Let’s see if this will stick. The real travesty tonight was If

Submitted by jbrandimore on March 9th, 2019 at 10:43 PM

jbrandimore

March 9th, 2019 at 10:45 PM ^

All our players had fouled out, MSU could have won by 50 like in the Amaker days!

Why was Iggy the only one allowed to foul out? He should have had company!

J.

March 9th, 2019 at 11:30 PM ^

I think it depends upon where you decide he had possession.  If he had possession when he got his first hand on the ball, it was a travel.  If he had possession when he got his second hand on the ball, it wasn't. It looked like a travel live and it looked clean in slow-motion, and that's why.

kevin holt

March 10th, 2019 at 12:34 AM ^

It wasn't a travel either way. You can take a step as you catch the ball (not only that, he didn't even step; it's just that his feet hit the ground at a different time which to the untrained idiot ref looks like a step). The second step was a pivot with an established pivot foot that never left the floor. It was a complete Breslin Special of a call.

Arb lover

March 10th, 2019 at 10:09 AM ^

Or from 55sec remaining to 35sec remaining when michigan was down and trying to foul, and the announcers were saying "many how many hack jobs are they going to allow Michigan to give right now?" The decision to not call any of those fouls (but as we saw vs PSU to try to do a more obvious foul creates a flagrant 1 situation) effectively ended Michigan's chances of tying it up, and as a point of order there were only 2 sets of end of game type free throws, so it wasn't like that 7-30 ratio was due to 20 FT's in the last 2 minutes. 

Arb lover

March 10th, 2019 at 10:01 AM ^

Actually I think it's larger than simply a free throw differential.  Yes, number of calls vs a team matters if you had a desire to manipulate the score of a game. The NCAA doesn't really grade on this though, they look at calls, and whether they were a foul/travel, etc, not really  missed calls. 

In reality they should be graded on obvious missed calls and secondly on percentage of iffy calls given to each side vs what could have been given. However that would take more work and probably raise some awkward questions. There was a really good ESPN investigative article on the Tim Donaghy scandal, and what his methods were that raises the hair on my  neck every time I see a ref acting in a similar fashion. Ignore this at your own risk, especially considering that the risks to the refs (cash) are no longer a concern (bitcoin), and that sports gambling is a much larger enterprise now than it was back then:

Donaghy acknowledged that, yes, he deliberately called more fouls against the side he'd bet against. He told the gambler about other tactics as well. "He said he liked to call an illegal defense call, right away, in the first minute." That way, the gambler said, Donaghy could force the side he'd picked against to play a little less aggressively on defense. "He said he'd pick on the big center, or the most valuable player of each team, and he'd try to get them in foul trouble."

Point of this is simply, early calls against key players can drastically shift the tempo and strategy of a team. Heck, for much of the later part of the 1st half we had two starters in. 

Cruzcontrol75

March 10th, 2019 at 10:50 AM ^

Heard an interesting interview with Brian Tuohy who wrote books on corruption in sports.  The majority of his research is based on FBI investigations. Essentially he says the more money involved in a sport the more likely there are games being fixed.  The mainstream media never touched the topic.  He spoke of the FIFA scandal and Donaghy mess-which to me seemed to be swept under the rug.  If you ask the average sports fan about Donaghy they have no idea what you are talking about.  If I see an impact player in NCAA basketball pick up a quick ticky tack 2nd foul first half or a quick 3rd foul early 2nd half I get a little suspicious.  Last night fouls 2,3 & 5 on Iggy seemed very weak calls and he was the most efficient scorer on the floor.  Feel free to make your own conclusions as to how some players never foul out or get in foul trouble.  http://thefixisin.net/

You Only Live Twice

March 10th, 2019 at 11:16 AM ^

You have to get almost to the end of the ESPN piece for this tidbit:

"He said he liked to call an illegal defense call, right away, in the first minute." That way, the gambler said, Donaghy could force the side he'd picked against to play a little less aggressively on defense. "He said he'd pick on the big center, or the most valuable player of each team, and he'd try to get them in foul trouble."

Now I have to check out the link you posted. 

rice4114

March 9th, 2019 at 10:46 PM ^

30 to 7 free throws

 

this is gene keady bobby knight type ref manipulation all over again. Its too bad. That isnt anything like what these two teams play like. We dont send a team to the line 30 times without the refs making it a point to help them out.

J.

March 9th, 2019 at 11:34 PM ^

Cassius wasn't the best player on the floor tonight.  Xavier Tillman was.  MSU actually lines up better against Michigan without Ward.  Tillman was 4/5 from 2, 9/12 from the line, got 8 rebounds, blocked five shots, and was credited with two steals.  Winston scored more points, thanks to his constant parade to the free throw line, but he turned the ball over 5 times and went 1/6 from 3 -- the one, of course, being the one that he missed so badly that he banked it in.

Blue Me

March 10th, 2019 at 12:06 PM ^

I've been saying MSU is better without Ward then with him since the second half of the OSU game when he went down. Their defense is far better and their ball movement on offense is much better without him holding onto and pounding the rock.

MoCarrBo

March 9th, 2019 at 10:49 PM ^

NCAA refs are incompetent but big Ten refs take the cake.

