WindyCityBlue

April 15th, 2019 at 3:38 PM ^

Meh. As far as I know, no one was hurt. (However, if someone was hurt/killed, then this is tragic event). 

They will rebuilt this to near a perfect match to what it was before. Many aspects of the building have been rebuilt in the past 40 years. I believe the spire is one of them. So in a sense, the building as it was just before the fire was not 800 years old. 

If you ever go to Japan, many of the prefecture castles are many centuries old and several were destroyed during the war. Osaka castle was rebuilt as a near perfect replica and you wouldn’t have none the difference if someone didn’t tell you otherwise. 

No doubt this sucks from a several perspectives, but as long as no one was hurt, all is fine. 

WindyCityBlue

April 15th, 2019 at 4:17 PM ^

Well ok then.  No one is denying that.  Much of what you see today is restored recently (some as recent as the 1980s/1990s).  No one cared then.

As I mentioned, this no doubt sucks.  But the greater importance is no one was hurt/killed (as far as current reports are telling me). 

snarling wolverine

April 15th, 2019 at 4:28 PM ^

Much of what you see today is restored recently (some as recent as the 1980s/1990s). 

There has been minor restorative work, yes (like with any old building), but that's all.  Other than the spire which was added in the 19th century, the "bones" of this structure were never really replaced. The wood in the ceiling that caused the flames to spread so rapidly literally dated from the 13th century.

NashvilleBLUE

April 16th, 2019 at 2:35 AM ^

Strongly disagree. Being upset at history going up in flames and being able to make a joke about it are not mutually exclusive.

When I first saw the image I was saddened because of the pure history and beauty of this and knowing the loss, then reading a few of the jokes made me smile. Humor (when not mean spirited or malicious) is actually good for the soul. 

ST3

April 15th, 2019 at 1:47 PM ^

Officials in Paris said the fire could be linked to restoration works as the peak of the church is currently undergoing a 6 million-euro ($6.8 million) renovation project.

I sure hope that construction company is bonded.

Spartans burn couches, Notre Dame burns cathedrals.

yossarians tree

April 15th, 2019 at 3:01 PM ^

That's what mystifies me...surely they have firefighting aircraft and choppers in that country. 

That being said there must some sort of mad scramble going on down on the main floor to try to get some of the artwork. Aside from the building itself, there are probably many priceless masterpieces inside.

snarling wolverine

April 15th, 2019 at 2:28 PM ^

Yeah, there are other cathedrals across the country (Amiens, Chartres, Reims are also really famous) which largely follow the same Gothic design.  Some have even fancier stonework.  But the one in Paris is special for its location and history.  

I had the chance to visit but did not get to see the view from the tower.  I was hoping to do that another time.  What a shame.  

WindyCityBlue

April 15th, 2019 at 3:02 PM ^

Despite what’s happening to Notre Dame cathedral, there’s lot of stuff to see and do for first timers. Many are quite obvious and you are probably planning to see anyway (ie Eiffel Tower, Arc de Trmp, Louve, etc). 

But if you get a chance, I recommend going to the famous cemetery, Pierre le Chaise. Jim Morrison, Proust and others are buried there. 

freelion

April 15th, 2019 at 2:17 PM ^

I was there last July. It's an amazing place and I'm so sad about this. I hope they can limit the damage but it doesn't look good

Don

April 15th, 2019 at 2:19 PM ^

It's gonna burn pretty much to the ground.

It's a horrible cultural loss.

While the nature of the event is obviously entirely different, and apparently with no loss of life, I think seeing this building go down is going to be as traumatic for the French as it was for us seeing the WTC collapse. There's something dramatically terrible about seeing huge, iconic buildings fall.

Don

April 15th, 2019 at 2:57 PM ^

The Notre Dame cathedral, completed in 1260, has been an iconic part of the French national identity for 759 years.

The World Trade Center (which was never regarded as notable for its architectural design other than for its height) stood for 28 years.

Now go ahead and tell us how the destruction of Notre Dame isn't going to be as traumatic for the French as losing the WTC was for us.

ijohnb

April 15th, 2019 at 3:17 PM ^

It's a building.  I get it, it is really iconic, important, historical building that is part of their cultural and religious identity, but I think the whole "not having thousands of people dying in the worst way imaginable in an intentional act" factor kind of outweighs those other factors.

Gucci Mane

April 15th, 2019 at 3:35 PM ^

Losing the WTC wasn’t even remotely traumatic for me. Having terrorists who enbody evil murder thousands of innocent people was traumatic. 

The Notre Dame fire is sad, but for a completely different reason. 

Squad16

April 15th, 2019 at 5:04 PM ^

Are you being serious? What an awful fucking take. Nobody cares about the buildings of the WTC on anywhere near the same scale obviously, but the implication of the attack, the terror of it all, and most importantly the 3,000 people killed (not to mention their thousands and thousands of friends, relatives, loved ones, etc.) makes Notre Dame burning look like a swing-set at a local playground burning down.