When you run out of reasons, it's you. [Patrick Barron]

This Week's Obsession: Moving On? Comment Count

Seth November 10th, 2020 at 9:09 AM

It's time to talk Jim Harbaugh job security.

Seth: If my opinion changed based on the result of one game is that a good opinion?

Ace: Nearly six years of games seems like enough. There’s always a tipping point.

Brian: I think the last two games are both so far below expectations and yet still part and parcel of what the Harbaugh era has been that they change things. Like: MSU lost to Rutgers and then got annihilated by Iowa. And Indiana just beat Michigan by three scores.

Ace: The last two games also reflected problems we’ve been discussing for years and saw coming before the season started.

Seth: MSU is a worse team but the IU loss feels much worse. I remember enough of Bo to at least know what's up when Michigan sleepwalks against a terrible opponent. Two weeks in a row of not knowing what your opponent is good at is incomprehensible.

Ace: We obviously didn’t expect… this… but we knew cornerback and defense tackle were problem spots.

Seth: Fuegobox hot take: defensive tackle has been fine?

Brian: Yeah there's a big difference between "the corners are meh Big Ten players" and what we've actually got.

Alex: My opinion changed because of one game, but it wasn’t the Indiana game. Michigan State is HORRIBLE and Michigan was at home, huge favorites... that’s the type of game you cannot be losing in Year Six.

Ace: Iowa scored 49 on them. Ricky White caught 1 of 8 targets against the Hawkeyes.

Alex: You got your Ricky White comment out before me lol.

Seth:

Alex: Indiana might actually be quite good, but the point remains. Harbaugh’s failed here. It sucks to put it that way, but it’s true.

Ace: Our scouting. This staff’s… hit or miss.

[After THE JUMP: Are you Fritz Crisler enough?]

---------------------------------------------------

Alex: One legit question is how much we are willing to give Jim a pass because this year was ruined by covid. Granted, that’s something every team is dealing with, but do we really want a transition in the next few months?

Seth: The thing about college sports is you can't fire the cornerback. You have to go back three years when they were recruiting these cornerbacks and see who's still around and what part of cornerback recruiting wasn't fixed.

Ace: The specifics don’t even feel worth going over because it’s the stuff we’ve been discussing for years. There’s just a point when you know it’s over. It’s over.

Seth: I mean we're making decisions for 2023 right now. The events of 2020-'22 are mostly set.

Brian: I don't think COVID has anything to do with jumping offsides six times in a half. All these teams are working under the same situation except Michigan didn't have to pause practice. How many consecutive years are we going to have to wonder why the offense makes no sense?

Ace: Particularly when there’s been a lot of changing on that side of the ball with one constant: Jim Harbaugh.

Alex: No, covid isn’t the reason why they look so poorly coached. It is why Ambry and Nico are gone — though who knows how big of a difference either would make. I guess I’m wondering whether making a move with this level of uncertainty would make the transition more difficult. Only one P5 hoops head coach was fired this offseason (before Chambers got canceled for being racist, I guess).

Brian: It seems like by the time the decision is being made we'll have a pretty good read on a whole bunch of different vaccines, so there will be way less uncertainty than there was for the basketball coaching carousel.

Alex: Good point. I guess we might as well rip the band-aid sooner rather than later too. A lame duck 2021 would be real bad.

Ace: When the main argument against firing a coach is “but what comes next?” that coach probably needs to go.

Seth: I think the main argument is "Can Michigan do better?" Not Michigan as if we're in charge. Is Warde Manuel going to get an improvement on Jim Harbaugh?

Ace: I hate that argument. We know this isn’t working. It’s time to try something else because at least there’s a chance it’ll work. There are so, so many football coaches! Buckets of them!

Alex: If we can’t get someone who won’t trip over their own dick against the worst State team I have seen in my life... might as well beef up the hoops budget.

Ace: Some of them didn’t even go to Michigan! In all seriousness, Manuel has the benefit of knowing this is a possibility early in the coaching change cycle. They should be kicking the tires on viable candidates to get an idea of what the market will look like before any move is made.

Brian: The pickings do seem a little slim.

Ace: There isn’t a strikingly obvious candidate like last time but strikingly obvious candidates, as we’ve learned, have sometimes peaked. I’d love to see them take a shot at Mario Cristobal, for example, but there are also always guys at smaller schools and if you find the right one on the way up that’s where home runs are often hit.

