against MSU, but it does signal the most engagement we've had with a game in general in a long time actually.

It's companion word - "shit" - returned to a level of usage seen at Nebraska, and then exceeded that ever so slightly. There were 124 shits given, which is actually lower than I thought we would see, but compared to only 42 for the Northwestern game, it was a big jump week over week. There were 117 shits given at Nebraska and 88 at Wisconsin, so it has remained somewhat elevated throughout much of the conference schedule, as you might expect.

Here is the summary comparison of the two:

We reached a high for the season to date when it came to "fire" as well - there were 87 instances of this word, and it was the usual mix of targets as well, with Harbaugh figuring into it a little more heavily this time.

Comments

yossarians tree

November 1st, 2021 at 12:55 PM ^

I do think moreso now than ever that team identities are going to rise and fall from year to year due to wildly fluctuating rosters, and in that context we should embrace this team. It's likely that at the end of the season only Bama, Georgia, or OSU--whichever two do not actually win it all, will rightfully be disappointed. The rest of us are pretenders and we all know it.

As for Harbaugh, he's not going anywhere, nor should he. Ask yourself this question: given the uniqueness of the Michigan job, which coach out there can really come here and take over the position--with all of it's palace intrigue, academic responsibilities, recruiting limitations, as well as actual football acumen--better than Jim Harbaugh. I doubt that the person exists.

Pumafb

November 1st, 2021 at 10:41 PM ^

From what I gather that was a paperwork issue not a can’t get into school issue that screwed up his early enrollment. Also, there will be a player here or there but do you really think we don’t recruit the same guys as Alabama and OSU? Go look where the top 100 recruits offers are from and you will see it’s the same teams for the most part. Finally, if you think football players at Michigan, generally speaking, have the same academic experience as the rest of the student body then you don’t know any football players. 

JBLPSYCHED

November 1st, 2021 at 1:36 PM ^

That person exists, of course they do, but it's impossible for us to know who he is. More importantly it's next to impossible even for those who should know, ie. those who have a say in who the next coach might be. It's essentially a crap shoot when making a hire like this and most of the time the dice roll produces disappointment (if not disaster).

Meanwhile in year 7 we more or less know what we have in Harbaugh, which is much better than most of the alternatives out there but not good enough for some. I personally think Harbaugh will leave in the next year or two of his own volition because he never stays anywhere very long and losing most all of the big games has got to be wearing on him.

I was ready to move on from him after last season. Enough is enough. This year has gone much better than expected so far and if we win the next 3 in a row and give OSU a battle and then win a quality bowl game then we'll be in position to say things might really be improving. I hope that happens...but I'm not betting on it.

schreibee

November 1st, 2021 at 9:23 PM ^

Being honest, Mel Tucker looks like a better coach than JH right now. 

It took some pretty good vision by msu to find a coach with a losing record at a Purdue level program and see the potential to turn msu around as quickly as he has.

Recognizing that Michigan likely wouldn't admit half the transfers he's brought in, so...?‍♂️

uminks

November 1st, 2021 at 11:14 PM ^

I think his NFL ticket is no longer valid. I don't think a school better than Michigan would hire Harbaugh. I see him staying here until he retires in 10 to 15 years. The university really doesn't care having an elite football team and as long as Harbaugh wins 8 to 11 games per season, the University is satisfied with a coach who runs a clean program. I'd rather keep Harbaugh then hire some flash in the pan type coach like RR.

Blue2000

November 1st, 2021 at 12:34 PM ^

But if you forget about past history and such and just take this year’s team in its own context, we’re looking at a very young team that’s an eyelash from being 8-0.

The problem is it's difficult to forget about past history when it is so recent and so clearly relevant.  We're an "eyelash from being 8-0," but we aren't, because we once again lost a rivalry game on the road, in a game where we made lots of unforced errors.  And as you note, the assumption, quite reasonably, is that we'll lose to OSU and maybe another (while I think we'll beat PSU, I don't feel great about it).  So our lofty top-10 ranking is likely to be, at best, top-15 before the bowl game.

That is this coaching regime in a nutshell.  And after the RichRod and Hoke disasters, maybe that's okay, because we know there is a far worse alternative.  But it's hard to be optimistic about a substantial improvement from this very young team in next year in the ones that follow, because nothing about Harbaugh's tenure to this point supports that sort of trajectory (or the ability to beat a competent MSU team, let alone OSU). 

