Michigan 15.5 Favorite Over Maryland
Most sites have Michigan as a 15.5 favorite over Maryland
As someone who just put a large amount of cash on Michigan to cover would love to get your thoughts
Positive Factors:
- Maryland playing their 4th string QB
- Michigan coming in playing their best ball of Big 10 season (covering easily against Minnesota and missing covering agianst Rutgers by 1)
- Maryland not a particularly hostile place to play
- Incentive to give DJ some karma for OSU two years ago
Thoughts?!
November 7th, 2017 at 11:56 AM ^
28-7 seems reasonable. One weird score and Maryland could cover in that situation. Id say more likely Michigan gets into the 30s than Maryland in the teens. Nothing is a given with our passing game though.
November 7th, 2017 at 12:53 PM ^
You can reasonably plan on us scoring over 28 when we just put 35 and 33 on two defenses that are much better than Maryland's. Rutgers just put 31 on Maryland. I like us to win a game that feels like our first real blowout of the year, something like 41-7.
November 7th, 2017 at 11:56 AM ^
Caleb Henderson, who was injured in fall camp and has played very sparingly, was considered the third-stringer coming into the season, meaning Bortenschlager is really the fourth-stringer and Brand would be fifth-string.
Crazy.
November 7th, 2017 at 12:35 PM ^
That's what I thought too, based mainly on Maryland blogs, but it proves yet again that the depth chart is not the depth chart per se for numerous reasons.
I know those words hurt Tim Brando, but I honestly believe they ring true.
November 7th, 2017 at 11:57 AM ^
easy cover
November 7th, 2017 at 11:57 AM ^
I think you were wise to take the over. Michigan will run at will on Maryland, and their offense (esp. at QB) is bedraggled. I think Durkin will turn that program around, but this year against Michigan?
They gonna die.
November 7th, 2017 at 11:58 AM ^
The Terps are ranked 113th on offense, 101st on defense. What could go wrong?
November 7th, 2017 at 12:02 PM ^
Vegas has taken my clothes the last four weeks. I even had a 4-leg parlay with PSU, OSU, ND and Florida covering last week. Errr... Not good, Bob. With that caveat, I think we hammer Maryland. 38-6 or something close. 4th string QBs won't fare well versus this D.
That MSU @OSU line (14.5, last I checked Vegas Insider) seems like a trap. ND turnover fest aside, State just doesn't seem like a team that will get blown out unless they play Bama. Who knows? I am staying away.
November 7th, 2017 at 12:18 PM ^
Dude, you bet on Florida to cover the game on the road after ridiculous distractions from firing their coach, and starting Zaire who has one good game his entire career? Not only that, but Missouri had dropped 4 TDs on Georgia recently and has been explosive on offense for the majority of the year.
November 8th, 2017 at 8:01 AM ^
Obviously it was a bad bet, but Mizzou is awful. They were 0-4 in conference and they got skunked by Purdue and have been handing out points like halloween candy. Florida is worse, I guess.
November 7th, 2017 at 12:49 PM ^
November 7th, 2017 at 12:07 PM ^
Going to this game and I'd really like to see a stress free 2nd half which would constitute an easy cover in my mind.
We've seen this script, what, four or five times this year. Michigan scores between 28-35 points by running over and over again. Defense gives up 1-2 scoring drives, maybe one with a short field.
College football is weird, especially on the road, but this should end up being 30-10 or something like that.
FWIW, road games against unranked opponents under Harbaugh...
2015:
at Maryland (28-0)
at Minnesota (29-26)
at Indiana (48-41, 2OT)
at Penn State (28-16)
2016:
at Rutgers (78-0)
at Michigan State (32-23)
at Iowa (GRR)
2017:
at Purdue (28-10)
at Indiana (27-20, OT)
So, 8-1 in road games against unranked teams with an average MOV of 14 (with Rutgers excluded).
