OT: Dune Part 2(no spoilers)

Submitted by The Shredder on March 1st, 2024 at 1:14 PM

Big Dune reader here, saw part 2 about a week ago, going tonight again. Also a big fan of Denis Villeneuve(arrival, sicario, prisoner). 

I highly suggest you see this on the biggest screen you can. I thought it was great, some changes from the book but I think they make sense. Amazing pace that breezes by. If you loved part 1, you'll love this. 

Brian created mgoblog to train the faithful. 

BlueRude

March 1st, 2024 at 1:24 PM ^

Saw part 1 in 3D on my TV. I also seen the part 2 about 6 months ago on movies2watch.tv even with all the work arounds. Sometime soon it will be in 2d and 3d rendered on 3Donlinefilms.com. 3D to see this movie is another world. Kinda like Dr. Strange Multiuniverse. Great mvoie.

MgoHillbilly

March 1st, 2024 at 1:32 PM ^

I hated it. Nothing worse than a movie that takes hours to get through that could have been half as long. So much redundant scenery and dialogue. I'm also not a fan of the music. How many hours of a woman yodeling at the top of her lungs can a human endure?

It's Friday though. No more complaining even though I could go on.

 

LabattsBleu

March 1st, 2024 at 1:39 PM ^

Got my tickets for an Imax showing on the 5th.

Super excited to see it on Imax...praying Dune Messiah gets green lit.

I am a big fan of the books, but I have learned to accept that this isn't going to be 'exactly' like the books; its an adaptation. You have to judge the movie that's made and not the movie you wanted made.

ST3

March 1st, 2024 at 2:22 PM ^

The Ringer has another theory about what the movie is.

https://www.theringer.com/movies/2024/2/28/24085259/dune-part-two-magic-dick-theory-paul-atreides-chosen-one-messiah

What does Magic Dick Theory even have to do with Dune? Didn’t we just say that traditional chosen-one narratives typically give the hero a sword or something swordlike, a phallic object that becomes the key to unlocking his special destiny? But there’s not really a magic sword in Dune, is there? Huh. Well, maybe when Frank Herbert sat down to write the novel, he decided to skip the overt penis symbolism and go for something more subtle, less obviou—OH MY GOD, THE GIANT FUCKING WORMS.

I laughed.

WindyCityBlue

March 1st, 2024 at 2:00 PM ^

I might be the only person who liked the 1984 version.  ugh!

Beyond that, I did like the first Dune a couple years ago.  However, I think Timothee Chamolet to be an overrated actor.

bassclefstef

March 1st, 2024 at 2:18 PM ^

Yeah, he's kinda coded as bisexual in the books, although I can't remember if it's stated outright, or just left it as an implication. Either way, it feels like an aspect of his character that's tied in with his hedonism and cruelty, which is... certainly a problematic association to make. David Lynch just took that idea and turned it up to, I dunno, 13 or so.

Ernis

March 1st, 2024 at 4:48 PM ^

Not the only person. Overall I found it more impactful than 2021. In the Lynch film I cared about the characters much more, ironically even though Villeneuve spent more time character building on Caladan. Lynch showed a warmth the Atreides had with each other that was lacking in the newer one, in which they were cold and austere. That much is in-character for the Atreides outwardly, but they are not supposed to be like that with each other. Not simply as a matter of integrity to the source material, but for making a film with characters people give a damn about. Their dull austerity was surpassed only by the Harkonnens, who are characteristically more flamboyant and exuberant in their villainy; theirs was a very striking change of character and the simplifying, muting effect is palpable.

The fact that both the noble families we spend the most time with were basically the same — cold, severe, aesthetically minimalist (really, pretty much all the characters are depicted thusly) — just creates a dull impression from the film. Very little emotional engagement with the audience, which was exacerbated by its hasty pacing and IMO over-emphasis on action sequences. And given that these are galactic aristocracy, with worlds of wealth at their disposal, the fact that they aren’t more ostentatious does not compute. The film was very much playing to the stylistic sensibility of early 21st century middle class Americans with their love of bland “modern farmhouse” aesthetic while depicting what should be an extravagant spacefaring feudal society, and as such disrupts one’s suspension of disbelief, I vouch. 

That said, Dune 2021 is visually a very impressive film and some of the acting was excellent (with some uninspiring acting as well). And the ornithopters are freaking sweet. Also a cool soundtrack from Hans Zimmer. Overall entertaining, worth a watch for fans of sci fi or epic films in general, and I certainly plan to see part 2 in theaters. But I think Lynch did a better job with character development and creating emotional impact.

WindyCityBlue

March 1st, 2024 at 5:28 PM ^

I haven't seen Dune 2 yet, but based on Dune 1 (which I really liked), here is my uneducated opinion in trying to compare it to the Lynch version.

Directors: it seemed that Lynch was handcuffed by trying the get the whole story captured in one movie.  Villeneuve seemed to have more freedom which surely benefited him. 

Story: Far more drawn out in the Villeneuve version, which I though dragged at times.  But it did give me a little more about the people on Arrikis which was basically lacking in the Lynch version

Character Casting: I think both did a great job.  As mentioned in a previous post, I'm not a fan of Timothee Chamolet's acting.  I think he is too weak compared to Kyle MacLachlan take on the character.  With that, I think Zendaya is a better Chani compared to Sean Young (who didn't so a bad job)

Soundtrack: Hans Zimmer is the best at soundtracks, but Toto was not horrible considering their popularity in the 80s.

AlbanyBlue

March 2nd, 2024 at 11:42 AM ^

Nope, I thoroughly enjoyed the 1984 version. But I'm not a movie-analyzer-then-critique type. Do I enjoy a movie? Yes? Then I consider it good. And I enjoyed the 1984 version.

I read the first two, maybe three, books and it's just too much world-building for me. It took me a long time to get through the GoT books, and I DNF the Wheel of Time series. Just too ponderous. 

mGo Go Gadget Play

March 1st, 2024 at 2:43 PM ^

I'm a huge fan of the books and enjoyed Part 1, but my takeaway from that was, "These planet leaders are really spending a lot in resources just to have 10,000 people stand in formation to watch a spaceship land." You'd think that maybe if they were a little more thrifty they wouldn't have to go to war over spice.  

Greatgig

March 1st, 2024 at 2:15 PM ^

Someone starts talking about Dune and I reply with, "ah, the biznochhaderoch' and we laugh.

It is great sci-fi and I look forward to seeing part 2

m9tt

March 1st, 2024 at 2:19 PM ^

I'm not a huge Dune fan (A+ worldbuilding, D+ story), but I hope it does well so Hollywood will be more willing to pour money into passion projects by great directors and "serious" sci-fi book adaptations, rather than the same old sequels and franchise reboots we see every summer.

 

Magnum P.I.

March 1st, 2024 at 2:59 PM ^

Sorry but I thought Part 1 was horrible and unwatchable. They just did jump cuts from one action scene to another and there was no world building or character development 

XM - Mt 1822

March 1st, 2024 at 3:01 PM ^

I first read the books when I was at Michigan, more than 40 years ago. I am old as a sandworm. I will be taking four of the children to the movie tonight. Looking forward to it.