This Week's Obsession: A Moment in Endzone Comment Count

Seth

The Question:

Now that we have all read it, what for you was the most jaw-dropping moment of Brandon's Lasting Lessons?

The Warning:

We're going to spoiler this. If you haven't read it yet you should go do that.

The Responses:

Brian: There are many jaw-dropping things. The whole book is cause to walk around Ann Arbor drooling, from Lochdogg's inability to parse data to Brandon cutting down the nets to all of the infinite firings. But I was most stunned by this:

img_7756_1024

Also the ellipsis.

That's the welcome plaque outside Brandon's house. It is quite something, and then you get to "the Brandon's." WHO DOESN'T CHECK A PLAQUE THAT IS GOING ON THEIR HOUSE CALLED "HAPPILY EVER AFTER"?! Even leaving aside the crazy rich person vibe the whole thing gives off, this is one metal object that Brandon clearly intends for generations to come and marvel at, and it isn't even proofread. Says somethin' about somethin', that.

--------------------------------

Seth: It has to be "Firing Fridays," and the massive turnover inside the athletic department. Throw a football down Granger and chances are it will be caught by someone sitting on the porch of a modest home with an "M" flag. That person probably had many opportunities through the years to take a job somewhere else that would afford a far larger and newer home, probably with a big yard and PVC pipes. So many of these people were pushed out, scared off, or straight-up let go that I even know a few of them.

In some cases, e.g. football coach, directing a money cannon at a proven professional is warranted. But Brandon took this to an extreme, bringing in two six-figure outsiders to replace every longtime $45k family member, then firing the family on the flimsiest of pretenses—often just voicing disagreement with Brandon—at such a rate that "Firing Fridays" was a thing. In a few short years those remnants from the Canham-Schembechler-Martin department were surrounded by a certain archetype of in-it-for-the-money young professional who knows nobody in town, owes everything to Dave Brandon, and knows little about college athletics except not to disagree with the boss.

Reading the quotes from former marketing and event presentation director Ryan Duey was the point when I got so angry at Brandon that even after getting up and stomping around the house for 20 minutes I had to get up and stomp around again like one sentence later. My page 297 is smudged and stained and has water wrinkles because it took me a day and multiple rooms to get through without throwing a tantrum in front of the kid.

The damage from that is irreparable. The people Brandon brought in are hardly worthless—they earned that payday by being excellent at what they do—but it will take 30 or 50 years for the kind of community and institutional knowledge Michigan used to have to grow back. Even talking about it now—three times in writing this response I've had to put down the keyboard and take a stomping tour around the living room. In fact here comes the fourth.

--------------------------------

[After the jump: you may want to make sure there's nothing throwable in reach]

David Nasternak: I have to admit that I'm only just over half way through BLL, currently. Shockingly, the progression of football season has severely cut into my free time for things like...reading.

The most gut-wrenching theme that unfortunately has repeated itself throughout the chapters I've read so far is Brandon's seeming ease with which he either fired people (with not much valid reasoning) or threw them under the bus, concerning whatever specific situation. Previously, I'd heard stories regarding that happening to a handful of employees, but I never realized how commonplace and widespread it actually was.

Reading that over and over just gave me a sick-to-my-stomach feel that I almost had to take a break a few different times. Now, I understand that people do get fired and upgrades happen in business -especially in the sports industry; however, the rate at which it happened and certain coaching positions that it happened to were downright baffling. Additionally, someone who can just cut ties with that amount of people -many of whom had quite a dedicated loyalty to Michigan that went above and beyond a paycheck- just for disagreeing or questioning some of the other changes/processes really makes me angry. Money and success are important; however, so are character and integrity...and those are qualities that money or success will never be able to grant. As the book goes along, I'm noticing that Brandon generally valued himself over others and would not hesitate to remove people if they became a hindrance to his agenda or publicly blame them in order to save himself from ridicule. I just believe there is no tolerance for behavior like that, especially in a leader.

--------------------------------

Adam Schnepp: The most jaw-dropping moment for me came during Brandon's meeting with four University leaders on Wednesday, October 29, 2014. As Bacon relays it, everyone in that meeting saw a new side of Brandon; he listened, he took responsibility for mistakes, and he seemed to genuinely want to know what could be done to mend some of the fences he'd broken. After reading a detailed chronological history of burned bridges and unimaginable arrogance, this new version of Brandon was hard for me to believe. The first few pages of this account painted Brandon as sincere, and that's a word that could only be used to describe his adherence to his own ideas and methods in the face of logic to that point.

