The Athletic- NCAA only got this last Tuesday

Submitted by btn on October 25th, 2023 at 8:44 PM

Pretty amazing stuff, this outside law firm presented this to the NCAA and the next day they tell the Big Ten

No more information who is paying this law firm

The timing also seems to confirm the leaks initially were from the Big Ten not the NCAA, the leaks today do seem to be from the NCAA IMO

“The firm presented its information to the NCAA last Tuesday, according to the newspaper, and the NCAA informed both the Big Ten and Michigan that it had opened an investigation into the matter Wednesday. The investigation became public knowledge Thursday.”

 

https://theathletic.com/4999767/2023/10/25/michigan-sign-stealing-inves…

Shorty the Bea…

October 25th, 2023 at 9:30 PM ^

That's a dumbass suggestion that someone would hack Michigan football's computers -taking all that risk - and decided the best thing to do with the data was to give to journalists.

Hackers would only target such computers for football subterfuge - and would thus be motivated to use all information hacked to their own benefit without M knowing they have been compromised - and possibly plant a permanent bug allowing them continued access to as much information as possible.

Think Ultra. You don't leak that shit to journalists so they can write "hey we have a cable from the Nazis saying they have been planning another operation." 

You keep your own secret and keep reading their shit and try not to let them know what you know.

This is not brain science.

You don't risk your professional life and or personal freedom to hack a computer in the UofM football department to share stupid ass info with journalists.

Somebody inside M who has access was really bothered by what was going on - frankly they were not wrong - and then chose to secretly provide that information to investigators and media.

Shorty the Bea…

October 25th, 2023 at 11:03 PM ^

Did you not notice that compliance was apparently NON-EXISTENT!?!?!?!

If that shit was going on in the department and it was not one rogue idiot but had the tacit support of powerful staff then clearly "Compliance" was only lip service and not an actual option.

The culture clearly lacked "compliance."

SalvatoreQuattro

October 25th, 2023 at 10:29 PM ^

This is a dumbass take. Having access doesn’t grant you the right to disseminate information. That is illegal.

Furthermore, this controversy really isn’t that significant. All teams steal signals. The matter here is the manner. If this person really had an issue with this and cared for Michigan they would have taken it to Manual or Ono and not a third party.

Using World War Two as an analogy is fucking dumb and incorrect that I won’t other to address how wrong you are.

Ernis

October 25th, 2023 at 9:59 PM ^

You’re assuming the person would know that what they’re doing constitutes hacking.

Accessing an unprotected shared file, something that can be done effortlessly by an internal or external user, can still be hacking in a legal sense if the person wasn’t authorized by the data custodian or institution responsible for the data. 

That said, a malicious insider seems the more likely explanation. But given how easy it would be for someone to unknowingly commit a crime like that, given the sad state of opsec in this operation I’m sure there were plenty of such data sources to trip over, it’s not out of the realm of possibility.

OuldSod

October 25th, 2023 at 9:51 PM ^

There are two different things.

It's illegal to use a password someone who is not the owner/admin gives you. A 3rd party firm couldn't do this. It would be a crime under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. 

A 3rd party could click a link to access some open website or shared drive that was provided by someone. In that case, the person providing the link may be legally culpable, but not the 3rd party. 

Also, a person could make copies or share documents to a 3rd party. That person may commit a crime by doing so, but the 3rd party is highly unlikely to commit a crime by viewing them. This happens all the time and is sometimes known as giving sunlight to an issue. 

 

MichiganMan_24_

October 25th, 2023 at 9:16 PM ^

It's only 2 things for me.

1. Somebody tipped off the NCAA, B10 (likely someone at some point inside the program) and the NCAA authorized a 3rd party access to investigate.

 

2. This is branched from a federal investigation involving someone with access to those computers and the FBI tipped off the NCAA...it happened in the Tressel case so yes, the FBI has notified the NCAA of things while investigating something else.

goblueSH24

October 25th, 2023 at 9:24 PM ^

According to Sports Illustrated today, Deputy of UM Police said it has nothing to do with Weiss investigation. 

 

And former offensive coordinator Matt Weiss was suspended and then dismissed last winter amid a University of Michigan Police Department investigation into a “computer access crime” inside the football facility. Melissa Overton, deputy chief of UMPD, told SI’s Pat Forde that the Weiss case is “still under investigation” but “not at all associated” with Stalions’s situation.

MIMark

October 25th, 2023 at 9:42 PM ^

Devil's advocate here. How likely is the average FBI computer forensic analyst to see photos and videos on a drive, and recognize evidence of a sign stealing scheme? Additionally, how likely is an average FBI computer forensic analyst to know that it is against NCAA rules to scout a team in such a way? That's why I was suspecting as soon as the WaPo article was released that whoever was the firm examining those computers was looking explicitly for something of the type. I just think the average analyst used to looking for either criminal evidence, or network intrusion evidence or the likes, is unlikely to be versed in NCAA bylaws. It would take an analyst some specific knowledge IMO to connect the dots from a bunch of pictures and videos of sidelines to a scouting and sign stealing scheme and know to report it to the NCAA.

los barcos

October 25th, 2023 at 10:28 PM ^

Re your first point - a third party still can’t just hack into your computer (legally). If you believe the Sam Webb reports, M was just as blindsided by this as you or I. No way they allow someone access to computers and then are surprised if this comes out.

2) FBI isn’t investigating sign stealing. This is “illegal” as an NCAA matter, but it’s not criminal. Why the fuck would the FBI be involved in any of this? 

lhglrkwg

October 25th, 2023 at 8:54 PM ^

Very interested to hear who is bankrolling this and how they got access to any Michigan networks. Everyones to busy fantasizing about Michigan penalties to stop and ask “….so whered you get this information again?”