Michigan 2023 Run / Pass Balance

Submitted by Cmknepfl on December 8th, 2023 at 4:21 PM

Heading into this year one of the narratives was that JJ and the passing game would take the next step and that the offense as a result would become more balanced.  Harbaugh made comments about wanting to be closer to 50/50 run pass both in terms of attempts and yardage.  Ian Boyd had the article in HTTV breaking down how JJ could take the next steps and what that may look like based on Jim's Stanford teams with Luck.  

 

I tried to use similar data for 2023 so far this year.  I totaled JJs pass attempts and yardage vs Corum, Edwards, and Mullings attempts and yardage.  I know it was only RB 1, and RB 2 in the article but as many of you know Mullings was getting carries in early drives in many of the games before he missed time.  (I used discretion and did exclude some of his carries in blowouts)

 

When compared to what we saw in the HTTV article I was surprised that we had an even higher percentage of rush attempts overall, while having a higher percentage of passing yardage overall.  

Observations:

1. Just run a lot fewer plays seems like it could be from shortened game, and new clock rules

2.  Despite the lower passing attempts, JJ is getting 9.2 per attempt which is pretty good, but still not the elite levels we have seen from high end College QBs

3. In the two biggest games we had high percentage of runs.

 

Questions for discussion:

1. Is this where the offense wants to be?

2. What do we expect from UMs passing game in the Rose Bowl?

 

 

Mods, if you want more data here or it displayed another way I can do that.  Thanks. 

 

 

 

Comments

PopeLando

December 8th, 2023 at 5:02 PM ^

You've got the beginnings of a good analysis here. But I think you need to look at all rushing attempts and all passing attempts. There were 34 rushing attempts against Iowa, and 30 passing attempts. That's 53% rushing by attempts. We got 66 rushing yards and 147 passing yards. That's 31% rushing by yardage. Etc.

As for what we expect in the Rose Bowl...look, the Harbaughffense is the Harbaughffense. There will be tweaks and counters and evolutions based on the stuff we've run all year, but anyone thinking that somehow we're going to unleash a wide open light-em-up offense like in Lloyd Carr's final game...hasn't been paying attention for the last 9 years.

In the past 5 games, JJ has thrown 1 TD and 1 INT. He's rushed for 146 yards and 3 TDs all season, and none  of those TDs came in the past 7 games. 

The Moore/Harbaugh Lizard Brain has been in full effect since...Purdue? At some point, you are what your numbers say you are, and I think we're at that point.

I will GLADLY have my crow with barbecue sauce and Zehnder's Chicken Seasoning if I'm wrong here, but I don't think I am.

MadMatt

December 8th, 2023 at 6:39 PM ^

And, we should ask ourselves would we want Michigan to whip out a brand new offense? We remember Lloyd's last game fondly (with a sardonic "where the F was that the last 4 years?!") Let's be clear; Michigan has a top ten offense this season. Do you really want to see an offensive game plan relying on plays that haven't been a point of emphasis? Anyone remember the Philly Special play against TCU?

Look, Harbaugh and Moore are highly skilled professionals. Perhaps they know more about football than we do?

Blue@LSU

December 8th, 2023 at 6:59 PM ^

On the one hand, we can look at this season and say: hey, we're winning, we have a top-10 offense, etc., so why change things up? It's hard to argue against that.

On the other hand, it's been pretty rough sledding at times because teams have just been able to load the box against us to stop the run. And too many times, the offense has just played right into their hands. There's a reason that Brian and Seth have been begging to see play action on first/second down all season. It's because of this (data are from Brian's UFRs. Only collected through Indiana because I ran out of time/got too busy):

Through Indiana, Michigan was facing 7-8 defenders in the box on > 70% of 1st down plays and 68% of 2nd down plays. This is excluding the red zone and garbage time.

And these are the plays and their corresponding EPA that they were running in these situations.

Play action was killing it on 1st and 2nd down.

I don't think anyone is calling for Michigan to change everything and run a brand new offense. But there are things they could've done to make life easier, prevent future teams from loading the box, etc. (And maybe, just maybe, make this offense a little more attractive to elite QBs).

I think the OP's data also point to this as well.   

