When you run out of reasons, it's you. [Patrick Barron]

This Week's Obsession: Moving On? Comment Count

Seth November 10th, 2020 at 9:09 AM

It's time to talk Jim Harbaugh job security.

Seth: If my opinion changed based on the result of one game is that a good opinion?

Ace: Nearly six years of games seems like enough. There’s always a tipping point.

Brian: I think the last two games are both so far below expectations and yet still part and parcel of what the Harbaugh era has been that they change things. Like: MSU lost to Rutgers and then got annihilated by Iowa. And Indiana just beat Michigan by three scores.

Ace: The last two games also reflected problems we’ve been discussing for years and saw coming before the season started.

Seth: MSU is a worse team but the IU loss feels much worse. I remember enough of Bo to at least know what's up when Michigan sleepwalks against a terrible opponent. Two weeks in a row of not knowing what your opponent is good at is incomprehensible.

Ace: We obviously didn’t expect… this… but we knew cornerback and defense tackle were problem spots.

Seth: Fuegobox hot take: defensive tackle has been fine?

Brian: Yeah there's a big difference between "the corners are meh Big Ten players" and what we've actually got.

Alex: My opinion changed because of one game, but it wasn’t the Indiana game. Michigan State is HORRIBLE and Michigan was at home, huge favorites... that’s the type of game you cannot be losing in Year Six.

Ace: Iowa scored 49 on them. Ricky White caught 1 of 8 targets against the Hawkeyes.

Alex: You got your Ricky White comment out before me lol.

Seth:

Alex: Indiana might actually be quite good, but the point remains. Harbaugh’s failed here. It sucks to put it that way, but it’s true.

Ace: Our scouting. This staff’s… hit or miss.

[After THE JUMP: Are you Fritz Crisler enough?]

---------------------------------------------------

Alex: One legit question is how much we are willing to give Jim a pass because this year was ruined by covid. Granted, that’s something every team is dealing with, but do we really want a transition in the next few months?

Seth: The thing about college sports is you can't fire the cornerback. You have to go back three years when they were recruiting these cornerbacks and see who's still around and what part of cornerback recruiting wasn't fixed.

Ace: The specifics don’t even feel worth going over because it’s the stuff we’ve been discussing for years. There’s just a point when you know it’s over. It’s over.

Seth: I mean we're making decisions for 2023 right now. The events of 2020-'22 are mostly set.

Brian: I don't think COVID has anything to do with jumping offsides six times in a half. All these teams are working under the same situation except Michigan didn't have to pause practice. How many consecutive years are we going to have to wonder why the offense makes no sense?

Ace: Particularly when there’s been a lot of changing on that side of the ball with one constant: Jim Harbaugh.

Alex: No, covid isn’t the reason why they look so poorly coached. It is why Ambry and Nico are gone — though who knows how big of a difference either would make. I guess I’m wondering whether making a move with this level of uncertainty would make the transition more difficult. Only one P5 hoops head coach was fired this offseason (before Chambers got canceled for being racist, I guess).

Brian: It seems like by the time the decision is being made we'll have a pretty good read on a whole bunch of different vaccines, so there will be way less uncertainty than there was for the basketball coaching carousel.

Alex: Good point. I guess we might as well rip the band-aid sooner rather than later too. A lame duck 2021 would be real bad.

Ace: When the main argument against firing a coach is “but what comes next?” that coach probably needs to go.

Seth: I think the main argument is "Can Michigan do better?" Not Michigan as if we're in charge. Is Warde Manuel going to get an improvement on Jim Harbaugh?

Ace: I hate that argument. We know this isn’t working. It’s time to try something else because at least there’s a chance it’ll work. There are so, so many football coaches! Buckets of them!

Alex: If we can’t get someone who won’t trip over their own dick against the worst State team I have seen in my life... might as well beef up the hoops budget.

Ace: Some of them didn’t even go to Michigan! In all seriousness, Manuel has the benefit of knowing this is a possibility early in the coaching change cycle. They should be kicking the tires on viable candidates to get an idea of what the market will look like before any move is made.

