MGlobules

December 21st, 2023 at 8:09 PM ^

In 2014-15, in his EIGHTH season at Michigan, John Beilein went 16 and 16 with the squad, 8-10 in the B1G, missing the NCAA tourney for the third time. The yahoos all cried for his head.

In order to keep his job, Warde made him take on a D coordinator. It was humiliating.

I had been insisting that Beilein was a genius from the beginning. A comb back through posts here will verify that. I adored the guy.

I fought with all the people, and the yahoos came out of the woodwork, to crap on Beilein. FOR YEARS. A certain columnist here made shitty comments about Beilein and his players ad nauseum.

I made the observation about Juwan and his record not to say he was as good as Beilein, anything, EXCEPT to point out that being 12 games up on our former Hall of Fame coach after three years absolutely does NOT indicate total collapse or awful coaching.

I think that people of a certain level of acumen can take that idea on.

Mr Miggle

December 21st, 2023 at 2:10 PM ^

Eh, I think Michigan should, and even will, insist on proportional shares of the media money. That isn't going to happen until the next media deal, so is there much point in their talking about it now?

What they can do is talk to other leading programs about banding together. Either to push for things in their common interest and possibly to form a super conference outside of NCAA control. The amount of extra money they can generate is enormous. I don't think these moves should be treated as threats. It's what Michigan should be doing regardless of how the other conference schools treat them. 

highlow

December 21st, 2023 at 11:18 AM ^

I dunno, this kind of persuades me that M's quieter approach has merits.  It's embarrassing to be affiliated with an institution that has, for more than a  year now, been making noises that they'll definitely, absolutely, for sure do something about the ACC and how unfairly it treats them.  The more FSU postures without doing something, the more I think they've got no leverage.

M should speak softly and carry a large stick.  What that is, I dunno, I hope Ono and the team are thinking on it.

 

1VaBlue1

December 21st, 2023 at 11:36 AM ^

This is the promise of those who advocate for always being quiet and doing everything 'in the background' - the promise that things are being done, and they all result in great things for Michigan.

Of course, we never see, hear, or learn about such great things...

I'm not saying that everything needs to be broadcast in the public, but there are times that a public response and public actions are necessary to support programs/students/coaches/athletes when they're getting railroaded.

highlow

December 21st, 2023 at 11:41 AM ^

I very much get the point.  I have zero faith in Warde and don't think there's anything going on in the background, which is a problem - because there should be.  But outside of making a few statements in support, which I think Ono has done, I don't think we should be constantly telling the world that we are Very Angry.  

If you want to go to war, fine, but actually go to war.  File the lawsuit, make an agreement with other schools, stop sharing revenue, whatever.  If you're not going to do that, maybe because you can't, then don't beat the war drums.

JonathanE

December 21st, 2023 at 2:50 PM ^

What's the point of doing all this now? The 12 team playoff starts next year. Who the hell cares about conferences anymore? 

 

The Big Ten still splits bowl revenue. The more teams in which the Big Ten can stack into the 12-team playoffs, the more revenue there is to divvy up among the member schools. 

JonnyHintz

December 21st, 2023 at 3:57 PM ^

ACC, B10, B12, SEC winners and runner ups will all get in easily
 

I wouldn’t be so sure about that. Those at-large bids are likely going to be dominated by the B1G and SEC. Looking at the current rankings, Oklahoma State is the highest ranked “runner up” from the Big 12 for next years conference lineup at #20 with Louisville the highest ACC team at #15, ND is also #16 fwiw. 
 

Based on the current rankings, you would get Michigan (B1G), Texas (SEC), FSU (ACC), Arizona (B12) and Oregon St (P12) as autobids by virtue of being the 5 highest ranked conference champs. Liberty would replace Oregon State as an autobid if they deem a 2 member P12 doesn’t qualify for an autobid.

You’d then get: Washington (B1G), Texas (SEC), Bama (SEC), Georgia (SEC), OSU (B1G), Oregon (B1G, and Mizzou (SEC) to fill out the field as at-larges. #10 Penn State would miss the cut. It’s a real stretch to say the runners-up from the ACC and B12 would easily be in considering those teams will have to be top10ish. That field is going to be dominated by the B1G and SEC every year

mGrowOld

December 21st, 2023 at 10:55 AM ^

Has FSU thought this through?  I mean yes, they got totally fucked over being left out of the Championship bowl series and yes, their membership in the ACC probably played a big role in getting left out and yes, they are the cash cow when it comes to the ACC in football but have to share revenue equally with programs like NC State and Duke that nobody gives two shits about, much less watch, but man, the other institutions and the league commissioner wont like this at ALL and will most likely get upset when they hear they want to move.

Sincerely,

Warde (probably)

robpollard

December 21st, 2023 at 10:55 AM ^

They may want to leave, but where are they going to go? Do they have an offer from the B1G or SEC? My understanding is they do not.

I'm sure the SEC would be interested in FSU and Clemson, so work with them and get a package deal going. Otherwise, it's just a lot of message board yelling & whining, but from wood paneled rooms & stuffed leather seats.

Kilgore Trout

December 21st, 2023 at 11:10 AM ^

I think the argument is that the ACC and SEC are both ESPN conferences, so it doesn't make any sense for ESPN to pay more for FSU as a member of the SEC than they do for them as a member of the ACC. But, Fox might think they are worth some share of B1G money that is likely somewhere in between what Washington and Oregon got and a full share.

So, in summary, an actual invitation is probably what the B1G offers that the SEC doesn't. 

MI Expat NY

December 21st, 2023 at 11:08 AM ^

Not reading the Athletic, but I've seen reporting elsewhere that the first step is essentially getting the grant of rights removed.  Once they do that, they must feel that the SEC/Big Ten won't wait for the other to make the first move and will immediately try and nab the ACC "properties" they want.  I think it's a pretty reasonable assumption, honestly.

MI Expat NY

December 21st, 2023 at 11:52 AM ^

It seems like they're going to challenge the legitimacy of the GOR, not buy it out.  If they succeed, they will will succeed for everyone (Clemson, UNC, etc.).  If the GOR is the only thing holding the ACC together, it's removal will lead to it all falling apart very quickly.

highlow

December 21st, 2023 at 10:32 PM ^

I'm a lawyer; I do complex contract litigation.  If you have a strong claim, you sue.  If you don't have a claim, you make lots of noise about how you're definitely absolutely going to sue because (a) someone might think you'll litigate and (b) you won't reveal how weak your hand is.  "I sent my lawyers to look at your document really hard" doesn't scare me a whit, "here's a five page memo explaining why your document is void and unenforcable" could.