Offensive Line Depth Chart Next Year - Not Scary!(?)
So, like many of you, I tend to peak ahead to see how the team shapes up in the future based on the depth chart, who we expect to lose, and our recruiting underway.
Regarding the offensive line, there had been plenty of concern on this board and Sam's show on depth after this year; almost a consensus that this will be the thinnest position group next year.
However, some encouraging signs/rumors, with the good performance of Ruiz on Saturday, energence of Spanellis as a contributor, Runyan with starting snaps, good news we are hearing about Newsome's recovery, and some whispering of a great position switch for James Hudson.
So, if you believe Newsome recovers 100%, everyone with eligibility returns, and James Hudson stays at tackle, here is a possible depth chart (with no true freshman):
LT:
Newsome
Hudson
Stueber
LG:
Bredeson
Runyan/Spanellis
C:
Ruiz
Runyan
RG:
Onwenu
Runyan/Spanellis
RT:
JBB
Ulizio
Filiaga
I took a leap that Runyan is a logical back-up at center based on overall experience, and Runyan and Spanellis will rotate as a third guard on either side. What say you? Not so scary thin? Who knows who may emerge of Vastardis, Honigford, and Hall...any TEs slide over?
November 6th, 2017 at 6:17 PM ^
Newsome huge question mark and JBB gotta long way to go. I am holding out hope Chuck is just gonna magically solve the problem at RT, but who knows
November 6th, 2017 at 6:26 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 7:10 PM ^
but JBB got a long way to go on Pass Pro. His run blocking is really coming along. If the rumors about Hudson is true, may be the best tackle of the bunch.
November 6th, 2017 at 7:10 PM ^
Hope he wins the job in camp, but at this point it’s like budget planning based off a scratcher you bought.
November 6th, 2017 at 7:20 PM ^
I sincerely hope that Filiaga beats out Ulizio by next season.
November 6th, 2017 at 7:28 PM ^
Our line is looking very strong next year. If not, then another year of heartburn every time our QB drops back for a pass.
November 7th, 2017 at 9:38 AM ^
Filiaga has the size and we have a need for OT. JBB is gaining experience and Ulizio can be his backup.
With Onwenu and Bredeson returning and Spanellis getting reps this year, it makes sense to try CF at tackle, imo.
I don't expect Newsome to play next year. If he does, great for him AND us.
November 7th, 2017 at 9:47 AM ^
who I think could add some depth and compete:
Honigford
Ja'Raymond Hall
We have some young guys, but I think the talent is starting to fill the depth chart.
November 6th, 2017 at 6:18 PM ^
The concern is entirely at the tackle positions and that concern remains.
November 6th, 2017 at 11:54 PM ^
Concern, sure. I don't think the tackles are going to be great, but I feel pretty good about them being passable while the interior should be beasts.
November 6th, 2017 at 6:21 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 8:06 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 9:45 PM ^
If he ends up at tackle it's likely a move by necessity. Ideally, the inside would probably be Bredeson, Ruiz, Onwenu.
November 7th, 2017 at 3:39 PM ^
freshmen isn't ready next year, it could very well be a necessity for Bredeson to move over, because there is literally no one else.
I'm optimistic it'll be Hudson, but Bredeson certainly isn't out of the question, especially given the talent we have inside that could take him place.
November 6th, 2017 at 6:22 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 6:24 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 7:12 PM ^
I'm also curious to learn about the prognosis of the Bears TE, Zach Miller. He had a very similar injury to Newsome.
November 6th, 2017 at 7:14 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 9:24 PM ^
He will play. People with that kind of heart and work ethic put in a position to succeed often do. I don't know if he will start. If I had to guess, I think he will. But if he doesn't, he will play meaningful snaps at least.
November 6th, 2017 at 6:26 PM ^
is a concern. The lack of any development in that area over the course of this season is a bit worrisome. I'd like to think they can get that ironed out between now and opening day next year.
Also, I think expecting Newsome back at 100% is a pretty big assumption. Until he starts practicing, having Newsome on a depth chart seems like putting the cart before the horse.
November 6th, 2017 at 6:27 PM ^
Barring catastrophe we are in great shape for guard. Our guards are good now (blown stunts notwithstanding) and have two years of improvement left.
Center is a hope, that Ruiz will have the offensive line calls mastered by next fall. He made some mistakes this past weekend but he looked physically ready to go, an important step. An offseason of work at the line calls and he might be ready. I'm optimistic.
We seem to have depth in the interior as well, since Spanellis is competing at both center and guard and Runyan appears capable, to say nothing of younger guys we haven't seen yet.