That's the difficulty and why this loss is so depressing (to me, at least).  Someone on another thread described our malaise as coaching purgatory, and I thought it was a great descriptor.  It really does feel that way.  I'm not clamoring for Harbaugh's firing only because it really feels like there are much larger, institutional programs that are hindering this program and are likely to plague the next coach as well until we figure them out (I have no idea what they are).  But I don't think Harbaugh has earned any additional time, either.         

ESNY

November 1st, 2021 at 12:46 PM ^

Yet in Year 7, we are still failing when it counts by repeatedly stepping on our own dicks.  We lose these games not just because we were outplayed but because our coaches turtle up when it counts. Whether it’s death by 1000 crossing routes or being grossly unprepared for tempo or going ultra conservative jumbo package in the red zone that hasn’t worked for us since the Hammering Panda graduated - many of our failures as self inflicted by our coaches.  That is the issue 

DennisFranklinDaMan

November 1st, 2021 at 2:40 PM ^

The coaches didn't "turtle up" when it counts in this game. That stupid fucking 3rd and 3 fade to Sanristil wasn't "turtling up," nor was the subsequent pass to Johnson that should have brought the PI flag. I mean, you can criticize Harbaugh for going for field goals on 4th down in this game, but that wasn't "when it counts," unless you mean "anytime during the game."

The coaches made a lot of mistakes, I think. But unless "turtling up when it counts" means "making mistakes at any point in the game," it's just wrong. It's like saying that JJ's fumble was "turtling up."

I really liked the play calling in this game, I liked how much we threw the ball, I liked letting JJ throw it in the end zone, I liked the crossing patterns, and, in all honesty, I would have kicked all of those field goals as well. Yes, it sucks that we can't get the ball in the end zone, but that's not "turtling up" -- that's some other kind of incompetence.

Ah, screw it. 

Ninja Football

November 1st, 2021 at 2:26 PM ^

But it's ALWAYS an eyelash.  You'd think in year 7 he would've won one big game, no? The only time we've beaten State is when they already suck.  Can't get our shit together to overcome OSU.  Come close in big games against PSU.  I mean, yeah, maaaaaaaybe we finally get there next year, but don't you people get sick of settling for next year every single year?  I understand some of you are incredibly risk averse, but how long do you stay in a bad marriage?

mgoblue0970

November 1st, 2021 at 4:46 PM ^

It’s year seven and we’re ranked in the top 10 in November.  Is that bad? 

Michigan gets the benefit of the doubt in rankings because we are a song, a stadium, and a helmet.  

But it's year 7 and this is the indisputable body of work -- neg away Harpologists:

  • 3-4 vs MSU
  • 0-5 vs OSU
  • 1-4 in bowls
  • 2-13 vs top 10
  • 2-9 on the road vs ranked teams
  • 0-9 on the road vs top 15
  • 1-12 as an underdog
  • 20-21 vs power 5 teams with .500 or better records

Enjoy your top 10 ranking moral victory!

Amaznbluedoc

November 2nd, 2021 at 1:58 AM ^

Is it bad?  No.  Has the team exceeded expectations?  Yes.  Why are we perpetually making excuses about rebuilding or it being a young squad etc?  Doesn’t every other program deal with that too?  It’s year 7 and we just lost again - 2nd year in a row - to a program facing even more challenges than we have.

The Homie J

November 1st, 2021 at 1:48 PM ^

Do people just memory hole every single two minute drill we've run this year to grab a few points before half time?  FFS I swear people want to believe a narrative so bad they'll wipe the slate clean despite the facts staring them dead in the face.  Last year we couldn't move swiftly down the field with only a minute left.  This year, we've done it in damn near every game.  MSU included.

Gustavo Fring

November 1st, 2021 at 12:28 PM ^

At this point it feels like destiny regardless of the coach.  We dropped a punt with two seconds left in the game that was returned for a TD.  Backup QB comes in for one snap and we have a fumbled exchange.  Stripsack inexplicably overturned.  

Every single break goes their way in this series.  Especially the complete flukes.  And their fans celebrate it.  It's so sickening.  

I Like Burgers

November 1st, 2021 at 2:35 PM ^

Agreed. Headed for 9-3/10-2 this season and a likely bowl loss because that's just what they do under Harbaugh.  Next season should be better, but better is 10-2/11-1 and a likely bowl loss because that's just what they do under Harbaugh.

Is that good? I don't know.  Being better than most, but never being able to be better than the same 2-3 teams every season is a weird place to be.

