our campaign of deception has failed [Marc-Gregor Campredon]

Unverified Voracity Identifies Steroid Deployment Comment Count

Brian February 2nd, 2021 at 12:31 PM

Hello. EA has detected a shift in the tides:

EA Sports is coming back to college football.

After last making a college football video game in 2013, the possibility of the game returning had been in limbo. Now, it isn't. EA Sports vice president and general manager, Daryl Holt, told ESPN the game maker will be returning to the space with "EA Sports College Football."

"As we look for the momentum that we're building on in sports, it all starts with the passion of our fans and the opportunities of what they are interested in," Holt said. "I don't think a visit where I go outside wearing a piece of EA Sports branded apparel, that someone doesn't go, 'Hey, when is college football coming back?'"

It will -- at some point. Holt said there is not a date on when the game will return or even a date where the return will be announced other than it won't be coming back for this year.

Announcing a return without a solid date looks like EA saying that they'll have a college football game as soon as they can get a license in a Name and Image era. This is now inevitable enough for EA to start sinking resources into a new version of NCAA Football, except they're going to call it "EA Sports College Football," following along in college football's rich tradition of naming things in the most store-brand fashion possible. (The previous notable entry: The College Football Playoff.)

[After THE JUMP: terrifying dad energies]

A shutdown becomes nonsense. Indoor dining has re-opened in Michigan. Michigan athletics is still on pause:

“While U-M has worked diligently on testing and reporting within state and Big Ten Conference guidelines, the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services is mandating a more aggressive strategy for this B.1.1.7 variant, which exceeds current program efforts designed around the standard form of the virus,” the University said in a release on Jan. 23.

Here’s the thing: The state isn’t mandating a more aggressive strategy for the B.1.1.7 variant anywhere outside of the Michigan athletic department. And that’s the problem.

If the state cared about preventing the spread of the new variant, it would have enacted wide-scale lockdowns. A year of evidence from around the world shows that’s the only way to actually stem COVID-19. If the state didn’t care about preventing the spread, it should’ve let teams without positive cases continue playing. Because ultimately, they’re the same as everyone else in the community who hasn’t been exposed to the new variant.

Instead, nine days of inaction from the state has revealed the forced shutdown of Michigan’s athletic department to be little more than a PR stunt.

The state shut down a bunch of heavily-tested, already-isolated athletes and is currently waving the white flag at measures that might actually have a meaningful impact. Whatever positive impact the shutdown might have on slowing the spread of the B117 variant is being given right back—and more—by this less than half-assed approach.

Carousel: not over. The Jaguars are going after Brian Jean-Mary:

This is likely because Jean-Mary is a trusted associate of Charlie Strong, who Urban Meyer hired to run his defense.

Jean-Mary was one of very few survivors on Michigan's coaching staff; if he goes the staff is likely to get even younger. I'm going to have to watch Spongebob to understand all their memes.

Hmmm. The Biden administration has selected a fascinating name to lead the National Labor Relations Board:

President Joe Biden has selected a familiar name in the sports world to serve as acting general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board. Seven years ago, Peter Sung Ohr, then a regional director for the NLRB in Chicago, stunned athletes and coaches alike by finding that Northwestern football players who received grant-in-aid scholarships were employees within the meaning of Section 2(3) of the National Labor Relations Act.

The Obama-era NLRB then vacated that decision in a 5-0 decision not to assert jurisdiction. That latter was a move to kick the can down the road without actually ruling on the employment status of college athletes. Seven years later, it might be time to open that can and distribute the contracts therein. I'd expect someone to bring something before the NLRB in the next couple years—they need a live case to say anything important.

They've noticed. Franz Wagner was hovering at the edges of the first round on the first wave of mock drafts after he'd established himself one of the most disruptive defenders in the Big Ten. Now he's at the tail end of the lottery. John Hollinger:

… Wagner’s stock continues to rise as scouts comb through his tape. … far and away the best prospect in the Big Ten. … presents the alluring prospect of a player with power forward size who is capable of switching onto guards. … anticipation and quickness for his size allow him to be very disruptive

…biggest concern with this Wagner is whether he can really shoot. He’s at 31.3 percent from 3 for his career, with a low push shot that requires time and space to get away. … can really pass, a plus skill that almost always translates, and his ball skills are pretty solid for his size as well. I don’t ever see him being a primary creator, but give him half a step on the second side of the defense and he can do some work. He’s averaging 6.0 assists per 100 — huge stuff for a 6-9 forward — and has nearly three dimes for every turnover.

