FSU: Injuries Count

Submitted by oakapple on December 3rd, 2023 at 1:10 PM

Some people are amazed when the Committee does exactly what it said it would do. The Committee’s own procedures say it must consider injuries. (The basketball committee does that too.) In contrast, there is nothing that says an undefeated P5 champ must be in the top four. I grieve for Florida State, but after its starting QB went down it simply has not been the same team.

Some in the media were arguing that Washington should leapfrog Michigan, because its win over Oregon “looked better” than Michigan’s slog over Iowa. But the Committee had Michigan consistently above Washington starting in Week 9, when Michigan still had not played Penn State, Ohio State, or Iowa. There was no way the same people who ranked them in that order were going to change their minds after Michigan handled Iowa 26–0.

CityOfKlompton

December 3rd, 2023 at 1:39 PM ^

Just imagine: The Kansas Chiefs just punched their ticket into the NFL playoffs, but Patrick Mahomes got hurt in the final game. In turn, the NFL decides that the Chiefs aren't all that good without their star quarterback, so they decide that the Chiefs will be replaced with another team that has a worse record and will not be participating for a chance at the Super Bowl.

Just. Absurd.

---

Beat Alabama.

ole luther

December 3rd, 2023 at 2:01 PM ^

Hintz,

You really don't get the anology here?

An undefeated, conference champion, who did what was asked of them, gets the consolation prize?

Sorry, Brady, you must return those rings because there was a team with one more loss than you, even though you beat everyone you were asked to along the way. 

We decided they looked better than you today...unlike yesterday.

,

 

DelhiWolverine

December 3rd, 2023 at 3:26 PM ^

The REAL issue here is that the committee broke precedent in a major way. The actual precedent has been that an undefeated P5 conference champion has ALWAYS gotten into the 4 team playoff, even if there was an argument that it wasn’t one of the 4 best teams. Based on precedent, FSU has a legitimate gripe and I feel for them and their fans. Based on how the committee claims they pick the top 4, I think there’s a real justification for including Alabama. But they’ve never actually acted this way before. 

FB Dive

December 3rd, 2023 at 1:13 PM ^

FSU still has an elite defense, which apparently doesn't matter, and regardless, they are a 13-0 Power 5 champion. This outcome is precisely what the playoff was created to avoid. It's a disgrace.

Imagine if Milroe had gotten hurt on the last play yesterday so the committee kept Georgia in over Bama. Bama fans would be outraged. ESPN's pro-SEC advocacy is solely motivated by their desire for money and ratings.

Amazinblu

December 3rd, 2023 at 1:46 PM ^

FSU should have it’s #2 QB available in a week or two.  But, no one has mentioned that - only how QB 3 played against Louisville.

FSU defeating Florida in the Swamp was a terrible game, yet Bama’s miraculous win over a mediocre Auburn gets no play.

Yeah - there’s no bias whatsoever.

The Oracle 2

December 3rd, 2023 at 1:13 PM ^

They had FSU ranked #4 and Alabama #8 before yesterday, with the knowledge that FSU’s #1 QB was gone for the season, but I guess they changed their minds about that?

colonel

December 3rd, 2023 at 4:00 PM ^

The difference is that that Ohio State team started rolling. They beat Wisconsin 59-0 in the B1G title game. They made a strong statement, and the committee had no choice but to include them. 

It's brutal and unfair, but FSU had to make a statement against Louisville. They had to win big, and they didn't. They pulled off a gutsy win, and I think they should be rewarded for that, but unfortunately they didn't play well enough on offense to remove the doubt about their abilities sans Travis. Going into the weekend, anybody who had been paying attention had said that a loss or a close, ugly win would knock FSU out, if 'Bama should win. It's arbitrary bullshit, but those were the stakes. 

And people are certainly overlooking the bullshit that is Alabama's win over Auburn (the defensive call by Auburn on the deciding play might actually be the worst defensive play-call in the history of major college football), and pretending that 'Bama has been absolutely rolling, but the perception exists that they're just better than FSU without Travis. Coming off a win for 'Bama over 12-0 Georgia, It's kinda hard to argue against that perception, annoying as it is. 

goblu330

December 3rd, 2023 at 1:14 PM ^

People are bitching about FSU being left out because they don’t want to play Bama.  FSU is not very good without Travis.  The CFP is not a “reward” for a job well done, it is to identify the best team.  FSU is not one of the best 4 right now and it’s clear.  Committee got it right.

UMForLife

December 3rd, 2023 at 1:22 PM ^

This is being said over and over again. I care for that kid who got injured. His team played their hearts out and still were left out. Why do you think people can sometimes look beyond an easy win. Fuck that. If UM can't beat Bama so be it. But do not trivialize how some of us feel about fairness. I did not neg you by the way. 

goblu330

December 3rd, 2023 at 1:43 PM ^

I don’t care about being negged it’s fine.

