Momentum for Varsity Women's Hockey?

Submitted by dcblue92 on March 28th, 2024 at 2:34 PM

Santa and the regents recommend a feasibility study for varsity Women's hockey, the first (required) step. Could it finally happen? It's long overdue, but it sounds like the right people are behind it.

https://247sports.com/college/michigan/Article/michigan-regents-president-ono-call-for-feasibility-study-for-varsity-womens-hockey-team-the-time-has-come-229476267/?

ramenboy

March 28th, 2024 at 2:46 PM ^

As a father of a 13yo daughter who plays hockey I think this is awesome news.  Not that I have any realistic expectations that my daughter would be able to play D1 (she only started tying her own skates last year ha) but it’s nice to dream.  

NittanyFan

March 28th, 2024 at 3:37 PM ^

I get it - the MHSAA doesn't sponsor girls ice hockey ---- yet ---- but::

  • (1) there's a lot of young Michigan resident women who do play the sport,
  • (2) Michigan's a pretty big hockey state,
  • (3) as of the moment, no Michigan University sponsors the sport at the NCAA level, and
  • (4) 4 of Michigan's 5 other "hockey school" conference-mates sponsor the sport.

Now, yes, there's the issues of $$$ and facilities.  The latter being the more serious (Michigan can very likely find the $$$ if they want to).

But Michigan (or MSU, or somebody) should really try to sponsor women's hockey.  It's a lot like men's lacrosse 10 years ago.  It's a sport that should be sponsored by a Michigan school, simply from the POV of serving the residents of a state.  A potential place for them to play the sport in their college years.

Wolverine In Exile

March 28th, 2024 at 7:51 PM ^

Honestly, who cares if mhsaa sponsors it. There's a strong girls hs program in the state with both a Div 1 and Div 2 level in spite of mhsaa's idiocy. We also have a strong tier 1 in program with the usual suspects (Little Caesars, Honey baked, Belle Tire, Fox Motors, etc) sponsoring nationally competitive teams. The issue has never been pool of players within the state. It's always been a triple headed monster of cost of Div 1, desire to have Yost as the home rink to maintain parity with the mens team, and balance with Title 9 scholarship limits. 

Leatherstocking Blue

March 28th, 2024 at 2:54 PM ^

If you look at the Women's Frozen Four this year, you have two B1G teams and Colgate and Clarkson. I'm not sure what the facilities are like at Ohio State and Wisconsin, but Colgate (enrollment 3,000) and Clarkson (enrollment 3,400) share facilities with equally strong men's teams, just one sheet of ice. The athletic budgets for these two upstate New York schools are a fraction of the the other Frozen Four teams, and yet, there they were competing against schools 10x their size.

It seems easily doable from both a facilities and financial perspective. 

 

 

HAIL 2 VICTORS

March 28th, 2024 at 3:24 PM ^

At what cost? 

Will financial attention to this non-revenue generating venture come at the cost of financial attention that could be put toward the NIL funding of sports that can sustain themselves financially?

Women's sports at Michigan are already very well represented and I would prefer to see the $ get put back into softballs return, women's basketball making a final 4, continued Field Hockey success, Golf, Tennis.  

Women's Hockey is at best niche.  Wants and Needs are two different things.  If Stephen Ross wants to fund this and it does not come at the cost of his contributions to Men's sports... ok I guess.

 

 

S.G. Rice

March 28th, 2024 at 3:43 PM ^

Women's hockey is growing in popularity.  A number of the new professional league games have hit 10,000 attendance numbers - over 13k at a game in Detroit this month.  It's a little bigger than niche.

If two minutes of research gave me accurate information, there is an 18 scholarship limit.  You can probably run a quality program for a couple million a year if the facilities are in place.

Realistically, I think you go the route that Penn State went and Illinois was trying to go -- find the right donors to fund the necessary facilities and assemble a collection of boosters that will reliably contribute to support the running of the program.

It is absolutely possible that there are donors out there that would fund hockey and only hockey.  I'm not wealthy but if I had some money I'd donate.  I can't think of any circumstance where I would do the same for the football or basketball programs.

