UM class moving up the 247 ratings
Don’t look now but Michigan’s class is up to 10th. A number of players just received big bumps in the composite rankings.
Loveland 340 (up about 200 spots)
Graham 351 (up about 300 spots)
Henry 376 (up about 70 spots)
Grant 452 (up about 100 spots)
Dent 896 (up about 600 spots I think)
I suspect this is some of the other sites finally updating their rankings.
December 10th, 2021 at 1:47 PM ^
"Still not top 100 players. Can't beat OSU or win the B1G with these types of players."
-Maizen-
December 10th, 2021 at 2:01 PM ^
What ever happened to ole Maizen and the rest of the Starz Mafia. Would love for one of them to come out of the shadows so we can point and laugh at them.
December 10th, 2021 at 2:04 PM ^
They kept getting banned and couldn't afford the $5 to keep making new accounts?
Also, when people who are set on an idea get proven wildly incorrect right in front of their faces, they tend to just quietly leave.
December 10th, 2021 at 3:06 PM ^
Which is exactly what happened to Maizen. He railed on and on about how basketball recruiting was subpar and we would never win anything with Beilein because he got lucky with that 1 class + Hardaway/Burke. It was proven wildly wrong after we made the championship game with Mo Wagner and company and then just stopped posting because everyone kept reminding him how wrong he was
December 10th, 2021 at 4:19 PM ^
All other things being equal, I prefer more starz over less starz...
But...all other things are rarely equal...
December 10th, 2021 at 2:08 PM ^
Well shit, you win the day.
December 10th, 2021 at 2:28 PM ^
Talent usually wins, and that isn’t going to change. One big difference this year was that Michigan had the best player on the field.
December 10th, 2021 at 10:24 PM ^
Hard work beats talent when talent refuses to work hard. The key is to make sure that the ones brought in have that mix. I’m ok with some low rated kids as flyers because they become program builders over four years. We should optimally be getting our class from the top 500 kids though. I also like to look at the position ranking too. You’d ideally want the kids in the top 50 of their position ranking. You get the 50th ranked quarterback you are gonna struggle, you get the 50th ranked wide receiver he could be one of the best in the country still.
December 10th, 2021 at 2:36 PM ^
So Maizen: How did that work out this year? As long as these young men are committed to put in the extra hard work and willing to be coached up, they can achieve their max potential.
December 10th, 2021 at 2:39 PM ^
I agree about hard work, coaching and max potential, but talent is still going to win most often. Hopefully, this year elevates Michigan’s recruiting profile and diminishes OSU’s a bit.
December 10th, 2021 at 4:21 PM ^
Agree - talent will win out 75% of the time, But in rivalries, emotion also plays a big part. I just believe that this year the players coaches got tired of listening about the OSU dominance and how they were favored. I know one thing though, next year, in Columbus, we're really going to have to bring it as they'll have a whole year to simmer about this year's game.
December 11th, 2021 at 12:40 AM ^
I don't get this narrative.
I mean, it's not like JH3 and the Michigan players are going to be sitting around having mocha lattes and talking about Sartre in the offseason. Ryan "hang 100 on them" Day will still exist and he can never walk back that one comment. Michigan players will still have that comment hanging over their preparations and as long as he's there.
December 10th, 2021 at 8:41 PM ^
The flaw here is that "talent" represented by a made up number, based solely on athletic measures created by a mostly unqualified judge, applied to a 16-18 year old whose mama still does his laundry and cooks for him, gives no real indication if that child is ready to grow up and actually live up to his potential.
That's why the "talent" represented in the highly ranked '16&'17 classes didn't "win most often" and even lead to the last two years of struggle, mostly because they busted through the portal real early.
That's why accepting early commits from guys you know are dedicated to the program is smart even if they are unranked or low 3*s.
They help build great classes that grow together like the #goonsquad19.
December 10th, 2021 at 1:47 PM ^
Be nice to get a top 10 class. If nothing else to show the moumentum for the 2023 class.
December 10th, 2021 at 1:48 PM ^
I'm at the point where I trust that Harbaugh et al. will get excellent talented kids in regardless of where 247 or Rivals or whoever has them ranked
December 10th, 2021 at 2:32 PM ^
I'm in the same boat. Considering what he made out of Hassan Haskins and Ronnie Bell, I just want them in the system for a couple years. Things will work out.
December 10th, 2021 at 6:38 PM ^
Do you think Ron(nie) Bell and Ron Bell(amy) have a secret handshake by now?
December 10th, 2021 at 1:50 PM ^
Personally I don’t really care if our class finishes 8th or 15th or whatever because the ratings are somewhat based on number of recruits anyway. But it’s nice to see a lot of these under the radar types that are getting huge bumps in the rankings. It shows that they agree with the scouting of our coaches.
December 10th, 2021 at 4:27 PM ^
You make a good point about recruiting ratings being based on the number of recruits but the final rating is based on number of recruits X the average rating of the players. That's why I automatically skip to the "average rating / recruit" per team as some teams just don't have that many scholarships to give out even though they've pulled in some big-time talent
December 10th, 2021 at 1:54 PM ^
Good things happen when Michigan beats OSU.
December 10th, 2021 at 2:14 PM ^
Hell people in Ohio are starting to believe him. Never in a million years I would have thought that. Michigan kicking Ohio’s ass is a good start.
December 10th, 2021 at 2:19 PM ^
Wonder where the guy is who originally posted the long-form of this thought...
December 10th, 2021 at 2:40 PM ^
But how are jersey sales in Ohio???
December 10th, 2021 at 3:48 PM ^
Like waffles! No, wait...
