Today's Rooting Guide / Latest on Brackets

Submitted by True Blue 9 on March 13th, 2022 at 10:08 AM

There's no way around it, outside of A&M and Virginia Tech (I think the latter was already in), yesterday was a great day on the bubble for Michigan. Losses by SMU, St. Louis, and Dayton were massisve. 

So, where does that leave Michigan? Here's what I'm seeing this morning:

  • As of last night's Bracket Matrix update, we're in 116 of 125 brackets 
  • We're listed as the 2nd 11th seed (which would basically be the last team to avoid Dayton)
  • Interestingly enough, I went to the Bracket Matrix rankings and, I'm happy to report that the top 5 rated bracketeers all had Michigan in! In fact, most had them avoiding Dayton but a few didn't. 
  • Our NET ranking stayed at 34. 
  • We're still 26 on KenPom 

The one concern I'm seeing is, if we get sent to Dayton, quite a few brackeeters have us playing Texas A&M. I personally would like to avoid that at all costs. They're playing amazing right now. I'd much prefer a matchup with Notre Dame or Wyoming but alas here we are. 

So, the rooting guide is simple today:

  • (1pm EST on ESPN) - Texas A&M vs. Tennessee - We want Tennessee to win this one. This game could have a big say on if we get sent to Dayton or not. If A&M wins, they're guaranteed to stay out of Dayton (conference champions can't be sent there). I guess the one good thing about A&M winning is we'd avoid them? Either way, Go Vols!
  • (1pm EST on CBS) - Richmond vs. Davidson - We're rooting hard for Davidson. No way around it, if Richmond wins, they're going to steal a bid from someone. We are close-ish to the cut line no matter how you look at it, so a Davison win today would be a relief. Thanks for knocking out TWO bubble teams but you gotta go, Richmond. 

 

Thanks everybody for the compliments and feedback on these posts. They were actually super fun to put together! Go Blue, let's go dancing!

True Blue 9

March 13th, 2022 at 12:13 PM ^

One more Bracket Matrix update just now:

  • Michigan is in 130 of the 140 brackets listed. All were updated either yesterday or today. 
  • We're listed as the last 11 seed (first team escaping Dayton)
  • The last 4 teams in the tourney (aka who gets sent to Dayton) are: Wyoming, Notre Dame, A&M, and Rutgers. This really shows why it's so important that A&M and Richmond take losses today. 
  • First 4 teams out, in order: SMU, Xavier, Oklahoma and Wake Forest. 

Ham

March 13th, 2022 at 12:33 PM ^

My prediction is that Notre Dame is out. They're 53rd in NET and have only 2 Q1 wins. I know Lunardi loves them for some reason, but they have no place in the tournament.

TrueBlue2003

March 13th, 2022 at 12:56 PM ^

I posted this to the thread yesterday but if you put aside recency bias and look at the resumes of Michigan and Indiana it's a no brainer:

Michigan Q1: 5-10 Q2: 3-3 Q3: 6-1 Q4: 3-0

Indiana    Q1: 4-8  Q2: 4-4 Q3: 5-1 Q4: 7-0

Quadrant records are extremely close.  Same exact win % in Q1 and Q2.  Michigan with one more Q1 win is better than IU's one more Q2 win. Michigan has one more Q3 win (for context, the Rutgers win was Q3 so that's not meaningless).  Let's conservatively call this a push if you're excited that IU played four more q4 games.

Let's check the metrics...

Michigan: NET: 34; Resume Ranks Avg.: 40.5;   Quality Ranks Avg.: 28.7

Indiana:    NET: 39; Resume Ranks Avg: 53.5; Quality Ranks Avg.: 33.7

IU is not ahead of Michigan in any of the six individual ranks.

Advantage: Michigan

Can we find something IU can hang their hat on? Road Record: Michigan 5-7, IU 3-8

Advantage: Michigan

Let's to head-to-head: Michigan won by 18 (!!) at IU, IU won by 5 at a "neutral" site

Advantage: Michigan

Hmmmm, maybe IU is hot, right?  They won two BTT games!

But prior to winning those, IU was 2-7 (!!!) since Feb 1, so 4-8 since then including BTT.

Michigan is 7-6 since then.  They're 10-6 since the covid break.

