When you run out of reasons, it's you. [Patrick Barron]

This Week's Obsession: Moving On? Comment Count

Seth November 10th, 2020 at 9:09 AM

It's time to talk Jim Harbaugh job security.

Seth: If my opinion changed based on the result of one game is that a good opinion?

Ace: Nearly six years of games seems like enough. There’s always a tipping point.

Brian: I think the last two games are both so far below expectations and yet still part and parcel of what the Harbaugh era has been that they change things. Like: MSU lost to Rutgers and then got annihilated by Iowa. And Indiana just beat Michigan by three scores.

Ace: The last two games also reflected problems we’ve been discussing for years and saw coming before the season started.

Seth: MSU is a worse team but the IU loss feels much worse. I remember enough of Bo to at least know what's up when Michigan sleepwalks against a terrible opponent. Two weeks in a row of not knowing what your opponent is good at is incomprehensible.

Ace: We obviously didn’t expect… this… but we knew cornerback and defense tackle were problem spots.

Seth: Fuegobox hot take: defensive tackle has been fine?

Brian: Yeah there's a big difference between "the corners are meh Big Ten players" and what we've actually got.

Alex: My opinion changed because of one game, but it wasn’t the Indiana game. Michigan State is HORRIBLE and Michigan was at home, huge favorites... that’s the type of game you cannot be losing in Year Six.

Ace: Iowa scored 49 on them. Ricky White caught 1 of 8 targets against the Hawkeyes.

Alex: You got your Ricky White comment out before me lol.

Seth:

Alex: Indiana might actually be quite good, but the point remains. Harbaugh’s failed here. It sucks to put it that way, but it’s true.

Ace: Our scouting. This staff’s… hit or miss.

[After THE JUMP: Are you Fritz Crisler enough?]

---------------------------------------------------

Alex: One legit question is how much we are willing to give Jim a pass because this year was ruined by covid. Granted, that’s something every team is dealing with, but do we really want a transition in the next few months?

Seth: The thing about college sports is you can't fire the cornerback. You have to go back three years when they were recruiting these cornerbacks and see who's still around and what part of cornerback recruiting wasn't fixed.

Ace: The specifics don’t even feel worth going over because it’s the stuff we’ve been discussing for years. There’s just a point when you know it’s over. It’s over.

Seth: I mean we're making decisions for 2023 right now. The events of 2020-'22 are mostly set.

Brian: I don't think COVID has anything to do with jumping offsides six times in a half. All these teams are working under the same situation except Michigan didn't have to pause practice. How many consecutive years are we going to have to wonder why the offense makes no sense?

Ace: Particularly when there’s been a lot of changing on that side of the ball with one constant: Jim Harbaugh.

Alex: No, covid isn’t the reason why they look so poorly coached. It is why Ambry and Nico are gone — though who knows how big of a difference either would make. I guess I’m wondering whether making a move with this level of uncertainty would make the transition more difficult. Only one P5 hoops head coach was fired this offseason (before Chambers got canceled for being racist, I guess).

Brian: It seems like by the time the decision is being made we'll have a pretty good read on a whole bunch of different vaccines, so there will be way less uncertainty than there was for the basketball coaching carousel.

Alex: Good point. I guess we might as well rip the band-aid sooner rather than later too. A lame duck 2021 would be real bad.

Ace: When the main argument against firing a coach is “but what comes next?” that coach probably needs to go.

Seth: I think the main argument is "Can Michigan do better?" Not Michigan as if we're in charge. Is Warde Manuel going to get an improvement on Jim Harbaugh?

Ace: I hate that argument. We know this isn’t working. It’s time to try something else because at least there’s a chance it’ll work. There are so, so many football coaches! Buckets of them!

Alex: If we can’t get someone who won’t trip over their own dick against the worst State team I have seen in my life... might as well beef up the hoops budget.

