RGard

December 6th, 2021 at 4:00 PM ^

Hi Rob, I thought about changing it back to the old one, but Michigan 12-1, beat the columbus school for football and won the B1G Championship since when I changed it to the skull.

Changing it now would be thumbing my nose at the football gods.  Can't do that.

Durham Blue

December 6th, 2021 at 11:43 PM ^

Actually, right now he is basically paying Michigan to coach here because of the bonus money going back to the AD.

Is there another CFB coach on this planet that would do such a thing?  Take a 50% pay cut, have an enormously successful year with huge incentives for accomplishing great things, then handing those incentives to fellow colleagues in need?

Newton Gimmick

December 6th, 2021 at 12:42 PM ^

In fairness it was pretty hard to know how much to count/discount the COVID year, since that has never happened before.  MSU was a completely new team with Walker and their record was inflated by some close/lucky wins, and their early-season opponents overrated (Northwestern, Miami pre-Van Dyke).  Indiana was decent-ish (about as good as MSU, really) until the QBs all died.

I still think about how good Michigan could be if Ronnie Bell and Xavier Worthy were part of the WR corps.  But who knows -- adversity seems to suit this team's identity.

mGrowOld

December 6th, 2021 at 12:32 PM ^

BUT I'M OUTRAGED!!!!  HOW DARE THIS PUBLICATOIN (do exactly what 95% of Michigan fans did if they're being honest with themselves).

Want to have some more fun OP?  Go back and see if you can find the pre-season predictions for the 97 season because I can tell you we weren't considered much that year either.  Coming off an 8-4 record with no clear-cut answer at QB, with a 3rd year HC who had yet to win a bowl game I'm pretty sure the expectations were equally low.

uofmfan_13

December 6th, 2021 at 12:37 PM ^

I'm just poking fun. 

And yes, I had a sporting news preseason mag back then too... we were ridiculed and predicted #18. Nobody thought Charles woodson would be the player of the year.

Michigan does well when preseason expectations are low. Just my experience.  Nothing set in stone... Onward!

Blue in Paradise

December 6th, 2021 at 12:41 PM ^

You are correct sir!  There was the infamous 1997 Sporting News cover photo: "M is for Mediocre".  I think they were ranked #14 going into the season, so nobody thought they were terrible but just couldn't get back into the elite category. 

Most people had Michigan pegged as an 8-4 type team playing a tough schedule.  I will say that the 1997 opener where they demolished a top 10 Colorado team was an eye opener and you had a feeling that something special was brewing.

swn

December 6th, 2021 at 3:37 PM ^

Revisionist history to protect your ego and not feeling like a bad fan. There were plenty of people on this board who wrote off Covid year as meaningless and expected Harbaugh to rebound to the same level of performance he had prior to Covid. Predicting 5-7 to 7-5 is recency bias, and recency bias valuing garbage data over real data. 

BlueinKyiv

December 6th, 2021 at 12:25 PM ^

Not just Athlon .... look at the whole of the sports media universe that did not include Michigan in the pre-season AP poll. That is essentially putting them 4th in the B1G East Division.

BlueinKyiv

December 6th, 2021 at 12:27 PM ^

The key is for Wolverines to make themselves heard, like the Wisconsin grad that covers sports at the WSJ wrote in an article today:

"My colleagues are singing “The Victors” on Zoom calls. They’re debating whether they should try to buy tickets for the semifinal versus Georgia, or take their chances waiting for a final against Alabama or Cincinnati. They’re ticking off their favorite Hassan Haskins runs and Aidan Hutchinson sacks. I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re quietly telling Jim Harbaugh he can write this column.   

It’s actually happening. Michigan has qualified for the College Football Playoff, and has a very real shot at winning the national football championship. 

You’ve never heard so much excitement inside The Wall Street Journal. Five out of every three people in the newsroom are Wolverines. To them, this magical Michigan season is bigger than Dow 30,000. It’s bigger than the Berkshire Hathaway shareholders meeting."

Eng1980

December 6th, 2021 at 8:33 PM ^

Agreed.  One of my reasons for suspecting a bad year this year was the lack of ability to get the ball to DPJ, Nico, or Tarik.  Nico was a jump ball beast.  I loved the look in his eyes after seizing a 50-50 ball like there was no way anyone but him was ever going to take that ball.  I would like a full explanation (with stats and charts) as to why they didn't just throw it up to Nico more often.

4godkingandwol…

December 6th, 2021 at 12:32 PM ^

It’s strange to me how some fans can’t separate hope that the team does well from predictions based on available data. 99.9% of fans wanted this team to go undefeated and win the national championship. Probably 98% of fans didn’t think that was in the realm of reality. It doesn’t make them bad fans. It makes them rational. 

othernel

December 6th, 2021 at 12:36 PM ^

Another "OMG, everyone who didn't pick UM wuz so dumb, lolz" post.

Based off the facts we had from last year, this was a totally reasonable prediction.

I'm so glad Athlon, ESPN, and 99.8% of Mgoposters were proven wrong, but it doesn't mean these we bad picks based off the evidence available before the season.

Not sure why everyone is taking these victory laps on pre-season predictions.

uofmfan_13

December 6th, 2021 at 12:42 PM ^

Because the preseason methodology is flawed when you use recency bias off a covid, abbreviated year with no fans and home field etc. Football is an emotional and mental game too, beyond just the physical stats and bodies. 

7-5 was simply an attack on Harbaugh, in my opinion. 9-3 made sense. The grossly inflated Indiana and Penn state predictions were also kinda short sited. 

I'd prefer for these pubs to simply analyze the current roster and coaching versus making immediate predictions and rankings. I really think AP top 25 shouldn't be produced until week 3.

Newton Gimmick

December 6th, 2021 at 12:49 PM ^

The grossly inflated Indiana

Although they weren't quite as terrible as their record, it's amazing to think back to a year ago.  I swear I remember Brian muttering during one of the late-season podcasts, "just hire Tom Allen."  Maybe it was half-joking, I sure hope so.  He was one of the 3-4 hot names last year along with Campbell, Fickell, Hafley.  Just imagine though.  Really glad our overreactions didn't tangibly change anything, as they seem to at places like Texas, where I imagine hirings/firings are made via message board comments

gm1234

December 6th, 2021 at 12:58 PM ^

I don’t think 7-5 was an attack on Harbaugh. The overwhelming majority of people everywhere looked at last year, all the coaching turnover, a decently difficult schedule and made their predictions. Even if you ignore last year, a wholesale change of defensive scheme, unknown QB production and the schedule were probably enough for most people.
 

Road games @ Wisconsin/MSU/Nebraska/PSU and home games against Washington/OSU…All of those games (and some others) were pegged as either toss-ups or certain losses by a ton of people going into the season, and honestly rightfully so pre-season…

Sometimes predictions are right, sometimes they’re wrong, thankfully this year the majority of them were wrong!

Neversatisfied

December 6th, 2021 at 12:37 PM ^

There are a few things I try not to do anymore. Bet on Michigan games(win or lose), and let my hype get too high during the offseason. I've been hurt too many times and my Michigan-Homer level is through the roof. My wife told me to put money on Michigan/OSU and I didnt. It's just something I dont do anymore. 

lunchboxthegoat

December 6th, 2021 at 12:45 PM ^

Most of the board and most of the people covering this team were predicting something very similar. I don't see a lot of value in trying to dunk on prognosticators here. We overperformed. Be happy with it and move on.