Coastal Carolina EDGE transfer Josaiah Stewart top 3 includes UM
Coastal EDGE transfer Josaiah Stewart releases top 3 of UM/LSU/USC. Not sure when he plans to decide. He is from the same high school as sainristil. At coastal, he had a stellar freshman year but had a drop in production this year, likely due to teams double teaming and scheming to minimize his impact. This is a big litmus test in my eyes for potential relaxation of transfer policy given he is a sophomore and NIL as well given USC and LSU have been very aggressive with NIL.
https://twitter.com/josaiah_stewart/status/1602364963175239680?s=20&t=qOUA_vMRyFo6kYOZaBD1YA
December 12th, 2022 at 1:29 PM ^
There won't be a relaxation of transfer policy. The rules, defined by the schools and colleges, are the rules. And treating an athlete differently is an NCAA violation.
December 12th, 2022 at 1:33 PM ^
Huh? We have very stringent criteria for accepting credits from transfers that they can use towards graduation. Hence, why we typically stick to grad transfers or theoretically freshman as they could give up those credits and still graduate on time.
December 12th, 2022 at 2:10 PM ^
Exactly, the OP is referencing a relaxation of Michigan's own policy of being very strict with transfer credits.
The way I understand it, they'll take transfers but if there isn't an "equivalent" class offered at Michigan for credits a student is trying to transfer, they won't get credits for that class at Michigan. So other schools golf and basket weaving courses don't transfer and a student with junior status at their current school might only have sophomore status at Michigan and they choose not to take a step backwards towards graduating.
Again, Michigan allows them to transfer, just not with the number of credits they want to bring so most choose to go elsewhere is my understanding.
But if they already have a degree, the transfer credits don't matter towards their bachelors degree. They're coming in as a graduate student with no grad credits anway.
December 12th, 2022 at 2:42 PM ^
my understand is that Michigan's transfer credit rules are a bit more sticky than what you're suggesting, for instance, Psych 101 at Coastal Carolina may not count for any credit at U of M.
Its not just the underwater basketweaving classes from other schools that the M admissions department doesn't like, it's damn near everything.
December 12th, 2022 at 4:45 PM ^
from my (admittedly limited) understanding, it has to do with the nature and rigor of the curriculum. A hypothetical transfer prospect from Vanderbilt, or Northwestern, or ND, or Stanford, etc, would almost assuredly have no trouble getting their credits to transfer to UofM for classes of similar content.
A kid coming to UM from a school with a 'lesser' academic reputation is often facing the prospect of going backwards regarding their progress towards a degree.
December 12th, 2022 at 10:32 PM ^
I wasn't a football player, but I had a hodgepodge of credits from academic powerhouses like Baker and Moraine Valley CC, and UM accepted them with no problem. My grades were high as shit in those classes, but my GPA just reset here. In A2, the classes counted as credit only and not towards my GPA.
If they did this for lil ole me, I'm sure strings can be pulled for this kid. As long as those classes are prereqs, and his grades are where they need to be, he should be good. He's only a freshman so they're probably all prereqs/100 or maybe 200 level courses. Badabing badaboom.
December 13th, 2022 at 11:09 AM ^
As someone very familiar with UofM's "Transfer Credit Equivalency" course catalog, I checked, and Coastal Carolina has plenty of classes that are transferrable, notably Psych 101 as well as numerous other 100-level classes (Soc, Polisci, History).
The list isn't as long as other, more common schools, but I know for a fact that classes can be added very easily to the transfer catalog. I had to take eight classes at an online university (Southern New Hampshire U) and all but one or two of them were listed in the catalog. All I had to do was email an advisor with the list of classes and their course description/syllabus, and it took a day or two for them to add the courses to the catalog and list them as transferable credits. As long as they weren't anything ridiculous like "Intro to Bowling," or they also frown upon taking math classes online, UofM doesn't ask many (or any) questions.
I'm just some guy that took a ten-year long hiatus from UofM and graduated last spring (thanks to the online classes), so I'm sure they can help some of these kids out fairly easily.
December 12th, 2022 at 1:33 PM ^
How is treating an athlete differently an NCAA violation? Schools treat athletes different than the rest of the students every day. Schools take partial qualifiers every day for athletics. Please explain.
December 12th, 2022 at 2:13 PM ^
I'll admit to use of poor phrasing "treating an athlete differently." The NCAA bylaw:
16.01.2 Eligibility Effect of Violation. [A] A student-athlete shall not receive any extra benefit. Receipt by a student athlete of an award, benefit or expense allowance not authorized by NCAA legislation renders the student-athlete ineligible for athletics competition in the sport for which the improper award, benefit or expense was received. If the student-athlete receives an extra benefit not authorized by NCAA legislation, the individual is ineligible in all sports. 16.01.2.1
Many "award(s), benefit(s) or expense allowance(s) are "authorized by NCAA legislation." The benefit of a relaxed academic policy, e.g. transfer credit evaluation, is not one of them.
December 12th, 2022 at 2:55 PM ^
If you don't know what you're talking about, just sit quietly in the corner.
December 12th, 2022 at 3:06 PM ^
So you don’t know what you’re talking about, and now you’re doubling down on not knowing what you’re talking about…
December 12th, 2022 at 8:12 PM ^
Doubling down, definitely need a change in moniker…
December 12th, 2022 at 2:00 PM ^
This is a joke, right? The vast majority of scholarship athletes wouldn't have a chance in hell of getting into Michigan as a regular student.
December 12th, 2022 at 2:08 PM ^
As someone who didn't have a chance in hell of getting into UM as a regular student AND as an athlete, I have to concur.
