[Zoey Holmstrom]

Hoops Preview: Villanova, Sweet 16 Comment Count

Brian March 24th, 2022 at 1:32 PM

THE ESSENTIALS

WHAT #27 Michigan (19-14, 11-9 Big Ten)
vs #11 Villanova (28-7, 16-4 Big East)



Novalogo

WHERE Ann Arbor Elder Law Center
San Antonio, TX
WHEN 7:29 PM
THE LINE Kenpom: NOVA -5
Torvik: NOVA -4
TELEVISION TBS

THE OVERVIEW

A second consecutive So We Meet Again in the NCAA tournament, this one against 2018 National Championship Game opponent Villanova. 'Nova remains 'Nova, a crew of snipers with big guards and relatively small bigs that switches everything and finds buckets and buckets of open shots.

The Wildcats did not win the Big East title because Providence's extreme luck extended to COVID cancellations that saw them finish 14-3, which is fractionally better than 16-4, but they are the conference's best team by some distance. In the nonconference they have an 18-point neutral court win over the Tennessee team Michigan just beat and a 14-point win against Kenpom #70 Syracuse. On the other side of the ledger they have an OT loss at UCLA, a hammering at Baylor, and a six-point loss to Purdue.

Seton Hall is another common opponent in addition to Tennessee and Purdue; Villanova swept the season series with identical 73-67 wins, although Ike Obiagu didn't play in the first one.

THE US

Seth's graphic [click to embiggen]:

image (109)

faq for these graphics

Devante' Jones has been practicing so we slot him back into the starting lineup.

THE LINEUP CARD

Seth's graphic [click for big]:

image (108)

Jordan Longino missed the first weekend with a knee injury that was supposedly day-to-day and may or may not be available. Perhaps worth noting that Dhamir Cosby-Roundtree, the most center-like of all Villanova players, was forced to medically retire after two seasons battling injuries.

[Hit THE JUMP for we seek revenge!]

THE THEM

Few teams in college basketball are as consistently themselves as Villanova, so you can just mentally pencil in the 2018 title game team here, give or take some NBA upside.

Center Eric Dixon is the only vaguely post-shaped guy on the roster at 6'8", 255. Dixon almost exclusively operates inside the arc, which will be of some relief to Michigan fans extrapolating Colorado State's Dischon Thomas to this game since Dixon features a terrifying 52% clip from deep. That clip is based on less than one shot per game, though: he's 16/31 on the season. It is of course possible that Nova decides the thing they want to do is make Dickinson defend threes but that would be a departure. They've played Purdue and OSU, both Big Ten teams featuring relatively immobile posts, and Dixon's launched a total of three treys in those two games.

Instead Dixon operates as a traditional big, and incredibly well. He's shooting 57% on post ups this year, which are over a third of his possessions used, and checks in at the 92nd percentile. He does not take jumpers; everything is at the rim.

The obvious question, then, is if Dickinson's size overwhelms a guy who is extremely skilled but also almost a half-foot shorter. I tentatively suggest the answer to this is "yes." Dixon's shooting craters to 41% in top 50 matchups—and since Villanova had 14 of those this year that's a pretty robust sample. In particular, games against familiar foes with size advantages seem to shut Dixon off. He was 4/11 from two against UCLA (which features Rutgers transfer Myles Johnson), 3/9 against Tennessee, 1/2 against Purdue, and 3/7 against OSU. In two games against Seton Hall he was 5/14. On the season he's shooting just 54% at the rim, which is more like undersized guard territory than burly center territory. Straight up post D should do.

Dixon has outstanding OREB numbers that do stand up in Tier A games; he's a 83% shooter from the line; he does not affect many shots. He was 73rd percentile as a post defender, which is squarely in "not enough" territory against Dickinson, particularly considering the size differential.

Jermaine_Samuels_2_at_X

[villanova.com]

Two 6'7" wing types round out the Villanova front court. Jermaine Samuels is slightly burlier and more important to the offense. He operates mostly as a spot-up shooter from three, post-up threat, and roll guy. The shooting is bleah: almost all of his jumpers are from three, where he hits 27%. He's middling in as a post-up guy and roll threat, and you'd think Diabate would be able to dissuade those shots. He is another dangerous offensive rebounder, particularly for his size.

Samuels is a guy you can float off of; his shooting does not improve when he doesn't get a contest. Allowing a ~30% three point shooter open looks is a viable strategy when your defense has to give something up, as Michigan demonstrated against Tennessee. Samuels looks like the best option to scramble from—and not back to—when things get dicey.

Note that Dixon only plays about 60% of Villanova minutes, so Samuels is the center-type person for almost half the game.