We don’t know if Chris Creighton can recruit but we also don’t know if he can’t and he’s done an incredible job in a horrible spot at Eastern. And I’m guessing Michigan can come up with several candidates people would like better.

Seth: If you're going to find one who can get Michigan to regularly competing for playoffs level you need an elite, and they don't come around often. When they do they shoot multiple small schools into national conversations.

Brian: I'm not arguing against a move. I am wondering if the lack of an obvious guy might tilt the scales towards a return we don't want.

Ace: Dabo Swinney was not an obvious guy.

Seth: Dabo's been the Harbaugh comp up until recently because Clemson was Clemsoning for half a decade before they hit.

Alex: Step 1: promote WR coach. Step 2: give up 70 in a bowl game. Step 3: win multiple national titles.

Ace: Seth, Dabo won 10, 11, 11, and 10 games in years 4-7. And that’s if you include his interim year as a full one. Otherwise that’s years 3-6. They went to the title game the next two years. There’s no comparison there.

What I’m saying is that it’s worse to wait when the only thing holding you back is not being sure of the next guy. You can always fire the next guy.

Seth: You don't fear becoming Nebraska?

Ace: Buddy, I’ve got news, we are Nebraska. I’d like to be better. Operating out of a paralyzing fear of losing the program’s inherent Michigan Greatness or whatever is exactly why it fell off.

Brian: This is going to be the first real decision Warde has to make. Bringing back that tweet from the game column:

If that's true and he doesn't pull the trigger you're looking at a cosmetic extension and the hope that returning almost everyone allows you to have the traditional Year Seven leap. Two things about this:

  1. Mel had left to coach Michigan Tech, got them their first two tourney bids in 30 years, and Michigan fell off the instant he left.
  2. When Beilein left the coaching carousel was already basically done so the Nate Oats types were already at new jobs. Juwan Howard was one of just three guys I preferred to just hiring Yaklich, and the other two were never options.

Totally different situation in football, where presumably they'd have a healthy amount of time to search and there are literally no even sort-of viable guys with any connection to the program.

Ace: I’ve choosing to live in a reality where that tweet doesn’t exist. It’s one source and we all remember 2014. And 2007.

Brian: I don't know what the chances are that Michigan makes a move after going 2-6, 3-5 but they're lower than I'd like.

Seth: "What are you gonna, do hire Brady Hoke?" --Man stabbed with Brady Hoke

Ace: The problem wasn’t hiring a new coach, the problem was hiring one of the worst possible options. I don’t even know what else to add there. Don’t make “Michigan Man™” a prerequisite, I guess. Or let Dave Brandon run anything.

Brian: There isn't even a Hoke! Hoke had a very good year at Ball State and greatly improved SDSU in year two. That's orders of magnitude more resume than the Michigan Man candidates have this time around.

Ace: Creighton. Cristobal. Joe Brady. Eric Bienemy. I haven’t even done research yet. I’m working on the hoops preview.

Brian: What I'm trying to say is that the chances of Michigan pulling the Hoke again are negligible because there isn't even a Hoke.

Ace: Sorry it’s late.

Seth: Bienemy was recruited by Bill McCartney if we need to play Six Degrees of Michigan.

Ace: We might need more degrees.

Seth: He also ran a Mad Magicians in the Super Bowl.

Ace: It’s been pointed out to me that a way Michigan could help repair some of their issues in Ohio is to hire Matt Campbell, a Mount Union guy. Mount Union has a much better coaching tree than ours—we’ve got two on staff.

Seth: Warinner and?

Ace: Ben McDaniels. Not a grad but connected to the tree. To be clear, I’m not saying Michigan should run out and hire Matt Campbell, but I’ve also heard worse ideas.

Like Hoke.

Seth: Eric Bienemy and Matt Campbell are fine options. I can't think of any others.

Ace: That’s a lack of imagination, in my opinion.

Brian: Luke Fickell. Tom Allen. Lane Kiffin. Matt Rhule.

Ace: Pay the Venables children to transfer. Jeff Brohm.

Seth: Brohm turns down his alma mater but goes to Michigan for the money and prestige?

Brian: Wow we're just gonna let Kiffin slide by without comment?

Seth: Wow you were serious about Fickell?