November 7th, 2017 at 12:14 PM ^
November 7th, 2017 at 12:23 PM ^
So how much money did you put down? How much is a "large amount"? $100? $1,000? $10,000? $1,000,000,000??
November 7th, 2017 at 12:27 PM ^
November 7th, 2017 at 1:36 PM ^
the zeros just kept going, all the way off my screen! Now that is a large amount of money
November 7th, 2017 at 12:21 PM ^
November 7th, 2017 at 12:26 PM ^
Mich... 45
Terps... 9
November 7th, 2017 at 12:26 PM ^
Maryland probably isn't breaking 10 points with a 4th string QB, so all you're likely betting on is Michigan's suddenly good rushing offense to get to 28. I'll take that all day
November 7th, 2017 at 1:37 PM ^
Unfortunately, every team has put 10+ points on us this year
November 7th, 2017 at 2:13 PM ^
We've held a lot of teams to around 10 points and Maryland is fielding a 4th string QB. Certainly won't be surprised to see Maryland at or beneath 10 points
Florida 3
Cinci 14
AF 13
Purdue 10
MSU 14
Rutgers 14
Minnesota 10
It's really not a bold statement to say we should expect to hold a Maryland team on their 4th string QB to 10 points or less (assuming the offense doesn't give them any gift points like we did for Florida)
November 8th, 2017 at 1:20 AM ^
November 7th, 2017 at 12:26 PM ^
That seems low. Maryland's defense is worse than Minnesota's in S&P Rankings but their offense is better. However, I don't think that takes into consideration the 4th (5th?) string QB making the start.
Maryland's rush defense is better according to S&P but that doesn't mean much. The Maryland defense is going to get tired very quickly from being on the field so much due to their offense going 3-and-out every possession.
I think Michigan wins by 20+.
November 7th, 2017 at 1:18 PM ^
They're not just worse in S&P...they're 57 places worse. This Maryland defense is baaaaaad.
November 7th, 2017 at 1:39 PM ^
But their rush defense is better than Minnesota.
Maryland rush defense is ranked 59. Minnesota is 100. Maryland should be able to stop our run better than Minnesota did, which should force us to pass more.
Maryland pass defense is ranked 92. Minnesota is 31.
Overall Maryland's defense is bad but the question will be if we can take advantage of that bad pass defense, if we need to. Against Minnesota, we didn't have to test that well ranked Minnesota pass defense, at all.
I see us struggling early on versus Maryland until we start to wear them down because of their offense getting bounced so quickly. I think we start to see the running game get going mid 2nd quarter and then it's on and back to business as usual.
November 7th, 2017 at 2:12 PM ^
But their IsoPPP is really bad too, so I still expect us to hit some big runs, even if we aren't getting 6 yards every run play with ease.
November 7th, 2017 at 2:12 PM ^
But their IsoPPP is really bad too, so I still expect us to hit some big runs, even if we aren't getting 6 yards every run play with ease.
November 7th, 2017 at 2:14 PM ^
Sir, I would like to talk to you about Maryland's defense's IsoPPP
November 7th, 2017 at 2:17 PM ^
But what about their IsoPPP?
November 7th, 2017 at 12:36 PM ^
If we hit good weather, I think we win by 20-30 points, maybe ever more considering the QB situation at Maryland.
As for OSU and MSU, I am completely lost as to how OSU can be 14.5 favorites over MSU. I think MSU wins that game, and OSU is 9-3 going into THE GAME. At this point for us, a win over Wisconsin would be a better win than over Ohio State as far as resume right? I know OSU has literally owned us, but I really want this Wisconsin win! Fuck OSU. We will beat them. Harbaugh is going to put a huge emphasis on winning that game. Damn I am pumped for Football!
November 7th, 2017 at 1:21 PM ^
Play the 2's against Maryland and Wisconsin if the 1's need some rest.
We're not winning the B1G, so it's a one game season as far as I'm concerned.
/OSU fan in my office feels the same.