People are acting like Bama is some scrub.  They lost one game to another playoff team 12 weeks ago.  They have gone undefeated since and just hammered the 2 time defending champ. The ACC is a weak conference.  FSU needed to win big last night and they didn’t.

Bama is a deserving playoff team.

TIMMMAAY

December 3rd, 2023 at 2:23 PM ^

I love how you totally ignore the very cogent reasons given, for the opinions you are disparaging. You just construct your own narrative for why people are saying what they're saying, regardless of their own fucking words. It's asinine. 

FSU got screwed, for all of the actual reasons listed above, and below your thoughtless comment. 

goblu330

December 3rd, 2023 at 2:58 PM ^

Somebody gets screwed almost every year in some form.  Yeah they have a good argument for the Playoff, sucks they lost their QB but they did.  I’m not disparaging anybody.  I think Bama and FSU were both deserving teams and one got the boot.  It happens.

The Oracle 2

December 3rd, 2023 at 1:25 PM ^

FSU’s defense is tough. I haven’t watched them much, but a couple of weeks ago I saw Jared Verse get a sack by picking up a 300+ pound tackle and throwing him into the QB like he was picking up a spare. Alabama lucked into a total collapse by Auburn to avoid a much deserved second loss, then beat Georgia when they were weakened by injuries. It isn’t clear.

Clarence Beeks

December 3rd, 2023 at 1:45 PM ^

Watched every single FSU game and went to one (my wife is an FSU alum) and you are spot on correct. FSU would have arguably brought the best defense to the CFP, after Michigan. They got absolutely hosed because Rodemaker couldn’t play last night, and that’s it. Period. They won the games they needed to, including last night with their third string QB - WHO WOULD NOT BE THE BOWL GAME STARTER. The viewpoint that in a bunch of posts that everyone is saying “everyone here would have picked FSU because it’s the easier game and that says everything” is (a) not true on either of those fronts and (b) complete garbage. I would have liked to get FSU so that both of my teams were in, but in terms of matchup, I wouldn’t want one bit of playing against the FSU defense. Luckily, Michigan doesn’t have to find out.

BornInA2

December 3rd, 2023 at 2:24 PM ^

FSU is not very good without Travis.

Only good enough to win all the games they played without him? How good do you want them to be? Better than Alabama that needed a miracle to beat Auburn last week? Better than Washington that needed a walk-off field goal to beat unranked Washington State last week, and squeaked by Oregon State by 2 points?

This shouldn't be about a committee guessing how good a team is for any reason. The only things they did right are not jumping Washington over Michigan and not rewarding Ohio State for sitting home this weekend.

EGD

December 3rd, 2023 at 3:18 PM ^

I am indeed bitching about M having to play Alabama instead of FSU. Michigan earned the #1 seed and should have the easiest path. Florida State earned a conference championship and went undefeated against a difficult schedule. So FSU deserved to be in the playoff over every non-undefeated team and M deserved to face them because FSU would be the weakest of the four teams. It didn’t happen so I am angry about Michigan’s chances at a Rose Bowl victory and national title shot being reduced. Why shouldn’t I be?

BornInA2

December 3rd, 2023 at 1:14 PM ^

I don't think they did honestly consider injuries. FSU won the games it played with backup QBs, including the championship. What the committee did do is guess at the future.

Don't forget that Alabama needed a miracle to beat Auburn just a week ago. But somehow that doesn't matter because of one game, beating Georgia...but all year we've heard that strength of schedule is important?

They should just come out and say "We're taking the four teams that we think will make us the most money." At least that would be honest.

DennisFranklinDaMan

December 3rd, 2023 at 1:59 PM ^

I don't get it. They already got the TV money, and they're certainly going to sell out the stadiums for both games, regardless. In what way will ... um ... the members of the Committee make more money by pulling in Alabama — who, lest we forget, only lost to another of the four semi-finalists, and beat what was, at the end of the regular season, the No. 1 team in the country) — instead of Florida State?

I feel for FSU. It totally sucks. But the constant assertions of corruption and conspiracy about every. single. decision. you. don't. like. (refereeing, ranking, selection, and yes, even sanctions) are baseless, insulting, and childish.

If you have some evidence that members of the Committee are corrupt or base their decisions on something other than their independent understanding of their formal responsibilities, go ahead and share it.

Otherwise, give it a rest. 

MMB 82

December 3rd, 2023 at 2:14 PM ^

User name doesn't quite check out????

Dennis Franklin is remembered for his role in the classic 1973 M vs OSU game. When the teams met, both teams were unbeaten with OSU ranked No. 1, and Michigan No. 4. Michigan had outscored its opponents 320–58, OSU by a margin of 361–33. After an epic struggle, the game ended in a 10–10 tie. Ohio State had gone to the Rose Bowl the year before, which normally would have given Michigan the tie-breaker edge. After some deliberation, the Big Ten athletic directors picked the Buckeyes. There were several explanations including that Franklin broke his collarbone in the game. Us older alumni remember this screw-job well, and can empathize with FSU.