Ace: Some of them didn’t even go to Michigan! In all seriousness, Manuel has the benefit of knowing this is a possibility early in the coaching change cycle. They should be kicking the tires on viable candidates to get an idea of what the market will look like before any move is made.

Brian: The pickings do seem a little slim.

Ace: There isn’t a strikingly obvious candidate like last time but strikingly obvious candidates, as we’ve learned, have sometimes peaked. I’d love to see them take a shot at Mario Cristobal, for example, but there are also always guys at smaller schools and if you find the right one on the way up that’s where home runs are often hit.

We don’t know if Chris Creighton can recruit but we also don’t know if he can’t and he’s done an incredible job in a horrible spot at Eastern. And I’m guessing Michigan can come up with several candidates people would like better.

Seth: If you're going to find one who can get Michigan to regularly competing for playoffs level you need an elite, and they don't come around often. When they do they shoot multiple small schools into national conversations.

Brian: I'm not arguing against a move. I am wondering if the lack of an obvious guy might tilt the scales towards a return we don't want.

Ace: Dabo Swinney was not an obvious guy.

Seth: Dabo's been the Harbaugh comp up until recently because Clemson was Clemsoning for half a decade before they hit.

Alex: Step 1: promote WR coach. Step 2: give up 70 in a bowl game. Step 3: win multiple national titles.

Ace: Seth, Dabo won 10, 11, 11, and 10 games in years 4-7. And that’s if you include his interim year as a full one. Otherwise that’s years 3-6. They went to the title game the next two years. There’s no comparison there.

What I’m saying is that it’s worse to wait when the only thing holding you back is not being sure of the next guy. You can always fire the next guy.

Seth: You don't fear becoming Nebraska?

Ace: Buddy, I’ve got news, we are Nebraska. I’d like to be better. Operating out of a paralyzing fear of losing the program’s inherent Michigan Greatness or whatever is exactly why it fell off.

Brian: This is going to be the first real decision Warde has to make. Bringing back that tweet from the game column:

If that's true and he doesn't pull the trigger you're looking at a cosmetic extension and the hope that returning almost everyone allows you to have the traditional Year Seven leap. Two things about this:

  1. Mel had left to coach Michigan Tech, got them their first two tourney bids in 30 years, and Michigan fell off the instant he left.
  2. When Beilein left the coaching carousel was already basically done so the Nate Oats types were already at new jobs. Juwan Howard was one of just three guys I preferred to just hiring Yaklich, and the other two were never options.

Totally different situation in football, where presumably they'd have a healthy amount of time to search and there are literally no even sort-of viable guys with any connection to the program.

Ace: I’ve choosing to live in a reality where that tweet doesn’t exist. It’s one source and we all remember 2014. And 2007.

Brian: I don't know what the chances are that Michigan makes a move after going 2-6, 3-5 but they're lower than I'd like.

Seth: "What are you gonna, do hire Brady Hoke?" --Man stabbed with Brady Hoke

Ace: The problem wasn’t hiring a new coach, the problem was hiring one of the worst possible options. I don’t even know what else to add there. Don’t make “Michigan Man™” a prerequisite, I guess. Or let Dave Brandon run anything.

Brian: There isn't even a Hoke! Hoke had a very good year at Ball State and greatly improved SDSU in year two. That's orders of magnitude more resume than the Michigan Man candidates have this time around.

Ace: Creighton. Cristobal. Joe Brady. Eric Bienemy. I haven’t even done research yet. I’m working on the hoops preview.

Brian: What I'm trying to say is that the chances of Michigan pulling the Hoke again are negligible because there isn't even a Hoke.

Ace: Sorry it’s late.

Seth: Bienemy was recruited by Bill McCartney if we need to play Six Degrees of Michigan.

Ace: We might need more degrees.

Seth: He also ran a Mad Magicians in the Super Bowl.

Ace: It’s been pointed out to me that a way Michigan could help repair some of their issues in Ohio is to hire Matt Campbell, a Mount Union guy. Mount Union has a much better coaching tree than ours—we’ve got two on staff.