Ace: Fickell would be a home run. Fire the cannon and make him think about it.

Brian: I'd say he'd be a solid bet to succeed, and that's about as good as we're going to get.

Ace: Circling back, Michigan is still a much better and more lucrative job than Louisville. Someone can step into a whole lot of money and talent.

Seth: Yeah but I don't think Purdue is and he stayed there.

Brian: (at most positions)

Ace: The difference between Louisville and Michigan as coaching jobs remains vast. It’s, again, not even a discussion.

Brian: Brohm is currently making 50% more than Louisville's coach FWIW. That BTN money came in handy.

Ace: Vast.

Seth: I just don't think the Michigan job is something everyone wants. The difference in lifestyle between $4.5 million and $7 million isn't that huge. It's a prestige job but it's also one people know comes with enormous baggage that other prestige jobs don't.

Brian: Yeah. RichRod getting torpedoed is going to make both sides of any potential deal wary. That's why we are where we are and why I'm very excited to watch some basketball and hockey over the next few years.

Ace: People said this about Alabama before Saban got there.

Seth: I was speaking specifically about Fickell, really.

Ace: No job is going to appeal to literally everyone.

Brian: Saban was desperate to get out of the NFL and already had a national title so was confident he could get the rabbling Alabama people on the same page.

Ace: It’s an example. The same thing happened with Harbaugh, Michigan just caught the wrong part of his career arc.

Brian: I mean Fickell might want something else. There is going to be a reasonable up and comer worth taking a swing on. Therefore take the swing.

Ace: Hard to hit dingers if you don’t step up to the plate.

Seth: Just take the donut rings off please. It's 2020.

Brian: I wonder who the bunt single coaching hire is

Ace: Nick Sheridan.

Brian: Bunt single is pretty all right! You got on base!

Ace: Scot Loeffler.

Brian: Not in a sustainable or reasonable way, but you're on base!

Ace: …is a strikeout looking.

Brian: On base, unsustainable, eventually doomed: Mike Leach. Mike Leach is the bunt single of coaching hires. Dabo Swinney is that home run that bounced of Jose Canseco's head.

Comments

dragonchild

November 10th, 2020 at 12:34 PM ^

I don't want to get into names -- in no small part because it's not my jam -- but the past two games are both baffling and yet inexcusable.  I don't want to be quick to pull the trigger, because it's disingenuous to talk about those "six years" as all bathwater throwing out a lot of babies.  The program has had some remarkable moments of competence.  "Jim Harbaugh sucks" rankles as an oversimplification because his program dominated MSU and Notre Dame just last year.

But then what the pants is going on right now??  As Brian pointed out, COVID doesn't cut it as an excuse because other programs dealt with the same adversity.  How do you not respect MSU's run defense?  How do you not recruit a press man corner for a defense that basically lives and dies by press man?

The only thing I find consistent about the program is the inconsistency, which makes the debacles somehow worse.  Never mind that Minny sucks; in that game the team didn't punch itself in the face.  It took free yards, managed the clock, and had a great QB run game.  The competence displayed in that plan carries over, and thus cannot be ignored for convenience of narrative.  But then WTF was that crapshow against Michigan State?  When competence is followed by incompetence, I'm inclined to think the problem is laziness.  And that is a reason I can't accept for people making as much money as these coaches do.

UMVAFAN

November 10th, 2020 at 12:42 PM ^

I’d do two things if was Warde Manuel:

1) Keep Harbaugh and demand he hire a new defensive coordinator who has fielded a top 10/top 25 defense and has shown they can slow down OSU. Mike Tressel fits the bill and was just demoted at MSU after Dantonio left. Pay him Don Brown’s salary and he might be on board. He falls into the same camp as Fickel - does he hate Michigan too much to do it? If he did come, he’d be a huge asset. Michigan has been cursed since his uncle took the OSU job and maybe this will break that curse!

2) Figure out quickly whether Gattis can hack it or not. Is he a bad OC or is he getting overruled by Harbaugh. If he actually has the reigns and we continue to flounder, find an experienced spread coordinator rather than an up and comer, and hand them the keys. Beg Greg Roman to switch which Harbaugh he’s working with. 