Brian: The pickings do seem a little slim.

Ace: There isn’t a strikingly obvious candidate like last time but strikingly obvious candidates, as we’ve learned, have sometimes peaked. I’d love to see them take a shot at Mario Cristobal, for example, but there are also always guys at smaller schools and if you find the right one on the way up that’s where home runs are often hit.

We don’t know if Chris Creighton can recruit but we also don’t know if he can’t and he’s done an incredible job in a horrible spot at Eastern. And I’m guessing Michigan can come up with several candidates people would like better.

Seth: If you're going to find one who can get Michigan to regularly competing for playoffs level you need an elite, and they don't come around often. When they do they shoot multiple small schools into national conversations.

Brian: I'm not arguing against a move. I am wondering if the lack of an obvious guy might tilt the scales towards a return we don't want.

Ace: Dabo Swinney was not an obvious guy.

Seth: Dabo's been the Harbaugh comp up until recently because Clemson was Clemsoning for half a decade before they hit.

Alex: Step 1: promote WR coach. Step 2: give up 70 in a bowl game. Step 3: win multiple national titles.

Ace: Seth, Dabo won 10, 11, 11, and 10 games in years 4-7. And that’s if you include his interim year as a full one. Otherwise that’s years 3-6. They went to the title game the next two years. There’s no comparison there.

What I’m saying is that it’s worse to wait when the only thing holding you back is not being sure of the next guy. You can always fire the next guy.

Seth: You don't fear becoming Nebraska?

Ace: Buddy, I’ve got news, we are Nebraska. I’d like to be better. Operating out of a paralyzing fear of losing the program’s inherent Michigan Greatness or whatever is exactly why it fell off.

Brian: This is going to be the first real decision Warde has to make. Bringing back that tweet from the game column:

If that's true and he doesn't pull the trigger you're looking at a cosmetic extension and the hope that returning almost everyone allows you to have the traditional Year Seven leap. Two things about this:

  1. Mel had left to coach Michigan Tech, got them their first two tourney bids in 30 years, and Michigan fell off the instant he left.
  2. When Beilein left the coaching carousel was already basically done so the Nate Oats types were already at new jobs. Juwan Howard was one of just three guys I preferred to just hiring Yaklich, and the other two were never options.

Totally different situation in football, where presumably they'd have a healthy amount of time to search and there are literally no even sort-of viable guys with any connection to the program.

Ace: I’ve choosing to live in a reality where that tweet doesn’t exist. It’s one source and we all remember 2014. And 2007.

Brian: I don't know what the chances are that Michigan makes a move after going 2-6, 3-5 but they're lower than I'd like.

Seth: "What are you gonna, do hire Brady Hoke?" --Man stabbed with Brady Hoke

Ace: The problem wasn’t hiring a new coach, the problem was hiring one of the worst possible options. I don’t even know what else to add there. Don’t make “Michigan Man™” a prerequisite, I guess. Or let Dave Brandon run anything.

Brian: There isn't even a Hoke! Hoke had a very good year at Ball State and greatly improved SDSU in year two. That's orders of magnitude more resume than the Michigan Man candidates have this time around.

Ace: Creighton. Cristobal. Joe Brady. Eric Bienemy. I haven’t even done research yet. I’m working on the hoops preview.

Brian: What I'm trying to say is that the chances of Michigan pulling the Hoke again are negligible because there isn't even a Hoke.

Ace: Sorry it’s late.

Seth: Bienemy was recruited by Bill McCartney if we need to play Six Degrees of Michigan.

Ace: We might need more degrees.

Seth: He also ran a Mad Magicians in the Super Bowl.

Ace: It’s been pointed out to me that a way Michigan could help repair some of their issues in Ohio is to hire Matt Campbell, a Mount Union guy. Mount Union has a much better coaching tree than ours—we’ve got two on staff.

Seth: Warinner and?

Ace: Ben McDaniels. Not a grad but connected to the tree. To be clear, I’m not saying Michigan should run out and hire Matt Campbell, but I’ve also heard worse ideas.

Like Hoke.

Seth: Eric Bienemy and Matt Campbell are fine options. I can't think of any others.

