Don Brown extended: 5 yr/1.4 mil
Here is to more seasons of dominating defense.
SOURCE: #Michigan DC Don Brown to get a new 5-year deal that'll average close to $1.4 million per year: https://t.co/ENnJy5clX0
— Bruce Feldman (@BruceFeldmanCFB) December 31, 2016
December 31st, 2016 at 11:50 AM ^
I could see someone spending a 6th on Magnuson.
But yeah, to your overall point, hey're meh generally.
Not sure Kalis isn't talented. Think his growth is just too stunted at this point. Actually, he could be a project OL practice squad guy too. Honestly, once you get past the first 120 guys or so per draft the margin between the roster filler guys and starting power 5 players at good schools is not that big.
December 31st, 2016 at 1:08 PM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 1:27 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 31st, 2016 at 12:32 PM ^
how good our OL is going to look when Deveon Smith graduates....
December 31st, 2016 at 12:48 PM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 11:19 AM ^
He's rested
He's ready
He's experienced
And he has ties to the Michigan program
December 31st, 2016 at 11:26 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 31st, 2016 at 11:37 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:28 PM ^
People are acting like there is no talent there but the shiny new recruits will be fantastic and then turbo-Harbaugh! I don't think the facts bear that out. Let's see:
Kalis was a top 100 recruit, a 5 star on 2 of 4 services
Dawson was a 4 star recruit on all 4 services, top 100 on 2 of 4 services
Cole was a 4 star recruit on all 4 services, top 100 on 2 of 4 services
Kugler was a 4 star recruit on 3 of 4 services and 5 star on the other. Top 101 on all 4 services.
JBB was a 4 star on 2 of 4 services
Braden, yeah, ok, just a 3 star.
Also, look at all of their offer sheets from other schools. It's not Eastern Michigan and Buffalo for these guys.
Newsome was solid 4 star too but let's ignore that due to injury and the real young guys who need time to develop. Anyway, I'm skeptical that the recruiting services were all that wrong on these guys. Compare Hoke's OL guys to Harbaugh's as recruits and they aren't really worse or less talented coming out of high school. And they might not fit Harbaugh's paradigm perfectly but these are Hoke manball dudes, not small quick 3 star RRod zone blocking OL types.
Now, I am completely open to the idea that Funk funked all of these guys up and the new guys will be so so so much better due to coaching. But what's the basis for saying that all of our older lineman are a bunch of 2 star unathletic scrubs is not based in facts.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:43 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 31st, 2016 at 1:00 PM ^
Funk was 1000000% the issue. Past that, I don't know.
I just think it is a little bit inaccurate to say our upperclassmen are not talented but Harbaugh's new guys are. That was true circa 2008 when RRod took over, and also true circa 2012 when Hoke took over and had some young small 3 star OLs to work with. Don't think it is really the case in 2016. Unless they are all busts. But...I tend to think more Funk.
December 31st, 2016 at 1:19 PM ^
Im not interested in how many stars a recruiting site gave a kid...This group is not a power run OL..They are not bad players, they are solid..What i expect in the future is a OL that is built of naturally bigger kids with a power run scheme fit across the board
December 31st, 2016 at 2:05 PM ^
Not seeing it. That could be a good distinction, but if you go through the heights and weights of the kids that Harbaugh has added, in the 2015-17 Hello posts, they dont appear to be any bigger than the junior/senior group at the time they were seniors. Well, at least if you exclude Onwenu who is an anomoly. But the rest, nah. Braden was 308, Kalis 294, JBB 320, Mags 285, Kugler 280 etc as recuits. Heights are similar too. Obviously you can't quantify the frame of a kid but if the heights and weights are the same, there's probably not a big difference in frames And kids with large frame potential are also often known as kids with not enough muscle eg it will take years to be college football ready because they are projects.
December 31st, 2016 at 8:24 PM ^
That's just simply not true. Let's look at an offensive line made up of the top recruits in Hoke's final 3 classes:
OT Kalis 6'5 300
OG Bosch 6'5 305
C Kugler 6'4 270
OG Dawson 6'4 280
OT Magnuson 6'6 275
Now a look at a projected (because of Filiaga not being committed) Harbaugh offensive line from his first 3 classes (actually 2.5 classes):
OT Newsome 6'6 290
OG Bredeson 6'5 307
C Ruiz 6'3 315
OG Onwenu 6'6 360
OT Filiaga 6'6 335
Those are not similar weights. Not even close. Ruiz is way bigger than any Hoke center. Filiaga is huge. Onwenu is even more huge.
December 31st, 2016 at 11:12 PM ^
Absolutely. Harbaugh and Drevno built Stanford on a bunch of maulers on the O-line. It's coming. Unfortunately we probably have to wait until 2018 for them to really flourish.
December 31st, 2016 at 2:07 PM ^
We need some linemen that have some 'whoa' to them.