Seth: Warinner and?

Ace: Ben McDaniels. Not a grad but connected to the tree. To be clear, I’m not saying Michigan should run out and hire Matt Campbell, but I’ve also heard worse ideas.

Like Hoke.

Seth: Eric Bienemy and Matt Campbell are fine options. I can't think of any others.

Ace: That’s a lack of imagination, in my opinion.

Brian: Luke Fickell. Tom Allen. Lane Kiffin. Matt Rhule.

Ace: Pay the Venables children to transfer. Jeff Brohm.

Seth: Brohm turns down his alma mater but goes to Michigan for the money and prestige?

Brian: Wow we're just gonna let Kiffin slide by without comment?

Seth: Wow you were serious about Fickell?

Ace: Fickell would be a home run. Fire the cannon and make him think about it.

Brian: I'd say he'd be a solid bet to succeed, and that's about as good as we're going to get.

Ace: Circling back, Michigan is still a much better and more lucrative job than Louisville. Someone can step into a whole lot of money and talent.

Seth: Yeah but I don't think Purdue is and he stayed there.

Brian: (at most positions)

Ace: The difference between Louisville and Michigan as coaching jobs remains vast. It’s, again, not even a discussion.

Brian: Brohm is currently making 50% more than Louisville's coach FWIW. That BTN money came in handy.

Ace: Vast.

Seth: I just don't think the Michigan job is something everyone wants. The difference in lifestyle between $4.5 million and $7 million isn't that huge. It's a prestige job but it's also one people know comes with enormous baggage that other prestige jobs don't.

Brian: Yeah. RichRod getting torpedoed is going to make both sides of any potential deal wary. That's why we are where we are and why I'm very excited to watch some basketball and hockey over the next few years.

Ace: People said this about Alabama before Saban got there.

Seth: I was speaking specifically about Fickell, really.

Ace: No job is going to appeal to literally everyone.

Brian: Saban was desperate to get out of the NFL and already had a national title so was confident he could get the rabbling Alabama people on the same page.

Ace: It’s an example. The same thing happened with Harbaugh, Michigan just caught the wrong part of his career arc.

Brian: I mean Fickell might want something else. There is going to be a reasonable up and comer worth taking a swing on. Therefore take the swing.

Ace: Hard to hit dingers if you don’t step up to the plate.

Seth: Just take the donut rings off please. It's 2020.

Brian: I wonder who the bunt single coaching hire is

Ace: Nick Sheridan.

Brian: Bunt single is pretty all right! You got on base!

Ace: Scot Loeffler.

Brian: Not in a sustainable or reasonable way, but you're on base!

Ace: …is a strikeout looking.

Brian: On base, unsustainable, eventually doomed: Mike Leach. Mike Leach is the bunt single of coaching hires. Dabo Swinney is that home run that bounced of Jose Canseco's head.

Comments

1VaBlue1

November 10th, 2020 at 9:51 AM ^

BTW, the whole 'Michigan Man' thing...  Can it fucking die, already?  It's the most overused, misunderstood, and controversial thing Schembechler ever said.  He only said it because the coach of the basketball team quit, but still wanted to coach.

Maybe the basketball team is at fault for the whole fucking 'Michigan Man' debacle?  Well, at least Bill Frieder.  Can we all just shit on Bill Frieder (again) because he moved Bo to say the dumbest thing of his career?  Fuck the 'Michigan Man' belief system...

My Name is LEGIONS

November 10th, 2020 at 2:21 PM ^

I was there as a student when he said it...   and it was taken out of context by all the homers... all he meant was a current staffer is gonna coach, not a guy signed with ASU... and Bo was right to say that, and not his fault.... blame the homers for misconstruing it...  after all, Fisher wasn't a Michigan alum.