Ace: That’s a lack of imagination, in my opinion.

Brian: Luke Fickell. Tom Allen. Lane Kiffin. Matt Rhule.

Ace: Pay the Venables children to transfer. Jeff Brohm.

Seth: Brohm turns down his alma mater but goes to Michigan for the money and prestige?

Brian: Wow we're just gonna let Kiffin slide by without comment?

Seth: Wow you were serious about Fickell?

Ace: Fickell would be a home run. Fire the cannon and make him think about it.

Brian: I'd say he'd be a solid bet to succeed, and that's about as good as we're going to get.

Ace: Circling back, Michigan is still a much better and more lucrative job than Louisville. Someone can step into a whole lot of money and talent.

Seth: Yeah but I don't think Purdue is and he stayed there.

Brian: (at most positions)

Ace: The difference between Louisville and Michigan as coaching jobs remains vast. It’s, again, not even a discussion.

Brian: Brohm is currently making 50% more than Louisville's coach FWIW. That BTN money came in handy.

Ace: Vast.

Seth: I just don't think the Michigan job is something everyone wants. The difference in lifestyle between $4.5 million and $7 million isn't that huge. It's a prestige job but it's also one people know comes with enormous baggage that other prestige jobs don't.

Brian: Yeah. RichRod getting torpedoed is going to make both sides of any potential deal wary. That's why we are where we are and why I'm very excited to watch some basketball and hockey over the next few years.

Ace: People said this about Alabama before Saban got there.

Seth: I was speaking specifically about Fickell, really.

Ace: No job is going to appeal to literally everyone.

Brian: Saban was desperate to get out of the NFL and already had a national title so was confident he could get the rabbling Alabama people on the same page.

Ace: It’s an example. The same thing happened with Harbaugh, Michigan just caught the wrong part of his career arc.

Brian: I mean Fickell might want something else. There is going to be a reasonable up and comer worth taking a swing on. Therefore take the swing.

Ace: Hard to hit dingers if you don’t step up to the plate.

Seth: Just take the donut rings off please. It's 2020.

Brian: I wonder who the bunt single coaching hire is

Ace: Nick Sheridan.

Brian: Bunt single is pretty all right! You got on base!

Ace: Scot Loeffler.

Brian: Not in a sustainable or reasonable way, but you're on base!

Ace: …is a strikeout looking.

Brian: On base, unsustainable, eventually doomed: Mike Leach. Mike Leach is the bunt single of coaching hires. Dabo Swinney is that home run that bounced of Jose Canseco's head.

Comments

Njia

November 10th, 2020 at 9:38 AM ^

I just don't think the Michigan job is something everyone wants. The difference in lifestyle between $4.5 million and $7 million isn't that huge. It's a prestige job but it's also one people know comes with enormous baggage that other prestige jobs don't.

This is the exact point I was about to make before I read Seth's comment. The last 3 consecutive coaches have failed to make Michigan a real contender for the B1G in anything resembling a consistent way. Maybe RichRod is right, and it's not the position or the coaches ... maybe it's us.

UMmasotta

November 10th, 2020 at 10:02 AM ^

I don't disagree - there's baggage at UM that makes it more difficult than, say, walking into Ohio St., Oklahoma, etc. But looking around the other "prestige" programs, who doesn't have baggage? Texas is probably as bad or worse than Michigan in terms of donor/administration interference (although admittedly it would be more likely to disappear if you just win). Nebraska's athletic department seems childish and has obvious recruiting hurdles. USC is a bit of a tire fire that has managed to stay under the radar. UCLA is a mess. FSU is a mess. Where is there a prestigious program that would conceivably be hiring a coach in the next three years that doesn't have its own significant baggage?

KentuckianaWolverine

November 10th, 2020 at 1:09 PM ^

USC, Texas, and FSU are perfect examples of historically great programs that can't find a head coach.  That proves that the homerun hire isn't as easy as throwing out a name.  Tom Herman was the "can't miss" coach, for Texas, but look how that's going.  These schools also have the advantage of great weather and in state talent.  Still.....they are struggling.

