Perkis-Size Me

May 6th, 2018 at 9:09 AM ^

MJ still has six rings (I think) to LeBron’s three, but MJ also usually had much better supporting casts.

Minus his years with the Heat, LeBron’s supporting casts have been anywhere from okay to awful. He has dragged Cleveland through the playoffs and to the Finals all by himself. Without him, Cleveland is a perpetual NBA cellar dweller.

G. Gulo of the Dale

May 6th, 2018 at 12:28 PM ^

Jordan had the advantage of having a fairly stable core at the peak of his career, and had some nice complementary parts, but there are reasons to think that over the course of both of their careers, they've been surrounded by a similar level of talent.  You may or may not agree with the analysis, but this FoxSports article makes the case that Lebron had a stronger supporting cast for eight of his first fourteen seasons:

https://www.foxsports.com/nba/gallery/proof-that-lebron-james-had-bette…;

Kyrie is a better offensive player than anyone with whom Jordan played, and he seemed to be the Cavs' best, most clutch scorer during any number of playoff games over the last few seasons.  Kevin Love has never fit all that well in Cleveland but had two 26 and 13 seasons before arriving.  J.R. Smith is somewhat erratic but hit clutch shots for the Cavs in the playoffs.  

I'm not using this as an argument for either Jordan or Lebron being the better player, I'm just not sure that the supporting cast is such a strong argument in Lebron's favor.

Hotroute06

May 6th, 2018 at 9:16 AM ^

He has to win 3 more championships to be considered the best. Jordan is still on top.

FGB

May 6th, 2018 at 11:14 PM ^

Thank you, finally someone else who thinks Robert Horry is one of the 10 greatest players of all time.  Steve Kerr also knocking on that top 15 door.

allintime23

May 6th, 2018 at 10:59 AM ^

Lebron is phenomenal and so much different than Michael. Nobody will ever be better than Michael Jordan, I’m sorry. He just really never lost. He was so dominant and graceful in everything he did. I’d always say and argue that he was the best player in any sport at his sport.

MichiganFan1984

May 6th, 2018 at 9:16 AM ^

Lebron is not the best of all time. MJ #1 Magic and Bird # 2 Kobe #3 After that Lebron can get in the discussion in my opinion.

MichiganFan1984

May 6th, 2018 at 8:08 PM ^

Yep. I’ll take Kobe over anyone except MJ, Bird or Magic. Dude was clutch and could create his own shot. Maybe not the best dude or teammate, but if we’re talking pure skill or 1 on 1 then yes I like him at #3.

allintime23

May 6th, 2018 at 10:54 AM ^

Kobe isn’t too 10, sorry. He’s the number one shot taker though. Number one ego too. I’d take Jordan, Lebron, Russel, magic, bird, the dream and a few others way before I’d take Kobe. Shit, I’d even take shaq over him.

Blueblood80

May 6th, 2018 at 11:56 AM ^

But watching him play is a thing of beauty. I have come to admit to myself just this year that he could very well be the GOAT. It’s hard to compare to MJ because the game changes over generations.
Not only can Lebron do freaky things on his own but also he gets the rest of his team going. His basketball IQ is insane. One example is the second he is double teamed, he knows exactly where to go with the ball. It’s just unreal.

bronxblue

May 6th, 2018 at 10:39 AM ^

They are different generational players, but I think Jordan and James are the two best players I've ever seen play, and both are the greatest in the sport, just in different ways. But what LeBron is doing right now, at his age and experience and with this profoundly mediocre team around him, is stunning.

bronxblue

May 6th, 2018 at 3:47 PM ^

I have no idea what your point is.  By this logic, Jordan shouldn't even be considered, since he hasn't played any professional basketball in years and his last two Wizards teams couldn't make the playoffs (or finish about .500) in a terrible East.

The dirty secret about Jordan's run is the league was down due to expansion and bad luck, so you had him facing a broken-down Lakers team for a title, plus some deeply flawed Blazers and Suns teams that couldn't come close to sustaining their brief moments of success.  Then he came back and he battled some Heat teams that were Pay Riley's poor attempts at creating "tough guy" teams.  Oh, and a Magic team that would have been a terrible matchup for them had Penny been able to stay health and co-exist with Shaq (something that turned into a running problem with him).  Jordan was still great, but there's this tired argument that Jordan's era was full of amazing super-teams mostly because guys who grew up watching the game then became bloggers and writers and fail to have perspective.

 

jbrandimore

May 6th, 2018 at 1:38 PM ^

A more unbiased view. Let’s pretend there are two teams that start with MJ on one team and LeBron on the other. You are the GM and you have to outfit this squad with the missing pieces. To me MJ is a 2 90% of the time, and in only selected matchups can he play some limited time at the three. He can certainly guard any 2, but only some of the 3s you might face. This means that you need to find a 1, 3, 4 and 5 around MJ. You better make sure at least one of the 4 or 5 is a guy that can lead the league in rebounding or you’ll be a middling playoff team. With LeBron, you can play him at the 2, 3, 4 or even the 5 in small ball lineups. LeBron gives you matchup nightmares that MJ does not present, and LeBron is much more versatile defensively. You can also use LeBron as a “point forward” and run your offense through him. Yet another thing you can’t do with MJ. You do need to have a couple shooters around LeBron. As you can find shooters much easier than guys that average 12-14 rebounds a game, I would say it’s clear it’s much easier to built a championship contender around LeBron than MJ. Also, if you are honest, LeBron could guard MJ. MJ would have zero shot at guarding LeBron. LeBron takes it, and I don’t think it’s that close.

HailObeans

May 6th, 2018 at 2:12 PM ^

Is pointless. We’ll never know which one was better. They are both transcendent players in their respective nba generations. Both played against high level competition. MJ faced much better defenses, but Lebron faces much better offensive teams. The sport has changed a lot, so this debate is entirely opinion based. Both players have won fair share of championships.

DTOW

May 6th, 2018 at 6:25 PM ^

MJ most definetly did no face better competition, not even close.  I've never understood this logic whatsoever.  So you're trying to tell me that players have gotten bigger, faster, stronger and more skilled but yet the old timers were better players?  I just don't buy it.  Golden State would absolutely mop the floor with any of the Jordan Bulls teams and it wouldn't be particularily close.

greatlakestate

May 6th, 2018 at 4:01 PM ^

I started watching the Cavs with my SIL who is a Cleveland sports fan.  I become a Cavs fan myself and a huge fan of LBJ.  He's unbelievable.  (FWIW the Cavs are the ONLY Ohio sports team that the SIL has managed to convert me to.  We take him to a home fb game each year to try to convert him...)

HailHail47

May 6th, 2018 at 5:50 PM ^

If you value rings more, you are more likely to say MJ, he was a great winner. If you value career stats, you are probably going to lean more toward LeBron. I think LeBron still needs a couple more rings to have a clear edge over MJ. If he gets it this year going through Golden State, I will be extremely impressed.

maquih

May 6th, 2018 at 7:38 PM ^

When MJ was in his prime, there was no question at all he was going to win the championship. And he beat a lot of excellent teams, maybe the Sonic's with Payton and Kemp was the worst team he beat in the finals. With LeBron, it's automatic he'll win the conference, but not the finals. That's the difference between them.

UM Griff

May 6th, 2018 at 8:35 PM ^

One of the greats, but still has a lot of his career to complete. To be fair, he needs to be evaluated when his body of work is complete.