 

colonel

March 28th, 2024 at 6:23 PM ^

The point is well taken that the University’s money might be better spent elsewhere, but you can’t possibly argue that women’s hockey is “too niche” and in the same breath support resources for collegiate softball, field hockey, tennis, and golf. It’s all niche. There are only two athletics programs at Michigan that are not.

If the donors are there to get the program off the ground and to support an expansion of Yost and/or a complementary facility, why not go for it? The University has pretty swanky facilities for many non-revenue sports. What’s one more?

The counterfactual I propose is what things might have looked like this year had Michigan had a team ready to compete with the Buckeyes for women’s hockey preeminence. When the men’s basketball team was in the dumpster and the men’s hockey team was scuffling a little bit, Michigan fans were looking for some excitement to keep the buzz from the CFP going. Wouldn’t Yost have filled up when the Buckeye ladies rolled into town? I kinda think it would have…

gbdub

March 28th, 2024 at 3:38 PM ^

Why is “do away with a parking lot” even a hard decision? Build a locker room and dig a parking garage underneath it. Or build a garage and put a locker room on top of it. Whatever. It will be a little oddly shaped having both lockers off one end of the ice but seems like a win win otherwise. 

They really ought to do this whether or not they start women’s hockey. 

NittanyFan

March 28th, 2024 at 3:26 PM ^

I'm not trying to knock Colgate & Clarkson - and their accomplishment in reaching the Women's Frozen Four - but women's ice hockey now is a bit like women's basketball in the 1980s and 1990s.  There's a handful of programs (OSU, Wisc, Minnesota, Clarkson for hockey --- Tennessee, UConn, USC and Louisiana Tech for basketball) that win basically ALL the titles.

The sport will mature.  If schools like Michigan (and ND, both of them) start programs, and if already existant programs like PSU (and BC and BU, among others) work at it more - the sport will get there.

But for now, Clarkson can be like Louisiana Tech women's hoops once was.  A consistent Final Four team despite being a considerably smaller insitution.

ST3

March 28th, 2024 at 3:47 PM ^

The interesting thing is that Denise Illitch appears to be backing this. Stephen Ross is our go-to example of the Michigan money cannon, but if Illitch thinks she can seed this with some $$$, it builds fan interest that ends up helping the Red Wings expand their fan base and return some revenue to her pockets. This sounds like a win-win situation. 

Chuck Norris

March 28th, 2024 at 10:02 PM ^

That'd be ideal. Renovated arena/facilities that can host both Michigan women's hockey and a PWHL team. The main problem getting a team is venue - LCA is a little big and frankly might not have the capacity to handle a *third* professional sport happening in the same timeframe. Interest certainly isn't an issue: Detroit set the record for women's hockey attendance during the one off game here.

BTB grad

March 29th, 2024 at 12:44 PM ^

Tell her to start spending on the Tigers while she’s at it. 21st payroll in the MLB while having a shot at the division crown in a weak AL Central is a letdown to the fans. There were some free agents they could’ve taken a shot at that they never got involved for. They at least need to be closer to average payroll.

98xj

March 28th, 2024 at 3:53 PM ^

The question of Yost Ice Arena needs to be addressed simultaneously.

Also, what is happening with the former Indoor Track Building? Could it be converted to an ice arena?

AWAS

March 28th, 2024 at 6:14 PM ^

Keeping the game day experience at Yost is non-negotiable to me.  A women's team should be able to use the same facility for game day, and have their own dedicated locker room.  Upgrading locker rooms for both hosts and visitors (including tournament capacity) should be managable with additions around the existing building.  

The next question is where to put an additional sheet of ice and facilities for practice and training. That's a bit more challenging depending on the goals and what is best for the athletes.  To me, the best solution revolves around replacing surface parking with one or more parking structures, and keeping all of hockey in the same general area.

 

 

colonel

March 28th, 2024 at 6:33 PM ^

You’ve hit the nail on the head. The ideal solution would involve both a locker-room expansion of Yost and the establishment of a separate practice facility. The first thing should probably happen anyway, varsity women’s program or not. The existing club teams and the various teams that visit Yost would appreciate that.

The second piece, the practice facility, seems trickier. I wonder if there is space near the new lacrosse and track facilities to put a sheet of ice. I’ve also heard the idea floated that the old coliseum, where the hockey team used to play, could be reconverted. Not sure if that idea has any legs though.