Tackle is a series of questionmarks. Will Newsome make a full physical recovery and be ready to compete? Can JBB learn to pass block, or can Ulizio make a year of steady growth? Can one of our young guys make a step up (I'm hopeful about Hudson, but as far as I know we've only heard one good report about him so far and it's not in the context of "competing for a job" yet) and be ready to play D-1 football as a RS freshman?
It's a lot of questionmarks. The good: Newsome was good before he got hurt and he has almost two full years to recover. JBB can run block very well, which means that a modest upgrade in his pass blocking locks down the position. And the young guys we aren't putting out there yet are talented and getting what we hope to be good coaching.
Which means that there are questions for perhaps five tackles, and if the answer for two of them is "yes" we have the makings of a good line next year.
It's unrealistic, but I'm geeked by the run blocking improvements and I think the tackles work out next season. And that lays the groundwork for a great, great season.
November 6th, 2017 at 9:29 PM ^
Great analysis. I think the interior is going to be looking excellent across the board. Ruiz looks like the real deal and so does Onwenu. If I had to bet I think Filiaga starts next year as well. If Newsome makes it back, great. If he doesn't we have one very important spot to solidify and we're golden for the starting lineup.
If the QB position comes along, we will have the personnel for one hell of a season I believe.
November 6th, 2017 at 11:35 PM ^
Some might justifiably say, yikes, he hasn't played in two years, that means 1) that was a really bad injury that is going to be hard to full recover from physically and 2) that's a long time not to play football and hope to come back and be good.
The optimist in you says: he's had a lot of time to recover, he must be extra recovered and ready to go!
November 6th, 2017 at 6:27 PM ^
JBB is pretty bad at pass blocking but that is a mental issue, with more reps and time he will get better, he is already a pretty good run blokcer. I think we will be fine with him at RT next year but the left tackle position is still a question mark. Hopefully Newsome is fully recovered and can pick up where he left of, that is asking a lot though.
November 6th, 2017 at 6:36 PM ^
November 7th, 2017 at 12:16 AM ^
that you mentioned. That lowers his pass blocking ceiling to probably not much higher than where he is now.
He's not gonna get much better there.
November 6th, 2017 at 6:27 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 6:28 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 6:32 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 6:34 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 6:53 PM ^
Ah my b
November 6th, 2017 at 6:34 PM ^
He'll knock you right on your fuckstickles.
November 6th, 2017 at 6:28 PM ^
Good show...
November 6th, 2017 at 6:30 PM ^
Coach Harbaugh might look for a grad transfer? Never know.
November 6th, 2017 at 6:39 PM ^
A grad transfer OL would be someone who wasn't good enough to start on his old/current team.. I'll pass on that thank you.
November 6th, 2017 at 6:43 PM ^
Sometimes teams are loaded at a position. Younger guys push out Seniors. Good point though.
I guess I was more hoping than anything.
November 9th, 2017 at 10:10 AM ^
Fair points. But you don't often hear about grad transfer OL's that are studs. At least not as much as other skill positions like WR (as mentioned) or QB.
November 6th, 2017 at 6:45 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 7:05 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 7:31 PM ^
plus - much like Matthews on our BB team - Bama football (or KY in BB) is a different level than most schools. If Mo Ways transfers to say Wisconsin next year there is a very low chance that he becomes a starter and NFL prospect. IF he were to go to Toledo? maybe he becomes a productive starter.
Bigger picture is OL seems to be a harder transfer accross teams on the same level - the Bama kid who we lost to OSU never started a game. MAYBE if there is a kid at an FCS school (whatever they call DII now) who has blossomed and is looking for more exposure as a 5th year it can work out -- Ramczyk at Wisky may be an example of this.
November 6th, 2017 at 7:47 PM ^
Dieter transferred from BGSU to Alabama, not the other way around - he leveled up in competition and was successful. Ramczyk is another example. The exceptions prove the rule, but if you look you just might find an exception.
November 6th, 2017 at 6:51 PM ^
The research suggests that OL grad transfers fail to work out. It actually applies to most positions with the exception of quarterback. Grad transfer qb is the only position Harbaugh can whisper to.
November 6th, 2017 at 6:57 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 7:01 PM ^
Didn't we miss out on one last year or 2 years ago?
Can't remember if we cooled on him or the other way around.
November 6th, 2017 at 7:12 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 7:48 PM ^
Left the team, in fact. Just like Fruhmorgen from Clemson after transferring to Florida.
November 6th, 2017 at 7:17 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 7:48 PM ^
November 6th, 2017 at 7:56 PM ^
I think this is the guy that I was talking about. The transfer I was thinking about had high priority on education, iirc.