Goldmember2

November 10th, 2020 at 9:51 AM ^

Does Ward have the stones and political capital required to out right fire Jim Harbaugh?  I'm concerned that he won't make a move in a year like this given the optics of paying a buyout that has been estimated around $10M for Harbaugh's contracts final season.  The best case scenario is Harbaugh sunsets himself after this year regardless of how many more games we win.  Saying he needs time to recharge and be with his family.   

I love Jim and was very excited when he came home.  I'm sad that we've not approached the level of success our talent warents.  While we aren't a Death Start level program would should be better then Alderaan when we play decently talented teams.  Outside a few examples (PSU and Wisconsin games) we always come up short.  

Totally2

November 10th, 2020 at 9:52 AM ^

Brian, luv ya man... but I doubt "... there will be way less uncertainty..."

Epidemiologist Michael Osterholm reports that this winter will be covid "hell."

Vaccines hold promise, but implementation takes months... and the ongoing economic impacts of the coming hell are highly uncertain.

Bigger picture, complexity increases are a, if not the, fundamental cause of the collapse of civilizations.
Exponential gains in complexity are the dominant, emergent phenomenon of our era.

Further, collapse is when-not-if physics.
Think this is the apocalypse & it's accelerating.
Yes, depressing & scary as hell... 

enlightenedbum

November 10th, 2020 at 9:53 AM ^

Chris Klieman continued the NDSU dynasty at the 1-AA level (4 titles in 5 years).  Inherited a bad Snyder team (5-7) got them to 8-5 with a bowl in in year one.  After the upset week one they've been playing pretty well, probably should have knocked off OK State.  WVU game was odd though.

53, getting 2.5 million a year.  Recruiting rankings aren't great, but off the K State historical average (of sucking).

Brian Griese

November 10th, 2020 at 10:01 AM ^

How do you include a photo of Urban Meyer and then not even make a mention of him in the commentary!?  You have to at least make that phone call and take his temperature.  

NYC Fan3

November 10th, 2020 at 10:01 AM ^

3 big issues exist that further details from our Media would be great.

1.  Dylan, what’s the real reason he chose to sit out this season despite still attending classes?

2.  Why did our best recruiter, Partridge, make a less than lateral move to coach at Miss?

3.  Defense is in shambles and nothing has been said about our new coach, Shoop not being with the team.

I feel like all of these issues are a result of Harbaugh.

Walter Rupp

November 10th, 2020 at 10:03 AM ^

We need someone who can appreciate what Michigan represents as an academic institution, but who at the same time has a standard for excellence on the football field.  And that's not just passion to play or knowing a history.  It's about the DETAILS and coaching those details in every aspect of a program.  This is not unlike running a corporation with many moving parts.  Most football coaches would never make good CEO's, yet alone good product managers or people with vision for taking that product forward in a competitive market. But the types that would are the one's we should be after. 

Half the coaches mentioned here would be Rich Rod types who didn't realize the student body at Michigan had a higher math SAT score than the combined at WVa (ok I've exaggerated, but you get the point).  There's so much to sell here between the outstanding academic body and the town of Ann Arbor.  Failure can't be acceptable.  And when you've got regression after 6 years, it's clear we're not hitting standards and no one is holding accountability for hitting on the details-- whether that's scouting, recruiting, building talent, or teaching.  There's too much excellence to sell for football to not be good.

If anyone remembers year 1 of Urban Meyer at Ohio State and the coverage of the story on BTN, it's worth digging-up to watch. It outlines how he broke down and attacked every aspect of the program and developed accountability at every level. It was painful to their culture at the time, but seems to have worked.

My Name is LEGIONS

November 10th, 2020 at 10:21 AM ^

Fickell missed all of that, right ?  The cleaning up and accountability ?

If so, then maybe we need to hire someone from Meyer's former staff....  Kevin Wilson? Elliott ?  Hafley ?

What about Kevin Wilson ?   Does a current OSU staffer like Wilson, does he have a block in his contract forbidding him from coaching Michigan ?

