4M-viewer games in the B1G since 2021

Submitted by Mgrad92 on November 15th, 2023 at 5:15 PM

Given the low-level talk about Michigan leaving the Big Ten, I decided to go back and make a half-assed effort to count the number of 4M-viewer games participated in by each member of the conference since 2021. (You can read more about the Four Million Club metric here: Staples: Why would the Big Ten form an alliance with the ACC and Pac-12? It’s all about TV’s ‘Four Million Club’.) Here's what I found:

Take this with a grain of salt, since a 4M-viewer in-conference game gets counted here by each team participating. But Michigan's total makes up more than 20 percent of the current Big Ten total, and the four Pac‑12 schools joining the conference next year combined only match Michigan's total.

I don't have any idea whether that makes it more or less likely that Michigan leaves the Big Ten, or which side has more leverage. (I'd suppose it would depend on where Michigan would land if they leave?) But maybe it'll add some context the next time you hear someone say the Big Ten doesn't need Michigan.

Derek

November 15th, 2023 at 5:20 PM ^

But maybe it'll add some context the next time you hear someone say the Big Ten doesn't need Michigan.

Has anyone actually said this? If someone suggested it, the proper course of action is to laugh in their face and walk away, not attempt to convince a deranged person to accept reality.

jblaze

November 15th, 2023 at 5:33 PM ^

Who gets credit if say Michigan plays Iowa? Both schools? It'd be interesting to do this analysis ex-Michigan (meaning the B1G average/ team 4M+ games w/ Michigan included and excluding Michigan).

M-Dog

November 15th, 2023 at 8:22 PM ^

What would be useful is to know how many Big Ten schools have 4M games without Michigan.

OSU will have some, PSU will have some.  After that, I bet it falls off considerably.

In fact if you also take out OSU, I would guess that the rest of the current Big Ten hardly has any.

They are being carried by Michigan and OSU . . . and they want to chase half of that away??

Idiots.

GoBlueGoWings

November 15th, 2023 at 5:34 PM ^

I believe the conference just wants Jim Harbaugh gone, they want to keep Michigan, but that evil Jim Harbaugh has to go.

I mean, it's not very nice to change up the Michigan signs when all the coaches have worked very hard to decode them and share them with each other.

How pissed do you think everyone was when Michigan added that extra screen outside the outdoor practice field?

I BET the ACC would love to have those Michigan numbers in their conference.

Catchafire

November 15th, 2023 at 5:40 PM ^

It would be silly to leave the BIG in the short term.  I know everyone is upset, I sure as hell am, but the money to be made in the BIG is more than the SEC.  Let's see what happens in the long run.

Koop

November 16th, 2023 at 6:40 AM ^

Michigan can't leave in the short term.  The TV rights were just sold last year and run until 2029.

Don’t think anyone can say this with certainty unless they’ve reviewed the relevant contracts, including taking into account the league’s breach of contract. See prior threads re association bylaws constituting a contract between the association and its members. 

DelhiWolverine

November 15th, 2023 at 7:58 PM ^

What you seem to be overlooking is the fact that Big 10 has more money BECAUSE of Michigan. If Michigan left, a lot of their money leaves with them because Fox isn’t going to let paying the same rate to show Iowa vs. OSU instead of Michigan vs. OSU. All the Tv deals get renegotiated if Michigan goes elsewhere. 

JacquesStrappe

November 15th, 2023 at 8:24 PM ^

I think most of us would like to stay in the Big Ten considering we are founding members and the oldest program in it. It was also much more collegial, if you could call it that, when schools really took the other aspects of conference membership seriously. Today it has become little more than a business partnership that draws upon nostalgia and distributes revenue to members. If the conference were to reinvigorate the CIC/Big Ten Academic Conference and stop the petty bickering then maybe that is a reason to stay. However, what is happening to Michigan is not new and we as a university are far more nationally and internationally oriented than when the Big Ten was formed as a collection of Midwestern universities in the 19th century. And the league‘s recent expansions only further dilutes this identity. It would be better to stay if we can right the ship. If not we don’t want to be burdened with partners who always have Schadenfreude and want a handout. Best to be deliberate and analyze options ahead of the next rights package.