Lansing hates the UP, favors MSU athletics

Submitted by Red_Lee on January 3rd, 2020 at 12:13 PM

https://www.miningjournal.net/news/front-page-news/2020/01/u-p-reps-want-to-use-state-owned-aircraft-to-fly-back-and-forth/

UP legislators would like to use State MDOT aircraft to fly to and from Lansing and are jumping through hoops to get permission. 

However, MSU athletics has had free reign on MDOT aircraft since 2008, and has been far and away the most frequent public university to use the aircraft. Their athletic department used it 16 times alone in fiscal year 2016-2017.

What a fucking joke. The State only cares about the UP when they need a photo for their cheesy ass tourist plugs or they want to pretend to be hunting and conservation experts.

If they can't provide accommodation I say the UP just has our own legislative sessions, with beer and saunas.

stephenrjking

January 3rd, 2020 at 12:24 PM ^

The article bears little resemblance to the content of this post, which appears to be a "man yells at cloud" summary that isn't clear what it is even angry about.

MSU's use of the aircraft doesn't appear to be relevant to the bill. It is relevant to the existence of the aircraft at all, which is discussed but isn't actually an issue with the legislation. 

Red_Lee

January 3rd, 2020 at 12:29 PM ^

Instead of driving 5-10 hours, our legislators would like better travel conditions. They're having to fight for the ability to save time and effort so they can be effective members of a government that tends to cast them aside.

The article clearly included the MSU athletics section to show what the State has decided is the "most appropriate" use of taxpayer funded transportation. 

 So, yes I'm yelling at a cloud, but that cloud spells out, "MSU's athletic department is more important than the people of the UP."

Should I not be angry? Why does MSU sports take precedence over, you know, actual government?

NittanyFan

January 3rd, 2020 at 12:34 PM ^

Right - although, MSU should be paying the MI government for use of the airplanes.

As for the UP legislators - there are daily Delta flights from DTW to 4 UP airports.  They can use those flights and from there either connect to a Lansing flight or take a shuttle.  I don't feel sorry for them at all here.

Looking at various maps, there are only 5 MI legislators from the UP anyway.  I know it's a bit of a pain getting to Lansing, but that's what they signed up for.  It's all expense-able anyway.

Red_Lee

January 3rd, 2020 at 1:06 PM ^

"That's what they signed up for" is a terrible reason to not provide better transportation, especially when it's been made available to an irrelevant cause like MSU athletics. It's also the typical response the UP seems to get, so it's not likely to satisfy the constituents.

Also, there is one flight in and out of every airport. Have you flown out of the UP? It is typically an easy, low demand flight. But unless you book months in advance, a reasonably priced or even available flight is far from a guarantee.

But your lack of empathy is not surprising. That's why this is an issue anyways. Most knuckleheaded downstaters will easily brush off MSU athletics being given better treatment than democratically elected officials of OUR state. But because there are "only 5" north of the bridge, it might as well be a different state.

NittanyFan

January 3rd, 2020 at 1:43 PM ^

I mean - imagine state legislators from western Kansas, western Nebraska, western Montana, eastern Oregon or the Idaho Panhandle.

Those folk are just as remote from their respective state capitals as folk from the UP.  But they do not have commercial flight options.  I follow the aviation industry as a hobby, and I know there are no regularly scheduled flights from Scottsbluff or Garden City, KS to the east!  They are definitely driving to Lincoln and Topeka!

In that respect, UP legislators have it fairly good.  They at least have daily flight options to get downstate.

And, yes, it IS what they signed up for.  Every job has its inherent challenges.  This job has travel challenges.  This is literally FIVE people trying to carve out their own use of a state resource.  

NittanyFan

January 3rd, 2020 at 2:10 PM ^

Fair enough - the "other state comparison" was just to point out that the UP isn't unique in terms of being geographically isolated from the rest of their state.

As for MSU: basically all big-time football/basketball coaches now have it written into their contract that they get use of private airplanes for (1) long-distance recruiting visits, along with (2) a set number of personal trips.

