Harbaugh talks up Mayfield and Hudson

Submitted by wolverine1987 on

Interesting story in The Athletic (behind a paywall) about how Harbaugh answered a question on offensive line play by immediately talking up the play of Hudson and Mayfield, rather than addressing the play of the starters, which the question was about. Here's one take in the article:

"This is interesting for many reasons. Among them: Michigan’s offensive line played far better against Western Michigan, but that was also to be expected. Runyan still got beat multiple times, and Bushell-Beatty had a couple of lapses in pass protection, as well. Hudson and Mayfield played in garbage time and both looked good. Hudson in particular was really shoving dudes around in the run game at right tackle."

From my view, this is right, better but still lapses from the starters, and two plays in particular Hudson was moving people around easily. I and I assume all M fans are praying for rapid progress from both.

https://theathletic.com/516232/2018/09/10/monday-thoughts-jim-harbaughs…

 

jamesjosephharbaugh

September 11th, 2018 at 9:21 AM ^

I noticed on another (free) site the same thing, and that Harbaugh said they were "in the ballpark" of the starting role. 

RoseInBlue

September 11th, 2018 at 9:27 AM ^

This is why I don't understand people who seem to think these guys are being held out of the lineup for "reasons".  I think the staff wants Hudson and Mayfield to take the jobs as much as we do but they're just not ready yet.  Harbaugh's said before that they're almost there, they just need to take that next step.

outsidethebox

September 11th, 2018 at 2:07 PM ^

Agree with your take. Peters should have been getting significant game-time snaps in the early non-conference schedule to get him more up to speed...and Michigan paid for this failure big-time in the end. Hopefully a similar scenario to last week plays out this Saturday and that second unit gets even more time together on the field. 

taistreetsmyhero

September 11th, 2018 at 11:55 AM ^

I don't really understand what you mean by "reasons." The issue is that it is all a calculated decision that has a huge margin of error. Consider Bowles's decision of whether or not to start Darnold last night. The upside over Mccown is huge, but the variation is way more vast. 

It seems like Harbaugh is extremely conservative when it comes to taking risks on higher upside players. There's only so much you can prove in practice, and it's completely possible that Hudson and Mayfield may shine in a trial by fire. That just doesn't seem to be Harbaugh's way. It's a calculated decision, and obviously fans are going to be skeptical of it when the low upside players do poorly.

outsidethebox

September 11th, 2018 at 2:14 PM ^

Exactly. And these guys (Harbaugh) should have a good sense about this...but seem not always to. I've had plenty of kids who were terrific practice players that locked up mentally in the heat of live fire. But Harbaugh and his gang have got to know this...??? Play the kids who make the plays when the lights are on!!!

Red is Blue

September 11th, 2018 at 2:26 PM ^

I think he knows as well as we do there’s no way Runyan and JBB both start all year. He’s just not going to come out and say it. 

 

If this is the case, then why not take the calculated risk and put them in now?  If he really expects Runyan and JBB to get passed, Mayfield and Hudson must be reasonable close now.  If they are reasonable close now, why not put them in the game and let them learn so later in the year they got valuable game experience?  

maize-blue

September 11th, 2018 at 9:24 AM ^

I think Mayfield or Hudson or both will find themselves in the starting lineup before the end of the season. I think the coaches went with known guys for the first few games in order to hold down the fort until Mayfield/Hudson were ready. 

Hail Harbo

September 11th, 2018 at 3:41 PM ^

Assuming that your assumption is correct, why do you suppose they aren't in the starting line up now so that they might learn their trade against inferior competition?  It would seem to me that if you're programming Mayfield or Hudson, or both, to be your starting tackles for the B1G season, you might want to get them ready against the likes of WMU and SMU.  Or do you consider a series of downs against WMU and another against SMU, plus repetitive tape watching of those series, experience enough for the likes of Wiscy, PSU, MSU, and OSU?

outsidethebox

September 11th, 2018 at 9:36 AM ^

I am more optimistic about the general state of the OL. Here, everyone is (overly) focused on the failures of JBB and Runyan but if you look at the film they did pretty well-in general. But I do agree, Mayfield and Hudson showed great potential and I do wonder how soon they step into the starter slots. 

