Just standing there

March 11th, 2020 at 6:10 PM ^

If only 1 or 2 percent of people are in danger of dying if infected - either elderly or those with history of respiratory illnesses, why are we treating this like Ebola or the Plague, where it's deadly for anyone?  Instead of quarantining (or at least restricting) everyone, why not have those at high risk quarantine themselves.  Then the rest of us can live normally, spreading this virus amongst ourselves no differently than any other annoying, but not deadly virus.  

There are major health ramifications of a crashing economy - especially for those on the lower rungs of the income ladder.  Schools closing means many will be left with the horrible decision of whether to lose a job or leave young kids home alone.  Major recession will force many more people into homelessness.  Lack of money will make people less likely to seek medical treatment for any ailment until it's too late.

 

 

HarboSchembaugh

March 11th, 2020 at 6:26 PM ^

Yes, let's just ask millions and millions of old people and immunocompromised people to self quarantine.  I'm sure they'll listen and start taking all measures immediately.

Or they'll be like you and complain, ignore the requests of public health officials whose whole job is to combat this stuff, go about doing their daily shit, and it'll get worse.

How about, just once, you take a slight hit to convenience your used to for the sake of public safety.

Just standing there

March 11th, 2020 at 7:35 PM ^

Yes, let's just ask millions and millions of old people and immunocompromised people to self quarantine.  I'm sure they'll listen and start taking all measures immediately 

If they don't, they're taking their lives into their hands regardless of whether or not events are cancelled.  Basically choosing to make a risky life or death decision, knowing what the potential ramifications are.  

I have less sympathy for people making such a decision than for those forced to lose a job to stay home with kids, those forced into homelessness, those who will be no longer able to afford medical treatment, etc.  There are very real life and death ramifications involved when decisions are made to shut down down the economy piece by piece.  Not as obvious, but they can impact more than 1% of the population.

It's really not about my convenience.  I'm lucky enough to have health care and a job where I work from home.  My life actually gets easier if I stop traveling for work.  None of this is inconvenient for me.  But it's life changing for a lot of less fortunate folks.

 

greatlakestate

March 11th, 2020 at 7:21 PM ^

You really don't get how this works do you?  Also this may come as a surprise to you but this people at risk--the elderly and those with underlying conditions LIVE IN THE SAME HOMES WITH PEOPLE WHO ARENT AT RISK... if those people are out and about in the community they will get it and bring it home.  In order for these things to work they have to be done on a massive scale.

Crime Reporter

March 11th, 2020 at 7:05 PM ^

I'm attending a comic con this weekend and will not be worrying about the Corona boogeyman. 

Might even take some toilet paper from work and sell it from my trunk prior to the show.

Bluenin

March 11th, 2020 at 7:25 PM ^

So is this a new precedent??  Influenza kills far more people, so are we going to shut down America for flu season next year??

Bluenin

March 11th, 2020 at 8:41 PM ^

Answer my question, why not shut down America like we are doing now for influenza?? It kills far more people and it’s just as contagious!!

Bluenin

March 11th, 2020 at 10:45 PM ^

All I’m saying is, we all know how flu spreads every flu season and kills tens of thousands of people in America and we don’t shut down all activities in America for flu season.  Why are we ok with doing this now for basically something that is more or less a common flu for most people who contract it? 

Don

March 12th, 2020 at 6:47 AM ^

"The federal government’s top infectious disease expert told lawmakers Wednesday that the novel coronavirus spreading across the globe is 10 times more lethal than the seasonal flu.

“I mean people always say, 'Well, the flu does this, the flu does that,'” Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), said Wednesday during a hearing before the House Oversight and Reform Committee.

“The flu has a mortality rate of 0.1 percent. This has a mortality rate of 10 times that. That’s the reason I want to emphasize we have to stay ahead of the game in preventing this,” he added."

https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/prevention-cures/487086-coronavirus-10-times-more-lethal-than-seasonal