The person who began our descent into mediocrity, but gets none of the blame: Lloyd Carr

Submitted by ImRightYouKnow on December 2nd, 2019 at 8:58 AM

For the past 12 years, we've been passing the buck on why we can't beat OSU. It's RichRod, it's Hoke, it's JH, etc.

However, the more and more we struggle, it becomes clear that Carr was responsible for cratering the program in the first place, and no one has been able to clean up his mess since. He wasted his last five years in the program by becoming complacent and too loyal to his assistants, and clearly fell behind the curve on things like the spread. He also wasted insane amounts of NFL-caliber talent, such as (but not limited to) Mike Hart, LaMarr Woodley, Steve Breaston, Mario Manningham, Chris Perry, Jake Long, Leon Hall, etc. He quickly fell behind Tressel in coaching and recruiting, and the end was near.

But his crime wasn't struggling against OSU, but rather what he did when it was finally his time to step down. From interfering with the coaching search, to encouraging players to transfer when RR was incoming, to promoting his buddy Hoke when the job came open again, to many other transgressions, he's clearly set the program up to fail in his image.

I know a lot of people love to praise Carr as a "class act", and in many ways his upstanding work for things like Mott and helping his proteges and players indicate that he's a decent human. But his meddling in the program set us up for a decade of failure, and to remove us from the elite of college football. He deserves a ton of the blame that we've only won once since he's left, and it might be too much for any coach, even JH to resurrect. 

Tuebor

December 2nd, 2019 at 9:42 AM ^

I blame Bill Martin more than Lloyd Carr.  Martin should have told Coleman that he had a plan to wait until after the BCS title game to go after Miles.  Bringing Les Miles to UM in 2008 would have been a great hire and we probably get 8 to 10 solid years out of him.  

 

Instead Coleman panicked and took over the search, resulting in us getting RRod.

I'mTheStig

December 2nd, 2019 at 10:41 AM ^

+1.  Such an underrated take.

Between Martin and MSC for not having oversight of Martin, I'm shocked there wasn't a succession plan in place.  That's not meant to show disloyalty to someone but in the big boy world, you contingency plan for what if something happens to our key personnel.

If Warde doesn't have 3 names in his desk drawer right now -- NOT to fire Harbaugh, but what if JH gets hit by a bus so to speak, he's failed as a leader.

Yeoman

December 2nd, 2019 at 1:31 PM ^

That's never quite felt right to me. I think it's probably an accurate description of the situation in '06 with Carr first broached retirement, and it's probably part of the reason they talked him out of it (they probably also thought he was acting out of grief and would change his mind). But in '07 they'd had a year of knowing their HC was talking about retirement; not to have even thought about it over that time is more incompetence than I'm willing to credit to anyone.

Anybody here ever work as an administrative assistant? "I'll be on my boat and can't be reached" when an important call is coming in told a different story to me than it seems to have to most people. Surely that had to be deliberate.

My theory is that there was a succession plan (OK, maybe that's too strong a word) in '07 but that Martin hadn't done enough DD on it to realize the size and power of the over-my-dead-body anti-Miles faction. Or the meaning of those factions and the implications of a Miles hire. That recognition came way too late in the process (I'm guessing it happened the day Martin told Carr what he was planning) and everything afterwards had the odor of panic. Carr's suggestion of RR is like drowning men grasping at a life preserver--they hadn't thought through that option at all. But at least it was the name of a competent coach who presumably wouldn't set off any civil wars in the community....

Yeoman

December 2nd, 2019 at 2:20 PM ^

I think it more or less corresponds to the whatever-it-takes / we've-got-some-honor-here split. Bo's competitiveness rubbed off on everyone, but his stickler-ness (there's got to be a word for this but I can't think of one) didn't. Carr and Miles were at opposite ends of the scale.

Miles's OK State program was the most famously scandal-ridden in the country. Has all this been completely forgotten? I understand that there are people that don't care as long as we win, and that's fine. It should also be understood that there were and are people that do care about some or all of it.

https://www.si.com/college/2013/09/10/oklahoma-state-part-1-money

https://www.si.com/college/2013/09/11/oklahoma-state-part-2-academics

https://www.si.com/college/2013/09/12/oklahoma-state-part-3-drugs

https://www.si.com/college/2013/09/13/oklahoma-state-part-4-sex

https://www.si.com/college/2013/09/16/oklahoma-state-part-5-fallout

Mpfnfu Ford

December 2nd, 2019 at 9:42 AM ^

Lloyd Carr gets plenty of shit, or at least did. Most online Michigan places were packed with vitriol for him, and I'm not gonna get into whether it was deserving or not, but obviously time and the personal tragedies in his family have done a lot to make most normal people move on from any anger they had to Carr. 

