Iowa Snowflakes: The Coaching

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on October 2nd, 2022 at 4:00 AM

This will be the thread for hot takes regarding the overall coaching performance. 

UMfan21

October 1st, 2022 at 3:25 PM ^

Still taking too long to call in plays.

 

I hated that 1st half call for an option when we were in the red zone.  It killed that drive and caused us to settle for a FG.

UMfan21

October 1st, 2022 at 8:48 PM ^

We have lots of variations of read option and triple option with a pass that can utilize his legs.  Not a fan of the speed option because McCarthy has to waste time learning how to pitch the ball, and it's a skill set he will never use in any other situation.

MaizeBlueA2

October 1st, 2022 at 3:25 PM ^

Waiting for someone to bitch about having co-OCs...when we had co-OCs last year (+ Harbaugh).

Weiss just replaced Gattis, but Klatt has the sheep acting like this is something different than what won us a B1G Championship. 

XM - Mt 1822

October 1st, 2022 at 3:31 PM ^

speaking of whining, you were hitting the gas pedal pretty hard in the game thread.  i'd say you were the top whiner of the day.  example here: 

"This is a HORRIBLE situation right now.

Because everything we've seen is that Minter is going to call plays to just keep everything in front and try to kill clock. 

Get ready for an excruciating drive. Death by a thousand paper cuts."

 

UMForLife

October 1st, 2022 at 3:27 PM ^

I was surprised when they threw the ball last but one drive. Need more RPO keepers for JJ. Hope they can clean that up. Winning by 20 (ed: except the garbage TD LOL) at Kinnick as a top 5 team is not easy. Conservative game plan. Kind of like NEB game last year but we didn't fall behind. Lot of work to do and hope they improve the next two weeks and be ready for MSU. 

kehnonymous

October 1st, 2022 at 3:28 PM ^

You can and probably should turtle against Iowa because they’re not gonna score 2 TDS at the drop of a hat. You would want a different approach against an opponent with an actual offence and I trust that the coaches realize that.

CompleteLunacy

October 1st, 2022 at 3:31 PM ^

I mean it’s like people forgot what happened *last week*. Michigan didn’t turtle, they kept the foot on the gas and built the lead to 15 to seal the game. It’s not like Michigan went conservative today with a less than 1 score lead (which is usually what gets us in trouble at Kinnick). It only happened once it was 20-0 and JJ almost gave the ball to Iowa for free.

gbdub

October 1st, 2022 at 7:15 PM ^

I feel like there is maybe a middle ground between “sling dangerous throws into zone” and “call literally nothing but runs between the tackles”. I mean run a screen or a sweep or that end around play again - safe plays that at least force the D to account for the WRs and the width of the field. 

CompleteLunacy

October 1st, 2022 at 3:28 PM ^

There’s an awful lot of complaining in this thread.

Iowa lives and dies off of turnovers. Literally the play of the game was Donovan Edwards recovering an I’ll-advised pass by JJ that went backwards. And anyway, that’s what got Iowa to start building momentum. I’d argue it was the only reason this game felt moderately stressful for a second in the 4th quarter.

Michigan won, comfortably, because they dared Iowa to beat them without cheap turnovers. And at the end of the day, winning by 13 is a good thing at Kinnick I will take it all day every day. Clean up some things on offense and defense, otherwise coaches called a good game that got the job done 

SD Larry

October 1st, 2022 at 3:30 PM ^

The opening drive was beautiful and efficient, positive yards on every play.  That was a strong statement.  Our running back Coach is special, as are Blake Corum and Donovan Edwards.  Was not perfect especially getting plays in from sidelines. Pretty dominant win at a very tough place to play.

 

lhglrkwg

October 1st, 2022 at 3:31 PM ^

Seemed like once it was 20-0 they just parked the bus on both sides of the ball. Defense probably too much as Iowa started actually moving the ball.

YoOoBoMoLloRoHo

October 1st, 2022 at 3:31 PM ^

Execution was crisp early and guys played hard the whole game.

Opening drive was exquisite. Great preparation and playcalling. 

Play calling was shaky when UM had the chance to put the hammer and then a lot of turtling in the late 3rd and 4th.

Minter has a lot of things to work on. Iowa’s offense is awful, yet Petras tossed for 246 yards. Starting with 3rd & long and prevent coverages.

BrightonB

October 1st, 2022 at 3:48 PM ^

I agree with what you said with the 3rd and 4th being way too conservative which I felt put more pressure on our defense so I feel a bit of that is on the play calling on the offensive side.  The D played solid I think and just didn't play with as much fire in the last 8 minutes of the game which they certainly should have. 

In truth there is very little to complain about a win at Iowa. 

Phaedrus

October 1st, 2022 at 9:15 PM ^

Minter was scheming according to plan—don't allow anything deep or on the sidelines. Basically, play prevent and keep that clock rolling downward. Challenge the d-line to make plays before the receivers get to the zone holes. This is why it alternated between completions down the middle and thunderous sacks/bad throws.

Our defense certainly could have executed it better and prevented those second half points, and the offense could have held on to the ball a bit longer in the second half, but that's expecting them to be perfect all the time. The strategy worked how the coaches intended it. They don't scheme for statistics, they scheme for wins. If coaches were judged on statistics, Kirk Ferentz would have been out of a job a long time ago.