51OXJPqGd-L._SX327_BO1,204,203,200_[1]
Warning: revelations in this book may
turn your mind to goo.

As the meeting wore on, though, Brandon maintained his new, vulnerable exterior while asking in different and subtle ways for the four other people in the room to tell him he had done a good job. He was looking for personal validation and for others to essentially agree that it was outside forces conspiring against him, not his own mistakes, that had put him in a position where he was holding onto his job by a thread. Again, my jaw hit the floor. Here's Brandon acting as though he's made this sweeping change to who he is, and when it comes down to it he again showed concern for little other than his own ego. His personality was to the best of his ability, and he didn't fix it.

--------------------------------

Ace: Perhaps because my focus is mainly on the revenue sports, I never fully realized how much coaching turnover there was across the athletic department until I started doing research for the book. Putting together the numbers was jaw-dropping: only one coaching staff Brandon inherited, consisting of all of two people, remained completely intact during his tenure. Despite Brandon's meddling, Michigan's performance in the Director's Cup got worse.

On top of that, Brandon treated the coaches he inherited like dirt, to the point it became obvious in the book he planned to oust several of them all along, almost regardless of performance. Few quotes stand out like the one he delivered to the men's soccer team at the team banquet after one of the most successful seasons in school history, when they won the Big Ten title and made the NCAA Final Four: "Do you know what happens when you make it to the Final Four? We expect you to do it again." He said this to the whole team! At a celebratory banquet! Is there a stronger term for "tone-deaf"?

Coach Steve Burns, who'd been successful at Michigan for a long time, didn't get a raise or an extension, and when his team had a down year the following season—after losing 98% of their goal-scoring from the Final Four squad—he "resigned"; Brandon replaced him with Chaka Daley, who got paid a whole lot more (with a guaranteed contract, no less) for worse performance. Brandon wanted his people in the department, he went to extreme lengths to make that happen, and to top it off, his vision for the department only worked in his head.

--------------------------------

PAB.NEW_.youMICH.2-25-13.002_0

Proppe (left) and Dishell (right). Patrick Barron|when he was with the Daily

Seth: What do you mean I already went? That was Angry Seth. Also somebody had to speak for the best moment of the book.

Bacon is a journalist, and I mean that in the "he sticks to the real story and what he can prove" sense. That makes some of his writing a bit dry, since he won't deviate from the facts for the sake of drama.

But in the Proppe-Dishell story he didn't have to, because the way that unfolded was plot development so good my Creating Writing professor would be nodding along almost as approvingly as Michael Proppe's statistics teacher.

You meet Proppe and Dishell after they've won their election to a mostly useless job on a technicality. Then they take on this real job and run circles around Brandon and Loch-dogg, who are dead set on ignoring CSG and shoving this policy down the students' throats. As the story develops the heroes get more heroic, and the villains get more villainous.

Everything builds up to that meeting before the faculty when Proppe gives a drop-mic performance, then the faculty turn to Lochmann and are like "so…are you changing this policy?" and he's like "I guess we'll have to" and everybody high-fives. But guess what: Brandon welches, and by the next meeting Lochmann is right back to patronizingly telling the students to do something anatomically impossible.

If this was a Ken Follett book at that point you'd be like "okay, I shoulda seen that coming since there's still 45% of pages left in this thing and this is what Ken Follett villains do." When you're reading a Bacon book and real people are acting like every Ken Follett bad guy ever, your mind is just blown.

How did nobody bring up M-Hacks?

Comments

Alton

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:35 PM ^

M-hacks was a programming "hackathon" hosted by a student entrepreneurial organization whose name I forget.  They wanted to use a luxury box in the stadium for the event, and the athletic department told them it would be "$30K plus additional expenses."

So they agree to that, and then they get a bill for $90K-$100K, with the athletic department tacking on charge after charge for "additional expenses" for the event.  The student organization, obviously, didn't have that kind of money so the College of Engineering basically bails them out.

