Grading the recruiting class
Overall I feel like this is a solid B+ class, which is remarkable given the circumstances of last season. Here are my grades, let me know if you agree or disagree with them. Also of note, my grades are partially based on need and the depth chart at that position.
QB: B-
*We are not Ohio State or Alabama so we do not stack five stars on top of each other. But I think that given the depth chart of McCarthy and McNamara starting for the next 2 to 3 seasons this was a pretty solid class. We got two guys with upside who can potentially provide some depth or starting down the road. Getting an elite QB next year is a must.
RB: C+
*Similar situation here. Stokes is a decent enough prospect but we have Edwards who is going to be a sophomore and Dunlap who will be coming off a redshirt season. Did not really need an immediate impact guy this year. Next year we will need to land a top running back.
WR: A
*Obviously a great class. Clemons could be Nico Collins but fast. Morris might have been a top 50 player if not for an injury. And Walker definitely has a high upside.
TE: A-
*Harbaugh loves tight ends and we got two of them with a lot of talent. Both seem to be in the mold of guys who can run and make plays in the passing game as opposed to just blockers.
OL: B+
*Given the number of young OL on the roster, I think three was the right number. And getting three tackles was equally important. I will count Gentry in this class and he moved the grade up a full grade. Getting Connerly would make it an A, but that is doubtful.
DT: B+
*I’m actually not too disappointed by missing out on Walker. We got Rooks and Benny last year and this year got two guys with huge potential no pun intended. For once it looks like we will have great depth at this position for the foreseeable future.
DE/Edge: B-
Would have been an A if we kept Burke and Henry assuming he does not sign with us. Getting Moore was huge and we are hoping Pollard turns into a Uche type, but we seem to be missing a natural pass rusher. Will definitely need to address that next season if we are unable to get anyone by February.
LB: B
*Rolder seems like the classic Big Ten thumper who will be an all conference guy by the time he’s an upperclassman. Spurlock is a guy with a lot of speed and athleticism that was very underrated. Sabb could end up here also.
Secondary: A
*I’m going to group them all together because a lot of these guys are versatile and could play either corner or safety. This was a haul. Even the lower ranked guys like Dent feel like they could end up being very good.
December 16th, 2021 at 11:23 AM ^
If only there were services dedicated to grading and ranking recruiting classes ?
December 16th, 2021 at 11:26 AM ^
If only you had decided not to post instead of actually posting ?
December 16th, 2021 at 12:24 PM ^
othernel has been here since 2009 and still doesn't get how MGoBlog and the internet work?
December 16th, 2021 at 11:27 AM ^
If only there was a Michigan fan-based blog where we could have a fun discussion about how we feel about the class, during a period of time where not many other athletic things are happening.
December 16th, 2021 at 11:31 AM ^
If only my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle.
December 16th, 2021 at 12:09 PM ^
Eh. These days, she could still be your aunt.
December 16th, 2021 at 12:37 PM ^
And setting NCAA swimming records with ease.
December 16th, 2021 at 2:11 PM ^
"She"?
PUT SOME RESPECK ON THEM PRONOUNS BRUH
December 16th, 2021 at 12:11 PM ^
Does this still make sense?
December 16th, 2021 at 2:22 PM ^
Stones
December 16th, 2021 at 2:41 PM ^
Wait. You are telling me he isn't?!?
December 16th, 2021 at 11:27 AM ^
To be fair, the national services that grade and rank players do not take into account a particular school's needs and whether a player fits the system. It appears that TK is trying to grade against Michigan's needs. So your snark is not just obnoxious, but ill-founded.
December 16th, 2021 at 11:34 AM ^
There are so many low-effort posts on this board all the time and you are criticizing this one? Come on.
OP did fine and this was worthwhile to post.
December 16th, 2021 at 11:48 AM ^
Decent post, but there were like 5 signing day threads yesterday, so if everyone starts a new post for their opinion, we're gonna have a bad time.
December 16th, 2021 at 11:53 AM ^
I'm sure it's ruining your day. You tell em!
December 16th, 2021 at 11:58 AM ^
Why a bad time? Are you obligated to click on and read through all posts for a thread you think doesn't need to be?
December 16th, 2021 at 12:22 PM ^
username definitely does NOT check out
December 16th, 2021 at 12:26 PM ^
Your moniker implies the possibility of you being not only a dick, but one who is oblivious to such dickdom
December 16th, 2021 at 3:03 PM ^
Oh the horror! Having to look through dozens of posts to find one that interests you! Let's create a great bit snowflake post so we can make sure no one starts any new threads.
December 16th, 2021 at 4:19 PM ^
You're gonna have a real bad time - we'll make sure of it!
And I'm Damn Right, you know?!
December 16th, 2021 at 1:17 PM ^
This is both mean-spirited and obtuse, given that the OP engages in his own (IMO valuable) evaluation.
Two things in relation to other sources' evals, though. If we are, more or less, being ranked as the number ten class nationally, and there are 350 (?) some-odd D1 schools, then I think that could be seen to nudge this class into A- territory in aggregate. And it's always worth pointing out that classes must be judged through time, especially in cases where you're already in a strong position with players on board. Nowhere does this strike me as clearer than in the case of QB for us, where you have two players stacked, a future recruit who would slot in perfectly if all goes well. Here, taking a gamble on an unpolished but promising prospect makes all the sense in the world, and will never pump up your overall grade.