Brandon Slater is the other wing. He shoots 63/34/88 from the floor on low usage. He's most efficient running pick and roll and getting to the basket himself; his passes out of PNR don't generally lead to great shots. He's one of those guys who is efficient largely because he defers the tough stuff to his teammates. But when he gets an opportunity he's the best guy on the team at the rim (70%):

“His slashing ability is pretty incredible,” Samuels said. “I don’t think a lot of people understand how much length he has. It’s a huge factor in his game and it’s implemented at both ends of the court."

He's also a defensive pest with that length, which helps Villanova switch. Frankie Collins can probably dust him but Devante' Jones and Eli Brooks getting matched against him is probably not an exploitable mismatch unless Power Mushroom Eli continues from the Tennessee game.

Combo guard Justin Moore spends most of his time running PNR and spotting up, with a fair bit of posting up—remember that Villanova likes to post their big guards. He is a adequate-to-good at the first two but post ups have not gone well; overall he's shooting a middling 45/35/74. When you drill down you discover something, though: Moore absolutely cannot be left. He's shooting 54% on open catch and shoot threes.

Get him off the dribble and he's fine—not great, fine. His 53% clip at the rim isn't great, either, though he is generating almost all of his own twos. That's a theme with this Villanova backcourt. They're deadly shooters but anything at the rim that is reasonably contested is a win for the defense.

Finally, point guard Collin Gillespie has come a long way since he didn't take a shot from the floor in the 2018 title game. First he was Just A Shooter, then he evolved into a fully-fledged star point guard. His shooting does remain the feature attraction. Gillespie is at 48/42/90 on the season and almost half of his threes are unassisted. Like Moore he is lethally efficient if he's allowed an open shot. He's at 57%(!!!) on unguarded catch and shoot threes. He's a 93rd percentile option off the dribble, too, but the gap between C+S jumpers and off the dribble stuff is a whopping 0.5 PPP. Even if Gillespie is a superior pull-up option there is a massive difference if you contest his shots.

Gillespie is also a 90th percentile option while running PNR, again because he can just pull up. His lone weakness on offense is at the rim, where he's shooting 50%. A contested Gillespie layup is a far worse option for Villanova than an open three.

Gillespie also posts up, albeit far less often than Moore. Like Dixon shooting threes this is an incredibly efficient way to do offense for Nova that results in a FGA about once per game. Gillespie is far more likely to use the post-up as a decoy to get a teammate an open shot.

Villanova follows the Craig Ross roster construction philosophy by having exactly one meaningful bench player:

  • Bench player of import is 6'4" shooting guard Caleb Daniels, who is in his second year at Nova after transferring from Tulsa. Daniels plays 60% of Nova minutes and operates as the usual Not Just A Shooter Villanova guard. On the year he's hitting 51/40/86 from the field. He's not much of a playmaker and his TO are is a titch high, but otherwise he might be the sixth man of the year in college basketball.
  • Jordan Longino may or may not be available, as mentioned above. If available he's shooting 35/31 on the season with a TO rate near 30.
  • Juniors Chris Archidiacono and Bryan Antoine will get brief cameos; both guys are averaging 4 MPG over the last five. Archiacono will hurl himself at the basket to either get a foul or a turnover; Antoine is strictly just a shooter. Neither guy is shooting it well at all.

THE TEMPO FREE

Overwhelming nowhere but good many places and bad nowhere:

image

The main drill-down stat that pops out is a combination of many threes launched by opponents (Nova is 321st at preventing them) and very few of those going down (they're 38th at defending them). Usually I would point a finger at this and say this means they're not as good as they look statistically, but this is a situation where Villanova's three point defense is probably real. The Wildcats probably switch 1-5 more than any team in the country:

And the resulting quality of look is not good:

 openthrees

You probably looked at Michigan on this chart and silently clenched your hands as you thought back to those nights where Michigan went 3/24 or whatever, but the point here is that Nova generally does not give up many open looks.

Other drill-down items of note: Nova shoots 83% as a team from the free throw line, #1 nationally. They don't get to the line a ton but when they do it's not good. They launch a ton of threes, as per usual. And they're one of the slowest teams in the country on offense. This is in part because of a low TO rate; it is also because just 9% of their possessions are in transition.

THE KEYS

51953826859_85527569dc_c

[Zoey Holmstrom]

Punish switches. If Villanova is going to switch there are going to be guards on Dickinson and Diabate, and there should be dunks. Villanova is going to double, I'd imagine, but I'd rather have Dickinson take a short hook that's virtually uncontested than rely on Michigan's wandering three-point shooting. Catches should be at the basket; dribbles should be optional. Post, repost, repost again, and repost again. Dickinson should be making the "too small" indicator every minute.

High-low. Nova does not have the size to contest Dickinson's passing and Diabate's going to get a wing for the whole game. One way to nerf Villanova digging at the post is to change the post entry angle and shorten the pass by using high-low sets, which we saw a little of in the first weekend. With almost a week to prepare this could be the tactical adjustment du jour.