At the end of the day, he's the guy who brought Michigan its only national title since integration, and he loved the place. He made mistakes but he didn't get anyone killed or other horrible things some coaches presided over. You could do a lot worse than Lloyd Carr.

StirredNotShaken

December 2nd, 2019 at 9:47 AM ^

I think the real culprit here is Bump Elliott. If he had done his job better we never would have fallen behind OSU in the 1960s and we would have never needed to hire Bo. This is critical because it's Bo's influence that kept us from adapting to the modern game for so long. If Bump does better there is no Bo or Moe and certainly no Carr to screw up the program to this day.  Damn you, Bump.   

RockinLoud

December 2nd, 2019 at 9:49 AM ^

Holy shit, just stop. We're not mediocre. Sure we're not with the truly elite teams, but outside of like 3-4 seasons in the last 25 years this program is basically right where it's always been since 1969 - which is very good, top 15 maybe top 10 with 2-3 losses per season. The only thing different is that we're not beating OSU as much, but we're also not dropping that one inexplicable game to an actual mediocre team near as much. Idk, at this point I'd trade a coupe of those to beat OSU I suppose. 

 

HollywoodHokeHogan

December 2nd, 2019 at 9:50 AM ^

Lol, go fuck your self.  Yeah, our best coach in the last two decades is at fault.  All he did was win titles and at least sometimes beat OSU.  He was way better than Harbaugh.  

MacMarauder

December 2nd, 2019 at 9:50 AM ^

I would argue that Michigan isn't mediocre.  We're good, just not elite.  The problem is that our arch rival is one of the 2-3 elite teams in the country.  Has Michigan ever really been at that level?  In Lloyd Carr's thirteen year tenure Michigan had one undefeated season.  He had two 2 loss seasons, five 3 loss seasons, four 4 loss seasons and one 5 loss season.  If anything we are back to where were were under Carr to begin with.  

uncleFred

December 2nd, 2019 at 1:29 PM ^

"We're good, just not elite."

Michigan is quite a bit better than good. If the team wins their bowl game Harbaugh will have 48 wins in his first 5 seasons. Impressive by any standard especially considering the devastating QB injuries suffered in 2017. Our expectations set the bar of good far higher than the vast majority of college programs, and deservedly so.

Despite the one-sided results in 2018 and 2019, progress is being made. When the lowest end of acceptability is to win the Big Ten Championship and make the college play-offs, we need to be prepared for a lot of disappointing seasons. This too is as it should be. This is Michigan. A historically elite program and the winningest football program in the history of college football. 

Those of you who weren't around for Michigan football in the 1960s have no appreciation for just how difficult it is to achieve and maintain that level of excellence, and the current structure of college football has made it much more difficult.

I'm damn disappointed in Saturday's game. That said at this point there is only one coach around who has a shot at getting Michigan football back to consistent elite status and, like it or not, his name is Harbaugh. 

And as a side note, anyone screaming to fire Don Brown needs to have their head examined.

 

smitty1983

December 2nd, 2019 at 9:51 AM ^

So now the excuse it a coach who hasn't coached in 12 years? This fanbase is starting to be pathletic. News Flash, YOU ARE WHO YOU ARE! Go look at the recruiting classes under JH, This team is finishing right in line with those. Get better players and develop them better, That's it!, that's the key to success anywhere. It's not hard to see. 

I'mTheStig

December 2nd, 2019 at 10:46 AM ^

Already kinda done. 

In another thread people were suggesting that because M has to fill 107K (minus the visitor's allotment) seats on Saturday, that's why there was so much red in the stadium.

So yeah, fuck you Canham for creating moneyball in college athletics.

Transitively, fuck you Yost for digging the hole too big (and below the water table so we cannot have nice grass).

/s <-- supplying that for the really obtuse still recovering from Saturday's hangover.

Jimmyisgod

December 2nd, 2019 at 9:58 AM ^

This is a horrible take.  Lloyd Carr won us a national title and had us playing for a spot in the National Title game another time.  That's more than Bo could say.

I think Ohio State taking their program to another level is what is to blame.

TdK71

December 2nd, 2019 at 10:01 AM ^

It really wasn't only Carr on that train to nowhere, it was guys like Joe Roberson, Tom Goss, that kept their hands on the throats of the Golden Goose of the Athletic Department, After Schembechler Hall was built in the late 80's there was never a major facilities upgrade for Michigan Football until 2007 when they broke ground on the Indoor Practice facility. 

We're finally catching up on that front but the fact that Lloyd thought just because he won a NC he could anoint a successor of his own choosing, and then sabotaging RR, and promoting Hoke over Harbaugh back in 2014. 

We've been losing the College Football Arms Race since the early 2000's Harbaugh didn't inherit a blueblood that had a couple of down years he got a trainwreck of a program that has had too much meddling by the former factions of players.

