Life After DJ: The Post-Wilson Squad and Potential Additions Comment Count

Ace


It's your show now. [Bryan Fuller]

Yesterday's NBA Draft withdrawal deadline brought good news and bad news for Michigan. Moe Wagner will be back for his junior year; DJ Wilson is staying in the draft, reportedly after getting a first-round guarantee from Utah, which owns the #24 and #30 picks.

Wagner's return is of paramount importance. He took the highest share of shots of any Wolverine last year, and he'll be leaned on even more after the departures of the next two players on that list, Derrick Walton and Zak Irvin. With grad transfer Jaaron Simmons, a strong pick-and-roll ballhandler, stepping into Walton's role, Michigan's offense should once again revolve around the 1-5 high screen.

Losing Wilson, however, has a significant impact on how this team can play. Let's start with a look at the current roster, keeping in mind that positional designations can be fluid, especially between SG-SF-PF:

PG SG SF PF C
J. Simmons MAAR C. Matthews D. Robinson M. Wagner
X. Simpson J. Poole I. Watson I. Livers J. Teske
E. Brooks       A. Davis

The area of concern is the position Wilson just vacated: power forward, where Duncan Robinson is poised to play huge minutes. Wilson's absence eliminates a lot of Michigan's lineup versatility. They're going to be small at the four, because Wagner isn't quick enough to stick with the vast majority of college fours, eliminating the potential to slide him down a position when Jon Teske or Austin Davis steps in at center—that lineup only looks viable against the rare team like last year's Purdue squad that occasionally plays two traditional bigs.

So how does Wilson's departure impact the team? How does John Beilein adjust? Let's take a look.

[Hit THE JUMP.]

PERSONNEL

As the roster currently stands, Duncan Robinson is going to play a huge role. At 6'8", 215 pounds, he's the only returning player who's built to play the four. I've seen several lineup projections with Charles Matthews getting time at that spot, but I don't think that will work; at 6'6", 190, he just doesn't have the requisite size—even Beilein's most undersized power forward, Zack Novak, played at 210 pounds.

That means incoming freshman Isaiah Livers is almost certain to not only crack the rotation, but see significant playing time. He'll be the most natural power forward on the roster, and while his defense may not be a strength as a true freshman, it should still be an upgrade over Robinson's.

The ripple effect also means Michigan is a little thin on the wings, especially if Ibi Watson can't bounce back from an ugly freshman year. If he can't contribute, it'll be up to freshmen Jordan Poole and Eli Brooks to provide depth behind Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman and Matthews. Poole, who has a natural role as a sharpshooter with NBA range, is the most likely to see 10-15 minutes off the bench—he'll at least provide spacing and outside shooting.

OFFENSE

Even though Wilson was one of the most efficient offensive players in the conference, this area is where his absence will be felt the least. He was utilized as a (very effective) role player last year, and his production tended to happen in spurts. If there's one thing Robinson can do, it's score; other than shifting a number of shots from the paint to the three-point arc, there shouldn't be much change here: the starting lineup will still be lethal if Matthews and Simmons live up to expectations, and Poole can hopefully fill Robinson's old role of designated bench gunner. Livers is an intriguing player here, too, as a natural four with a good-looking shot, three-point range, and impressive passing.

DEFENSE

This is where things get hairy. According to Synergy, Wilson was easily Michigan's best defender last year, giving up only 0.74 points per possession (83rd percentile) while taking on the most individual defense possessions of any Wolverine. Xavier Simpson (0.76 PPP, 80th percentile) was the only other rotation player to grade out above the 60th percentile, and he played a lot less than Wilson.

Robinson, meanwhile, ranked in the 23rd percentile on defense. While Oregon iso'd him to death in the Sweet Sixteen, his bigger issues came off the ball—he did a very poor job of fighting through off-ball screens and wasn't great at closeouts, two things Wilson did very well. Livers has good defensive upside, though it's hard to bank on a true freshman being a plus player in that department.

Wilson was Michigan's only player who consistently blocked shots since Ekpe Udoh, and the only guy who looks like he could be a rim protector—Jon Teske—is stuck behind Wagner. Wilson arguably made an even bigger impact on M's defense with his ability to switch between perimeter players and bigs and hold up well against both. That's not going to be the case with Robinson, and Livers is going to take some time to develop.

REBOUNDING

This was already an area of concern—it's hard to overstate the importance of Derrick Walton's defensive rebounding the last couple years—and it's only become a bigger one sans Wilson. While Wilson wasn't an impact rebounder last year, especially once conference play hit (7.2 OR%, 12.2 DR% in B1G play), he had a lot of upside in that area that Robinson (0.4%, 10.0%) simply doesn't. Livers wasn't sound on the glass in high school last year, either.

Michigan is going to need their athletic wings to crash the glass with Walton-like aplomb, because Wagner isn't a great rebounder and now he doesn't have another 6'10" guy alongside him. This could be a real problem when Michigan faces teams like Michigan State, which now has a huge, deep, and talented frontcourt.

POSSIBLE ADDITIONS


please?