Just a sign that the Brandon Athletic Department didn't see itself as a part of the University, or as having an educational mission.

petered0518

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:41 PM ^

EDIT: started typing just before guy above posted a better account. Oops.

A university programming club wanted to put on an event in the Big House suites which is called M-hacks. They invite top computer programming professionals (think Google, Microsoft, etc. types) though I don't remember the details of the conference.

The athletic department told them the cost of using the Big House would be 30k plus a TBD amount (wasn't clearly explained what went into calculation of the value). The club agreed, raised the money through donors, and put on what sounded like a fantastic conference that was good for the university.

They get the bill and the TBD amount which they anticipated would be nominal fees was actually an additional 60K (for a total cost of over 90K for the whole event). College of Engineering ended up having to foot the bill since the club couldn't pay.

That story also stuck out to me. Anyone who maybe was thinking that Brandon was purely inept and not amoral, go reread that story. Guy clearly didn't have the interests of the university in mind.

SaddestTailgateEver

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:28 PM ^

Not to justify *that* kind of bill, but I've seen first hand the type of event MHacks pulls together. A short list of greatest hits:
-Numerous, persistent safety violations of things like fire code
-A broken door on North Campus (shattered glass pane)
-Garbage all over the place
-Wanton disregard for others utilizing the space (this is likely a non-issue in the stadium, but in say the common areas of North it's a big issue)
-Inability to plan for adequate power supply and distribution leading to overtaxed circuits, fire hazards, and blown circuits that, if at the big house would likely require after hours maintenance to remedy

Again the figure quoted is excessive, but I don't have a hard time envisioning them racking up what would otherwise seem a ridiculous amount of add-on fees



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Gallagher

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:24 PM ^

For me at least: when Proppe and Brandon were discussing the students attending games, or the lack thereof. I don't have the exact passage, but Brandon basically told Proppe he was going to keep raising student ticket prices until the students started to show up.

How this made ANY sense to him I have no idea.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

BlueMan80

September 23rd, 2015 at 1:24 PM ^

that was an amazing theory of how price and quantity interact.

The guy was self-absorbed and clueless.  All his assumptions about the world were correct.  No one had any knowledge he valued.  He had all the good ideas and the best taste in everything.  He surrounded himself with people that would agree with his ideas and implement half-baked plans.  Cross his path and you are gone on Friday and, while terrorizing his staff, he implemented that organizational survey to demonstrate how wonderful his creation was.  Wow.  Just wow.

I saw Dave Brandon speak at an alumni association event and he came across as concerned about the student athletes across all of Michigan's sports.  Seemed like a caring guy.  Turns out, he didn't care about anyone else.

Craig

September 23rd, 2015 at 4:13 PM ^

Yeah, I think the quote from the book was something along the line of 'Brandon would make the ticket prices so high that they would be too valuble to not use." I remember reading that and thinking "WTF" that doesn't make any sense! Make the ticket prices too high and NO ONE WILL BUY THEM. Couple that with eroding the value of season tickets by endorsing the secondary market (StubHub) and you have straight up wacko thinking on Brandon's part. 

nowayman

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:27 PM ^

was the most interesting part to me (this also directly ties in with Brandon's firing habits).  

Bacon clearly points out how seemingly unrelated terminations systematically allowed the event to occur, from the firing of the equipment manager that required graduate students holding helmets to shadow qbs, the disappearing liason between the sideline and the press booth, to the firings that lead to the degradation of Michigan's relationship with the press. 

I also enjoyed the confirmation regarding Hoke, which I'm not going into, and Hagerup's story which was pretty amazing.  

George Patton

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:28 PM ^

The dystopian business book. So many scenes and facts made me cringe, an yet I couldn't stop reading. It's a study in how not to be a CEO and how to fundamentally misunderstand his mission. I'm not aware of anything else quite like it, and I read a fair number of business books. I will make a point to have my kids read the book at a certain age.

steve sharik

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:30 PM ^

...it's how DB came to be AD. Mary Sue lost my respect for how she engaged in cronyism and even put together a faux search committee that would've brought us Manuel, Bates, or DeCarolis--three quality, experienced ADs with strong Michigan ties. She followed that up by politicking the regents to vote approvingly of Brandon. And shame on the regents for going along instead of doing what was best for the university by being objective.