In short there's plenty of blame to go around, the future of Michigan Football and where it ultimately ends up is in the hands of the President of the University. You have to be committed to winning from the top down.

GoBlueTal

December 2nd, 2019 at 10:02 AM ^

Why you're 100% wrong:

1. Because football is the ultimate team sport.  Lloyd didn't let receivers behind our secondary on Saturday you flipping idiot.
2. Because nothing as big and complicated as this has one person or cause to fix.  
3. Because winning is not more important than integrity, and OSU believes the opposite.

4. Because the fault lies in fans like you: not the coaches, not the players, not decisions that were made in what was then thought to be the best interests of the team but in 20/20 hindsight weren't - in pathetic idiot fans who can't take their brains off the delusional myths they tell themselves, and demand easy solutions to complicated problems.  When the fan base gets its head out of its collective ass I personally guarantee we'll have more wins over OSU.  Without necessarily changing a single thing about the way the team is run right now.  

Don

December 2nd, 2019 at 10:06 AM ^

"He deserves a ton of the blame that we've only won once since he's left..."

—"ImRightYouKnow": Member for 1 month 1 week

Blaming a coach who hasn't coached here in 12 years makes as much sense as MGoBlog blaming you for the OSU loss—we hadn't lost to the Buckeyes this year until you joined.

 

Luke15

December 2nd, 2019 at 10:20 AM ^

You're probably right Don. The longevity of someone's profile on MgoBlog ultimately determines whether they could possibly have a reasonable take or know what they're talking about. Your 84,000 points are a badge of honor and something you must be truly proud about. Consider a custom t-shirt.

MGoStrength

December 2nd, 2019 at 10:14 AM ^

Eh, 5 years is long enough for JH to overcome those issues.  IMHO there is nothing wrong per se with what JH is doing.  JH has gotten UM back to what they've traditionally been...an 8-10 win team.  What's missing is obviously the conference championships because they can't beat OSU. 

Unfortunately for UM, OSU is better than they've ever been and JH's UM simply can't beat them.  He needs to find a way to become a top 5 elite recruiting destination, ala Bama, UGA, OSU, Clemson, etc., if they wish to compete with OSU.  Personally I don't see that happening in the current landscape of CFB.  Maybe player likeness compensation will change that, but I have my doubts.  Regardless, Carr's issues are not relevant to the last two beat-downs the Buckeye's have given us.

bluegary

December 2nd, 2019 at 10:37 AM ^

I hate Lloyd Carr. Yes he had a great record but he left the program in shambles for r.r. But Harbaugh should have At least 1 win over osu. J.T. Was short. If we didn’t turn the ball over we could have another. That would have helped in recruiting. I don’t think getting rid of Harbaugh is the answer. If anyone reads the book 3 and out you would understand why I do not like Carr. He would not help r.r. He let any player that wanted out he let them go. 

Wendyk5

December 2nd, 2019 at 10:42 AM ^

I'm not trying to be melodramatic, just pragmatic. The rivalry as we know it doesn't really exist anymore, except in words (TTUN, X's for M's during game week, Ohio is the worst state, etc, etc,). I think we've diverged from the original rivalry, with Ohio State literally becoming a football school (and I don't mean in the best way -- football is more important to them than anything else) and Michigan becoming even more of an academic school (great school when I was there, but even more acclaimed and $$ endowed now) with football as a very important component. I can't speak to how that plays out in recruiting in terms of how Ohio State outdoes Michigan, but clearly the emphasis at Ohio State is football first. 

Hotel Putingrad

December 2nd, 2019 at 12:07 PM ^

Yup. Tressel and Meyer convinced OSU admins of the merits of making the program a football factory. UM has always placed emphasis on the well-rounded student athlete. OSU would never contemplate something like these international trips in the spring. They have different institutional priorities. And in modern recruiting, the vast majority of the top 100 prospects prefer the focus on football. Michigan may get the occasional Rashan, Jabrill or Dax, but OSU will get way more.

All that being said, there is a path toward beating them again. Harbaugh will figure it out.

Yeoman

December 2nd, 2019 at 1:51 PM ^

That's probably true, at least at FBS level. But there's a question of degree here--the academic standards football players are held to at the service academies is probably a bit different from the standard at OSU or Clemson or Alabama.

We can argue about where Michigan falls on that spectrum but they're not at either end of it.

---

And a bit of a tangent: I think "getting in" misses the point to some extent and what truly varies from place to place is what's expected of you after you're admitted.

Wendyk5

December 2nd, 2019 at 4:16 PM ^

Dude, OSU isn't in the same league as Michigan. I'm not saying you can't get an education there, I'm just saying that line by line comparisons of the various schools -- law, business, engineering -- show Michigan to be far ahead of Ohio State. Thems are the facts. No arrogance involved.