  HT WT ORtg %Min %Poss OR% DR% ARate TORate Blk% Stl% FTRate FTM-FTA 2PM-2PA 3PM-3PA
Cam Johnson 6-8 210 120.7 82.0 16.4 2.5 12.8 14.4 12.6 1.0 1.7 26.1 60-74 (81.1%) 49-96 (51.0%) 78-188 (41.5%)
MiKyle McIntosh 6-7 234 99.2 57.1 28.2 6.5 16.4 14.5 20.5 3.8 1.5 47.7 103-135 (76.3%) 85-193 (44.0%) 32-90 (35.6%)

Wilson going pro does leave Michigan with an open scholarship, and given the above it'd sure be nice if they could use it on someone who's viable at the four. At the moment, there are three known options, though none of them seem exceedingly likely.

Sam Webb posted yesterday that he expects M will attempt to get back in the mix for Pitt grad transfer Cam Johnson, a coveted 6'8" wing who's in transfer limbo after Pitt blocked him from transferring to another ACC school:

I mentioned this in a reply to one of the threads below, but my gut tells me Michigan will kick the tires Pitt grad transfer Cam Johnson. He dropped Michigan from consideration due in part to the inability to guarantee him a spot. He is a versatile wing that is a big time academic kid, and PITT is blocking North Carolina as an option. I don't know if anything will come of renewed interest on the Wolverines' part, but my gut tells me they will at least give it a try.

Johnson has two years of eligibility remaining, which makes him a particularly enticing option. He's a proven outside shooter who was very effective as a role player for Pitt; while he mostly played the three for them, and would need to do more work on the glass at Michigan, he's an ideal fit for Beilein's system. He'd be a huge get.

Another possible grad transfer is Illinois State's MiKyle McIntosh, who withdrew from the draft yesterday. He's got the requisite bulk and rebounding ability, and he's a decent outside shooter whose numbers would likely improve when not playing an extreme high-usage role. Unfortunately, Wisconsin may have the inside track after hiring ISU assistant Dean Oliver to their staff.

The final possibility is landing four-star Canadian forward Ignas Brazdeikis, who has strong interest in Michigan, and convincing him to reclassify to 2017, which is on the table. He'd yet to talk about this possibility with the coaches when UMHoops' Orion Sang talked to him yesterday, and the coaches don't necessarily have to rush; they can kick the tires on grad transfer prospects, who are likely to have a bigger immediate impact, before giving Brazdeikis a spot on the 2017-18 roster.

OUTLOOK

Wilson's departure relegates Michigan to the second tier of Big Ten contenders behind Michigan State and Purdue, and there are a lot of believers in Minnesota and Northwestern, too. (I'm rather skeptical of both.) Maryland will be dangerous now that Justin Jackson has announced he'll return for his sophomore year, Indiana has plenty of talent and Archie Miller, and you can never fully dismiss Wisconsin from contention.

Landing Cam Johnson would vault Michigan into that first tier; if that happened, I think they'd have as good a shot at the conference crown as anyone save (sigh) MSU. As the roster currently stands, this is a team that's going to have to out-gun their opponents, and I see that as a team that'll finish in the 3-6 range in the conference—good enough to get in the tournament, but probably not a team that's going to make a major postseason run.

Comments

Whole Milk

May 26th, 2017 at 12:40 PM ^

I agree that the team rankings system can be flawed, but you are the one who has used them as a baseline before so I figured I would talk to you in your own terms. And in terms of brand recognition, you are correct, we should not lump ourselves in with those teams. In terms of recent basketball success? They have all been to a final four since we have. I find it frustrating to have a conversation with you about this because you seem more intent on winning the argument, therefore change your evidence so often, than actually discuss the nature of your original points. This started with you saying that we needed to recruit near a top 10 class to be able to make a final four again, and I was simply providing you with evidence that it is not the only way to do it, based on the handful of teams to make it without having those type of classes in the last few years alone.

Maizen

May 26th, 2017 at 1:45 PM ^

And MSU went to a college football playoff doing the same thing, how's that working out for them now? Recruiting rankings matter, and trying to poke in holes and illustrate the cases it doesn't misses the entire point. I'd rather try and win with top 10 classes every year than top 40 classes. But that's just me.

StateStreetApostle

May 25th, 2017 at 5:03 PM ^

We talk all the time about what we were saying about Beilein 3.5 months ago...

 

...but speaking of bringing up the past, what would people have said about Ace if in his preseason prediction he said that DJ would leave at the end of the year as a 1st rounder?

 

Beilein über alles.

wayneandgarth

May 25th, 2017 at 5:06 PM ^

Good lord, the team is going need to figure out rebounding and defense and Mo is going to have to learn how not to take poor fouls.  I would expect one of the reserve fives to step and we get some help from the last open scholarship. 

 

wayneandgarth

May 25th, 2017 at 5:34 PM ^

Cam Johnson is doing everything he can to be allowed to transfer to UNC.  The holdup is Pitt, who isn't currently allowing him to transfer to an ACC school or one Pitt is playing next year. 