True Blue Grit

September 23rd, 2015 at 3:48 PM ^

I was shocked to read that the Committee had 3 good candidates plus Brandon and actually ranked DB the lowest of the 4.  Yet MSC wouldn't accept any recommendation from the committee other than Brandon.  So, they just opted against fighting her on it. 

SAM love SWORD

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:39 PM ^

For me it was Brandon asking Hoke to sign on without a dollar amount just so he could pretend Brady was the next Bo at the press conference. He even told the press it was "kind of eerie right?", when he staged the whole thing. Fortunate for Hoke his agent saw the leverage and used it to get his huge contract.

petered0518

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:48 PM ^

I've been trying to keep my OMG stories to my friends to a minimum because they are already sick of hearing me complain about Brandon, but this is one of my go to stories. It really encapsulates Brandon's arrogance, deceitfulness, and incompetence.

To him, the story of Bo accepting the job without knowing the salary was simply another Michigan tradition to be bought and marketed.

Alton

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:56 PM ^

What was so incredibly awful about that scenario is that after Brandon asked Hoke for permission to say he didn't ask about the salary, Hoke seemed to realize the amount of leverage that gave him, and he was entirely on board:  "Sure, talk to my agent" was (more or less) Hoke's response.

So instead of Brandon's story, which made Hoke look like kind of an idiot, the actual story is that Brandon was the idiot, for putting himself in the position of negotiating salary with a person who has already been introduced to the media as the best candidate available.  I seem to recall that somebody expressed the opinion in the book that Hoke made an extra $1M per year at Michigan because of that screwup by Brandon.

MadMatt

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:39 PM ^

 

Brandon's misdeeds were truly epic.  I was aware of some, like for example firing the head coach of the only varsity women's water polo team from outside the State of California to be ranked in the top 10.  But, there were many that came as shocking news to me, like the scale of his firing long time staffers and successful coaches.  Ultimately, it was more of what I’d come to expect from Brandon.

What I found absolutely shocking, though, was how much of a good guy Brandon could be in the right circumstances.  How he worked with Will Hagerup, the fact that he made a point of showing up for the competitions of "non-revenue" sports, and spent real money on their facilities.  I have to hold in my mind two inconsistent thoughts, that the same guy is responsible for both the villainy and the charity.

alanmfrench

September 23rd, 2015 at 1:07 PM ^

Regarding the Hagerup situation, as his portion of the story wrapped up it didn't quite sit well with me. Part of me still felt like even though Brandon was immensly helpful to him it still seemed like it was going to end up being a "look what I did" story for him more than what it should have been which was helping a young man steer his ship back on course and leaving it as a story for Hagerup not for Brandon. I hope I'm wrong but after reading the whole book it's hard to believe Brandon has any redeeming qualities any more. 

Dude needs therapy. 

Rupertus

September 23rd, 2015 at 9:11 PM ^

I found it interesting how what was presented in the book as one of Brandon's worst qualities - heavily prioritizing the athletes, often to the exclusion of other stakeholders - actually seemed to have led him to give a troubled but decent young man another chance that many people wouldn't have given him.

I didn't have the impression that Brandon was doing it for pats on the back. In fact, we probably wouldn't have known about it if Hagerup hadn't told us.

JWolve

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:41 PM ^

Seths point about that loss of institutional knowledge is what stood out for me. Once you lose that, especially at the level with which Brandon got rid of it, you can't just get it back. I'm sure we can make some good hires who will do excellent jobs, but it'll take a lot of work and many years to rebuild what Brandon destroyed. Second, as much as I dont like him, I find it harder to blame Brandon for being the person he always has been than it is to blame MSC and the regents for not doing the necessary research to know that about Brandon. The information was out there, and they still hired him.

Its me Dave

September 23rd, 2015 at 1:21 PM ^

The gutting of institutional knowledge isn't something repaired with an incantation of HARBAUGH! or HACKETT!  The ahletic department is on pretty fragile footing right now and will remain so quite some time.  After reading pgs 288-298, I thought the subtitle of the book was either too optimistic or premature.

