January 21st, 2018 at 5:37 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 6:45 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 7:06 PM ^
January 22nd, 2018 at 2:02 PM ^
I may be wrong but I only recall McCray getting beat badly on wheel routes when in coverage. Otherwise I still would say he is at minimal above average in coverage and was always in good position. I am probably higher on McCray than most but I am also high on the young guys we brought in to replace him. Between Ross, Singleton, and Anthony I'm feeling real good.
I agree about safety. I'm not worried about the position but it was our weakest spot on a very strong D.
January 21st, 2018 at 6:15 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 11:17 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 6:26 PM ^
We have 5 returning starters if you include Watson along with Hill, Long, Kinnel and Metellus. Backing them up we have Thomas, St. Juste, JKP and Woods, with Hawkins possibly moving ahead of one of them. That seems like pretty good depth. Then you add in the 4 commits we already had in the class and we're at 14 scholarship players. That's an abundance of depth and also has the virtue of being balanced going forward.
Meanwhile, we are very thin at DT and will be thin at OG in a couple of years, especially if the remaining spots are filled by OT types, which seems likely. At DT we have Mone and Lawrence who will probably be gone after next year with only Solomon and Dwumfour having shown signs of filling the need. At OG you have Bredeson and Onwenu who are both true Sophomores. Ruiz may be the C with all 3 spots backed by Spanellis and a bunch of guys we hope will work out.
People are baffled by these additions because it seems that this isn't a position of great need and will necessarily result in positions of need going unfilled.
January 21st, 2018 at 6:59 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 10:00 PM ^
Paea may end up at OG. Johnson hasn't shown anything yet after 3 years. Irving-Bey may be a DE. Myers is a preferred walk-on. 247 composite has him at the #95 player in Michigan in 2016. If I read 247 right he had no other offers. Maybe he's Ryan Glasgow 2.0, but don't bet the house on it. That leaves Jeter. We have high hopes for him, as high as the hopes we had for Marshall. Here's hoping. But that's still just 1 guy to back up Dwumfour and Solomon after next year. You should take a DT in every class.
January 22nd, 2018 at 8:46 AM ^
January 22nd, 2018 at 8:53 AM ^
January 22nd, 2018 at 12:40 PM ^
NT is the question here. We need at least 1 NT in 2019 and maybe 2 if it looks like Solomon will be jump to the NFL after year 3 (I expect he will be good enough to do this).
SDE and 3T are nearly interchangable in Don Brown's defense and we have a LOT of SDE both on the roster and in the 2018 class. Add in Chris Hinton in 2019 and those positions are stocked with potential dudes.
WDE is also stocked with Ron Johnson, Luigi Villain, Kwity Paye all playing behind Chase this year. Stephen Herron will replace Chase on the depth chart in 2019 so we will still be 4 deep.
January 21st, 2018 at 7:21 PM ^
This is a good review. But Hawkins is moving to Viper.
The 4 freshman DBs have almost nothing to do with 2018 depth, at least we hope. So what you describe above is a 2-deep. Which means one injury puts M in a scary, scary spot. Why wouldn't you take an experienced DB? They want to win next year.
In terms of the other roster spots, that's done. There aren't any other recruit targets there. Would you pick up a kid who's not very good just to have a body? People keep asking to take a flyer... why? They'll have to make up in the 2019 class with guys who are ready to go.
M has guys with positional flexibility in terms of Paea and Irving-Bey. They're also running a 3 man line frequently. Losing Tyler Friday was big though, no doubt.
January 21st, 2018 at 10:58 PM ^
I can understand taking Hughes for an immediate impact. I have trouble thinking that 5 freshmen DBs is a good idea. That isn't criticism of any of the 5 DBs, just an observation about positional balance. The early signing period has changed things quite a bit but I've got to believe there are still talented recruits out there who could fill a position of need.
January 21st, 2018 at 5:37 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 5:41 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 5:43 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 5:42 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 5:46 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 5:56 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 6:05 PM ^
I,for one, hoped for more in late January than beating out Missouri and West Virginia for a lightly regarded player and bumming an average grad transfer from Utah.
Like other posters said, I really hope this doesn't mean they are missing on the rest of the 2018 recruits. A lot of the 2015 and 2016 guys will be out of eligibility or going pro after 2018 and it really doesn't seem, on paper at least, that the 2018 class is up to that level. These grad transfers will be headed out the door as well, so it's not like moves like these help the future and gaps in the classes.
January 21st, 2018 at 6:15 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 8:53 PM ^
Trick Daddy? Damn, you a corny mother fucker aren't you. Simon & Garfunkel lyric avatar DEFINITELY checks out.
January 21st, 2018 at 6:06 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 6:16 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 6:24 PM ^
I think what others have said about adding depth with experience makes sense. It's good to be in a position to give the incoming freshman time to grow and mature.
Welcome to Michigan, Casey!
January 21st, 2018 at 6:28 PM ^
January 22nd, 2018 at 12:17 PM ^
A starting corner on a top-15 pass defense isn't all bad. Especially when he's being brought in to shore up the safety/nickle position. You remember, right? The same spot that allowed so many bombs last year? At the most inopportune times?
January 21st, 2018 at 6:30 PM ^
January 22nd, 2018 at 12:17 PM ^
Doesn't everyone at Utah punt? Imean, Utah had the best punter award for 12 years in a row, or something...
January 21st, 2018 at 6:30 PM ^
I really don't follow Utah football all that closely, but if Casey Hughes was a starter/starter-ish for them... Why would he transfer from being the starter at P5 program to another P5 program where he will most likely be behind 2 established starters in Hill and Long?
Was Hughes being passed up on Utah's depth chart? I don't know a good place to look up snap counts to see if Hughes was progressively losing snaps as the season went along. I guess that would make sense then for him to want to leave, and get a fresh start at Michigan.
January 21st, 2018 at 6:42 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 6:44 PM ^
is always welcome - especially from a full year starter w/4.4 40 speed
January 21st, 2018 at 6:55 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 6:57 PM ^
Occam's Razor, ak47, Maizen--all this thread needs is Stringer Bell and we'll all be ready to drink antifreeze rather than face another agonizing season of Michigan football..
January 21st, 2018 at 7:01 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 7:43 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 7:43 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 10:13 PM ^
January 22nd, 2018 at 8:04 AM ^
Good question, but the better question is can he cover better than Metellus?
January 22nd, 2018 at 2:30 PM ^
January 21st, 2018 at 9:00 PM ^
Battling Juco kids for his job? Great!
January 21st, 2018 at 10:03 PM ^
JUCO players can be good players. Many of them were good HS players who don't qualify right away.
January 21st, 2018 at 10:03 PM ^
I know you just want to be negative like a lot of other people, but just because a kid is a JuCo doesnt mean he's not good and not good enough to beat out another solid player. Jarret Stidham, Isaiah Buggs, Kendall Sheffield, those were all JuCo guys who came in and took a spot. They might be the top dudes, but the point is sometimes those kids are very talented and come in and make an impact.
January 21st, 2018 at 10:40 PM ^
Depth on the dime package?
Anyway I wish the young man luck and you never know.
January 21st, 2018 at 7:06 PM ^
January 22nd, 2018 at 12:36 AM ^
January 22nd, 2018 at 12:56 PM ^
The more the marrier! Hey, maybe this guy becomes a superstar here...or never plays a down. You never know! I'm all for it, Go Blue!!