Gucci Mane

May 25th, 2017 at 5:38 PM ^

Blows my mind how many kids can't gain weight. You play college basketball ! Eat a lot of food and lift heavy weights ! Get it done !

Richard75

May 25th, 2017 at 5:42 PM ^

The big question here is can Robinson get his shot off more. He had an increasingly hard time getting free last season—his usage rate against top-50 teams was 15%. If playing Robinson 30+ minutes means playing 4-on-4 on offense for much of the game, that isn't going to work. The trade-off on defense is too severe.

AA Forever

May 25th, 2017 at 5:46 PM ^

And Duncan Robinson is definitely not a power forward.  If some combination of Teske and Davis cannot be at least solid at the 5, to the point where Robinson has to start, we'll be right back where we started last year...second tier Big Ten and NCAA bubble team as predictions.  Any Michigan team where DR is starting instead of coming off the bench is not going to be a championship contender, and that's even assuming that Matthews is Big Ten starting caliber from the get-go (which we actually have no idea about).

Zeke21

May 25th, 2017 at 6:54 PM ^

What could have been.  Good luck DJ.

Bless the 89 team. How many seniors on that team?

College b ball almost out the door with me.  NBA already is.

vanbluegens

May 25th, 2017 at 7:20 PM ^

By the end of the year, Isaiah Livers is going to see a lot of time at PF. At UM we are too used to needing time to groom our freshman. Fer God sakes, look at the top ten in most mock NBA drafts, they are all freshman, 100% of them!!! Isaiah is big enough, athletic enough and strong enough to fill in quite nicely at #4 and perhaps start.

EconClassof14

May 25th, 2017 at 7:26 PM ^

Great stuff ace.

Don't forget about Wagner's absurd foul rate. That could lead to half a game or more or Teske/Davis at the 5, which doesn't sound too appetizing.

Hopefully Livers is ready to roll

Mich1993

May 25th, 2017 at 7:35 PM ^

I agree with the others about Wagner spending time at power forward.  I also think Matthews will spend time at the 4 in certain cituations.  The beauty of it is that Wagner is best suited to play the 4 against bigger slower players while Matthews is better suited against smaller faster players.  Seems like a good combination.  It may be a problem going against scorers that are somewhere in the middle, but smaller, quicker players are going to be in trouble guarding Wagner in the post.

champswest

May 25th, 2017 at 9:34 PM ^

great between UM and MSU for next year. Our starters at 1-3 positions are probably a push. I would take Simmons over Winston, senior MAAR is probably as good or better than sophomore Langford while Bridges gets the nod over Mathews, but the gap is not as great as some might think. I like Wagner over Ward. MSU likely has the edge at the four since we don't know yet how the final scholarship will be used. Off the bench, we are way better at 1-3 with X, Poole, Brooks, Robinson and Watson versus McQuade and Tum-Tum. MSU's bigs are deeper than Teske, Davis and Livers, but would not dominate us.

True Blue Grit

May 26th, 2017 at 8:50 AM ^

if that doesn't work out, try to get Brazdeikis for this year.  The former would help us out more immediately.  But, the Canadian I think has a higher upside down the road.  

Muggins

May 26th, 2017 at 9:31 AM ^

I don't like the idea of playing Robinson at the 4 when Wagner is the 5. If Robinson is on the court you need a big who can defend and rebound. Wagner isn't that guy. Personally, I'd give 30-40 minutes to Teske/Davis and preferably limit Robinson to a specialist 3 guy off the bench who gets 10-15 mins. If Robinson is playing the 4 you have to pair him with Teske or Davis, which means he (Robinson) isn't starting.

funkywolve

May 26th, 2017 at 9:48 AM ^

I think Wilson's offense is a little undervalued in Ace's original post.  Wilson's emergence on the offensive end tended to coincide with UM's hot streak.  Obviously, there were other factors which helped too, especially Walton taking on the alpha dog role.

When Big Ten play began Wilson was averaging 8.5 pts/game.  When the season was over he was averaging 11 (4th on the team).  In the postseason, Big Ten tourney and NCAA tourney, Wilson averaged 15.8 pts/game, second on the team behind Walton.

uncle leo

May 26th, 2017 at 12:29 PM ^

One of the guys on UM Hoops claims that Cam Johnson is visiting next week. Seems pretty confident about it.

Cam is hell bent on playing at UNC, but Stallings is kind of a dick and doesn't seem to be letting up on his ACC stipulation.

OkemosBlue

May 29th, 2017 at 9:32 AM ^

Many of us are very happy with Beilein.  Is he the greatest coach ever?  No.  But he's a great offensive coach and developer of players while being (as far as I can tell) an excellent human being.  Adding Donovan on defense paid off late last year.  

What is occasionally frustrating is not that he's a perfect recruiter-coach, but that he's being held up to a standard that very few coaches-schools can meet in today's college basketball world where it makes sense for the best players to leave as early as possible.  Even Izzo is having some problems now.  If people want to harshly criticize him, then they need to come up with an alternative coach whose proven.  Not everyone is Jim Harbaugh, Roy . .. , K, etc.