December 16th, 2021 at 4:09 PM ^
There's more quality content in this post than any of the services
December 16th, 2021 at 11:24 AM ^
I think you’re being modest on the o line group. Easy A, Andrew Gentry will be an all American
December 16th, 2021 at 11:40 AM ^
User name checks out
December 16th, 2021 at 12:54 PM ^
Yeah, TK is a pretty tough grader. A ranking of 9/130 in FBS means we are in the top 7% of teams, which would translate to about a 93% on a test. Depending on the teacher, that is usually either an A or an A-.
I think little Jimmy Harbaugh will be complaining to his mom later this afternoon, and TK should be anticipating a strongly worded email and a request for a parent-teacher conference tomorrow...
December 16th, 2021 at 2:27 PM ^
There's a very good chance that multiple OL recruits from this class will be All Big Ten.
December 17th, 2021 at 2:05 AM ^
Word is they are all like Mark Hart but blockier.
December 16th, 2021 at 11:25 AM ^
Only tweak I would make is bumping Secondary up to an A+. Amazing in quality and quantity.
December 16th, 2021 at 11:40 AM ^
I agree with this. Last time we had a good secondary class was 2016. I believe this one is better.
December 16th, 2021 at 11:53 AM ^
Agreed. Never forget...
December 16th, 2021 at 11:27 AM ^
If one of my students had made this, they would email asking me to round it up to an A-. Or their parents would...
December 16th, 2021 at 11:33 AM ^
You round them down for asking right?
December 16th, 2021 at 11:56 AM ^
I mostly just complain about them to other teachers, like a true professional
December 16th, 2021 at 4:23 PM ^
And on internet message boards, amirite?!
December 16th, 2021 at 12:01 PM ^
Exactly this. And it's usually after you've already "rounded up" to a B+...
December 16th, 2021 at 9:31 PM ^
Yes. I tend to grade fairly tough on individual components, then that way if someone is at a 79 or 78 it's fine to move them up to a B- once I put it all together and see their final score. The ones who do complain are often the ones with crappy grades who probably should have gotten worse grades and I was being a little too kind in the first place. It also helps having a mandatory curve I can point to, although in some good classes it can screw some students over.
December 16th, 2021 at 12:33 PM ^
When I was TA at Berkeley most of the Biology students were pre-med and super concerned about their grades. 1st quiz of the semester I received twenty-something requests to regrade the quiz (some with full writeups as to why they deserved at least 3.8 points out of four instead of 3 out of four, etc.).
There were ~50 people in the class.
So, I did nothing until the following week. I got up in front of the class, and said "here's the deal. I will regrade your quizzes if you want me to, but I'm not regrading just the question you didn't get full points for. I regrading the entire quiz/test/assignment from top to bottom. It is a better than 50:50 chance you'll end up with a worse grade." Many complained to the prof., but I had cleared this with him before hand and he LOVED the idea.
No one asked me to regrade anything for the next year.
December 16th, 2021 at 5:57 PM ^
I was a premed at UM ( and med school ) this was standard operating procedure then as well as sucking up to the TAs and profs. We had 4 premed freshman at my floor at Bursley leave or change majors the first semester
December 16th, 2021 at 6:29 PM ^
Yep, I did undergrad at Cal and this was the policy across the board for all exam regrades I think for every professor I ever had. My current grading policy as a faculty member is to do the same and emphasize the "fine tooth comb" nature of the regrade.
December 16th, 2021 at 11:31 AM ^
It seems like you said you had no inside knowledge in a previous post. Do you feel that you can evaluate the quality of recruits now? Are you a coach or a scout? Or is this just feelings, nothing more than feelings?
December 16th, 2021 at 11:45 AM ^
I feel like you like to post obnoxious and often repetitious graphics. So I guess we all have our thing.
December 16th, 2021 at 11:33 AM ^
I agree with most of this!! I wouldn't doubt Sabb moving to LB in the future. I think a very solid all around class with very underrated players. I believe there will be some house-hold names from this class in a couple of years. My picks would be Johnson, Clemons, Moore, Loveland, Berry and Sabb. Very excited for the potential of the 2022 class. On to 2023.
December 16th, 2021 at 2:20 PM ^
Can't move 100% to 2023 just yet. Need to go after a few for the traditional signing date in February. Beat UGa
December 16th, 2021 at 11:35 AM ^
DT needs to be A- imo. Graham is gonna be star and the the kind of penetrating DT we haven't had since Mo Hurst and Willie Henry. Grant will also be a nice add: finally a big 300+ lbs NT that's necessary in order to run what Macdonald wants.
December 16th, 2021 at 9:14 PM ^
Loved Harbaugh’s line about Grant: with him we finally have a lineman as big as his coach (Nua).
December 16th, 2021 at 10:54 PM ^
He’s practically the size of King Kong Bundy! Oops, sorry S.D. … too soon?
December 16th, 2021 at 11:38 AM ^
B+ The staff beat the horse in down the stretch. Get Conerly in February and another DE and I’ll bump it to an A!
December 16th, 2021 at 11:44 AM ^
I would say Clemons IS Nico Collins fast but FASTER (channeling my inner Fred Jackson). His timed 40 is faster than Nico's, is it not?
After a quick Google search it appears Nico's 40 time was 4.43s at the pro day. Clemons posted 4.37s. So yeah, Clemons is a tick faster.
December 16th, 2021 at 11:44 AM ^
Reason for this years QB class is the super 5-star from MLK they will be going for next year. Might have to go to an MLK game if I get the chance.
December 16th, 2021 at 12:01 PM ^
You won’t be disappointed. True pocket passer and can navigate in the pocket. By all accounts he’s a great leader. I was at the King vs Cass game in September, D. Moore passed for 363, 5 TD and no ints.