Top QB Performances of Harbaugh

Submitted by Mercury Hayes on October 31st, 2021 at 9:46 AM

One of the narratives of the Harbaugh tenure is that he lost the ability to develop quarterbacks. After yesterday's performance, I (and others on this board and the internets) felt like Harbaugh finally found his QB. Fumbles excluded, he may have a second one as well. But what do the numbers say? I looked through all the QB performances since 2015 to see the best games by Michigan QBs. I took into account quality of opponent and stats. I glossed over non P5 games because I don't think they are a fair comparison.

In top competition, here's what the best games look like (in reverse chronological order).

2021 vs. MSU (8): Cade 383 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT, 23 rush yards. 

2019 vs. MSU (unranked): Shea Patterson 384 yards 4TD in a blowout win

2019 vs. ND (No.8) Shea Patterson 6-12, 100 yds, 2TDs in blowout win

2018 vs. Wisconsin (15) Shea Patterson 124 yds, 90 rushing yards and 1 TD

Outside of rivals and top competition, Ruddock went off in a home game against Indiana with 440 yards and 6TD. Certainly worth consideration, but Indiana was unranked.

My conclusion, is that Cades performance is arguably one of, if not the best big game performance under Harbaugh. Certainly there are no moral victories in that, but I'm also not on the team. I'm just a guy on a message board looking to discuss how this performance was vs. all the others we've seen.

Taking it a bit further, how does this compare to QBs prior to Harbaugh? Gardner had some ridiculous stat lines against teams like Indiana and Denard was a different type of beast with so many memorable games (such as ND where he had 200+ passing and 200+ rushing).. 

I also appreciate your healthy debate on this Sunday morning. I know it may be too positive of a take for many but I thought it would be good to have a holistic discussion about quarterback play from a historical lens.

uofmfan_13

October 31st, 2021 at 9:58 AM ^

Again, great game by Cade. I want him to be the guy. Here's the bottom line though... game on the line, TD-winning drive needed. Are you able to step up and get it done? Came close. Close but no cigar. The truly great QBs will continually do this. Cade had time yesterday I thought the line pass protection was very solid.  Got to lead the team all the way down in that scenario. 

snarling wolverine

October 31st, 2021 at 10:17 AM ^

So many internet tough guys.

Cade played his ass off despite apparently having some injury issue (he was in the tent when JJ came in and fumbled) and his favorite target (All) left the game in the second half.  If All had been in there on the last drive, he may have caught that ball that was picked off.

People get on Cade for accuracy issues, but look who he’s had to throw to.  Bell was the primary receiver in fall camp then got hurt.  Wilson started to emerge and then got hurt.  All stepped up and then got hurt.  Cade’s had to continually develop timing with new WRs/TEs.  Andrel Anthony had zero career catches before yesterday.  How many people expected him to catch two TDs?

sammylittle

October 31st, 2021 at 11:00 AM ^

He played he best game of his career and displayed all of the leadership intangibles including returning from injury. This loss cannot be pinned on Cade. At the same time, MSU has a bad pass defense. This is not evidence that UM has found a passing game that can win games against good pass defenses. OSU's pass defense is not great so this performance does provide hope that the score will not be lopsided.

Blue@LSU

October 31st, 2021 at 10:01 AM ^

Nice post, Mercury. Cade played a hell of a game and we saw what I hope is the beginning of an amazing career at UM for Andrel Anthony.

The outcome of yesterday's game was a disappointment, but it also showed that this is not the same Harbaugh offense that we've seen for the past 6 years. In fact, I would actually argue that the stats undersell how good the offense was yesterday. For example, that dropped pass to Corum could've gone for at least 40 if not taken all the way to the house, some unfortunate drops, etc. 

uncle leo

October 31st, 2021 at 10:23 AM ^

It is the same offense. Don't get it twisted.

There may be a lot of cute little gimmicks, spread, etc. But the SYSTEM is the same. Incredibly conservative. The runs are not creative whatsoever. There are very few reverses, screens, wheel routes, you name it. When you peel back the layers, Harbaugh's 1970s style Michigan is ALL over this team. There is no risk taking. On 4th and 1, Tucker dials up some crazy play that opens a TE right over the middle, or on 4th and 4, he takes a chance with his best player on the perimeter. 

And then, inconceivably, when it's 3rd and 2 or whatever, Harbaugh/Gattis dial up a heave that goes incomplete, putting an incredible amount of pressure on Cade to deliver on 4th.

There's no up-tempo stuff, nothing that catches a team off-balance. Michigan has been incredibly fortunate that they've had two stellar RBs able to mask the sheer lack of creativity for the offense.

I don't know what this team is supposed to be. 

Blue@LSU

October 31st, 2021 at 10:43 AM ^

There is no risk taking. On 4th and 1, Tucker dials up some crazy play that opens a TE right over the middle, or on 4th and 4, he takes a chance with his best player on the perimeter.

