CBS Bracketology UM #1 Overall

Submitted by Maize4Life on January 28th, 2019 at 8:02 AM

#1 Overall Seed as of today

 

https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/bracketology-no-1-overall-seed-michigan-leads-10-big-ten-teams-in-updated-ncaa-tournament-bracket/

scanner blue

January 28th, 2019 at 8:19 AM ^

Yes, many are looking forward to tomorrow night, but are you going to Crisler? Snow today and tomorrow with sub zero wind chill, 9pm start on a Tuesday might lead to the emptiest venue for any highly rated team. Before anyone negs me, I will be trudging back to my car through the stadium concourse at 11:20,  hoping my car warms up before I pull in my driveway.

mGrowOld

January 28th, 2019 at 10:00 AM ^

Got same text.  And the first 10 responding were going to moved to the lower bowl so it sounds like seats are available there as well.

Bums me out the weather sucks - was going to make trip up from Cleveland with my best friend who just happens to be the world's biggest OSU honk alive.  I've been taking a LOT of shit from him over the past several years thanks to our football team - would love some in-person payback thanks to basketball!

mGrowOld

January 28th, 2019 at 11:17 AM ^

Ok 2nd biggest OSU honk.

My friend goes to every home & away game for OSU football and all home games and about 1/2 of the away games for OSU basketball.  But unlike Bishop he's not a complete asshole to anything Michigan - it's all good natured.

Bishop, for those not not in Ohio, is a local broadcaster who actually rooted for Peppers to fail as a Brown cause he was from "sCum"   He has the brains of a pea pod.

scanner blue

January 28th, 2019 at 11:29 AM ^

Buy an upper bowl ticket and come early. Make friends with a friendly Event Team Member and after the second TV timeout said ETM might find you some nice seats in the lower bowl. Don’t ask me how I know this but trust me — the AD doesn’t like whole rows of empty seats on national tv either.  

scanner blue

January 28th, 2019 at 1:19 PM ^

I worked with Herb for a year and a half at 110 and so probably met you. He polished the helmets under Bo in the ‘70’s on Friday’s before games. He’s probably dealt with so much b.s. from certain “fans” over the years that his strict adherence to policy is understandable. (Ask him how the ADA seating is going in sec108 and he’ll talk your ear off— perfectly able bodied people taking spots on his platform ... rabble,rabble). 

1989 UM GRAD

January 28th, 2019 at 1:22 PM ^

I sort of figured the strict approach was due to people taking advantage of the system.  Plus, with attendance at high levels, it's probably more important than ever to ensure people are sitting in their own seats.  I know you've mentioned this before, but what section do you work in at Crisler?  Would love to come by and meet a fellow MGoBlogger.  

MGoBender

January 28th, 2019 at 12:19 PM ^

Well, schools are going to be closed on Wednesday. I would expect the normal Ann Arbor family crowd that will brave the cold once they hear it's not a school night.

I'll be there. Unfortunately I don't think I'll be able to get there much before 9p, which means I'll be hiking a bit from and to my car :|

Ihatebux

January 28th, 2019 at 8:05 AM ^

Awesome, I'm glad at least one ranking has us #1.   Serious question, how does Kenpom still have MSU ranked above us after the loss yesterday.   Their OOC SOS is very high, but they lost the 2 biggest out of conf games they played.   They get credit for losing big games every year.  I don't get it.

BlockM

January 28th, 2019 at 8:13 AM ^

Kenpom is not trying to rank "who has had the best season so far." The goal is predictive. Based on the games everyone has played so far, on a neutral floor, the algorithm says they would be favored against us. No one is/isn't giving them credit for anything. If Team A plays all top 20 teams and loses to each of them by 1, they'd probably be ranked higher than Team B that beat all bottom 20 teams by 1, even though Team B is undefeated.