If Harbaugh is the defacto OC and won’t adapt to modern times, then his time has passed and he needs to go. Which brings me to:

3) Hire Mark Stoops. I don’t think Fickel would come, and I’m not sure if Cincinnati is really all that good. They rocketed up the polls this year because COVID put them higher than they otherwise would be. Stoops has overachieved in the SEC at Kentucky, and his staff has been a major factor in MSU falling behind in recruiting because Kentucky is taking the players that we’re going Green 5-10 years ago. He’ll get the players and has shown he can coach.

Trebor

November 10th, 2020 at 1:03 PM ^

You're not going to slow down OSU through scheme alone. You need players, and sadly we have none in the secondary besides Dax. It's a result of a multi-year recruiting failure at CB; sure, it's being exacerbated by clinging to a scheme that we absolutely do not have the skill to use, but there's not a scheme we can run with the players we have that would do anything to keep OSU from naming their score this year. If I'm Day, you better believe I'm seriously trying to hit 100 this year, because he'll be a legend forever if he can pull it off.

Greg McMurtry

November 10th, 2020 at 12:45 PM ^

I don’t get the Jeff Brohm thoughts. Because he beat OSU by realizing no one could get a hand on Rondale Moore, grabbing a lead and OSU couldn’t win playing catch-up? If anything, Rondale Moore won that game and Brohm was just along for the ride. Moore was torching guys. Brohm has a losing record. I’m not impressed.

dragonchild

November 10th, 2020 at 12:57 PM ^

The other thing is that OSU had slept on Purdue in a way they'd never with Michigan.

I don't know if I want to hire any coach under 50 these days because it seems a lot of them don't understand how sports works in 2020.  You might have data on a Purdue, but even if you do, you're loathe to re-write the playbook for them because practice time is limited.

Michigan, however, is always under a microscope.  You need to wrinkle your plays weekly and throw in surprises.  And they've done it before!  They've shown they can do it.  But there's no short-term fix for three-year lapses in positional recruiting, and they keep sitting on games when they should know better.

Wolverine 73

November 10th, 2020 at 1:13 PM ^

I don’t understand the Fickell talk.  He played at OSU, he coached there, he was interim head coach.  This isn’t like Bo, who was simply an assistant there before moving on to head coach at Miami, OH.  Fickell is dyed in the wool scarlet and gray, spent most of his life hating on Michigan.  Not to mention, what if Day leaves for the NFL and the Buckeyes decide to hire him?  Just what we need, another Mattison situation.

UMVAFAN

November 10th, 2020 at 1:27 PM ^

Go back to the Cradle of Coaches and hire Chuck Martin. He’s actually orchestrated a remarkable turnaround of that program, has won multiple championships at the D2 level, and was a coordinator at a big time program in Notre Dame. He’s on the ascent but could be worth the gamble. He’d be a cross between Bo and Tressel with his background.

SC Wolverine

November 10th, 2020 at 1:21 PM ^

One problem with the Dabo/Harbaugh comps is that Clemson plays in the ACC.  So of course they have 10 or 11 wins every season.  It's like playing Rutgers 4 times a year,  Illinois twice, and a smattering of Purdue, Maryland, and Northwestern.  If Michigan was in the ACC, Harbaugh would have gone 11-1/10-2 every year (assuming that tOSU was also in the ACC).

Oldadguy

November 10th, 2020 at 1:44 PM ^

Jim Leonhard DC Wisconsin. Alabama went after him. He'd bring a system from Wisconsin that would translate well to Michigan and he'd be able to recruit better players.

Fickell, OSU grad, is NOT coming to Michigan

Done

FrozeMangoes

November 10th, 2020 at 1:47 PM ^

How long til Day gets a shot at the NFL? I wouldn't hate if the Lions hired him. I think Fickell will stay at Cincy a few more years in hopes Day leaves and he slides into the OSU job. 

trueblueintexas

November 10th, 2020 at 2:05 PM ^

The AD and the coach are equally responsible for coalescing the fan and support base. While one can mess it up, both have to make it work. 

Warde is entrenched as the AD at this point. He has proven himself. It will be just as much on him to get everyone to support a new coach as it will be a new coach. 

The time prior to Harbaugh and Warde should not be viewed as indicative as to what will happen going forward. We all know there were things wrong with the coaches and the AD at the time.