November 7th, 2017 at 1:45 PM ^
not a one game season. Giving Wisconsin its first loss of the season would be a big win and would continue momentum into the Ohio State game. Also, if we won out it is better than a 50/50 shot we would play in a NY6 bowl, which means something, even if people insist that it doesn't in fits of rage.
November 7th, 2017 at 3:10 PM ^
It'll be interesting to see how big of a test Iowa can give Wisconsin this weekend. Iowa can be a completely different team when they're on the road, but it looks like Wisconsin may actually have to play teams with a pulse on back to back weeks.
November 7th, 2017 at 12:39 PM ^
To hell with MSU.
November 7th, 2017 at 12:47 PM ^
Why is everyone under assumption 4th string will start? Sounds like Max is a game-time decision and trending to start. If anything, I'd rather him start then the guy that finally moved the offense against last game and can run option with their 2 good RBs.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/terps/tracking-the-terps/bs-sp-maryl…
November 7th, 2017 at 12:52 PM ^
November 7th, 2017 at 6:23 PM ^
Did'nt Rutgers just put 31 on them?. I think our offense is just a wee bit better than Rutgers. I think Michigan should be favored by far more and look for Michigan to push past 40 easily.
November 7th, 2017 at 12:54 PM ^
I would play to cover.
More improvement from Peters and the offensive line.
November 7th, 2017 at 1:02 PM ^
Before playing Wisconsin and osu. Hopefully, the run game continues to show strength and Peters gets more chances to pass. It's on the road so a win is a win at this stage. Hoping to see a blowout.
GO BLUE!!
November 7th, 2017 at 1:13 PM ^
November 7th, 2017 at 1:19 PM ^
MSU can win against OSU. I'd put odds at 40%
Just like always, we underestimate MSU. Leweke is actually a good QB i'd want for M and their WR (Felton?) is making plays whcih we also lack (yet again, how the F is Dantonio doing this????).
Can we say the same for M? Not yet.
Oh and we cover easily because Peters throws couple of TDs and Higdon wrecks Maryland D to shreds.
Bring on Wiscy and noodlearm Horni.
November 7th, 2017 at 1:33 PM ^
on Saturday afternoon. If there's a prop bet on that, I may put a shilling on the meteor.
November 7th, 2017 at 2:26 PM ^
It should be pointed out that Felton is a true junior; their other top receiver (Stewart) is a RS Sophomore. Michigan has Grant Perry and that's about it for upperclassmen receivers of note. And Michigan is working with their 3rd-string QB; put Damion Terry out there and let's see how they look.
November 7th, 2017 at 2:32 PM ^
No directly comparing M. Thats an older receiver (Freshman receivers suck).
We will most definitely improve - just like our run blocking has improved.
I'm just more incredulous at MSU's path. I was led wrongly to believe MSU was junk by this blog or other media. Their record indicates they were better entering and they keep improving too (they are young and Lewerke has been on fire past two games).
I also hope DPJ or Black is better than Felton like next year. Can't wait to see offense firing on all cylinders!
November 7th, 2017 at 4:59 PM ^
November 8th, 2017 at 3:51 AM ^
we have other upper classmen WRs, they just have flamed out.
November 7th, 2017 at 1:28 PM ^
I think a 14-point spread is right. Michigan has an untested QB starting his first road game. Durkin knows JH's tendencies very well.
November 7th, 2017 at 1:28 PM ^
I will have my fat ass planted at the bar in the sports book at the Wynn Casino starting at 8:30am and running through about 5pm (have Tony Bennett tickets - yes he's still alive allegedly) so I'm wondering if anybody has anything they really like this weekend.
Of course I'll play the Browns +12 against the Lions on Sunday. The Lions will win, obviously, but I think coming off a bye and the Lions playing on Monday night will lead to a closer game than expected. Or at least I hope so.
November 7th, 2017 at 1:34 PM ^
like their looking to be relegated to a lower league that doesn't exist.
November 7th, 2017 at 1:38 PM ^
I wouldn't bet the Browns to cover