Ihatebux

January 28th, 2019 at 9:22 AM ^

I guess I agree with your assessment, but our D eff is better than MSU's even if their O eff is better than ours.   I understand it is predictive, but it seems like they give too much weight to SOS instead of W and L's.   No doubt Staet is good, but it just seems like they aren't that impressive to watch and they really don't have any big wins.   You would think the large UNC, Nova and Purdue wins would give us a big boost.

ak47

January 28th, 2019 at 9:26 AM ^

I mean he built his model by looking at thousands of games and seeing how changing weights impacts its ability to work. He doesn't really care what you think is being overrated. If sos is weighted heavily its because historically playing well against good teams, whether you win or lose a close game, is a better predictor of future team performance than beating a bad team easily.

MSU has 9 tier 1 wins, we have 4. It is pretty clear that msu has played a more challenging schedule to this point.

FreddieMercuryHayes

January 28th, 2019 at 8:15 AM ^

I mean, come one, MSU, up until yesterday, has been playing amazingly well.  Better than UM.  They're above UM in efficiency margin in B1G play and have played a tougher schedule so far than UM.  They're far ahead of any other B1G team in defensive FG% and eFG% I believe, and have one of the best offenses in the whole nation.  There's ebbs and flows to every season, but credit due to them right now.  We'll see if they can keep it up, or if there will be a little regression (I think the Purdue game saw a little regression, plus while they have played decent B1G teams, they've also played ones like Iowa who are uniquely ill-suited to match up against MSU).  But still, they've earned that KenPom ranking right now.

Bill22

January 28th, 2019 at 8:35 AM ^

Amazing well when?  During the conference season until the Purdue loss?  Certainly not the entire season.  What win does MSU have that Michigan does not?  We have Villanova on the road and UNC at home.  If we’re using KemPom predictive analytics, I like our chances in both games head to head.

We have a slight slump of losing one game and not completely dominating a few others and MSU is better?  Gimme a break.

FreddieMercuryHayes

January 28th, 2019 at 9:24 AM ^

Ok, well you apparently don't understand the difference between efficiency and predictive metrics and measuring resume by wins.  They are completely two different things.  KenPom is predictive and basically says based on how the team is actually playing on a per possession basis, who should win between two teams.  That does not measure who actually won big games.  I don't think anyway is saying MSUs resume is better.  That's probably why UM was still ranked ahead of them after losing to UW.  But while UM was slogging it in ugly wins through most of December and Jan, MSU has been hammering everyone they've played.  Which also included clobbering Purdue up in East Lansing.  And MSU has been clobbering generally better opponents than UM has been struggling with over the past month and a half.  I don't know what's so hard to understand about that.

Bluelaf

January 28th, 2019 at 10:02 AM ^

Michigan State has been really consistent against a tough schedule, while we have struggled a bit in January versus a modest schedule.

 

I still think we have the better resume (and better team!), but it's not hard to see why the computers think MSU is stronger: yes MSU is 1-3 versus Kenpom Top 20 teams while we are 3-1, but MSU has 6(!) wins versus teams 21-40.  We have zero (our next best wins are #43 Indiana - twice - #56 Northwestern, and #57 Minnesota).  MSU's slaughter of all those tournament teams over the past couple months was remarkable, even if no single win was as impressive as our obliteration of UNC.

 

This will all be decided on the court in 4 weeks (and again in March)!

ijohnb

January 28th, 2019 at 9:02 AM ^

We can be.  I think we have the potential to win it all, but our offense is scuffling right now.  We are a good enough defensive team and have enough talent to be very good regardless, but for this to be a team to live up to its potential we need a true go-to player to emerge and need to make more open shots when they present themselves.

Beilein is averse to true post up situations, but I think that both Teske and Matthews have post up games that could be at least teased when they have size advantages to try to draw some doubles and create more organic perimeter looks.  A lot of our threes are really low percentage looks right now.

Additionally, I saw DD live three times in high school.  One thing he can do is flat out fill it up and has notable range.  I’m sure JB has his reasons why he isn’t seeing the floor, but I would not hate seeing him for a few minutes here and there.