But then you give an example of M taking a risk, only describing it as "a heave": 

And then, inconceivably, when it's 3rd and 2 or whatever, Harbaugh/Gattis dial up a heave that goes incomplete.

Durham Blue

October 31st, 2021 at 11:20 AM ^

I think the only thing that this offense has been missing is passes into the end zone while in the red zone.  The offense seems to be pretty wide open and successful up until the red zone.  Then we sort of go into a bit of a shell knowing that Moody has our back and it's an almost automatic 3 points.  If we can't gain yards running the ball near the end zone then take a few shots with Cade.  And I am not talking about sideways passes or sweeps.  Throw the ball INTO the end zone.  We need to do better in those situations.

dickdastardly

October 31st, 2021 at 10:03 AM ^

Individual performances are great but, as we know, football is a team game. We witnessed MSU play as a focused team who came back after their mistakes, scored when they needed to (2 successful 2 pt conversions), and played inspired football. We saw glimpses of that yesterday early on with Michigan but then the wheels fell off in the 2nd half. Forget the calls Michigan didn't get. It still needed to score TDs in the red zone and that is becoming an issue now. FGs just don't cut it. 

I have to tip my cap to MSU. They took advantage of Michigan's weaknesses in text book fashion. 

As far as QB's go, Jake is the man. The guy came alive in the 2nd half of the season and was on fire. We haven't yet seen a QB under Harbaugh elevate to where Jake was, imo.

BlueInGreenville

October 31st, 2021 at 10:14 AM ^

Corum and Johnson both dropped passes that would have put Cade over 400 yards and probably swung the game in the other direction.  People on this board need a target other than McNamara, who could turn out to be really, really good by the end of the season.  We lost that game yesterday because MSU played out of their minds against us (as usual) and the Michigan players and coaches screwed up just enough to let the officials decide it.  That's it, but Cade was fantastic.

KC Wolve

October 31st, 2021 at 2:08 PM ^

This is going to sound like a JH defense and the JH haters are going to neg the shit out if this but man, it is always a catch or 1 play in these close games. Again, this is on JH as he is the leader, but it’s always one or two plays, some of them not even difficult. If Corrum makes that simple catch, it’s prob 6. If they wrap the RB on one of his breaks, it’s prob over. If the call stands on the strip, if the spot was in UMs favor, if the safety catches the INT right in his hands. Again, it’s on JH, but it would be nice to see someone step up and make a big play when needed every once in a while. 

mpbear14

October 31st, 2021 at 10:38 AM ^

Stupid take?  We kicked 4 field goals. We played like 30pts was enough to win the game, in 2021, on the road, against a team that leads the conference in explosive plays. 

 

We had no back pocket plays for the game. Tucker had a handful and scored on 1 of them. 
 

“Tired” is the appropriate word here. I’ll give you that. 

mpbear14

October 31st, 2021 at 11:45 AM ^

The fact that nothing stands out says it all. 
 

I don’t think there’s a more fitting example of this than when we went hurry up on 4th and 2 and handed it off to Corum right up the gut. We literally do that 100% of the time in that scenario. Do you think maybe Mel had that scouted?  He did. 
 

Perfect opportunity to break tendency yet Harbaugh did what he always does: man balled it with the smallest player on the team.  
 

Tuck in the same situation scored a td on a back pocket play to a wide open receiver. 

UMxWolverines

October 31st, 2021 at 10:09 AM ^

He played well but we've heard the "finally found his QB" bullshit after Speight, O'Korn, Peters, Patterson and Milton and none of them won anything. 

Not to mention the chance to put yourself in Michigan football history with a game winning drive and you throw a pick. 

It really doesnt matter how good of QBs you have anyway if your coaching holds them back, see Georgia and Mark Richt as an example who we seem to be a mirror of. 

blue in dc

October 31st, 2021 at 10:22 AM ^

Before he got hurt against Iowa, Speight  in fact was on a very good trajectory.   The others do not have the body of work that Cade has.   He has shown up when we needed him.  He rarely does more than he needs to, which unfortunately hurt yesterday, but he is still young and is trending in the right direction.  

If you really want to boil Cade’s performance down to that last pick, that is on you, not Cade.    

Perkis-Size Me

October 31st, 2021 at 10:09 AM ^

Great performance by Cade yesterday. He did everything Michigan needed in order to be able to win, and JJ made some bad freshman mistakes that he deserves the opportunity to learn from. I have to believe he’s going to. Failure is a great teacher. Maybe the best one there is. 

MSU’s secondary is pretty bad but the OL consistently gave both QBs time to operate in the pocket against what is supposed to be a very good MSU front seven. I don’t recall seeing many sacks, if any at all. So that’s a good step in the right direction for sure.