Maison Bleue

September 11th, 2018 at 9:50 AM ^

He also REALLY talked up Dwumfour and that’s not looking so great. I hope the Harbaugh hype is real for these two, if they can get average pass pro from the tackles the sky is the limit for this team.

Maison Bleue

September 11th, 2018 at 10:50 AM ^

I dont think he’s injured, are you thinking of Solomon? Brian said on the podcast that Harbaugh came back to an interview with Sam Webb and told him “ask me who I am excited about” so he could specifically talk about Dwumfour. Then the first two weeks he’s behind Mone and Lo Marshall and Kemp looks like the better 3T. At this point I hope he is ill/injured, because the hype was “bigger Mo Hurst” and we need that badly.

SMart WolveFan

September 11th, 2018 at 9:57 AM ^

Ahh, Hudson and Mayfield. They must be those too young Amish boys Brother Yoder was speaking of.

They can really pull the cart in the run game, not to mention they're real butter churners in pass protection.

Only problem is they're always a little late:)

Damn I love that simile!

Caesar

September 11th, 2018 at 10:24 AM ^

By the time Northwestern rolls around, I think we'll know. The ramp-up in D quality from SMU to Nebraska to NW is a manageable one to get some guys ready, in my view. Playing against Western's 2nd string isn't a good situation, in my eyes. 

SlothWolverine

September 11th, 2018 at 11:15 AM ^

Another guy who was tossing DLs around and moving really well in mop-up duty was Honigford, #59. He looked nasty out there and got a nice couple of combo blocks showing good feet. 

Alumnus93

September 11th, 2018 at 11:20 AM ^

Anyone who missed being in a NFL survivor or knockout pool and still want to be in one, its not too late !!!!!   I've been running one for ten years, and we always start a week late, in week 2 !!!... lots of fun...  3 lives, one bye, pick a team to win (straight up), and then unlimited times in playoffs. Double picks start in week 7 til pool ends. Here is the link if you would like to play...

http://www.officefootballpool.com/pools.cfm?poolid=61654&p=2&pwd=marktw…

MGoStrength

September 11th, 2018 at 11:43 AM ^

I have resigned myself to the fact that MSU, Wiscy, PSU, & OSU will all destroy our tackles in pass pro.  I am not looking forward to seeing Bosa & Young and I hope Patterson makes it safely through the game.  We just need to beat MSU & PSU to maintain our position as #2 in the East and salvage a 9-3 record.  Hopefully they can get in some work against SMU, Neb, NW, & Maryland before we get into the meat of the difficult schedule.

ShadowStorm33

September 11th, 2018 at 12:03 PM ^

I get what people are saying about holding Hudson and Mayfield back until they're ready, but what I don't understand is that it would seem like the best way to get them ready would be to play them more. The coaches have said many times that the best way to get better at football is by playing football.

Personally I would think starting them against these overmatched defenses would be the best thing if you really think they're going to take over sooner or later, but at least put them in earlier than the fourth quarter of a game that was clearly out of hand. The fact that most of our starters were playing well into the fourth quarter makes it seem like the coaches don't expect the younger guys to push through this year and want to get the starters as many reps as possible...

Mich1993

September 11th, 2018 at 12:13 PM ^

I agree with this.  If Harbaugh's goal was to get Mayfield and/or Hudson ready to start instead of Runyan/JBB, he would have subbed them in with the first string OL in the second half of the WMU game.  Clearly it was a higher priority to get the starting OL more reps together. 

Not definitive, but it's a data point that indicates we may be seeing JBB and Runyan for a while.  Maybe it will be different against SMU now that the first string OL has almost 2 full games together.