December 10th, 2021 at 4:20 PM ^
This comment brings me an odd sense of closure. Like a joke running for 10 years finally got a satisfying conclusion
December 10th, 2021 at 1:54 PM ^
I feel like we have a lot of under the radar gems in this class as well as high motor, high character program guys. Hoping this will be like the 2018 class with Hutchinson, Haskins, and Bell where we see a lower ranked class develop into a very strong core.
December 10th, 2021 at 4:39 PM ^
I only pay attention to the 247 Composite as it averages all of the other recruiting sites together and sort of minimizes some of the crazy - of the wall - ratings by one service for a player.
December 10th, 2021 at 9:40 PM ^
247 Composite doesn't yet incorporate On3's whereas On3's is the only one to currently incorporate all four recruiting services (On3, 247, ESPN and Rivals). At this time 247 Composite incorporates 247, ESPN and Rivals. So your point would be actually accurate for On3.
December 10th, 2021 at 1:54 PM ^
Great to see! Now let's make sure we hang on to those California guys
December 10th, 2021 at 1:57 PM ^
As long as they are angry
December 10th, 2021 at 1:58 PM ^
People scoff at players getting a "Michigan (or Bama, OSU, PSU, etc) bump" after they commit but it makes sense. Who is more qualified to evaluate talent than the coaches whose job depends on recruiting enough of it? If a kid has a strong list of offers, that means more to me than whatever ranking he has.
The other thing that gets forgotten sometimes is that these are teenagers and they're often still growing into their frames. By all means, there should be a lot of movement in the rankings as these kids advance through the high school years.
December 10th, 2021 at 1:58 PM ^
This is OT... but I still can't believe what Texas AM is pulling in recruiting wise given their record and recent history.
December 10th, 2021 at 2:02 PM ^
Texas oil money. It flows.
December 10th, 2021 at 2:04 PM ^
I don't think everyone's success is about the bag...but A&M has that reputation even in the SEC (along with Tennessee, I've gathered) as pretty shady. So while they have some success (they finished last year #5 I think) and are in a talent-rich area, they're going to bend and break every rule they can.
December 10th, 2021 at 2:13 PM ^
They play in the SEC, so big players are attracted to that.
They are in Texas, with its fertile recruiting ground, so guys that want to stay home or close by are easier to get.
Not sure what you mean "given their record and recent history" They are 8-4 this season and beat #1 Bama. They finished last season #4 in the AP Rankings and won the Orange Bowl.
85-41 the last 10 years for A&M. 81--38 for UM.
December 10th, 2021 at 3:24 PM ^
Yes they beat Bama...but they're also 4-4 in their own division. I would be equally surprised if UM were the #3 recruiting class this year with a 4-4 division record.
December 10th, 2021 at 4:01 PM ^
I mean, it's been discussed ad nauseam at this point on the site, but this season's records usually have less to do with the classes than the one before. They finished #4 last season and won the Orange Bowl. That's the A&M that was getting sold to a lot of these recruits. Yeah, they haven't been great this year, but if people on this site wanna talk about how big beating OSU was/is for UM recruiting wise, then you should acknowledge how beating a #1 Bama would be good for their class.
Either way, my main point was you can't really say A&M shouldn't be getting good recruits because they haven't been good, when a quick look shows good seasons recently, and a comparable record to UM.
I just get tired of all the lazy takes about who should and shouldn't have good recruiting class and always blaming it on $. That is not to say I don't think $ has a lot to do with it, but posters on this site act like there is no other reason why schools like Tennessee and Texas A&M would get good recruits. Posters do it about Florida State hoops everytime UM loses out to them too. It shouldn't be that surprising when schools with notoriety, large fan bases and history still land good recruiting classes. Especially schools who are located in Texas or near the South, where most of the great talent is. A lot of the most talented players grow up hearing about those schools their entire life, want to stay in that area, and A&M and Tennessee don't have to convince them to come across country like a UM would.
December 10th, 2021 at 2:20 PM ^
They don't give out gold Trans Ams anymore, but they still give out stuff.
December 10th, 2021 at 4:31 PM ^
That was my favorite part of Pony Express, how Dickerson shook them down for the Trans Am, went to SMU anyway and they couldn't do shit about it. Hilarious.
December 10th, 2021 at 2:06 PM ^
Nice to see the ballz starting to swing our direction.
December 10th, 2021 at 2:09 PM ^
How the hell is Stanford pulling this sort of recruiting class with no new coach and those on field results? Lots more people respect an education than football players are given credit for.
December 10th, 2021 at 2:10 PM ^
Our dominant offensive line play should bring in top OL recruits
December 10th, 2021 at 4:32 PM ^
I actually believe that an OL is more about development than any other position group. Now don't get me wrong, yes, I would love to pull in a few 5-start OL but the point is that a OL made up of 3 and 4 star talent can still be real good.
December 10th, 2021 at 2:18 PM ^
Recruiting rankings always baffle me.
Michigan is behind Stanford, which is basically Michigan West, but their team sucks and they have less fans. Also right in front of Mizzou, who hasn't been relevant in a long time.
I think NIL is going to change everything once everyone has an established system running. Hopefully Michigan benefits, I think we might have the most fans, and probably the most high earning fans, in the entire sport. I am sure some other schools are right there with us, but Michigan should be able to capitalize on this in the next few years.
December 10th, 2021 at 2:37 PM ^
Stanford has found its recruiting sales pitch: if you're looking for an Ivy-type school (small, elite private school), it has the best football program - and great weather too.
Mizzou is a lot weirder. Probably just a one-year blip.
December 10th, 2021 at 3:19 PM ^
Yeah Mizzou managed to keep a couple highly touted local kids home. Not something they can bank on moving forward. But I wonder if NIL will help keep local HS stars around
December 10th, 2021 at 2:19 PM ^
movin on up!
December 10th, 2021 at 2:24 PM ^
Just wait until we hit the free agency market