Live with guards posting up. One item that leapt out from the Purdue game was guard post-ups drawing a ton of attention and leading to open threes. Given the size differential in Nova's favor I'd imagine we see those back-downs become a major part of the offense. And… ok. Moore is not good at them; Gillespie is but I'd rather live with Gillespie trying to win the game with his back to the basket than open Nova threes.

51953827534_284868bec6_c

[Zoey Holmstrom]

Frankie factor. Devante' Jones is practicing and is going to start in this game. I would hope we see some early Collins minutes to explore two things: can he get in Gillespie's face enough to disrupt the Nova offense and can he get to the rack against a team without a rim protector? The former is particularly important since Gillespie is lethally efficient off the bounce from three.

Terrance time. Caleb Houstan's leash should be shorter in this game after Terrance Williams came off the bench to spark Michigan in the Sweet 16. If Houstan's hitting early, fine. If he's headed for another bagel Michigan can't afford to have him out there for 35 minutes.

THE SECTION WHERE I PREDICT THE SAME THING KENPOM DOES

Villanova by 5.

Comments

stephenrjking

March 24th, 2022 at 1:47 PM ^

Good to see someone else think that high-low might be in the gameplan, because with the all-switching plus doubles, working looks with the post guys seems like an important option, but I don't trust my own knowledge of basketball offense to know for sure. Juwan sure has been able to use high-low to good effect in tournament games before, though. 

SDskyjammer

March 24th, 2022 at 3:13 PM ^

Agree that High-Low set is an obvious choice with Michigan’s height advantage. I will be very interested to see if TWill gets time at the 4 to play High. Seems to me he has better entry pass skills than Diabate. Also TWill is a better midrange shooter which means his defender has to stay engaged to defend that shot option.

For sure more Frankie time as a disruptive defender & slashing get to the hoop guy with option to drop it to HD at the rim.

TrueBlue2003

March 24th, 2022 at 5:24 PM ^

Yes, this should a big factor.  I would think Michigan is going to have dominate in the post to win this game, because their switching will likely neutralize much of what Michigan can do on pick and roll, it'll eliminate pick and pops, etc.

There's a chance Frankie and Devante (and maybe even Eli like he did late Saturday) can find success driving given that Villanova doesn't have much in the way of rim protection.  But this probably has to come with Dickinson drawing a guy to the perimeter because the paint is generally clogged otherwise.

ShadowStorm33

March 24th, 2022 at 1:50 PM ^

I'll repost this here. Bing (which granted is a search engine, not a news source) has a pretty scary injury report listed with the game info, but that has to be either way (like months) outdated or flat out wrong, right?

lou apo

March 24th, 2022 at 2:20 PM ^

I don't know about that.  A google searches gives me nothing.  It also gives me this video of Eli being interviewed about the game where he looks pretty good.  I assume the footage of the team running around on the court was all filmed yesterday (the video was posted last night) and I saw Diabate, Jase Howard, and Brooks on the court looking quite healthy.  Didn't spot Williams but might have just missed it.

https://news.yahoo.com/michigans-eli-brooks-hungry-revenge-025312709.html

XM - Mt 1822

March 24th, 2022 at 3:33 PM ^

reposting this: SS33, that is scary looking stuff, but i don't see how it could be true, at least for us.  it makes no mention of d. jones, and lists guys that were jogging off the court and celebrating, and seen at practice yesterday.  unless the team bus from the hotel hit a semi, i'm thinking this has to be wrong.  either that, or our collective fan base is going to need medication.

True Blue 9

March 24th, 2022 at 1:51 PM ^

lol the picture and the joke around Frankie and Jace's glasses will never not make me laugh. Thanks for that. 

Really feels like a game we'll need Caleb to hit 3-4 shots but I said the same against Tennessee and here we are. 

Win the game! Michigan by 5, 75-70

TrueBlue2003

March 24th, 2022 at 5:35 PM ^

Since they're a heavy switch team, and hence light on the helping / scrambling, I don't see Houstan getting many open looks.  Unless they're aggressively doubling on Hunter.  So that will be the key.  If they're mostly manning up on Hunter, I'd put in Twill and accept that Houstan isn't going to be a factor.

Minutes should look like this for best chance:

PG: Jones 25, Frankie 15 (give or take depending on health and who is playing better)

SG: Eli 40

SF: Houstan 25, Twill 15

PF: Moussa 25, Twill 15

C: Hunter 30, Moussa 10

Even though Hunter will be key to the offense, I think we need to limit him to no more than 30 minutes, maybe just 25ish. He had 24 points in the first 26 minutes against Tennessee and then died. Only had one more point until garbage time fouls with 14 seconds left.  Same taper as the IU game.  He needs a good 6-7 min break in the middle of each half and for the love of god don't bring in Johns.  Play Moussa at center and Twill at the four.  Hopefully Nova being small will break Juwan out of his insistence on two bigs.