Overall, it’s unclear yet whether there is enough shot creation upside to get Wagner into the top ten, but I can’t imagine him lasting much beyond that point. This combination of size, feel and mobility is valuable even if the shooting and shot-creation component is only average. If those elements of his game come around he could end up a hugely valuable starting wing in a few years.

SI's Jeremy Woo has Franz 13th overall:

…has stepped his game up in a meaningful way on a very good Michigan team. What’s impressive is that he’s done it without hijacking the offense or dominating the ball. … well-rounded floor game and a surprisingly disruptive impact on defense, showing off great anticipation skills and quick hands to block shots and force turnovers. He looks like the type of big forward who can blend lineups with playmaking and feel. Though he’s only shooting 32% from three, given he’s always been a good free throw shooter, there’s not too much concern about the long-term health of his jumper. Wagner looks the part as a top 20 prospect and should continue playing his way into late lottery consideration if all goes well.

(Other notable names: #10 Greg Brown, #14 Moses Moody, #28 Josh Christopher.) Sam Vecenie and Matt Pennie had him at 14 and 17 in their recent Mock Draft 2.0 podcast. That is a major move from Vecenie's latest mock draft article, where Wagner was 31st.

Clowney, the recruitment. How Jadeveon Clowney ended up at South Carolina, oral history style, at The Athletic:

Mike Farrell (Rivals national recruiting director): Clowney just avoided schools and avoided everybody. I spoke to him a total of three times. All of them in person. All of them awkward. And all of them him trying to get away from me. That’s just the way he was. All these famous kids, I have dealt with them minimum 20 times. Clowney was the one man, it was impossible to get to him.

Lawing: He lived a life kind of in the spotlight, but he really didn’t want all that. He really didn’t, I’m telling you. That wasn’t him.

Mike Farrell: ….He was a different cat is really all I can say. I don’t think he liked recruiting. It was just so weird because his answers were so stock and awful, intentionally awful, “yes, no,” and then you’d ask an open-ended question and he’d still answer, “yes, no.”

Clowney does not appear in the story, naturally.

Radiating dad energy. LeBron James had a bit of a run in with some folks in courtside seats last night, resulting in this perfect tweet:

This follows James calling the then-president a "bum" and presages truly terrifying dad levels to come. LeBron James is doing this as an active NBA player. What happens after he's been retired for some years, has a little bit of a gut, and is working on a schooner inside a glass bottle? Will we have to invent a new metric system to contain this level of dadness? One metric system is not enough any more.

Back. Per Aaron McMann:

Defensive tackle Donovan Jeter and linebacker Josh Ross are both planning to return to the Wolverines for the 2021 season, utilizing an extra year of eligibility provided by the COVID-19 abbreviated schedule this past fall.

Who knows these days but we had Jeter and Ross as redshirt juniors who were eligible to return even without the COVID waiver. They could hypothetically return in 2022. (Maybe?)

Etc.: Don't click here. Soccer's all-time leading goalscorer, maybe. Big Ten Cs, including Hunter Dickinson, are half of the Kareem award top 10. I Got Into Michigan Tik Toks. Concussion risk at practice. Supreme Court to hear Alston here is a person bombing the NCAA's brief. 30 players have left Tennessee since last preseason.

Comments

kehnonymous

February 2nd, 2021 at 1:02 PM ^

I've always been amused at the dichotomy of how LeBron is generally very thoughtful and intelligent in person but presents himself on social media as a vapid wine mom

kehnonymous

February 2nd, 2021 at 4:22 PM ^

I first heard of that term from, of all things,  reddit and it's a little fascinating how that term is kind of this generation's spiritual successor to 'soccer mom' - they're vernacular descriptors that have unfortunately taken on some socially and politically fraught and mean-spirited baggage. I think that's part of a larger conversation about the intersection of parenthood, class, gender, and work/life balance in this country that I'm not nearly qualified enough to conduct on my own and especially not here.

Phaedrus

February 2nd, 2021 at 9:37 PM ^

I've always been amused at the dichotomy of how LeBron is generally very thoughtful and intelligent in person but presents himself on social media as a vapid wine mom

You say that he is "very thoughtful and intelligent in person." Do you know him? Based on the various interviews and public appearances I have seen from him, he appears pretty vapid in general.