December 12th, 2022 at 2:34 PM ^
The situation re: transfers is less about being admitted, but rather how their credits transfer.
December 12th, 2022 at 2:56 PM ^
So what you're saying is, because UM is more stringent with transfer credits, they're committing NCAA infractions?
/s
December 12th, 2022 at 8:13 PM ^
Keep typing bro, even a broken clock is…
December 12th, 2022 at 2:06 PM ^
And treating an athlete differently is an NCAA violation.
December 12th, 2022 at 8:10 PM ^
Isaac Newton, LOL?!
December 12th, 2022 at 1:36 PM ^
Other than NIL, which is a huge reason, why would any defender choose USC?
December 12th, 2022 at 1:39 PM ^
Sunshine and women (if they are so inclined), probably.
December 12th, 2022 at 1:39 PM ^
playing time? impact? weather? It's not like he's picking between UM, LSU, and Ball State
December 12th, 2022 at 1:46 PM ^
Immediate playing time
December 12th, 2022 at 1:55 PM ^
From what I saw, USC has 11 D spots in need of upgrade. Also, Upgrayedd.
December 12th, 2022 at 2:00 PM ^
Ah, 2 D's for a double dose of pimpin
December 12th, 2022 at 1:56 PM ^
Smoking a bowl with snoop dog?
December 12th, 2022 at 2:02 PM ^
It's on my bucket list.
December 12th, 2022 at 2:12 PM ^
weather, beaches, women, education, connections, snoop-dog (and Martha Stewart by way of snoop-dog), blue-blood program with phenomenal history, etc
December 12th, 2022 at 3:12 PM ^
Women, academics (not that they’re better than UM but they’re close enough that Michigan’s academics aren’t a huge factor and put USC ahead of many competitors), weather, proximity to beaches, playing time.
December 12th, 2022 at 1:43 PM ^
Wait til he sees Maryland though!
December 12th, 2022 at 1:44 PM ^
Its not a litmus test at all. The school has never been the problem. There's a sophomore transfer from oregon state currently playing on our womens basketball team. There is a very small number of non graduate transfers good enough for Michigan to be worth taking every year and just like in standard recruiting we tend to lose those guys to Alabama's of the world. Its not because the school doesn't accept transfers or because guys who think are going to the NFL care about having to take an extra semesters worth of free classes to get a degree.
December 12th, 2022 at 1:51 PM ^
I’m not sure I agree with “There is a very small number of non graduate transfers good enough for Michigan to be worth taking every year”, particularly in the current climate. CB, LB/Edge, OL, RB, TE are all theoretically spots where Michigan would benefit from taking players who are in the current portal.
December 12th, 2022 at 3:58 PM ^
There are guys we want, I'm just saying its not a large number. Like look at Campbell, one of his finalists is USC. When kids are coming out of high school and we are recruiting directly against USC we generally lose. If we lose this one its not going to be because Campbell is worried about losing a few credits from his freshman year, its going to be because Lincoln Riley is a very good recruiter and USC is a desirable place to go.
December 12th, 2022 at 3:39 PM ^
Kampschroeder transferred after her freshman year at Oregon St. There is no issue with transferring at that point in your career.
Strategically, Michigan has not pursued this type of transfer in football recently, but we have been interested in sophomores and juniors and been unable to get them in (Terrance Shannon, Lance Dixon, Nojel Eastern, etc.)
December 12th, 2022 at 1:46 PM ^
Reel him in, Mikey.
December 12th, 2022 at 1:57 PM ^
Hmmm...one of these is not like the others. Michigan has been to the last two CFBs and has only one regular season loss. Oh, and we just had a #2 overall draft pick at DE and an injured DE this year make 2nd-team AA.
In summary, come to Michigan if you want to:
- Win
- Get drafted
- Be the best at your position
But I guess SC and LSU are okay schools, too.
December 12th, 2022 at 2:08 PM ^
I mean, you can't kid yourself - those are three really A-tier top options for a guy transferring from Coastal Carolina. I know we are biased but it's not like the list is "Michigan, MTSU, Akron"
December 12th, 2022 at 3:39 PM ^
Yeah, I have watched exactly zero film of this guy, but if you're telling me he's choosing between legit offers from UM, USC and LSU, that's all I need to know -- I am 100% confident he is a good prospect.
December 12th, 2022 at 8:18 PM ^
As much as it pains me to admit, SC is right there with UM in undergrad academics.
December 12th, 2022 at 1:59 PM ^
USC and LSU are great competition to have for a kid. Awesome info, thank you!
December 12th, 2022 at 2:25 PM ^
Anyone know off of the top of their head which of those teams has been in the playoffs the last two years?
December 12th, 2022 at 2:27 PM ^
No, I don't recall.
December 12th, 2022 at 2:34 PM ^
Mr. Steward, consider the Michigan edge.
December 12th, 2022 at 4:25 PM ^
I didn't know that transferees were releasing "top" lists of their potential targets now, just like high school recruits. Seems like mostly they just announce the new place. I may be old and out of touch, but I can't bring myself to care to much about someone who is MAYBE transferring to Michigan.
December 12th, 2022 at 6:34 PM ^
Given this kid never was in the limelight out of High school going to coastal Carolina, I have no problem with him getting the decision excitement now with powerhouse programs like USC, LSU, and UM recruiting him Now. He deserves it, in my opinion.
December 12th, 2022 at 4:35 PM ^
Great, we're going against 2 big bag schools.
December 13th, 2022 at 9:48 PM ^
To me this means 1 of 2 things
1) Our NIL for existing players may not be as bad as we think
2) Players are willing to consider us because we develop talent and send it to the league
If it’s 2 and we can get high end players to atend and not just consider, that’s huge.