UCLA not as historically good, but same thing for them.

Nebraska.  Remember when Bo Pelini brought them back from obscurity, and made them respected again?  Yet, his 3 loss seasons were deemed "unacceptable", and they could do better (sound familiar?).  After terrible seasons, after that...historically great school....Scott Frost homerun hire.  Still a tire fire.

Hell....even Saban had a hard time being successful coaching in the state of Michigan and the Big 10.  Wasn't until he went to the SEC that he became SABAN.

Michigan has a lot of things that make the job more difficult.  Cold weather, admission standards, state HS talent, FOUR "rivals", and the ridiculous amount different high ranking people with opposite agendas. 

Remember, Sears was once the biggest retailer in the world.  Walmart became better.  Sears thought a better CEO could get them over the hump.  Sears is bankrupt, and Walmart is still thriving.

Just because we were awesome in the 40s doesn't mean we are entitled to win championships in 2020s. 

The point is....if it was easy to find that type of 13-0 season coach, then the other "blue bloods" (with far more advantages) would have had no trouble finding them.  I got news for you.  Those teams have big time "money cannons", as well.

The risk of gambling the entire paycheck, to possibly win the lottery, is far worse than living off that paycheck.

Remember, we thought Lloyd losing 3-4 games a season was pitiful, and anyone could do better.  Then, a decade of losing seasons followed.

Be careful what you wish for.....because you might just get it. 

SoIWontGetFined

November 11th, 2020 at 5:08 PM ^

That seems to be what people are missing.  There are 3 elite teams and then a huge gap to the next tier.  We should be more solidly in that tier and it's beyond frustrating that we can't get that done.  But it is simply not realistic to expect us to join the top 3.  And even if it were possible I'm not that interested in us doing the things we'd need to do to get there.  That said, we can and should be better than this.

DMill2782

November 10th, 2020 at 10:42 AM ^

Just my opinion, but I think this is kind of a cop out. I don't believe this so called baggage hinders recruiting. I doubt most recruits think much about donors, admin, AD pressure, etc. How does this baggage affect game planning or the lack thereof? It sure as hell doesn't affect the coaches being unwilling to make adjustments in game. It doesn't affect player development, which really appears to be a major weakness of Harbaugh and his staff. 

 

Njia

November 10th, 2020 at 12:51 PM ^

By "baggage," I mean the University administration, former players, alumni, donors, etc., who "helpfully" remind the coach of "how we do things around here," and more importantly, "how we will NOT do things around here." For example, what business is it of anyone's to have game captains, who wears the #1 jersey, etc. except for the head coach and his current staff and team? And that seems to be just the tip of the iceberg.

My Name is LEGIONS

November 10th, 2020 at 2:17 PM ^

Most of that baggage is now gone save the requirement to win but not at all cost.  OSU is win at all cost... they booted Bruce, if you can imagine.   When we began to lose to Tressel consistently, if it were them they'd have booted Carr right away.

MGoCarolinaBlue

November 10th, 2020 at 9:39 AM ^

"Dabo won 10, 11, 11, and 10 games in years 4-7."

OK? Dabo also doesn't have to play OSU's fully operational death star with 5 star talent at every position on the field every single season, which is another reason why trying to make these comparisons is an exercise in stupidity.

FreddieMercuryHayes

November 10th, 2020 at 11:44 AM ^

I mean who is in charge of getting studs along the defensive front?  The coaches.  Honestly, I think most of UMs problems have to do with recruiting.  Is Harbaugh recruiting worse than Hoke?  At least doing worse in the recruting and retaining.  Harbaugh's best year was with a two deep of Hoke DL that each line could be a starter at most all big ten schools.

M_Born M_Believer

November 10th, 2020 at 11:43 AM ^

While your point is taken.  While building Clemson, all he had to take down FSU that was already on the downside of its glory days.  So it was much easier to build up a record cruising through a bad ACC conference before hitting a bowl game or playoffs.