The Oracle 2

December 10th, 2023 at 6:01 PM ^

As we’ve seen the last two years, what works against Big 10 opponents isn’t going to work in the CFP. I was watching highlights of the TCU game today and had forgotten what they were able to do once they had no choice but to let McCarthy start slinging it. Alabama is a better defense than TCU, but 3 yards and a cloud of dust isn’t going to work against them.  They have to willing to let McCarthy make plays. 

Tex_Ind_Blue

December 9th, 2023 at 1:05 AM ^

I would abso-fucking-lutely want them to light up Bama. I would doubly abso-fucking-lutely like them to not put downs on fire a la TCU 2022. I would triply abso-fucking-lutely want them to hit Bama with haymakers instead of running into a wall. 

Yes, the Michigan coaches forgot more about football in the time it took me to write all these sentences, than I could ever learn. Still. 

They have come to the dance three times in a row. Very few teams have done it in the past decade. Let's fucking go for the win. 

No guarantees for next year. 

MichiganiaMan

December 10th, 2023 at 1:47 AM ^

The answer to this is yes. I’d very much like to see Michigan doing a bunch of things they have yet to do. The main reasons being is 1) because we will need to do so to win a national championship, and 2) we have the talent to do it. I don’t care to spend another year wondering what would’ve happened had Moore & Weiss called the whole TCU game like they called the last 1.5 quarters of it. We’re better than the other three teams in the CFP, but that means nothing without the hardware to show for it.

meeashagin

December 8th, 2023 at 7:33 PM ^

Michigan needs to run their offense. Our offense vs Ohio State with maybe a few added JJ keeps (injury prevented it vs OSU) is good enough to win the national championship. These teams we are playing aren't 21 Georgia good, see SP+ or FPI.

Why people are so obsessed with airing it out is baffling to me. Michigan had a historic defense this year which would've changed any game plan no matter how good your offense is. Playing a 14/15 schedule 3 years in a row Michigan chose to sit/rest their starters in 2nd half all year...again because our defense was unbelievable.

Also, I think Michigan did come out throwing more this year, like Harbaugh said, JJ was excellent first 2 games (of course fans cried about the run game) then Bowling Green happened & with our defense there's no need to take those risks.

I'm pretty sure Bama runs it more than us.

Blue@LSU

December 8th, 2023 at 7:59 PM ^

Again, I don't think anyone is advocating airing it out. Just getting a more even run-pass distribution would help to prevent teams from stacking the box. 

And we saw last year against TCU why you can't just rely on your defense, even if it is elite. At some point, you are going to need to outscore your opponent. 

abertain

December 10th, 2023 at 11:06 AM ^

Agreed. Michigan should have been spread to pass in that late era Carr team. This team? It just needs to incorporate more PAP on standard downs, a little more misdirection and more run game diversity, a la Georgia Tech. 

I also love the defense. However, I don't think they are historically elite. They have played a crap ton of bad offenses. We'd probably all have a different feel if Michigan had played teams like Oregon and Washington. They've basically played two offenses that are truly respected all year. They gave up 24 and 23 points. Good, but not historically good. 

MGlobules

December 9th, 2023 at 3:19 AM ^

I think the calculus is to minimize risk and injury. And Michigan is taking it to a new, very sophisticated level. Where the team's potential gets hidden in the stats. A game where you win by a couple of scores may be a far better option, all around, then one where you wallop your opponent, whether it looks like that to the average fan or not.

But the proof will now be in the pudding. Over the next one, two games Jim and Sherrone will either reinforce the long-standing narrative about Michigan's stodginess or demonstrate the comprehensive character of their vision. Jim either enters the pantheon of the absolute greats or looks like his predecessors. He may or may not have lots more chances.

The exciting thing is that this is doable. The more important chance comes first. This is a right-sized challenge for Jim and for Michigan football. In a game of funny bounces, we could play brilliantly and still lose; but we will be able to tell the difference.  

Blue@LSU

December 8th, 2023 at 7:07 PM ^

Thanks for this, OP! 

I think in some cases, like Penn State, avoiding the passing game was necessary. They started out trying to pass the ball, but JJ was under pressure every time he dropped back. But in other cases, it's hard to see why we've been so conservative, especially when JH said he was aiming for that 50-50 balance at the beginning of the season.