Bluelaf

November 10th, 2020 at 2:57 PM ^

7 coaches who are both young, palatable, and likely gettable, that have had their teams (across all of their stints) outperform SP+ the most, relative to their schools' historical performances:

1. Josh Heupel

2.  PJ Fleck

3. Bryan Harsin

4. Tom Allen

5. Matt Campbell

6. Chris Klieman

7. Luke Fickell

Ordered by estimated effect on their team's SP+.  I like Harsin the best, and Campbell second.

 

FWIW I'm in the give-Harbaugh-one-more-year camp.

 

 

 

RockinLoud

November 10th, 2020 at 3:07 PM ^

FWIW I'm in the give-Harbaugh-one-more-year camp.

You can't just give him one more year. He has one year left on his contract and if it's not renewed now then recruiting will tank because of the the uncertainty, setting the program back even further. If you extend him, then he fails, you have a massive buy-out you're going to have to pay. We're in a sunk-cost situation where the best option for future gains is to just cut it off now and start over with something that has better prospects for future performance.

Michigan4Life

November 10th, 2020 at 3:14 PM ^

What about Lance Leipold from University of Buffalo? He has Midwest ties. He coached at national powerhouse in D3 with Wisconsin-Whitewater and built Buffalo into a winning program.

readyourguard

November 10th, 2020 at 3:41 PM ^

I would fully support a Luke Fickell hire.

I think Michigan fits him, and he fits Michigan.

He sucked at Ohio State during the Buckeyes worst year THIS CENTURY.  Since then, he's done a heck of a job at Cincinatti.  His teams look good, they're prepared, don't appear to shoot themselves in the foot repeatedly, or take a step backwards.  And I may be in the minority, but I still believe in recruiting Ohio and the Great Lakes region for kids who grew up watching Michigan Ohio State.

 

Trebor

November 10th, 2020 at 4:32 PM ^

Hahaha, kids growing up watching Michigan-OSU games... there are kids in high school who are one Braxton Miller overthrow from seeing exactly zero Michigan victories over Ohio State in their entire lives. What has Michigan done that would make them want to come here over Penn State, Michigan State, Wisconsin, Notre Dame, etc.? All of them have at least won a conference title and/or have made the playoffs in the last 16 years.

ca_prophet

November 10th, 2020 at 5:59 PM ^

I would say we have three high-level problems:

1.  OSU is a modern-Day Death Star, which is a serious roadblock to any aspirations we might have.  Our best hope there is likely the NIL legislation transforming the landscape, but I don't see any coaching hire we make getting us closer than we have been.

2.  Aside from OSU, we have a number of recruiting failures.  That in itself is not damning - recruiting is a game where you can do everything right, spend any amount of time and money, and still lose because we're talking about 17-18 year olds who have lots of options.  Maybe we could do better here, but it's a tough problem to solve, and while he's not recruiting well enough to slay the dragon, we can't say he's recruiting poorly.  However ... 

3.  Whatever recruiting issues we do have, there is a seeming unwillingness to adapt to them.  *This* issue could be fixed by a coaching hire (unfortunately, it would take a few years).

*****

As Dragonchild pointed out above, we have had moments of genuine competence and even excellence.  That Florida bowl game in Harbaugh's first year was really something.  Just last year we crushed MSU and ND.  And every time we've hit a snag, it seems like Harbaugh has taken a reasonable, logical shot to fix it:

- QB room not looking good?  Coach up Ruddock and Speight, snap up a former 5* in Patterson, and grab up a ready-to-roll recruit (McCaffrey) and a project (Milton).

- CB pipeline slowing down after a great run?  Take a shot at a bunch more 5*, and pick up as many bullets as we can find.

- DL not available?  Take a shot at more 5*, and pull in as many bodies as we can.

- Pulling in coaching and analyst talent from everywhere.

- Hiring Don Brown when we needed a DC was viewed at the time as a huge win.  

More generally, every time Harbaugh's hit a snag, we've seen him come up with a solution that made sense at the time.  (And of course, either they were all superficially-good-looking with no depth, or he's been snakebitten.)

It just all makes these last two games puzzling in the extreme.  Especially the gameplans on both sides of the ball!  

*****

As an aside, it doesn't really matter how much we're paying Harbaugh.  $1/year wouldn't justify these last two losses, and it's not like paying $10M/year for our next coach guarantees success.

Where the money is relevant is that it means we're not firing him this year, when the AD is going to cry poor about losing money due to Covid.  Doesn't seem like adding a $10M buyout on top of that is the way they're going.