Finishing every season by losing 2 out of 3 or 3 out of 4 games is always a tough pill to swallow too.  Never feels like you're building momentum.

awould

November 1st, 2021 at 2:44 PM ^

Year 7 total, but only Year 1 in Reboot 2. How many reboots does he get? Nobody knows. This game was the most Michigan State-iest game ever, not one 'weird' play or ref call went our way. The TD that was overturned was a ridiculous decision that basically cost Michigan the game, something totally out of their control. The missed DPI call on 4th, same thing, though McNamara missed hitting an open receiver. Having McNamara in the tent for one single play, forcing McCarthy to go in immediately after he already put it on the ground. Just a string of negative outcomes that chipped away at the possibility of winning. Michigan was the better team and should have won, but didn't. This is where UM under Harbaugh seems to live.

MGoStrength

November 1st, 2021 at 5:39 PM ^

it's perfectly reasonable to argue that this is not where the program should be in Year Seven of Harbaugh.  I am not for firing Harbaugh, but I don't think that there is an obviously correct answer.  It all comes down to how much you want to shoot for the moon and risk being killed by Moon Men.

I think you've got three basic options.  One, fire JH and move on.  Despite decent W/L records his records in big games and against the rivals is enough to fire him.  I have to assume a win versus MSU and not getting blown out by OSU were two agreed upon preseason goals that are likely to be missed.  I do think there are guys out there that can do better even if their records at their current stops are not better than JH's...they don't have UM's resources.  A few names off the top of my head are Campbell, Fleck, & Hafley.

Two, you can keep him knowing full well the ceiling he puts on the team and say 7-10 wins a year is enough even if he struggles in the big games and let him ride it out as long as he wants. 

Three, you can have a hard conversation with him where you both agree to give him a few more years assuming he can maintain the 7-10 win mark and there is no regression to losing seasons with the caveat he starts preparing someone else to be his successor because we all want to beat OSU and MSU more often and the data suggests JH can't.  I don't know who that is.  Mike Hart?

uminks

November 1st, 2021 at 11:37 PM ^

I doubt the bar was set that high after a 2 win COVID season. I think all Harbaugh had to do was to win 7 games against the cupcakes and he would show enough progress for one more year. Well, he is way above that low bar, so Harbaugh will be back next season for sure! Many of us would like to have an elite football program but I don't think the University has that goal any longer. I/m not sure if beating OSU is a big deal any longer.

jsquigg

November 1st, 2021 at 7:30 PM ^

What's frustrating is that Harbaugh does so much right that the flaws stand out in stark contrast (Covid year aside). You could tweak what's being done and see a perennial top 5 program, but a coaching change risks reversing some of what is being done right, and this isn't a lucrative destination if only because the fan base has no patience.

They fought so hard Saturday and did a lot of right, and there is nothing to do but hope they learn more quickly from their mistakes and go balls out in the remaining big games.

MGoBlue96

November 1st, 2021 at 12:15 PM ^

Ughhh on the Johnson play, frustrated initially by the officials not doing their damn jobs and then add a layer when you notice that Sainrestil was as open as you can get. Honestly looks like he would have scored easily. Definitely would have been the easier throw for Cade to make as well.

WolverineMan1988

November 1st, 2021 at 12:52 PM ^

This is the correct response. I don’t think this is a pick play. MSU defender guarding Sainristil is simply playing off coverage and ends up impeding Johnson’s route. If it was a pick play, which Michigan hardly ever runs and is terrible at running anyway, then Sainristil would have been the first read. He clearly wasn’t the first read.

Durham Blue

November 1st, 2021 at 10:38 PM ^

If the ball goes to Sainristil he picks up a big chunk, potentially a TD if he jukes the only defender that would've been in his way.  If the MSU defender doesn't grab CJ and CJ is able to get to his spot to catch the ball there is literally nothing in front of him but about 30 yards and the end zone.  Touchdown.  I think the throw to Sainristil was more difficult because of the mass of humanity blocking Cade's throw in that direction.  Cade made the right choice at that moment based on that situation.

Fuck that MSU game and fuck those refs.

ClaudeTee

November 1st, 2021 at 12:16 PM ^

This was as excruciating a loss as they come.  But if, before the season began, you had told me that, eight games into the season, Michigan would be 7-1, ranked #9 in the country, with its only loss coming on the road, by four points, against a Top Ten team, I'd define that as a huge step forward.