Cake Or Death

November 10th, 2020 at 1:01 PM ^

Top recruits want to get to the NFL.  The education part helps as a very small factor, way down on the list.  Yes, I know that they say otherwise (at least the ones who have us on their radar), but for the majority, they CAN get a decent education at a lot of places.  Some do, but a lot don't, as they don't necessarily HAVE TO play school.

maizenblue92

November 10th, 2020 at 10:09 AM ^

Two names not mentioned I'd kick the tires on are Jeff Hafley and Tony Elliot. Jeff Hafley has won a recruiter of the year award, he's young, and has immediately improved BC. Tony Elliot is the OC at Clemson. He's young, runs a modern offense, and can recruit like hell as evidenced by the talent on Clemson's offense. 

kzoomgr

November 10th, 2020 at 10:15 AM ^

Before this season I was of the view that we were essentially Iowa football under Harbaugh. Run of the mill for 4-5 years, then inexplicably crush it one year to keep the fan base hopeful, rinse and repeat. But it's clear we're not even that level of competency. If you're not going to be a perennial contender, you have to catch lightning in a bottle every once in a while - exhibit A, Ed Orgeron. Harbaugh cares deeply, he's insanely competitive, but I'm sure by his own admission things are not working. We're looking at a 1-7 year - Rutgers and Maryland are far from gimmes - which should force Warde's hand rather than extend the agony. 

abertain

November 10th, 2020 at 1:38 PM ^

The defense has been better than the offense every year harbaugh has been the coach. Brown has failed to adjust, but the defense hasn’t been the primary problem. LSU was only good ish on defense last year, and they won it all. Oklahoma has been to the playoff and beat Ohio State during their run. Michigan can’t compete on offense. 

abertain

November 10th, 2020 at 1:38 PM ^

The defense has been better than the offense every year harbaugh has been the coach. Brown has failed to adjust, but the defense hasn’t been the primary problem. LSU was only good ish on defense last year, and they won it all. Oklahoma has been to the playoff and beat Ohio State during their run. Michigan can’t compete on offense. 

Ghost of North Hall

November 10th, 2020 at 10:17 AM ^

I still think Steve Sarkisian would be a good hire. Only 46, NFL and head coaching experience. Still an offensive minded guy who might even want to keep Gattis around. Could also lead to further recruiting wins in SoCal, which feels like a pretty good place to setup shop right now.

Who doesn't love a redemption story?

HateSparty

November 10th, 2020 at 1:59 PM ^

Sark should be in the top three.  Assuming he is clean, he would kill to be here, restore his name and has ties in the south and Cali.  Great offensive mind.  Could draw in other great coaches to work with him.  

 

I despise Fickell but he has shown he is capable of being a high quality head coach.  He needs to be in top three.  I like Hafley or another offensive minded coach as the third.  Next year would cost alot for a head coach and coaching staff but years two-forever will be more than manageable. 

bronxblue

November 10th, 2020 at 10:26 AM ^

The fact Brian keeps referencing Michael Spath's tweet as some evidence of institutional resistance to change is troubling because it's Michael F'ing Spath.  

I also don't understand why people keep conflating losing to Indiana with losing to MSU.  Michigan lost to MSU and that's an inexcusable loss, but Indiana is a veteran, solid team that ALSO got to play Michigan down their two starting tackles and probably their best defensive end about 1/8th into the game.  The cornerback play is bad and guys jumping off sides isn't acceptable (though I do notice that Brian doesn't mention the fact that they stopped jumping offsides at halftime and generally played more disciplined), but this place needs to stop looking at certain teams through the lens of 10 years ago, especially when you also say that the HC at that school (Tom Allen) might make sense at Michigan.  

bacon1431

November 10th, 2020 at 10:46 AM ^

I don't think it's embarrassing to lose to Indiana. I think it's embarrassing that we were never within a score of them after halfway through the second quarter. I think RR and Hoke would have lost to this Indiana team. But we were shellacked. 