*****

Overall, I fear the chaos that a coaching change will bring.  There are many, many worse things than Harbaugh out there, and nothing clearly better.  I have heard the "we could pay anyone $M to lose to MSU!" argument but have no sympathy for them, precisely because as soon as that first person does lose to MSU, those same people will be calling for their heads.  I have more sympathy for the "this isn't working, therefore we have to change" argument, but not enough.  Specifically, while this isn't working, we're not crushing the program the way (it can be argued) RR and Hoke did.  The wrong change could break it in ways that are not easily repairable.  Unless the change has a chance to make things better (and depending on who you are, how good that chance is), we shouldn't make it.  Personally, my threshold for "chance to make things better", is "better odds than Luke Fickell gives us".

*****

For those arguing that the fanbase is up in arms, the AD doesn't really care about that.  The AD will care when they stop giving them money.  The same people whining the loudest today will be whining the loudest at the next coach, when he inevitably misses out on a 5* recruit or we lose a game.  They're not a good reason to change.

*****

But when it comes right down to it, this is not fine and we are not OK with the events currently unfolding.  We likely do need to make a change, and I just hope we can find someone better than Fickell.

uminks

November 10th, 2020 at 6:48 PM ^

If Harbaugh wants to stay here he will get one more year for sure and if he does reasonably well next season, lets say 9 wins, then he will get a contract extension. I'm just hoping that Harbaugh's slow withdrawal from building the team up over the last couple years is a sign he was going to jump ship at the end of this season or next season for the NFL. Our only hope is that he makes the jump at the end of this season. 

YoOoBoMoLloRoHo

November 10th, 2020 at 8:59 PM ^

Saban arrived at Bama as a ~55 yr old coach with incredible drive and energy. JH arrived as a 50-yr old with drove and energy.  Skip ahead 6/years: Saban is 13 years older than JH right now with multiple NCs and still shows more intensity than JH. Urban Meyer is the same age as JH and he never relented in his intensity. Swinney is still only 50. Kirby 44.

The point: teams respond to their leader and JH has lost his edge. Time to move on.

 

BornInA2

November 10th, 2020 at 9:25 PM ^

Firing Harbaugh after this stupid, ill-advised season or because of losses during it, is like changing the offense after a really good season that you got clocked by OSU at the end of. They have way better talent, and will for as long as they keep cheating, and letting players "take" all their classes online, while Michigan doesn't.

So unless you plan to shit-can every academic standard, start cheating, and hand a new coach a giant bag full of dirty money, you keep Harbaugh regardless of how many games are lost this season.

maquih

November 10th, 2020 at 10:49 PM ^

Bro we lost at home to one of the worst MSU teams of all time.   They just got completely destroyed by Iowa 42-7.  (Iowa was 0-2 going into that with losses to northwestern and purdeue.)That's not acceptable.  If (and that's a big if) covid is the excuse, how come it's not an excuse for other teams that are beating us and playing competitive in the big ten?? So now it's okay for us to vastly underperform teams like iowa purdue and northwestern??  It's okay that we just completly fall amidst the chaos of covid and the rest of the conference does fine ( i guess you think we belong in the company of minnesota and illinois scraping the bottom of the conference??)

We are looking at a very real possibility of a 1-win season, with several objectively bad football teams on our schedule.  Just not acceptable.

ih8losing

November 11th, 2020 at 8:41 AM ^

I'm no WD, but I do appreciate a nice piece of merchandise, often the simpler the better. That jacket Urban has on in the picture above, did Nike make a similar one with the Block M? Just looks sharp

Todd92

November 11th, 2020 at 11:37 AM ^

Stop with the COVID excuses.  Just stop.

Stop recycling the same list of potential Harbaugh replacements with 'resumes'.  Zero imagination.

Tony Elliott?  Clark Lea?  There's 20 more of these out there.  There was always a viable replacement available.  Harbaugh's contract made him impossible to jettison sooner.  It is now feasible, but probably still won't happen until after next year.  Who's going to hire him and cough up the buyout?  Who's going to hire the docile Harbaugh, period?

burtcomma

November 11th, 2020 at 1:31 PM ^

Reality is that JH is not going anywhere unless HE decides to go.  You guys can speculate and toss out names, but our Athletic Director is going to offer him an extension beyond 2021.  Bank on it.