 

Oh well, when they get beat down in the tourney they have nobody to blame but a conference that coddles them 

 

 

Luke15

March 9th, 2019 at 10:50 PM ^

Wow. Mods deleting every single thread critical of the officiating. After every game, no matter what the sport. I hope I'm not the only person extremely put off by this.

jsquigg

March 10th, 2019 at 1:17 PM ^

My hunch is that he's got his tongue planted in his cheek with that comment, because if you read the blog you know that's not true. Then again, by simply creating this platform of free content Brian has been a target of vitriol from entitled know it all plebes who claim Michigan fandom. I think the logic is more that complaining about the constant reffing ineptness is self defeating because it will never change until they change transparency in sports, which isn't happening.

mgoblue98

March 9th, 2019 at 11:01 PM ^

Michigan didn't lose entirely because of the refs.  They lost because of the following...

  • They didn't seem to know who their man was on defense.  Multiple times guys caught playing no one.
  • They didn't play physical enough.
  • The takes to the basket were soft.  Take the ball to the rim with authority if you want foul calls.  Instead they got their layups blocked.
  • Michigan missed 5 or 6 layups in the 2nd half.  
  • Michigan didn't shoot well from the outside.
  • The motions on offense looked disjointed.  Guys drive, but their are no cutters to pass to.
  • Michigan could not stop scramble despite knowing it was coming.

MGoBlue96

March 10th, 2019 at 12:23 AM ^

Actually he didn't consistently. He had a stretch where he took three straight to basket in the second half and got one call despite being fouled all three times. And no MSU was not going any harder to the basket. Flopping on plays with no contact is not going hard. The only thing ignorant is not acknowledging how that big of free throw difference and UM having guys in and out in foul trouble impacted the game. UM did outplay MSU for almost the entire first half despite two starters sitting for half if it, free throws were the only thing keeping them in it at that point.

mgoblue98

March 12th, 2019 at 1:28 AM ^

The only drive he got a call on was the one he took right at the defender.  MSU did get into the chest of the defenders and get fouls called.  Michigan had a 12 point lead with 3:00 minutes to play in the first half.  Michigan played poorly the rest of the way.

 

bronxblue

March 10th, 2019 at 9:42 AM ^

The refs were not the sole cause of this loss (as you noted, UM played poorly in a multitude of ways), but "oh the refs were bad but stop complaining" is also ignorant.  A poorly officiated game can have a major effect on how teams play and can contribute to other issues, such as stagnant offenses, lack of aggressiveness on defense and rebounding, and sub-optimal substitution patterns.  

Iggy also got a total of 4 foul shots, both sets in the second half, about 11 minutes apart.  Those weren't the only two times UM tried to generate offense going toward the basket.  

charblue.

March 9th, 2019 at 11:22 PM ^

This isn't all on the officiating, but a 23 free throw differential in this game is ridiculous. Michigan went strong to the hoop, they got hit on the hand or across the arm on drives, they just couldn't get a call. I mean the walk on Teske and then the foul that was waved off was ridiculous. Lamont Harris took out Michigan's best scorer on three rebound foul calls in the space of  what 7 minutes, and he called the Teske walk that wasn't. His best call of the night was the charge on Winston that Izzo couldn't even contest because Poole had him. But they coulld have easily called MSU for multiple fouls in the paint for holding and arm bars. They decided not to call that, instead they called touch fouls on drives. Winston's first drive was a blowby with a whisper of contact that was called by Harris.

J.

March 9th, 2019 at 11:42 PM ^

I think you mean Lamont Simpson, not Lamont Harris.

This game had two referees in KenPom's top 10 -- and Simpson, who is #97.  (He ranks them basically by who gets assigned to the biggest games, on the assumption that the conferences are rewarding the best officials with the best assignments).

I still can't figure out how Castleton got called for a foul on the MSU drive to the basket in the first half.  I didn't think he touched him.

And Iggy fouled out when he got thrown away from the basket by Tillman.  It looked like a hook and hold (by Tillman) and instead Iggy gets shown the door.  Odd.

mgoblue98

March 10th, 2019 at 12:04 AM ^

Michigan did not go strong to the hoop.  They went soft, except for Brazdeikas...and he shot free throws.  You have to go at the chest of the defender if you are going strong.  That wasn't the case...and it resulted in a bunch of blocks.  Also, dunk the ball.

J.

March 10th, 2019 at 12:05 AM ^

What?  That doesn't even make any sense.

If you go at the chest of the defender, you're asking to be called for a charge.  The goal is to get past the guy, not run over him.

Winston wasn't going into anybody's chest.  He was driving by, tossing the ball toward the hoop, hoping it would fall, and going to the free throw line.

mgoblue98

March 10th, 2019 at 12:44 AM ^

It is charging if you drop your shoulder and run over a stationary defender.

It is not charging if you jump into the chest of the defender who is in motion...to create space and to draw foul calls.

Winston did go at the chest of moving defensive players on a couple of occasions.

SDCran

March 10th, 2019 at 3:19 AM ^

he also dove to the floor without getting touched and drew a foul on Teske.   DD praised Tillman for jumping straight up when  he landed literally 5 feet away from where he jumped in the direction of Iggy.   Rewatch the game, the refs were a shit show    

MoCarrBo

March 9th, 2019 at 11:25 PM ^

Your point fails when you watch Michigan state take it to the basket and get soft touch fouls and Teske the one time we get it in the post on a mismatch gets called for a bullshit travel.

 

No team in history is going to overcome a 30-7 foul disparity 

 

Basketball officiating is garbage, it's the only sport where you literally interpret rules on the fly and it's getting exposed by players in the NBA