13 rush yards against a team that gave up 121 and 250 in rushing to Rutgers and PSU respectively. 

I think it was an embarrassing result. Not because we haven't lost to them in 30 odd years. But because of how it happened. 

bronxblue

November 10th, 2020 at 11:37 AM ^

They were also driving with a chance to make it a 3-point game midway through the 4th quarter.  And again, being down your two starting tackles against a team that loves to blitz and attack the edges is going to mess with your offense.  

Michigan also threw for 344 yards, which is about half the total number of yards IU has given up in the air all year.  And this IU secondary is pretty talented, so that's a testament to the passing attack.

Again, I'm tired of all this grandiose UNACCEPTABLE! responses this site trots out when things are bad.  Losing to MSU was bad no matter how you look at it; being in a 10-point game latr on the road against a top-15 team with your first-year QB behind a jumbled offensive line isn't that for me.

bacon1431

November 10th, 2020 at 12:53 PM ^

"On the road" isn't a thing right now. Yes, the team has to travel but there's virtually no difference between playing at Bloomington or in Ann Arbor right now. 

A 10 point deficit midway through the 4th quarter isn't an argument that it wasn't embarrassing. I get Indiana is decent. But we did not come out with a good game plan. The same issues crept up from the week before. 

I am the kind of fan that is fine keeping JH around if we get 10 wins every year. I think it'd difficult to make a jump up from that. But we got to 10 wins once in the last three seasons and we're probably not even going to get to 7 wins this year (I think that's roughly the equivalent of a 10 win season with a normal schedule). We are going backwards. 

bronxblue

November 10th, 2020 at 1:42 PM ^

Yes, road and home splits are less pronounced than in years past but it still matters when one team has to travel and stay in a hotel room while the other gets to go to its facility, its lockerroom, etc.  There are comforts and, especially with a young team, matters somewhat.  

I'm not going to debate what the deficit in the 4th quarter means to people; it's subjective measuring of how competitive a game it was.  And some of the issues that crept up were absolutely known and systemic (bad secondary) and some may have been specific to this game (being down two starting tackles and reshuffling a line undoubtedly stymied the running game more than it would have otherwise).

People can call for Harbaugh's removal if they want, but this entire discussion in this article was basically a bunch of people processing a lost season and not some deep dive into viable alternatives.  

1VaBlue1

November 10th, 2020 at 10:49 AM ^

It's not losing to IU that bothers people - its how that loss came about.  But you know that...  The first half was absolutely abysmal on both sides, and there is no excuse for that.  Where was the second half defense when the game started?  Why were they running into a stacked box on first downs, then following up with an off tackle run on 2nd down, and finishing off with the predictably dependent 3rd and long pass?

At least Bo's offenses had moved the chains when the dust cleared out.

CompleteLunacy

November 10th, 2020 at 11:31 AM ^

I'll keep saying it. I'm not upset they lost...I'm upset they never made it competitive. The couple of times they cut it to 10 points were immediately undone by an IU touchdown or a Michigan turnover. It was 24-7 in the first half. That's not great, Bob. That's not far from the 28-0 halftime against Wisconsin last year, which everyone agreed was an absolute disaster. Except we're talking about Indiana

bronxblue

November 10th, 2020 at 11:59 AM ^

They were down 10 and driving to make it 3 when Milton threw a bad pick.  Perhaps not surprising given that he's in his third start of his career.  That Wisconsin game last year was way more depressing because that was a veteran NFL line with a senior QB and a bunch of top-rated, veteran WRs.  It featured a defense with a couple of veteran corners and a defensive front with some NFL guys last year as well as this one.

This all just feels like recency bias.  If Michigan had pulled out the win against MSU people wouldn't be flailing around now calling for Harbaugh's head, and looking at the available options I'm not remotely optimistic that there is anyone who would make this team any better and a TON of guys who could make the situation worse.

