BlueTuesday

September 30th, 2023 at 10:07 AM ^

The tunnel incident. That pushed it over the edge for me. I’d rather we not play them as a protected rival, fuck ‘em’. That game is far more important to them than it is to us. I’m not buying that game is too big of a financial windfall to cancel the yearly series. Michigan Stadium sells out every game regardless of the opponent. I’d be quite happy playing them once every 4 years or whatever it is.

XM - Mt 1822

September 30th, 2023 at 11:26 AM ^

i would be in favor of telling them to pound sand.  it would be a definitive statement that they are beneath us.  i don't think we have sent anywhere near enough of a message to sparty about that incident.  would love to see that happen next month in EL on the field (legally), but they need to be shamed and embarrassed for that gutless tunnel-gangster behavior. 

PopeLando

September 29th, 2023 at 11:40 PM ^

SD4L HAS to mean “Spartan Dawgs 4 Lyfe”, right?

I mean… it’s not a GOOD thing that a mega donor clearly is feeling some kinda way about the team these days and is fucking all the football players out of their NIL deals…

If I’m a football player who still has the possibility of a redshirt, I’m not playing again this year. If I’m a football player who just lost a significant amount of money…I’m calling Tom Mars.

This might end up being the most Sparty NO thing ever. I did NOT have “the biggest Sparty NO moment happens off the field involving someone who isn’t even on the team” on my BINGO card. Jesus.

tubauberalles

September 30th, 2023 at 8:23 AM ^

Is it possible the SD4L NIL sponsor is making this move to benefit the players or as a response to their own requests to be released from their contracts?  Making it possible for any to sit out and retain eligibility might actually be a gift to players.  We also wouldn't know if any payments were being continued outside of the contract for any that stay, etc., but as a blanket move it could be a way to let any player make choices for their future free of any NIL commitments.

Caveat: I know nothing about the actual NIL deals, contracts or player desires.

Late edit: I should have scrolled down to see Leaders and Best's post with SD4L's lame cop-out message.  Sounds way worse than I was willing to guess above.

PopeLando

September 29th, 2023 at 11:54 PM ^

Steve St. Andre is reportedly worth $6.7 billion. Billion with a B.

This guy could buy and sell an entire football team’s worth of 5-star mercenaries from now until forever and still call it a rounding error on his annual budget. The total cost of his NIL business per year is definitely less than it takes to maintain the smallest of his private jets, and is PROBABLY less than he spends on wine, golf club membership fees, and the fresh flowers he has flown in every day from Argentina for his ski mansion in Colorado.

This isn’t a business failure. This is a middle finger from Mr. St. Andre to someone.

HighBeta

September 30th, 2023 at 12:28 AM ^

Don't know the guy, never will, don't know anyone who knows him so - cups of salt with my following speculation(s).

People can have huge personal Balance Sheets with illiquid long term assets that produce no income: artworks, private (non-revenue real estate), hedge fund stakes with gains locked in to/by the General Partner for the forseeable future. The liquid, short term component, the income producing component ‐ can be small.

That is. Some billionaires have relatively low incomes

NIL agreements require cash flow from personal and/or business interests. This guy is probably, in this crap economy, hurting (hurting? yes, I know, but it's all relative) and he might be struggling to fund the cash payouts committed in the NIL deals. So, he's either got to find partners to join him in cash payout commitments or reduce the number of or size of his committed payouts. He's not finding partners, his income stream is diminishing, hence the cutback(s).

The losers here are the kids. Yep, sometimes life bites your ass, Sparty. C'est la vie.

PopeLando

September 30th, 2023 at 8:52 AM ^

I’ll forgo my usual rant that I pull out whenever someone says the economy is bad right now. It’s just important for you to know that you’re wrong. The economy isn’t crap. Especially if you’re a billionaire.

The economy is NEVER crap if you’re a billionaire: there’s only “times where assets are expensive” and “times where assets are cheap”

Clarence Beeks

September 30th, 2023 at 1:22 PM ^

None of that is political and it’s wild to even think it possibly is. That inflation number is a perfect example of how one can make data say literally whatever you want it to. Let’s take a longer time lens on inflation and then come back. Truly, if you think that what inflation has actually done over the last several years, let alone the last three decades, is indicative of a health economy, I really don’t know what to say to that.

ST3

September 30th, 2023 at 2:30 PM ^

Discussions of economics often lead to discussions of politics. Hence, my original disclaimer.

Inflation spiked because of a couple shocks to the system - government spending to prevent a covid induced recession and Putin’s invasion of Ukraine that disrupted energy and food supplies. I was born in 1970. I experienced stagflation. My dad worked for state government in the 80s when the recession hammered the big 3, leading to massive reductions in state tax revenue and the laying off of 10,000 state employees. I graduated from UofM in 1992 during the first Bush recession. I went to grad school because there was not a good job to be had. I’ve lived through crappy economies. This is not one of them.

HighBeta

September 30th, 2023 at 10:33 AM ^

And "times when money is expensive and times when money is relatively free".

If I can generate a steady 14 percent return on borrowed funds, I'm fine when borrowing costs 6 to 7 percent, not fine when it costs 12+/- percent. Expensive money reduces my margins for error; my profit margins can shrink hard, especially with inflationary wage pressures added in.

For bill- and millionaires, the economy can be crap while life continues to be quite comfy/cushy. Zero arguments about that. The difference comes in how they choose to spend (or refrain from spending) their free (read excess) cash flow.

Does paying a kid for the use of his NIL generate an incremental increase to "my" personal balance sheet? Does it advance my business interests. Yes? Then I'll continue to pay. But. If paying the kid does little to nothing for my interests, now or in the near future? Then I will probably reduce my commitments.

Yep, it's good, very good, to be a mill/billionaire, no doubt. I am just speculating what might be causing the Sparty to back away from his prior spending plans.

And. Thanks much for not blasting/ranting. It helps the conversation stay ad rem, not ad hominem. I genuinely appreciate it.

UMfan21

September 29th, 2023 at 11:50 PM ^

For those who are unaware, St. Andre is the other mega donor who along with Matt Ishbia funded about 1/3 of Mel's contract.   He's got plenty of cash so this isn't about funding as the message implies.

Leaders And Best

September 29th, 2023 at 11:51 PM ^

I don't know what it means, but none of it is good. Imagine trying to recruit against another school with this out there. I don't know why anyone would want to put this out there. Better off eating the loss on the existing NIL deals. Even if the donor wallets end up opening up after a new hire, what recruit is going to trust MSU and their NIL operation to keep their word?

snarling wolverine

September 30th, 2023 at 12:27 AM ^

who along with Matt Ishbia funded about 1/3 of Mel's contract.

The FOIA document showed that they simply pledged to donate a total of $24M to MSU over 10 years.  That money wasn't specifically earmarked for the Tucker contract.  If MSU has to settle with Tucker, those two aren't obligated to pay any of the settlement.