Corum: 100% back or no(?)

Submitted by 006BOatman on October 18th, 2023 at 6:10 PM

Hey guys.  I'll admit, during the first game or two, I thought, by eye, Corum had lost a step, maybe.  Upon reflection, maybe it was the fact that he was getting used to game-speed reps again, getting hit (as he was not during fall camp), and/or his actual knee just finished healing wholly and completely (I've had an ACL and labrum shoulder surgically repaired so I know something about how long that takes). But still, I was skeptical.  Brian and team, at the beginning of the year, they assured me I was crazy, Blake was back.  His clocked in-game speed was still elite (someone clocked this, I'm pretty sure).  Decisions were on-point.  But since then, and admittedly I can't quite remember exactly when or why (which is why I'm starting this thread), they've said maaaybe he's not where he was last year. Why the H not?  What's he supposed to be doing that he isn't given this year's team, and given what he did last year and year before?  And in his interest, what CAN he do to show he's as good as last year and deserves to be a high draft pick?

Thanks, I'll hang up and listen

chrisball96

October 18th, 2023 at 7:35 PM ^

And I do wonder if the fact that we’re not running the ball that much that plays into it. Seems like Corum had plenty of games where the first half he would just pound away and get little chunks. Then in the second half when the opposing team’s defense was shot he would break a huge one. 
 

This year we are throwing it more efficiently and he’s not having to do that chipping away. And the fact that he’s not having to run the ball as much yet just cuts down on the chances of a huge run. But I’m just fine with what’s going on now, we have the perfect complimentary run-pass game going. 

BroadneckBlue21

October 19th, 2023 at 8:42 AM ^

His jukes are fine, but his speed is not where it was last year. He’s running more around 4.55 than the supposed 4.4 or so he’s been said to have. I’m sure he will continue to improve his speed again, but he could probably carry a little less weight for his shorter frame and still maintain his freak strength and gain back some acceleration.

LandryHD

October 19th, 2023 at 8:23 AM ^

I haven't heard this discussed but something I been thinking about. Could our struggles running the ball be from literally having 4 tackle style offensive linemen starting? Our 2 guards are taller than our tackles. I feel a shorter heavy DT could basically have a stalemate with our tackle sized guards which doesn't create holes for our ball carriers

KRK

October 18th, 2023 at 6:19 PM ^

Brian and Seth were pretty clear from the first game that Blake did not look 100% and tracked how he improved every game over the first month. Not sure where they told you he was 100% to start the season. Every broadcast has talked about how Blake said he didn't trust his knee to start the season but was trusting it more and more every week.

He isn't getting as many carriers. They're clearly protecting him. And they have been dinking around with different run game concepts and not focused on getting Blake 2,000 yards and a Heisman. 

Blake being back is probably #42 on the list of concerns we have, and even the top concerns for this team are pretty minor. So I don't think there's much issue here. He'll be drafted in rounds 3-5, just like he would have if he came out last year. Coming back wasn't going to improve his draft stock.

 

006BOatman

October 18th, 2023 at 6:37 PM ^

Not sure if you listen to all the podcasts or not, but game 2 or 3 had a decidedly Blake-is-fine attitude and since then have tapered off into… slightly less than that.

It's not just less carries, it's not just saving him for Nov.  Hence the discussion. Wondering what they saw generally.

KRK

October 18th, 2023 at 6:55 PM ^

It was “Blake will be fine” on the podcasts. Not that he was 100% then. There was a drop off initially as he got his legs back and got used to contact. And he’s gotten better with each game. 

He’s averaging 5.7 yards a carry, has 550 yards and 12 TDs. He hasn’t had huge runs this year but some of that is second level blocking not being what it was last year and some of that is him still getting back to his peak after the injury. 
 

What exactly do you want from him? More long runs? 

006BOatman

October 18th, 2023 at 7:22 PM ^

Kinda why I’m asking the question. He seems to have regained his numbers, looks pretty darn good considering what we all agree is a slight step down in offensive line play. But the crew has decisively characterized him as “not the same Blake” so to speak in the past several weeks, after a different opinion the first few games. Just wondering what they’re seeing. -Not a slight toward Blake; quite the opposite 

BroadneckBlue21

October 19th, 2023 at 8:59 AM ^

Most of his TDs have been short yardage, so that stat is irrelevant to the conversation. Nobody is attacking Corum, but your response seems pretty defensive in asking “what do you want.”

Corum has increasingly looked very good, but he has not looked as elite as he did last year from start to Illinois. 

Part of that is the line is very good but not as cohesive as last year—and the changing starters at tackle supports this. 
 

Yet, fans are allowed to critique/analyze players and it not be about hating on them. Corum’s “regression” is observable. It’s also why despite his amount of TDs he’s currently nowhere being discussed as a Heisman favorite. He hasn’t had the wow runs that also end up in a long score—his longest run of the year resulted in him being caught from behind. That is not a diss on him—just an observed fact. 
 