Barry22

March 24th, 2022 at 2:02 PM ^

Those defensive clips were impressive, especially watching when a smaller player was switched off on a big. The front the post so aggressively it prevents a quick entry pass, and show help lurking behind to discourage a high lob to get it over the fronting player. 

I can't wait to see how UM looks to exploit these tendencies. I agree that this game calls for more Terrance, but they may come more at the expense of Diabate than Houstan. If TWill is out at the 3pt line that lifts their help defender from pestering the lob entry or digging down. And he is also our best player at flashing to the elbow and delivering that high-low entry pass to Dickenson.

With Terrance at the 3 spot, you still have the issue of Diabate's man being able to play rover down low. 

BuddhaBlue

March 24th, 2022 at 2:07 PM ^

Another great preview, thanks Brian

I'd like to think we meted out some measure of revenge when we pummeled them in the inaugural game at their new arena, 73-46

L'Carpetron Do…

March 24th, 2022 at 3:44 PM ^

Yes, I'm not a Nova hater but I found that game extremely satisfying.  Gillespie had a terrible performance in that game but IIRC, that was his first big game starting at the point...and he had to go up against upperclassman Xavier Simpson. He's obviously much better and experienced now but let's hope M can keep him in check tonight.  He's really a great all around player. 

Darker Blue

March 24th, 2022 at 2:19 PM ^

I'm terrified of Villanova. Jay Wright finds a way to exploit other teams weaknesses as well as anyone in the country. 

Hopefully Diabate brings his A game and so does Hunter. I will lose my mind tonight if we move on to the Elite 8. 

Go Blue!

dragonchild

March 24th, 2022 at 2:48 PM ^

I don't think Wright can do anything about his center being 6'8", though.

This looks to be a scoring fest, the question being can Hunter hitting 80% from 2 outscore Nova hitting 50% from 3.  Turnovers might be the difference.

But of course since I just put that in writing, the final score's going to be something like 48-43.

goblu330

March 24th, 2022 at 3:14 PM ^

The thing is, what Nova does to offset the height issues and allow the switching is that they front all big men looking for post touches.  Michigan has seen neither the switching nor the fronting really all year, at least not for anything more than short stretches.  It is just uncomfortable because if Michigan wins they are going to have to do in a manner very unlike what they usually do.  One thing I think Howard may do is to run a little bit more to put Nova on their heels.  If we are playing against their half court defense all game Hunter will do some work but a lot of it will depend on precision entry passes.

Blah.  This is a really hard draw.

TrueBlue2003

March 24th, 2022 at 6:32 PM ^

This looks to be a scoring fest, the question being can Hunter hitting 80% from 2 outscore Nova hitting 50% from 3.  Turnovers might be the difference.

This seems spot on to me.  The leverage points seem to be whether Hunter can completely dominate (even like 60% probably won't be enough) or whether we get another lucky 3 pt against game.

Oneegct

March 24th, 2022 at 2:37 PM ^

I reviewed the box score of Villanova's loss to Purdue since it's the opponent they played that I know best and Purdue has big men comparable to our big men.  Two things jumped out at me.  First, 34 of Villanova's 58 shots (just under 60%) were from 3 point range (made them at at 38.2% clip).  Crazy volume.  Maybe this is because Edey/Williams had trouble guarding pick and rolls on the perimeter (Purdue's defensive efficiency is slightly worse than Michigan).  Second, Edey and Williams were incredibly efficient and combined for 30 points on 13/20 shooting.  Despite this level of offensive efficiency by its centers, Purdue also needed to shoot well from 3 point range (10/23) to win a relatively close game (Purdue won by 6).  Who will step up on M to supplement what will likely be a efficient/big output at the center/power forward position?

TrueBlue2003

March 24th, 2022 at 5:45 PM ^

Wow, that's crazy good luck that Nova shot that poorly from FT line.  And it's not like those were disproportionately shots by bad FT shooters.  A 76% guy went 1/4 and a 86% guy when 0/2!

Despite only getting one block Purdue gave up only 7/12 at the rim which is both a success in terms of % and low volume so their shot blocking certainly impacted the game.  Unfortunately, it's not very comparable because Edey is a much better rim protector whereas Hunter invites shots at the rim.

kjhager444

March 24th, 2022 at 2:45 PM ^

I know the 3 point chart isn't the be-all end all- but it does kind of help validate the feeling that Michigan has been doing the right thing to win games most of the season.  There were just so many games where either the uncontested shots for weren't falling, or the contested ones against were falling.  

Whatever, I'll take whichever path to the sweet sixteen and beyond.