Cranky Dave

November 10th, 2020 at 1:15 PM ^

I agree that in the context of losing both starting tackles the IU loss isn’t as bad as many people here think.  However, the overall direction of the program has changed my opinion on whether Harbaugh is ever going to get the program to consistently beat teams a tier below OSU, Bama, Clemson, etc.  The stat that caught my attention was JH starting 20-4 but going 28-16 since.  To have major holes at QB, DT, CB in year 6 (Thomas opting in would have helped but still...). Clock management has been a consistent problem too.   I don’t think firing a HC mid season is a good idea unless there are Baylor type problems.  But Warde and the administration should absolutely be thinking about potential replacements, as it’s always important to have good succession planning.  

Perkis-Size Me

November 10th, 2020 at 10:26 AM ^

I hate the Clemson comparison. Absolutely hate it. Dabo’s program began to ascend just as soon as the the other traditional powerhouse program in the ACC, FSU, began its rampant decline. Before Winston left, Clemson couldn’t carry FSU’s jockstrap. And luckily for Clemson, that was the only other team in the ACC that was a threat to contend for titles. Now FSU is more a threat to itself than to anyone in the ACC.  There is literally no one in the ACC that can truly challenge Clemson on a year in, year out basis. At least not until FSU gets its head out of its ass. 

Michigan has to deal with an OSU team every single year, in its own division, that has had one down year in, what, the last 50 years? They are loaded with five stars at every position on the field. Not to mention great Penn State and Wisconsin programs, and for much of the 2010s a truly great MSU program. Michigan‘s path to success is so much more difficult to navigate than Clemson’s has ever been. Clemson only ever had one team to worry about, and now they are down and out for the foreseeable future. Michigan‘s competition has never really gone away, and an OSU’s case, has only gotten stronger and stronger every single year.

 

Perkis-Size Me

November 10th, 2020 at 1:04 PM ^

I'm at that point as well, minus Michigan somehow making a grand slam, bottom of the ninth, two outs, game 7 of the World Series kind of hire. Someone who can somehow get the program to rise up in spite of all the roadblocks the fanbase and administration put in the way. As in an Urban Meyer or Nick Saban caliber of hire, and those guys don't come around very much. Even when they do, you have to convince them to want to come here and not go to the SEC, Clemson, or OSU.

Beyond that, at this point I think Michigan just is what it is. We are a slightly better version of Nebraska. We are the Tennessee of the North, right down to the T (no pun intended). Haven't been a true national force in years, cling to the past, hang our hats on a former QB who was decent in his time at the school but far more made a name for himself in the league. We are a program that still lives in the past because the past is all we have, and will probably be all we have for quite a while. And I've made peace with that.

I don't think this is a Harbaugh problem so much as I think this is a Michigan problem, and its not going to change unless the powers-that-be make the commitment to allow the football team to do whatever it takes to win. And I just don't think they're ever going to be comfortable with that.

As long as that is the case, no one should ever expect Michigan to be anything more than they are now.

bronxblue

November 10th, 2020 at 10:34 AM ^

Yeah, I guess I'm old enough to remember Clemson'ing, where Clemson found so many ways to lose to better teams on their schedule.  The ACC has always been insanely top-heavy, and so you get these years where they have one or occasionally two top-tier teams and then a bunch of muck afterwards.  Same with the 3 big Florida teams - rarely are UF, FSU, and UMiami all consistently good at the same time, and now it's FSU's time to be down.  

I don't know if there's a coach out there who would appreciably improve UM's chances at winning a title in this conference as presently constituted.

matty blue

November 10th, 2020 at 10:31 AM ^

a presumably-serious coaching conversation that mentions

  • mike leach,
  • scot loeffler,
  • nick sheridan, and
  • lane fucking kiffin

is the best proof i've ever seen that we are entirely fucked.