The ACC was / is a weaker conference than even the Big 2 Little 8 days.  It did not take long for Dabo to get to a point where Clemson was heavy favorites in 10-11 (ie their ENTIRE CONFERENCE SCHEDULE) of their games even before a bowl game / playoffs.  Match that with being locally placed within talent rich regions (GA, SC, FL) led to factors that helped.

It came down to making the playoffs under the current structure.  Clemson became the top dog in the ACC with an easy path to CFP.  His pitch got very easy.  Come to Clemson and we can make it to the playoffs, or go to UGA / LSU / FLA / Auburn.  Great schools, but far less likely to make it to the playoffs.......

At the end of the day, he got the job done.  But make no mistake the opportunities and factors helped......

McFate

November 10th, 2020 at 12:12 PM ^

Dabo did have an easier path.  Clemson's recruiting success is predicated on getting to the playoffs consistently, which mostly requires navigating one's conference without a loss.

Over the prior four years (2016-2019 inclusive), Clemson has faced exactly one AP-final-top-ten team in conference play (#8 FSU in 2016).  Michigan faced nine over the same span (OSU x4, PSU x3, Wisc x2)

MGoCarolinaBlue

November 10th, 2020 at 11:15 AM ^

Recruiting hinges on winning, and winning hinges on recruiting. I don't think our coaches are perfect but I have no doubt the trajectory of the program right now would be different if we had won the 2016 OSU game or the 2018 OSU game.

Momentum going from the regular season to the postseason matters as well. It's obvious over the years that some of Michigan's players have checked out after OSU losses.

Anyway, the questions we should all be asking:

1. Is another coach likely to be able to recruit better than Jim Harbaugh?

2. Is another coach likely to be able to get over the hump vs. OSU's death star?

I have yet to hear any suggested candidates where the answer seems to be "yes".

Pumafb

November 10th, 2020 at 11:53 AM ^

This is the problem. You aren't going to find a "yes" to that. There are a ton of "maybe" answers though. A "maybe" is much better than the answer we currently have which is a big "not a chance". Harbaugh has proven he can't recruit well enough or consistently enough. He can't retain enough players and he can't beat any team that is "better" than Michigan. That's the whole point. Why would anyone be happy with the bad team we have this year or the mediocre to slightly above average teams we had in the past 5 years? I would much rather have the chance at greatness than maintain the average to bad status-quo.

1VaBlue1

November 10th, 2020 at 9:39 AM ^

Ace has been reading my comments!  When you realize that your current direction is failure, the only thing to do is change direction.  That new new direction may also lead to failure - but there is a decent chance it also leads to something better.  You know you're failing, so a change is the only thing that can change that.

Warde better have a good list of offensive up and comers.  Football isn't about defense, anymore, and Lloyd's play action offense can't score more than 20.

FreddieMercuryHayes

November 10th, 2020 at 9:41 AM ^

I  mean it's Luke Fickell right?  That's like the only viable candidate that is anything close to a "sure thing".  I know he's not a "Michigan Man", but hell at least he understands the OSU rivalry.  But anyway, I don't think UM will get on par with OSU until they start recruiting better.  UM is a clear step down from OSU in that department.  Either that or they have to stop with the attrition of a Top 5 Class Every Year type of program.  It's like they push people out a Top 5 Class Every Year rate but aren't recruiting at that level.

Njia

November 10th, 2020 at 11:04 AM ^

Fear of rejection is paralyzing!

It sure as shit is. There was a girl I was head over heels for in 8th grade but I didn't have the guts to ask her to dance. Same thing happened pretty much every year in high school, too. I kept wondering how the dumb jocks ended up with the hottest girls; years later, one of those "hot girls" told me the secret: they were often the only ones who asked for dates.

ndscott50

November 10th, 2020 at 9:43 AM ^

I continue to think everyone is missing the elephant in the room here.  Will the University leadership approve firing Harbaugh and his staff (which requires buy-outs) and spending the substantial money needed to hire a new coach and staff when the athletic department is already going to lose millions this year? This whole conversation about the coaching change seems silly if it does not address this issue.

robpollard

November 10th, 2020 at 10:56 AM ^

Maybe. But probably not.