LeBron James is thoroughly postmodern. Pretty much his entire life since he turned 18 has been an attempt to play the role of a fictional character called LeBron James who is the second coming of Michael Jordan. It's odd and disturbing. Michael Jordan was weird because he was a genuine asshole who played the role of a nice guy for the sake of his career and endorsement deals—but that was just a dickhead pretending to be nice. LeBron James pretends to be the nice guy that Jordan pretended to be. He's a simulation of a simulacrum.

Does LeBron James have a personality? Is he smart? I dunno. I don't follow him on social media, so maybe he expresses some form of genuine expression there. But I know for damn sure everything that man does when a camera is on him is an eerie act where he pretends to be something that was fake to begin with.

One thing I loved about Kobe Bryant was that he never pretended and he knew what he wanted. He wanted to be the best. LeBron wants to be perceived as the best. There's a subtle but important difference there.

MaizeBlueA2

February 2nd, 2021 at 10:24 PM ^

Kobe literally tried to be Michael Jordan in every way until he grew up and realized there was more value in just being Kobe.

He's said this, hell he even talks about it on The Last Dance. 

You've made up two characters to fit a narrative because you like Kobe and don't like LeBron.

You could've used a million other people to make your point, but you used the one guy who literally tried to do everything Michael Jordan did (and was the closest thing we've seen and will probably ever see to Jordan).

Phaedrus

February 3rd, 2021 at 12:04 AM ^

I completely agree that Kobe, especially in his early career, wanted to be Michael Jordan more than anything else. He never tried to hide that. But he wanted to be Jordan on the court—he wanted to be the guy who was indisputably the best basketball player. LeBron wants to be Space Jam and Nike ad Jordan.

I could be full of shit. Our interpretations of celebrities are bound to be flawed because we only know them in terms of their public activities, but it's still fun to speculate and bloviate.

Also, I won't deny that I dislike LeBron and really liked Kobe. The bias is there—but I would argue the rationale is the cause for the bias, not the other way around.

93Grad

February 2nd, 2021 at 1:04 PM ^

The shutdown of the Michigan athletic department looks more and more arbitrary and dumb by the day.  Let's just hope that they don't get any actual infections and lose more games than they already have.  

champswest

February 2nd, 2021 at 5:00 PM ^

We should not be surprised by the State’s reaction and directives to the UM virus issues. The policies out of Lansing have been confusing and illogical during this entire health crisis. After following the science and the data for a full year, they are still unable to construct a sensible action plan.

Blue Vet

February 2nd, 2021 at 1:06 PM ^

• Sponge Bob rules!

• Franz: think how great it would be NEXT YEAR at Michigan, getting to be a student in normal times!

• Michigan acceptance Tik Toks: What a thrill to be reminded how thrilling it is to get into a college you really want.

njvictor

February 2nd, 2021 at 1:19 PM ^

I would not be shocked by Franz getting drafted in the middle of the first round with that team immediately getting a shooting coach to help him recreate his jump shot. He's got so much extra movement on his form that I think makes it too inconsistent of a release

My Name is LEGIONS

February 2nd, 2021 at 3:57 PM ^

Would you be shocked if Franz stays another year as to experience the true March Madness with the fans in the stands?   I wouldn't.... lets hope his brother covers the insurance policy, so Franz can return one more year, and increase his stock further.

njvictor

February 2nd, 2021 at 4:40 PM ^

I think he's probably gone given his draft evaluation, but I definitely wouldn't be shocked by it especially since he's so young and has that room to try to up his 3PT%. He turns 20 in August and will be as old as some freshman next year

TrueBlue2003

February 2nd, 2021 at 6:46 PM ^

Two years ago would have been no way but with the new rookie salary scale, there's big gains for moving into the top 10 or top 5 and Franz has that upside.

I would be surprised but maybe not totally shocked if he decided to give it one more year.

Michigan4Life

February 2nd, 2021 at 8:06 PM ^

General rule of thumb is if a player put his name out for draft evaluation and come back the next season, chances are that they're pretty much gone after next season. It's rare that a player would come back to play the season after next season.  Franz is as good as gone and as he should since he's now projected as an outside of the lottery pick.

crg

February 2nd, 2021 at 1:48 PM ^

I always find it interesting that Brian, a person who clearly loves college sports enough that he chose to make a profession of following it, continues to advocate for actions that are killing the spirit of college sports (thus rendering them pro sports-lite).