I think the worst part about the three tomato cans we opened the season with is that many in the fan base start expecting those perfect performances week in and week out, completely discrediting our competition. The coaches had a game plan that accounted for Iowa's strengths and weaknesses. I guarantee if there's an Iowa version of MGoBlog, in their UFR they'll complain about how they got outcoached.

MRunner73

October 1st, 2022 at 3:31 PM ^

A satisfying win and good play calling on both sides of the ball. A big win at Kinnick where Top 5 visiting teams die.

I'll take it and glad this game is behind us.

Blue Vet

October 1st, 2022 at 3:34 PM ^

Good job. Quibbles maybe but we can quibble about anything.

It feels especially good considering worries* about Kinnick & Iowa's D.

* My worries. I'm sure all the rest of you were totally confident.

HollywoodHokeHogan

October 1st, 2022 at 3:37 PM ^

Can we take a minute to appreciate Iowa’s 4th and 2 call.  You anticipate selling out the run and go with a pass (seems smart).  You call the pass to the line of scrimmage, so even if don’t you end up making the receiver go down for the catch, that guy is going to have to plow through a tackle for 2 yards (seems incredibly stupid).

BrightonB

October 1st, 2022 at 3:43 PM ^

Happy for the win.  Played a really flat 4th and my only gripe is they got very conservative with the offense too soon in my opinion.  JJ threw another too long deep ball .. BUT .. only missed by probably a foot vs several yards last week that were yards away so feel he will continue to dial that in.  He looked far more comfortable this week which was great to see. 

We won and that's all that matters and we won on the road.  Another Big 10 opponent down.

Now I am going to go watch Maryland beat State.  =)

TheJimandI

October 1st, 2022 at 3:51 PM ^

If you can win convincingly in a difficult place to play by being mostly conservative (taking away the other team’s strength) without showing your hand to Penn State, MSU and OSU - that’s a huge win.

my FAVORITE play in The Game last year was that huge throw JJ put on the money after doing nothing but run the ball all year. 
 

Harbaugh is playing chess.

Perkis-Size Me

October 1st, 2022 at 3:51 PM ^

Coached smart against a top defense that thrives on generating turnovers. Didn’t give them a single one. Iowa’s only chance to win was by generating turnovers and scoring on their own, or giving their offense an extremely short field. Harbaugh took away the only thing that gave them any realistic chance to win. What more can we want?

I don’t think you coach to win sexy at Iowa. You coach just to win however you can, and then get the fuck out. Iowa is a really hard place for anyone to win in. 

5-0 is 5-0. Take it and move on. 

gustave ferbert

October 1st, 2022 at 3:55 PM ^

Seeing some criticism on the coaching.  

The prediction in Brian's preview called for Michigan 29 and Iowa 9.  Save for the garbage time touchdown, he was practically spot on with the score basically 27-7. 

We covered the spread.  It seemed like the whole nation had us on upset alert.  

We did a more than competent job in a place where we haven't won since 2005.  

 

jhayes1189

October 1st, 2022 at 4:10 PM ^

Good. They took what Iowa gave them, sometimes Jim can call the game a little “NFL-ish”, but this works well against Iowa when you are up 3 scores.

swalburn

October 1st, 2022 at 4:15 PM ^

Road game, young QB, and the team didn't turn the ball over.  It was a very business like effort.  This coaching staff does a nice job developing kids.  A lot of those guys were not big time recruits. 

RJWolvie

October 1st, 2022 at 4:15 PM ^

“Conservative” offensive calling: exactly how you’re supposed to play Iowa in Kinnick with a lead, with a young QB in first road start against a ball hawking #1 points, #2 yards Defense in country. Not one complaint on O coaching.

D coaching, too, also way more than good enough, except: someone needs to tell these NFL DCoords that, yes, actually, appearances _do_ matter in College ball. Knock that last-minute “meaningless” drive & TD shit off.

If y’all want to worry, only thing to worry about is how this D is going to keep OSU below 30 and how this O is going to run them out of their own stadium, like last year’s D and O did in ours. Lots of good film last couple weeks to work on this.

Team did good last week, very good this week, and seems not near their potential and in stride yet. That’s pretty damn good place to be, and coaches are big part of why, imo

AlbanyBlue

October 1st, 2022 at 4:21 PM ^

As far as the offensive staff, this is what I expected -- I said Michigan would score 19. The turtle job in the fourth was totally expected and totally hard to watch, since I've seen it a million times from Bo to Carr to Harbaugh. But it was effective against Iowa, as it took away their best weapon -- the defensive TD. I would have liked to have seen more aggressiveness in the first half on Iowa's side of the field, since we will need that ability going forward. But we didn't need it in this game, so hey, great. Again, all totally expected.

On defense, again, it was decent. In reality, they gave up 7 points. I didn't like some of the chunk plays in the passing game, and I definitely noted that Petras missed 2 open throws for TDs, but that's only because our pass D will need to be tighter for PSU and OSU and maybe even MSU, to a degree. I assume we stayed in zone quite a bit, and that will need to be better for our better opponents. 

Overall, though, it was a good game plan for Iowa, and it all worked out. For this game, the coaches did fine overall.

PopeLando

October 1st, 2022 at 4:47 PM ^

I expect a lot of RPS pluses on the offense UFR and a lot of RPS minuses on the defense UFR.

Scoring 27 on Iowa AT IOWA is really good. And I don't mind the turtling late because Iowa can't score 3 touchdowns in 2 minutes.

BUT it also seemed like the Iowa offense had us on our heels for large stretches, that we were often in the worst possible alignment against them.