If I'm a B1G Athletic Director planning my budget, am I assuming full houses will be allowed by health officials and university presidents next year? While I certainly hope so (e.g, Pfizer vaccine etc) there is no guarantee. Vaccinations won't get started in earnest until winter/spring, and my guess is B1G schools will be cautious, as has been their history.

If you had to budget, I'd assume something like 50% capacity. And thus, you're a) still losing revenue (just not as much as 2020) so firing a coaching staff and paying a bunch of payouts will hurt and b) even if if a good portion of the fans are pissed and don't want to attend, you'll still be able to easily "sell out" a stadium.

Now, if Stephen Ross is annoyed and wants to make a change, that matters a lot. But if someone has heard any rumbling regarding that or similar, I haven't seen it.

RockinLoud

November 10th, 2020 at 11:27 AM ^

even if if a good portion of the fans are pissed and don't want to attend, you'll still be able to easily "sell out" a stadium.

Maybe, maybe not. If the team goes 1-7 this year (which seems more likely than not at this point), with how utterly pathetic they've been, do you think fans will be clamoring to get to games next year if no change is made? Hoke's 2014 teams weren't near this bad and they barely managed to get to something like 65% capacity towards the end of the season. I have doubts they would "easily" get to whatever the capacity number is next year if nothing changes.

Now, if Stephen Ross is annoyed and wants to make a change, that matters a lot. But if someone has heard any rumbling regarding that or similar, I haven't seen it.

That's the bigger point. It's clear the program is in disarray and floundering, the likes of which hasn't been seen since RR. Big money donors are not going to be happy to keep with the dumpster fire and will absolutely be calling for a change if they haven't already.

robpollard

November 10th, 2020 at 12:31 PM ^

Big money donors are not going to be happy to keep with the dumpster fire and will absolutely be calling for a change if they haven't already.
 

Maybe. But Ross and big money donors have more on their plates than usual right now than Michigan football.

Point is--until we hear them agitating for change, it's not going to happen. Fans in the stands are likely not going to be a metric in B1G schools until 2022, unfortunately.

robpollard

November 10th, 2020 at 10:39 AM ^

Yes, this whole conversation seems completely detached from reality.

UM is hemorrhaging money this year -- the whole entity, not just athletics (which is itself losing tens of millions). The school just announced students can't live on campus (huge revenue hit); the health system swung from a $175 profit to a $3 million loss. It's a major crisis.

And, yes, Michigan has a huge endowment -- most of that is earmarked for specific things, and UM has shown no interest in being creative in using it to cover losses.

Unless Warde and the Regents decide that "Eh, what's another few million?" (very doubtful!) when there is not an obvious candidate (a la Harbaugh in 2014) to be the replacement, then Harbaugh will get one last chance in 2021 (assuming he wants it -- I have no idea what his mindset is, but I do not get the sense at all he'll quit).

ndscott50

November 10th, 2020 at 10:55 AM ^

I wonder if Warde’s biggest concern is Harbuagh leaving this year.  I would expect the coaching market to be fairly depressed this year.  Not many schools will want to make changes this year due to the costs. There will also be a lot of push back from University leadership on the cost of a new coach. Sure, when the AD is rolling in cash, they will approve 7 or 8 million for a head coach plus millions more for staff.  In the current environment there would likely be pressure to keep this under control and more in line with Big Ten averages.

Worst case for Warde would be Harbaugh quits, and he is told to find a coach for under $6 million in a market with few candidates available. Pay what ever it takes to lure a top coach away from another team is likely to be off the table.

MGoStrength

November 10th, 2020 at 9:47 AM ^

Re Brohm and UM being a prestige but stressful job.

Yes, there is pressure at UM, but there's also the resources to win a NC with the right coach.  That doesn't exist at Purdue.  Even if you don't think UM will ever compete with OSU at the very least there are the resources to sign top 10 recruiting classes and a good coach can do a lot with that...a lot that can't be done at a Purdue.

Can UM do better than JH?