I 100% agree that there are problems/shortcomings in the current system - with the monetization being one of the largest.  Injecting even *more* money into the sports and pushing for actions that further devalue/disincentive the "student" aspect of student-athlete are not going to solve the problems - they simply further ensconce them.

ak47

February 2nd, 2021 at 2:03 PM ^

I think its more he recognizes the farce and cares more about the people playing not being exploited than he does care about the 'ideal' of college sports which has never really existed but certainly doesn't at this point. Punishing kids as the last remaining holdout of this ideal is just hurting kids, not protecting college sports.

crg

February 2nd, 2021 at 4:03 PM ^

I would also disagree that these kids (who are actually almost all grown, adult men/women capable of making their own decisions in both a legal and developmental perspective) are being "exploited".  For the very few that professionally marketable sporting skills *prior* to their entry into college, they might be getting undervalued/undercompensated by playing at the college level.  For everyone else, it is a trade-off: the university develops them (physically, schematically, professionally, emotionally, and also intellectually - these are still schools in the real sense) and also provides them a national platform to showcase and market their skills.  In return, the university uses them in their own promotions and marketing and also monetizes the media rights of the games (which is what pays for all that development, training, marketing, etc. that the players receive).  Oh, and the players also happen to get *guaranteed* 4 year full rides to prestigious universities (minimum - can be longer with eligibility exceptions) that is irrevocable regardless of how well the athletic performance is or if they get injured (including non-sports injuries) and can no longer pursue an athletics career - which is how they got the scholarship in the first place.  This deal is a *privilege* - a potential once-in-a-lifetime opportunity that tens (maybe hundreds) of thousands of other young men/women would kill to have.  To say that it is "explotation" or some similar term is an insult to those in the world that are truly suffering and being exploited.

Michigan Arrogance

February 2nd, 2021 at 4:57 PM ^

making a semantics arguement re: 'expoited or not'... I mean who cares? No one's gonna disagree with you that the athletes are getting some nice shit for being D1 players.

The question is, are they getting fair market value for their services? Now, given the salaries of the admins from the NCAA, conf down the individual school coaches, the golden toilets and waterfall embedded bowling alleys, etc, etc, etc, the answer is NO. These guys should be getting about 20k/year at least, lifetime health insurance as a start.

crg

February 2nd, 2021 at 5:37 PM ^

"Fair market value" means they can go somewhere else (meaning outside of college in this case) and get that.  The fact that many (most) of these players cannot get that (can't make the pro leagues as is), means that their market value is less than the proponents are claiming.  *Also important* is what the "fair market value* of the various non-monetary benefits/perks/etc. that they are receiving by being a scholarship student-athlete of a major university.  You threw out a $20k/yr salary as a taking point - most P5 scholarship athletes get several times that amount in equivalent value when you sum everything together.

I'm not going to defend the salaries of the coaches/administrators/etc. - it is all far too overinflated.  That is not justification for turning a student-athlete into a paid professional position.  That's not what college is.

Alton

February 2nd, 2021 at 3:05 PM ^

Sadly, two things can be true:

(a) The professionalization of college football and basketball is ruining those sports.

(b) College football and basketball players are being taken advantage of, and it is important to fix that...even if the fix furthers the professionalization of those sports.

Not everybody agrees with (a) and not everybody agrees with (b), but neither (a) nor (b) is excessively controversial, and believing one does not mean you can't believe the other.

bronxblue

February 2nd, 2021 at 4:11 PM ^

I mean, if you believe we can put the toothpaste back into the tube as it relates to money in college sports by all means go for it, but otherwise I don't see it hurting anyone if the organization that makes billions off athletes (and consumers, for the most part, don't mind paying for their services) to share in some of that.  

And honestly, college sports have always had huge economic forces at play - the idea money only started to play an outsized influence recently is mostly the result of good PR management by the NCAA, not reality.

Wolverine In Exile

February 2nd, 2021 at 1:53 PM ^

Two items:

1) If you want to understand the youth memes, you need to watch Bluey, not Spongebob, which was soooo late 90s / early 2000s.

2) A year of data has showed precisely no correlation between lockdown policies and successful mitigation of COVID spread. Peanut butter spread lockdowns at this point are political theater.  

Kilgore Trout

February 2nd, 2021 at 3:18 PM ^

1. Bluey is hilarious. One of the few things my kids watch that makes me legitimately laugh.

2. I don't think #2 is as absolute as you say. UM's School Of Public Health just put out a modeling paper showing that the interventions in Michigan between November and January likely saved lives while comparing to states that didn't intervene. It's reasonable to debate if the policies help, but I think it's pretty undeniable that the behaviors that the policies advocate for do mitigate spread.