True Blue Grit

September 23rd, 2015 at 3:56 PM ^

 here.  If Brandon was this awful as AD, all of his bad traits must have manifested themselves at Domino's also.  I'm amazed at least some of that didn't get back to people at U-M somewhere along the line.  Of course, I realize he was ruthless at protecting his reputation so people within Domino's were probably scared to death of even whispering anything negative about Brandon outside of the company.  It sounds like Bo was not aware of Brandon's true character based on what he said about him in the Lasting Lessons book. 

johng

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:43 PM ^

Do we know for a fact that DB doesn't refer to himself as the Brandon? That would both keep the focus on him and explain the apostrophe before the s. Although I guess he would probably capitalize the t in the if that was the case.

loraa854

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:43 PM ^

 

my best friend's step-aunt makes $72 every hour on the internet . She has been without work for 10 months but last month her pay check was $13051 just working on the internet for a few hours. why not check here  ;;;;

 

►œ►œ►œ►WWW.netweb30.com

Reader71

September 23rd, 2015 at 1:48 PM ^

Thanks, Seth! That makes me feel better. Not about Brandon. But it's better to live in a world where not even a Gordon Gekkoesque sociopath tries to run Big Jonny off. Might as well ask: is there any way you could ask Jonny if he was asked for input regarding his replacement? I always thought Bob Bland would be the guy. Was surprised we went to an outside guy.

Seth

September 23rd, 2015 at 9:57 PM ^

He has an event coming up to promote his book. Might be a good q to ask. He doesn't tell most stories; that's why Big Jon was around to hear the ones he can tell. This isn't a PR guy or a journalist used to sharing information. He was an equipment manager and a friend to everyone who came through his locker room. You're not gonna get many negative stories about anyone from him, partly because he doesn't tell those sorts of tales, and partly because (my opinion) he doesn't seem to notice the bad in anyone.

medals

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:50 PM ^

Seemed like Brandon's seeming fixation on the Sears Trophy was a big problem.  Do we, as a university and fan base, really care if the tennis team, or volleyball teams don't do well for a few years?  Does that merit firing the coaches or chasing them away?  Particularly when many of the coaches had proven track records of winning.  As far as I'm concern, I expect excellence, or close to it, for Football, Men's Basketball, and Hockey.  For the rest of the sports, I just hope that we're relatively competitive in the league.  If a team is an absolute doormat for years and it impacts recruiting, then, fine, maybe make a coaching change.  But running what appear to have been (according to Bacon) fully capable and successful coaches out after a couple of lagging seasons seemed to be incredibly unfair and short-sighted.  It left the reader (ok, me) with the impression that the culture of "fear" was rampant in the athletic department.  

BlueFish

September 23rd, 2015 at 1:39 PM ^

We, as a University and fan base, probably don't care about it.  I don't lose sleep or find myself in a bad mood because tennis finished 9th in the B1G.  And no fan of another school has ever made fun of me or my school due to the track team's poor finish.

But I could see how the AD would use it a potential metric of overall program performance.

Unfortunately, as you suggest, his fixation on it was a problem.  More importantly, the implementation of his fixation; shitcanning good coaches and thinking it will improve performance was a problem.

Fact is, we're never going to be Stanford, and hoping to compete with schools like that (for the Sears Trophy) on a consistent basis is somewhat of a fool's errand.

TIMMMAAY

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:45 PM ^

When Brandon had his first staff meeting with the Athletic Department staff, and his first words were (paraphrasing): I fired 80% of my last staff in my first year on the job. 

The sheer level of hubris, and disregard for people who made the thing work was just mind numbing. 

The other big takeaway for me was how Brandon thought he could just run right over the CSG on the the general admission fiasco. Then when the regents backed Proppe and Dishell, the near complete 180 he turned just made me sick.

I really hate that man, and I don't even care if he truly loves UofM, or what he did for Hagerup. He's a disgusting person. Full stop. 

Everyone Murders

September 23rd, 2015 at 12:54 PM ^

There's plenty to be disturbed about w/r/t Brandon's sign.  One thing, though, is it looks like it came straight out of the MSU print shop.  Is this an acurate assessment?

a place the Brandon's could live

Pretentiousness of the whole thing aside, (as Brian notes) WTF is that apostrophe doing there?  You know who doesn't proofread signs that will be viewed over time by many people.  Spartans - that's who!

This supports my growing suspicion that Brandon was a Sparty mole.  That would explain a lot.