To answer your questions:

  1. In the end, I'll trust the coaches because they know more than I do. It's hard to argue against a strategy that's been winning. But it seems like it's been more difficult than it needed to be at times.
  2. I don't expect too much to change for the Rose Bowl. 'Bama has some good pass rushers and if the RT position doesn't get sorted out, JJ could be running for his life. They also have a good secondary. My hope is that they can scheme some things up for Edwards like Seth was talking about.

Just a question: do you have data on pass/run plays by down? Along with PopeLando's suggestions, I think this could be useful. 

Romeo50

December 8th, 2023 at 9:30 PM ^

Play to your strengths. Defense is stout and tightens as the team learns the opponent so control the clock and keep the D fresh. Shorten the game and limit opponent possessions especially if high powered.  

Keep them in front of you and shorter high velocity throws minimize interceptions. Tight ends are extra blockers of note and can exploit linebacker safety coverage by walling off the defenders with big bodies to move the chains.

Seems a statistical approach to play a game few others do as well.

AlbanyBlue

December 8th, 2023 at 11:39 PM ^

Excellent analysis and very enjoyable to read.

To keep it brief, our CFP experience tells us that our opponent, with a month to prepare, will stop our Plan A run-first game. With our OL issues in 2023, this will be even more pronounced.

Therefore, it's imperative that we break tendencies on offense. JJ reads/keeps have to be on. We need to utilize play-action. Edwards as a receiver needs to be a bigger part of the offense. It would be nice to see RPOs. We need to be sure not to tip plays based on formation and motion. We have to utilize the intermediate-level passing game and the middle of the field, especially against their LBs.

I don't think anyone is expecting a total overhaul of the offense, but it's tendency-breakers like what I've outlined that could keep our offense on track. Alabama will score -- our offense needs to do its part.

Don

December 9th, 2023 at 10:56 AM ^

If Michigan's coaches think we can rely on our defense to hold up while our offense sits in a run-first shell that doesn't attempt to put pressure on the opposing defense in ways it wasn't expecting, we'll be looking at a repeat of the 2007 Rose Bowl.

Which is what I think is going to happen. The Schembechler DNA runs deep in the Michigan program.

michengin87

December 11th, 2023 at 8:33 AM ^

I agree that Harbaugh tends to heavily lean on offensive conservatism and defense.  This is fine and good against the everyone not rated in the top 25 to ensure things like The Horror don't occur.

The 2006 was loaded on both sides with experienced and strong talent.  However, the coaching staff was not nearly at the level of the current staff.

As well as having fantastic players and depth this season, this team is much stronger in coaching ability.  The OC and DC of the 2006 team was Mike DeBord and Ron English.  Both had just been promoted to coordinator.  DeBord and the offensive coaches might be on par with Sherrone Moore and the current offensive coaches, but Jesse Minter and the current defensive staff is a BIG upgrade.

So, Harbaugh has his tendencies and it's not going to change now, but I'm hopeful that the play calling will be drastically improved with the improved strategy and technique of better coaching.

jmblue

December 9th, 2023 at 12:07 PM ^

 Harbaugh made comments about wanting to be closer to 50/50 run pass both in terms of attempts and yardage. 

I always took that to mean a 50/50 balance when the game is in question, and not the overall season numbers.  The huge number of blowouts we've had, which led to JJ almost never playing in the 4th quarter before November, is going to skew the numbers.

Then you have the PSU game, a clear outlier in which JJ's health and our inability to protect him on the right side of the line were certainly factors.  (It could also be that Harbaugh's absence influenced the play-calling, although this is impossible to know for certain.)

If you restrict the dataset to only possessions with JJ playing QB, I think we probably see a closer balance, especially outside of the PSU game.

True Blue In Ohio

December 9th, 2023 at 12:42 PM ^

If I were the coach, I would break tendencies and just be more creative with the play calling. I wouldn't abandon successful play calls that have worked, but you also have take what the defense gives you if they are hell bent taking something away. The playoff game will definitely be a chess match.

what would Bo do

December 10th, 2023 at 7:25 PM ^

To be a contrarian to the OP's statement that JJ's 9.2 YPA isn't very good; he finished 11th in the country in that statistic.  Noteable QBs he finished ahead of were: Kyle McCord, Michael Penix, Quinn Ewers, Sam Hartman, Jordan Travis, and Drake Maye.