Per Chris Balas - Kansas Rumored to Have Offered 2 Year $4M NIL Deal to Hunter Dickinson

Submitted by Maizinator on April 20th, 2023 at 4:55 PM

Balas posted the rumor to the ON3 message board so no story link provided.   

If true, that's certainly a large sum of money offered.  It was further commented that it would be unlikely for Michigan to compete with it.

Hunter is apparently still visiting Kentucky, so who knows what they offer there.

Interesting times.

BornInA2

April 20th, 2023 at 5:00 PM ^

Golly this makes being a fan so much fun. Anytime Free Agency.

And I'm also sure it is beneficial to the student-athlete's education.

/sarcasm

The Oracle 2

April 20th, 2023 at 9:36 PM ^

It’s making college football and basketball a job market and will end up greatly diminishing both sports. And being a star athlete getting big money in college doesn’t have any relation at all to the real world job market, assuming players getting this kind of money ever need a job.

JamieH

April 21st, 2023 at 11:47 AM ^

NFL and NBA have league structure including contracts.  If you sign a contract with one team, you can't just jump to another team for more money.  You have to play out your contract first.  You can sit out trying to force a re-negotiation, but you can't just take another contract.

This "NIL" (open corruption) situation in college is just garbage.

bluebyyou

April 20th, 2023 at 6:14 PM ^

Very true...free agency at least gets one a contract with the team you go to.  College sports have no rules unless it is Harbaugh (fuck the NCAA!.)

Can't blame Dickinson...wonder if it is guaranteed money?  

As we have seen, all it takes is some generous donors to buy a few very good players.

vablue

April 20th, 2023 at 8:23 PM ^

You can’t blame the NCAA for this.  NIL is not a NCAA decision, it is the result of a court case and there is no circumstances in which limits on an athletes ability to get NIL money would remotely be allowed in court.  The vast majority of this board supported NIL for athletes, welcome to the world you wanted.

25dodgebros

April 21st, 2023 at 10:31 AM ^

Why is the no sit out rule a problem.  Do you have a "sit out" period in your contract with your employer?  A few do but this is very uncommon overall and some argue it is harmful to the economy to require productive, in demand, people to be sidelined from their profession when they change jobs.  

 

Brhino

April 20th, 2023 at 9:25 PM ^

The NCAA had an opportunity to establish some kind of framework in which players could be fairly compensated in a regulated way.  They had years to do that. Instead, they dug their heels in and fought tooth and nail against anything even starting to move in that direction, and held on until the courts blew the whole thing up.  They could have gotten out in front of things and maintained control, but they didn't.

vablue

April 20th, 2023 at 10:35 PM ^

You still have the same issue.  There is no way to regulate NIL and it is highly unlikely you will get a union to negotiate with based on the number of athletes and the vast disparity in employers and their ability to provide compensation. This is not the NFL and putting together a single set of regulations for the NCAA will be virtually impossible. Even if you did, NIL will still be unregulated and the difference maker.

the college football and basketball you used to love is dead.

M_Born M_Believer

April 21st, 2023 at 11:42 AM ^

Yes, there is / was a way.  I am waiting for the first college to offer kids "2 year / 4 year" contracts.  So it goes both ways.  Yay, you'll get paid but you will also sign a contract stating that you will "work" (ie participate in a sport) for said school.

And yes, I know there will always be escape clauses and such, but this would certainly be a way to tamper down some of the transfer portal with athletes will be tied to contracts and actually committed to a school, just as the school is committed to paying the athlete.

DennisFranklinDaMan

April 20th, 2023 at 10:42 PM ^

I more or less agree with the court's decision, but ... I understand why the NCAA did what it did, and ... I do worry that the end result is going to significantly lessen the entertainment value of college football and basketball for fans. 

And, hell, maybe that's for the best. Maybe it was necessary. But ... college basketball is now, in my opinion, significantly worse than it was in the past (God it was fun to watch Gary Grant and Glen Rice play for three years, and even Chris Weber play for two), and college football is as well (in different ways).

The NCAA was trying to maintain something that benefited the fans (and, by the way, the non-revenue-producing sports), at the expense of the athletes in the revenue-producing sports. Maybe that wasn't fair, and maybe that wasn't, at the end of the day, the "just" thing to do. But ... I think we've opened Pandora's Box, opened the barn door, and let the genie out of the bottle (I'm not quite sure which of those metaphors is most apt, so I'll let you decide). 

And ... sigh. College sports is the worse for it.

jbohl

April 21st, 2023 at 10:36 AM ^

"The NCAA was trying to maintain something that benefited the fans (and, by the way, the non-revenue-producing sports), at the expense of the athletes in the revenue-producing sports. Maybe that wasn't fair, and maybe that wasn't, at the end of the day, the "just" thing to do. "

 

The NCAA was trying to maintain something that benefitted the NCAA and the schools.  The fans were a secondary consideration.  And you succinctly stated the unfairness of the system.  In my opinion, there is no maybe.

L'Carpetron Do…

April 20th, 2023 at 11:09 PM ^

Spot on - they 100% screwed the pooch and this is the new normal. They should've found a way to pay the players a generous stipend that is uniform across all schools. I would've favored a system that paid players fixed amounts on a schedule that encouraged them to come back to school and earn more each year and then get a bonus upon graduation. And if should top recruits should get more, give them some kind of maximum bonus. But the idea is that it would at least be somewhat equitable (on the surface at least), theoretically allowing all teams to compete. Instead, we get this Wild West free agency that is turning the big programs like Kansas into the Yankees. 

MgoBlueprint

April 21st, 2023 at 9:30 AM ^

But that is exactly on the ncaa. They had every opportunity for o implement a system or framework, but refused to do so. State legislators stepped in, which created a patchwork of policies. Again, the ncaa failed to create a uniform system that would allow for player compensation. Then, finally they had to try to cobble something together after the Supreme Court forced them to. This could have been avoided had the ncaa been proactive 

FatGuyTouchdown

April 20th, 2023 at 9:34 PM ^

The education is the exact same for big time basketball players, except now they’re getting real world experience in changing jobs, negotiating contracts, and branching out. 
 

this is absolutely what Hunter needs to do, unless he gets more elsewhere. Win win for him. Win more games, maximize your earning potential to set yourself up for life

RadOWon

April 21st, 2023 at 4:04 PM ^

The universities and billionaire media moguls all know this has ZERO to do with educations and it's interesting that people actually believe it still does.

 

If I'm Hunter and I know I'm not going to be drafted or have a real chance in the NBA, I'm taking the money and running. Anyone who says otherwise is either lying or a fool.

 

 

gruden

April 20th, 2023 at 8:33 PM ^

Anyone who gets into teaching for 3 months off is doing it for the wrong reasons.  I'm jealous that my wife gets 2.5 months "off" every year, but I don't want to deal with what she has to put up with for the other 9+ months.  A lot of talented people are getting burned out and leaving.

AZBlue

April 20th, 2023 at 6:24 PM ^

Sam Webb did say on the MGoBlog Roundtable today that the rumor is that KU was determined "not to be beaten" in terms of NIL for Dickinson fwiw.

 

PS - While I am hopeful M hoops will be better next year I do not believe they will be title contenders.  It would be fitting Karma for Hunter and KU to end the run of "Izzo's best team ever!!" next March.