I don't know.  JH seems like a high floor, low ceiling guy.  You don't run a ton of risk of a losing record in a non-Covid year with regular top 12 recruiting classes.  But, you're also never going to beat better teams.  I think I'd prefer to take a risk at someone that can at least do it differently and get some signature wins to get the fans and recruits excited about, even if it's with the same 9-4 record.  And, I'd prefer a younger guy that maybe is less set in his ways will change things more readily when they aren't working.  Also a guy that uses more modern systems, whether it's offense, defense, social media, recruiting tactics, etc.

The specifics don’t even feel worth going over because it’s the stuff we’ve been discussing for years. There’s just a point when you know it’s over. It’s over.

This to me is the bottom line.  It doesn't matter why it isn't working any longer.  There has been enough time to realize that while JH could potentially fix some issues, others will simply pop up and the trend will continue regardless of the specific issue.

amedema

November 10th, 2020 at 9:48 AM ^

Why do people seem hesitant to go for Matt Campbell? He's a midwestern guy, has some major upsets on his resume, and has turned shitty ass Iowa State into a respectable program. He'd be number 1 for me. 

Pumafb

November 10th, 2020 at 10:05 AM ^

I think it comes down to what you hope to get out of the hire. To me, Campbell seems like a "safe" hire. Another high floor/low ceiling guy. Perhaps he wins a few games he shouldn't, something Harbaugh is incapable of doing. I think most don't see him as a home-run that might bring Michigan a championship. That may be a pipe dream, but there is a portion of the fan base that is willing to take the high risk/high reward guy with the hopes that Michigan become relevant in college football again. Luke Fickell has that chance. I don't personally believe Matt Campbell does.

MGoStrength

November 10th, 2020 at 10:46 AM ^

Luke Fickell has that chance. I don't personally believe Matt Campbell does.

I personally see Fickell as the same.  One of his biggest weaknesses IMO is recruiting.  Cincy is never going to be a top 10 recruiting class destination, but after two 11-win seasons they still can't crack the top 40.  IMO they should be more in the 20-35 range.  And, I don't see UM ever getting over the OSU hump without regularly signing top 8 classes.  They need a charismatic, younger guy for recruiting or if not a guy with a recruiting management system in place that can make up for his lack of charisma ala Saban/Fisher/Smart.  If UM can't find a guy that can recruit at least as good as JH, there is no sense making a change and I don't think Fickell can do that.

Pumafb

November 10th, 2020 at 11:08 AM ^

That's fair. I would be ok with a young up-and-comer too. What I'm not fine with is sticking with the status quo for any reason. If the guy Michigan picks ends up not working out, move on to the next. That's what programs do when they want to win championships. Being happy with average to below-average results is not something I subscribe to. 

My Name is LEGIONS

November 10th, 2020 at 2:20 PM ^

Never say never.... Ohio has had only one good program, and there is room for another....and it might be hip to play for them if they continue to win....   I always thought how it sucked how we have to compete with MSU instate whereas OSU never did... but we made up for it by taking many Ohio recruits... now with Cinci rising, we won't get them either.

MGoStrength

November 10th, 2020 at 5:30 PM ^

I always thought how it sucked how we have to compete with MSU instate whereas OSU never did... but we made up for it by taking many Ohio recruits... now with Cinci rising, we won't get them either.

Keep in mind that while ND is in Indiana, which borders both OH & MI, South Bend is right on the border to MI, so lots of kids in MI grow up as ND fans as well.  I'd say more so than in OH.  Most OH kids grow up as OSU fans.

bacon1431

November 10th, 2020 at 10:39 AM ^

He's near the top of my list too. Iowa St has not won a conference title since 1912. They have won 9+ games once in their entire history. They have like 10 total 8+ win seasons and Campbell has two of them. He won 6 conference games with them a couple years ago and that's the most conference wins they've ever had IIRC. Iowa St is one of the worst jobs in the country and he's got them competing against bigger programs. 

I wish he has won some conference titles at Toledo to make this a little easier, but to me, he's doing a great job in Ames. He's from Ohio and still has a ton of Ohio ties. I think he'd be a very good hire. Home run? Doubt it. But I think he'd kill for the job and would do, at the very least, a solid job.