TrueBlue2003

February 2nd, 2021 at 6:57 PM ^

You're 100% very wrong about point number 2.

There's a mountain of data.  Here's one example: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landig/article/PIIS2589-7500(20)30165-5/fulltext

"In the context of COVID-19, mobility data including airline data and app-based data suggest that realistic travel restrictions at a national or even international level substantially mitigates disease spread between cities."

But policies don't always translate to behavior so when there isn't high compliance with the "policies", as is the case in the US (because they're no more than recommendations here), the policies are mostly meaningless and ineffective.

WindyCityBlue

February 2nd, 2021 at 2:14 PM ^

For the the Kareem top 10 centers, the big ten accounts for 5 of them.  I don't know if that means the big ten is so old school that we use a lot of centers or that we are that good with our centers.  Either way it is good to see HD in the top ten.

pescadero

February 2nd, 2021 at 2:48 PM ^

" The state shut down a bunch of heavily-tested, already-isolated athletes "

A bunch of heavily-tested, already-isolated athletes that introduced the UK variant into Washtenaw County - and then made the community susceptible by wandering around places like Meijer and Briarwood.

robpollard

February 2nd, 2021 at 4:39 PM ^

This is why I think, in part, UM has been so servile in this -- they don't want to lift the rug for the public of how, exactly, this happened, so they've decided instead of "singling out" certain teams or highlighting certain faulty processes and who at UM made that decision (e.g., no actual, legit quarantine for UK travelers), they went will the "we'll be 'fair' and punish everyone" approach.

To be clear, I think shutting everything down for a week was completely reasonable. But as we've moved closer to 14 days, and no info about spread among basketball etc it makes less and less sense.

huntmich

February 2nd, 2021 at 3:27 PM ^

Friendly reminder that the state of Michigan did not shut down University of Michigan athletics. They recommended aggressive action be taken to curb the spread.

robpollard

February 2nd, 2021 at 4:32 PM ^

"The state shut down a bunch of heavily-tested, already-isolated athletes and is currently waving the white flag at measures that might actually have a meaningful impact."

The state didn't shut down UM basketball or UM hockey for two weeks. Why is this "mandate" talk now on the main page? Is there some memo that's been issued but not made public? I have not seen it -- and I've looked.

The state made it crystal clear two Sundays ago it was a recommendation; not only was that word literally in the short, 2-page letter they wrote the university, the follow-up for clarification from the press (not the school, notably; they couldn't be bothered) confirmed it.

"When asked in an email what potential penalties Michigan might face if it did not follow the recommendations, Stufin replied, “no penalties.” 

UM decided a 2-week total shutdown of athletics, along w a "stay in place" order for all students, was the best course of action. They have made no public pushback. In addition, they have given no public press conferences or detailed explanations of how the university got into this situation and why their protocols for basketball, hockey, etc are safe enough to operate for months during a pandemic and still have zero positive tests, but not for the end of this 2 week period--even when CDC guidelines make it clear it is an option. I can see no valid scientific reason why UM basketball (assuming they have 0 positives *and* had no close contact w the infected) shouldn't be playing MSU later this week.

Is it because the variant has spread so much at UM? Who knows? UM & WHCD stopped giving updates on that six days ago.

This is Schlissel, Warde & co's shitshow and we just have to hope we can find away forward for the community (i.e., that the containment of this UM-introduced B.1.1.7 cluster has prevented its spread in Ann Arbor) and for the sports teams.

Michigan Arrogance

February 2nd, 2021 at 4:49 PM ^

Shit show is a bit harsh. The state DOH rec'd shutting it all down. No, there's no way for the state to enforce that. But if the DOH rec'd that you shut down and you don't, and more get sick, that's going to be on you. Perhaps even legally if not at the very least morally.

As usual, all the people making these decisions are making the conservative choices b/c it's *actually their asses* on the line, not ours. It's easy to blame the state governors, HS officials, etc about their decisions. The reality is, if you were *actually* in the position to make these calls, you'd realize 1) hell, I'm gonna get shit no matter what I decide, whether from group 'shuterdown' or group 'openerup' and that 2) if I side with group 'openerup' and shit goes south... it's my ass. If I side with group 'shuterdown' there's no downside side b/c the shit you'd get from group 'openerup' you'd get either way.