December 31st, 2016 at 10:57 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 11:02 AM ^
I think the 10 new starters thing is a touch overblown as Michigan really didn't play just 11 guys out there, but it makes a cool talking point for ESPN talking heads which I get
The whole D-line was rotating in this year (Winovich, Hurst, Mone, Gary), one of the linebackers played a lot in Bush (and maybe Furbush), and Kinnel got a lot of PT toward the end. It's not like we're marching 10 new guys with no game experience out there. The heavy rotating the defense does will serve us well next year and in future years as well
December 31st, 2016 at 11:10 AM ^
Valid points indeed. Metellus got his feet wet and honestly I thought he was pretty decent. First game ever at SAM and didn't look like a liability at all. He will only continue to improve. Cornerback I think will be the biggest question mark. Hill and Long have all the talent in the world, but will they be ready yet? This off season is going to be huge for the secondary and offensive line. Many of the recruits that come in this year will fight for early playing time for sure.
December 31st, 2016 at 11:16 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 31st, 2016 at 11:26 AM ^
Agreed on the CBs. Lewis/Stribling is probably the best corner combo we've had since...? Before I became a Michigan fan back in '06. I'm not sure Long, Hill, Watson, etc. are going to be ready next year. I'm afraid CBs will be a liability
December 31st, 2016 at 11:45 AM ^
Getting Clark back for his 6th year would be huge.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:52 PM ^
Love me some J Lewis, but last nights performance was puzzling. It makes me wonder if he was fighting some physical issue. I'm sure I wasn't the only one who sighed with relief when he was in coverage on the gw td pass. Something didn't seem right with him last night...
December 31st, 2016 at 1:31 PM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:14 PM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 11:19 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 11:27 AM ^
The guys rotating in this year are the starter's now and the guys on the bench this year now need to prove they can rotate in and not be a precipitous drop off.
December 31st, 2016 at 11:29 AM ^
Charlton and Glasgow are really good...Winovich and Mone are probably not going to fully fill their shoes. True, the first group of DL is experienced, more or less. But the second group is unproven so probably fair to think of it as replacing half or 2 starters worth of DL. Less depth-- they'll need to stay healthy.
I think we'll have some more athletic LBs but ithey won't be 2016 Peppers quality, or even Gedeon level necessarily next year.
Secondary was lockdown and is being completely replaced despite Kinnel getting some run. We'll see. Young secondaries get burned a lot, even if talented. Watson, Hill, Long, whoever will have to be good fast. If you can't cover, you're toast. CB is my biggest concern.
It's not 10 starts per se but it's like 8 of 11 and lots of very talented guys at that. New players always carry a lot of downside risk. It might be fine, it might not. You never know until next year. I think you might be underestimating the impact.
And maybe if you had a veteran offense then ok, they carry you till defense is up to speed. But you're losing starters: 3 OL, RB, 2x WRs (maybe 3x), TE etc. And senior leadership. And your P/K.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:22 PM ^
True, but the issue is going to be who do we rotate in now that those guys are starters?
We won't totally lack experiance, but we will totally lack depth.
December 31st, 2016 at 10:58 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 10:59 AM ^
The effort against OSU was truly incredible. To me it goes down with Devin Gardner's performance in 2013 as moumental, legendary performances in the game that are going to be forgotten because we couldn't eke out the win
December 31st, 2016 at 11:05 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 11:05 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 31st, 2016 at 11:35 AM ^
You're so cool.
December 31st, 2016 at 11:13 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 31st, 2016 at 12:25 PM ^
And on top of it, our offense did nothing to help the defense. It kept them out there with 3 and out after 3 and out.
Same thing in the FSU game.
Put that Don Brown defense on any one of about 10 different other teams this year and it would win the NC.
December 31st, 2016 at 11:01 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 11:01 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 31st, 2016 at 2:26 PM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 11:03 AM ^
Great things ahead.
December 31st, 2016 at 11:06 AM ^
Fear the 'stache.
December 31st, 2016 at 11:06 AM ^
Worth every penny and more
December 31st, 2016 at 11:07 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 31st, 2016 at 11:13 AM ^
Bush-McCray-Metellus will be pretty good, I liked what I saw from Metellus last night. Hoping McCray slides into Gedeon's role in the middle, because Bush Jr. is more athletic and probably has a better chance covering RB's out of the backfield than McCray or Gedeon did this year. We will also have very good (albeit very young) depth at LB.
I'm still praying we land Willie Gay. I think he could fight for early playing time at SAM.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:27 PM ^
Metellus is the most Don Brown Dude guy ever.
December 31st, 2016 at 2:42 PM ^
Re watched game, Gedeon missed 7 tackles and misplayed 5 other plays. Michigan Defense will be better just minus Gedeon next year.
December 31st, 2016 at 11:08 AM ^
Glad we've locked him down for perhaps the last 5 years of his career. We're starting to get more and more athletic recruits on the defensive side of the ball and I can't wait to see how the young kids look over the next several years.
I wonder what, if anything, will we decide to do on the offensive side of the ball..
December 31st, 2016 at 11:12 AM ^
Love this guy, love that he gambles with the blitz, it bites you sometimes here and there but percentage wise it's successful. You have a moderately successful offense and it's no problem.
December 31st, 2016 at 11:12 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 31st, 2016 at 12:11 PM ^
If Don Brown can kee us with top 10-15 defenses consistently then we just need Harbaugh to continue to work his QB magic and find a running game and we'll be a CFP contender in most seasons