Advantage: Michigan

SoS: Michigan 3rd, IU 34th

Advantage: Michigan

If the only argument for IU is tHeY hAvE a BeTtEr ReCoRd (literally the only thing they have) without even drilling down, let's talk about Dayton or any other random team with a better record than both of them.  If IU is ahead of us, burn it all down.

I can see arguments for Rutgers (more q1 wins and much better q1 win %), I can even see an argument for BYU ahead of us (better q1 win %) but not IU.

mfan_in_ohio

March 13th, 2022 at 1:28 PM ^

To drill down even further, 4 of Michigan’s quad 1 wins are quad 1A (basically the top half of quad 1), while only 2 of Indiana’s are quad 1A. So while the overall quad 1 records are effectively the same, within that Michigan still has the more impressive resume.

Also, Indiana had 9 games against the bottom 5 teams in the big ten, Michigan only got 6. So Michigan finished with a better record in the same conference against a tougher schedule, even if you add in the BTT games.

Kilgore Trout

March 13th, 2022 at 1:56 PM ^

Great breakdown! To me, Michigan's spot tonight should teach all of the bracketologists a lesson about how much raw W/L means. If it is a big factor, expect Michigan to miss the tournament or be one of the last ones into Dayton. If it isn't, I think avoiding Dayton is possible. I don't know what will happen, but I think it will teach us all something. 

TrueBlue2003

March 13th, 2022 at 5:43 PM ^

Correct.

The quadrant records are the primary evaluation method.  It's the way the committee can evaluate schedules with drastically different difficulties.

MSU has Q1 of 5-9, Q2 of 7-1 (!!!)

Michigan Q1 of 5-10, Q2 of 3-3 and they have identical Q3 and Q4 records.

So it's not even close that MSU has a much better resume.  It doesn't matter if Michigan has slightly better quality metrics, MSU has a way better resume.

When the quadrant records are inconclusive as it the case with Michigan and IU, they go to the secondary tools including the metrics.

Qmatic

March 13th, 2022 at 1:46 PM ^

The fact that we are on the right side of most projections at 17-14, shows how much the process has changed. In decades past, that record alone would be exclusionary. Glad we have looked into the whole body of work more than just W/L

SDCran

March 13th, 2022 at 2:12 PM ^

If they are going to give the B1G a 9th team, it feels likely they will be motivated to put one in Dayton.  Here is hoping for IU.  

True Blue 9

March 13th, 2022 at 2:32 PM ^

Another update just now from Bracket Matrix, only includes brackets updated today:

  • Michigan in 77 of 88 brackets. 
  • Still listed as the last 11 seed, just below Miami and just above....Indiana
  • Last 4 in: A&M, Wyoming, ND, and Rutgers
  • First 4 out: SMU, Xavier, Oklahoma and Wake Forest 

Looking good but I'd feel a lot better if Davidson pulled this out

mfan_in_ohio

March 13th, 2022 at 2:51 PM ^

Looking at the first four out, it’s pretty hard to make a case for any of them over Michigan. Xavier was 8-12 in Big East play. Wake has a dog shit schedule and didn’t beat anyone above a 9 seed. SMU has a better quad 1 percentage (they were 2-2) but that is mitigated by having both a quad 3 and quad 4 loss. Oklahoma’s resume is basically “Michigan but worse.”  
 

Of those four, SMU is the one I’d worry about, but I also  would put M well ahead of Notre Dame. Seriously, both teams have two “bad” losses, but M is 5-10 against Q1, and ND is 2-8. Michigan is almost 20 spots better across the computer metrics. I don’t even get how it’s close.

umchicago

March 13th, 2022 at 2:36 PM ^

i do not see how byu and xavier get in. byu finished 5th in their conference going only 2-6 against the top 4 teams. xavier finished 7th in the big east with a 8-11 record. 

i think ND is in since they tied for 2nd in the acc.

i think UM should get a play in game.

jdraman

March 13th, 2022 at 2:38 PM ^

Where a team finishing in the conference standings does not factor in to the committee’s decisions. BYU and Xavier should miss the tournament due to their lack of quality wins. ND should also just miss because of their lack of quality wins, though they did beat Kentucky. 

redjugador24

March 13th, 2022 at 2:37 PM ^

I know we are rooting for Davidson but it's been kind of fun watching former MSU captain (thanks CBS, we heard you the first 6 times) Foster Loyer get absolutely worked by a guy who is generously listed at 5'9 160lbs.