Some universities own 1-2 airplanes (I know Penn State does), some don't.  For those that don't, they have to rent a plane out.  As long as MSU is paying Lansing for it, I don't really see an issue with MSU using those planes for those purposes.

I think MSU using state planes and U-M not doing so is simple as which university is located in Lansing.  If U-M needs to rent a plane, it's simply cheaper to use someone who is hanger-ing their planes at Ann Arbor (or Willow Run).

Red_Lee

January 3rd, 2020 at 2:46 PM ^

Well neither of us seem to know for sure if MSU is paying for it but we'll just assume they are.

The beginning of the article does make mention of all the other state departments that are allowed to use this program at no cost.

Oh and the bill does allow for using already scheduled flights (like you suggested), forgot to mention that in your earlier points. They aren't currently allowed I guess. Seems like a no-brainer, good-will notion to pass it. Hopefully it does, I feel the UP is feeling more and more underrepresented lately. Whitmer has pretty much stomped popular UP topics (deer baiting, wolf hunt, gas pipeline, Pure Michigan to name a few). We don't need to get into those, I just want you to know there is a lot of anti-Lansing angst brewing again.

wolpherine2000

January 3rd, 2020 at 4:07 PM ^

If you are for eliminating tax payer support for any university athletic endeavor, that's one thing. But assuming that you are fine with some taxpayer money dribbling into college athletics, it doesn't really matter if the State of Michigan subsidizes the use of its planes for athletic purposes, or the school "pays" for a charter (like we do). Both still depend on the use of tax revenue...

mjv

January 3rd, 2020 at 2:25 PM ^

The UP should be a separate state if the populace feels that disconnected from the treatment from Lansing. 

There are many situations that this would fit -- Illinois, California, NY are the first three that come to mind -- where the populations are very large and a significant percentage of people don't feel that the single state government represents their interest.  

xtramelanin

January 3rd, 2020 at 12:57 PM ^

not everyone.  love the U.P. and proudly claim my yooper heritage.

as an aside, literally 100 yrs ago when cars were a new-fangled thing, my grandmother used to drive my great grandfather to the legislature meetings down in lansing.  the then-governor asked great grandpa to draft the driver's license bill.  he did that but the governor objected to the minimum age, which great grandpa had set at 14.  my great grandfather told the governor (as legend has it), 'my daughter has been driving me to the meetings since she was 12, and she's only now 14'.   so for years, the driver's license age in michigan was 14 b/c of grandmother XM.  

Maize and Luke

January 3rd, 2020 at 12:39 PM ^

This is the 21st century. Technology has made it possible to attend meetings in audio and/or visually. They don’t need to drive 10 hours or take a plane or even get out of their PJs.

Red_Lee

January 3rd, 2020 at 1:34 PM ^

Jacobetti is a UP hero for a reason.

And we still talk about the feasibility of separation. The State of Michigan is among the most pathetic members of the union when it comes to revenue sharing. The municipalities would most likely survive, but the schools and universities would take a massive blow.

freelion

January 3rd, 2020 at 1:00 PM ^

I have flown on those planes a few times. Trust me, it's not a privilege. They are little prop planes that bounce around like a carnival ride. I would much rather fly commercial.

LSBlue

January 3rd, 2020 at 1:26 PM ^

Meh.  Around Labor Day, I flew into Marquette from DTW and out through Hancock to O'Hare.  The planes weren't bad at all, both smaller jets.  However, the terminals, that was crazy, especially in Hancock.  I'd never experienced anything like that. 

leu2500

January 3rd, 2020 at 2:27 PM ^

“Terminals?” Houghton (only the airline uses Hancock) only has 1 gate.  They recently upgraded TSA from the same agents swapping back & forth between examining luggage & processing passengers.  Ie 15 minutes luggage, 15 minutes passengers.  

Marquette is a metropolis with its 2 gates.  

Maize.Blue Wagner

January 3rd, 2020 at 1:18 PM ^

Did you know...that if you live in Ironwood, you're closer to five other state capitols and the capitol of Manitoba (Winnipeg) than you are to Lansing. And a couple more are only forty miles further (Indianapolis and Pierre).