My take on the facts of watching him so far is that he’s still not 100%. Or, that he’s put on too much muscle for his frame and has lost a step. He’s still one of my favorites, but FOR HIM I’d love to see more long runs. The offense as a whole is much stronger this year—best depth maybe ever. Yet, for Corum, I’d love to see him increase his YPC and break more long runs into the open field. 

We can all say the same for Donovan, who seems to be pressing for long runs, overthinking rather than being instinctual and using/trusting his eyes. And who needs to drive with his legs more once he gets contact.

The Homie J

October 18th, 2023 at 7:24 PM ^

I feel like The Don needs to literally just stand still for 2 seconds at the start of each play, see what's happening, and then go.  Feels like he rushes right into the back of his OL all the time, but when he actually stops and sets up a juke, he's still got that elite burst

Midukman

October 18th, 2023 at 7:55 PM ^

You’re not wrong. If he’d count to, two Mississippi there’d be something more. He’s in his own head and not letting the game come to him. I think getting a TD last game will open the flood gates. Any team in the country would be glad to have him, unfortunately and fortunately for us, the emergence of our 230 lb freshman wrecking ball and Mullings may throw a wrench in his carries. He’s got a shit ton to offer just being on the field and the staff will get it figured out. 

Midukman

October 19th, 2023 at 6:30 AM ^

Mullings yes. Hall was not a “short yardage” back last week. He came in, took over and looked like a freshman who deserves some run and he’ll get it if Donavan continues to struggle. Trusting a freshman as the competition gets tougher is a coin toss, but Harbaughs “meritocracy” says the best guy will play. We’re all Hoping that’s Edwards obviously. But if Donovan can’t get a 3rd and 1 more times than not, he’s not gonna be Harbaugh #1 back. 

RobM_24

October 18th, 2023 at 6:33 PM ^

He's fine. The OL isn't as good. The carries are down. And the portion of the game when we lean on teams, wear them out, and start getting longer runs -- Corum is on the sideline.

RobM_24

October 18th, 2023 at 7:14 PM ^

I think the reduced carries is probably planned -- by the coaches and Corum. Blake never looks frustrated when he isn't in. I think he knows that this is the best plan, bc he's been hurt two years in a row at the end of the season when we're facing OSU. And then of course, the offense is more balanced and the starters are done after 2.5 quarters of action every game. 

HarBoSchem

October 18th, 2023 at 6:38 PM ^

I think we've seen this question, in some form or another, all season. The o-line isn't playing as well as last year, but are improving. The opposing teams are stacking the box and the safeties have mostly been playing 10 yards off the line of scrimmage. Corum hasn't seen nearly the amount of touches as last year, because he doesn't have to. Keeping him healthy through the whole season is probably the most important thing. I don’t think this team is worried about the stat column, other than the win column. 

MeanJoe07

October 18th, 2023 at 6:42 PM ^

He's a step slower and has less agility for sure.  He's gone from elite to just excellent though so is still an effective back. Sometimes you're never the same. Sometimes it takes a lot longer to really be back.  

Caesar

October 19th, 2023 at 1:02 PM ^

While thread-starting OP could've done a better job of presenting the point, I agree with MeanJoe07's view of what's off.

Problem

For lack of a better word, Corum has lost some 'shimmy.' There are several times where he breaks free from the lines, staring down a linebacker or someone in the secondary, and instead of his patented 'juke in a phonebooth' stuff, he bulls into the dudes. This is still effective, though it probably gains fewer yards. I don't know how 'shimmy' is quantified. Shuttle maybe? But to my eyes/mind, there's a difference, at least in his approach (why this is not the same as 'ability' is discussed below). 

I also think his acceleration has taken a hit, and as a commenter mentioned below, it looks like his top-end speed isn't where it was at last year. In the past, Blake would all but dust most guys, and given the level of competition to date, that should've happened by now. 

Cause?

I don't know enough about knees/knee surgery to say if the procedures robbed him of the agility, but I would speculate that if it isn't physical, I could see it being mental. Tearing up that a knee would make a guy reconsider sharp cuts. 

Another potential issue is maybe a 'Mike Tyson' effect, where a typically explosive dude bulks up, and through this added weight, robs himself of some agility, acceleration, and top-end speed. I could see explosiveness contributing to a loss of agility (side-to-side 'explosion') and acceleration. Top-end speed could be a pure weight issue, which you seen in guys like DK Metcalf, who go to the Olympic trials, but have bulked up for football and can't match their college times. 

GoBlueGoWings

October 18th, 2023 at 6:43 PM ^

And in his interest, what CAN he do to show he's as good as last year and deserves to be a high draft pick?

Win the National Championship

 

I like how Blake only plays into the 3rd quarter and cheering on his teammates the rest of the game. I hope to continue to see that the rest of the year. Let the NFL worry about his knee.