Dan Lanning staying at Oregon

Submitted by FrankMurphy on January 11th, 2024 at 2:05 PM

I gotta hand it to him; this was a cool way to announce that he's not a candidate for the 'Bama opening.

https://twitter.com/CoachDanLanning/status/1745490828850815112

jmblue

January 11th, 2024 at 2:59 PM ^

Well, aside from that they're going to be playing a bunch of road games 2,000 miles away and will be getting reduced TV payments for the next seven years.

They may be able to overcome these things in the end, but these certainly are issues that could give a coach pause.

Michfan777

January 11th, 2024 at 2:10 PM ^

I don't blame him. Oregon is arguably a more attractive place than post-Saban Alabama - especially as long as Knight is funneling money into their program.

Vasav

January 11th, 2024 at 2:21 PM ^

It is kind of remarkable how resilient Oregon has been over the last 20 years. Numerous coaches go elsewhere and don't really replicate. But Oregon, I think it's fair to say, has been the premier Pac program since Pete Carroll left SC. And I'm not really sure what it is about them institutionally that gets them there.

Vasav

January 11th, 2024 at 2:36 PM ^

yea you're right - I guess it's tough for me to really understand that when most of the other powers are either in recruiting hotbeds (Bama, UGA, Clemson) or dominate populous areas (OSU, Texas, SC) - basically a couple versions of having easy access to HS talent. Oregon really has found a very different way - not quite AS successful but certainly not very far from OSU, Texas and SC in the last 15 years (if not actually ahead of a couple of those schools).

Michigan's 3 year run has been great and is also a very different way and I'm hopeful it will continue, but the other schools mentioned all stayed near the top for a bit longer over the last 25 years.

Vasav

January 11th, 2024 at 4:17 PM ^

It's true that crossing time zones is hurt, even in an era of flying being so cheap. So it can keep WC kids west...but what differentiates Oregon from other non-USC pac12 schools? UCLA, ASU, Cal and Washington all have that, and all have had some success in the last 20 years - but only Washington got as high as Oregon and none were as consistent.

I think Nike is the differentiator. It's a really unique thing, and credit to them.

FrankMurphy

January 11th, 2024 at 4:30 PM ^

It's not just that it matters to kids. The flow of money from Nike and Uncle Phil into that program is virtually unlimited. That puts their facilities and resources up there with the likes of 'Bama and Georgia, even if they're just outside that group in terms of overall pedigree. 

They're kind of like a kid who is reasonably smart and has the grades for a Northwestern or a Cornell, but who gets into Harvard because his uncle sits on Harvard's board.

Vasav

January 11th, 2024 at 5:40 PM ^

I hear what you're saying but the difference is they aren't old money like a kid who gets into Harvard based on connections. They remain sorta offensive to USC - they come out with swag that makes Hollywood blush. They're attitude is the opposite of that kid. They're more like the kid who was smart and got a sweet scholarship from Nike but didn't have the connections for Harvard so they went to a respectable state school and then got themselves into a Rhodes scholarship without the connections but their style isn't old money enough for the rest of their class.

Vasav

January 11th, 2024 at 4:27 PM ^

I think you're right but I'm not sure. Their golden age was at the beginning of my arbitrary window, and the BCS made it harder to maintain the run that, say Clemson had. SC had a 3 year run better than our 3 year run and then stayed a top5 team for another 3 years. Texas only won the 'ship once over about the same time period and would probably have been a "playoff" team 3 times in that era - I'll give you Texas hasn't done more, but I think SC of that era compares to Clemson.

Clemson was great for 6 years, perennial playoff team, with 2 wins - it's a different era but that's similar to USC's stretch and better than Texas'. I think

(Texas did get into the playoff this year but either end of the era feels kinda like cheating this thought experiment to say they were better, so I concede we were Texas level. But push back on USC).

FrankMurphy

January 11th, 2024 at 2:15 PM ^

'Bama is a textbook case of being a victim of its own success. After Bear Bryant retired, they wandered in the woods and cycled through coaches for almost 25 years before they hired Saban (though they did win one national championship under Gene Stallings).

Let's hope it takes them at least another 25 years to find the next Nick Saban.

Hotel Putingrad

January 11th, 2024 at 2:11 PM ^

Good for him. Oregon is one of the best jobs in the country in terms of quality of life. You've got all the Nike amenities without the SEC or OSU type pressure to win.

Besides, he'd be a fool to take the Tide job now. You always want to be the guy after the guy who replaced a legend.

UgLi Eric

January 11th, 2024 at 2:15 PM ^

Baller. Can't help but love this new look B1G, even if it came from a really bad reality. 

Are Oregon fans going to be alright? The shock of a head coach staying put might be too much for them to handle.